AMR AMAM AM PAM WATTERS,
>>> WELCOME TO "TUCKER CARLSON"
TONIGHT, ONE OF THE MOST
EXTRAORDINARY MOMENTS ON SOCIAL
MEDIA IS UNFOLDING RIGHT NOW AS
WEWE WE WE SPEAK. IT BEGAN WHE
MUSK TOOK CONTROL OF TWITTER.
WHEN HE BOUGHT THE COMPANY, HE
PROMISED TO REVEAL ITS CORRUPTION OF TWITTER ENGAGED IN
CORRUPTION OF TWITTER ENGAGED IN
POLITICALLY MOTOR SENSORSHIP.
WELL, TONIGHTLESS THAN AN HOUR
AGO,AGO, MUSK BEGAN TO MAKE GOO
THAT PROMISE. TWITTER SHARED A
DISCOVER OF DOCUMENTS, THESE
DOCUMENTS ARE COMING OUT AS WE
SPEAK. WHAT THEY PROVE IS VERY
SERIOUS. THOSE DOCUMENTS SHOW US
SYSTEMATIC VIOLATION OF THE
FIRST AMENDMENT. THE LARGEST
EXAMPLE OF THAT IN MODERN
HISTORY. THESE DOCUMENTS SHOW
AMONG OTHER THINGS, POLITICAL
OFFICIALS IN THE DEMOCRATIC
COMMITTEE WERE DIRECTING
SENSORSHIP SENSORSHIPSENSORSHIP
THETHE THETHE 2020 ELECTION. ON
ADDITIONAL REPORT FROM THE DNC.
THETHE DNC WAS TELLING TWITTER
TO PULL OFF THE SITE AND TWITTER
WAS WAS
WAS WAS COMPLYING. A TWITTER
OFFICIAL CONFIRMED THE POST HAD
BEENBEEN DELETED. I GRAB THE FI
ONE, THAT TWITTER EMPLOYEE
WROTE. TWITTER FOLLOWED IN
INSTRUCTIONS FROM THE BIDEN
CAMPAIGN. ONE OF THE DOCUMENTS
PROVE THAT OFFICIALS REDIRECT
TWITTER TO REMOVE POSTS OF
BIDEN.BIDEN.
BIDEN.BIDEN. THAT E-MAIL INCLUD
LIST OF SEVERAL TWITTER ACCOUNTS
THAT CRITICIZED JOE BIDEN. THE
REPLY, QUOTE, "HANDLED, WE JUST
CHECKED,"P CHECKED,"CHECKED
REMAINED SUSPENDED TODAY.
TWITTER WAS SENDING USERS AT THE
REQUESTREQUEST AT THE DNC AND T
CAMPAIGN. THAT’S NEW. MANY
SUSPECTED AND NOW IT IS
ABSOLUTELY CONFIRMED. THE NEW
YORK POST TWITTER ACCOUNT WAS
BANNED. WHY? THEY HAD A STORY
THAT MAY CHANGE THE OUTCOME OF
THETHE 2020 ELECTION. TWITTER K
IT WELL. THEY HAD ACCURATE
INFORMATION ABOUT HUNTER BIDEN’S
LAPTOP. JOE BIDEN’S FAMILY IN AN
ONGOING SCHEME TO SELL INFLUENCE
OF THE POWER OF THE U.S.
GOVERNMENT TO CHINA AND UKRAINE.
THAT SCHEME THAT UNFOLDED OVER
YEARS MADE THE BIDEN FAMILY
MILLIONS OF DOLLARS, 10% OF THAT
MONEY WAS RESERVED AS YOU KNOW
FOR THE BIG GUY, MEANING JOE
BIDEN.
THAT WAS INFORMATION THAT MAY
HAVE CHANGED THE OUTCOME OF THE
ELECTION AND THAT’S PRECISELY
WHY TWITTER PREVENTED ITS USERS
FROM FROMFROM READING IT. TWITTE
FAR AS TO BLOCK ITS USERS FROM
SHARING THE NEW YORK POST STORY
ON TWITTER’S DIRECT MESSAGE.
ANYONE ATTEMPTING TO SHARE THE
STORY ABOUT HUNTER BIDEN’S
LAPTOP WAS TOLD UNSAFE. NOW,
THAT MEASURE PREVENTING USERS
FROM SHARING INFORMATION
PRIVATELY IS SOMETHING THAT
TWITTER RESERVES IN NORMAL
CIRCUMSTANCES ONLY IN THE MOST EXTREME CASES.EXTREME CASES.
EXTREME CASES.EXTREME CASES.
EXTREME CASES.EXTREME CASES. EX
CASE, INFORMATION THAT MAY HAVE
HURT JOE BIDEN CHANCES OF
BECOMING PRESIDENT WERE INVOKED.
THE DECISION WAS MADE AT THE
HIGHEST LEVELS OF THE COMPANY
BUT WITHOUT THE KNOWLEDGE OF CEO
JACK DORSEY, WITH FORMAL HEAD OF
LEGAL POLICY AND TRUST BY GADI
PLAYING A KEY ROLE. ALL
SUSPECTED NOW CONFIRMED. NOW, IN
PUBLIC, TWITTER AND ITS MANY
ALLIES CLAIMED THE NEW YORK POST
STORY VIOLATED THE HACK MATERIAL
POLICY THAT TWITTER HAD. BUT AT
TWITTER, EVERYONE UNDERSTOOD IT
WASWAS A
WASWAS A PRETEXT, THE LAPTOP WA
NOTNOT HACKED. AS OF RIGHT NOW
ISIS 8:04 EASTERN TIME. THERE I
NO EVIDENCE IN THIS ONGOING
THREAT THAT TWITTER RECEIVED
CONFIRMATION FROM THE U.S.
GOVERNMENT EVEN THAT THE LAPTOP
WAS FAKE OR FROM RUSSIA. THEY
JUST MADE IT JUST MADE ITJUST MA
ADMITTED, HACKING WAS AN EXCUSE
BUT WITHIN A FEW HOURS EVERYONE
AT TWITTER REALIZED THAT WAS NOT
GOING TO HOLD BUT NO ONE HAD THE
GUTS TO REVERSE IT. TRENTON
KENNEDY WROTE THIS, I AM
STRUGGLING TO UNDERSTAND THE
POLICY BASES FROM MARKING THIS
LAPTOP STORY IS UNSAFE.
TWITTER’S FORMER HEAD TRUST AND
SAFETY EXPLAINED TWITTER HAD TO
CENSOR THE STORY SO DONALD TRUMP
WOULD NOT BE REELECTED AS
PRESIDENT. THIS IS AN EMERGING
SITUATION WITH THE FACTS
REMAINED UNCLEAR. GIVEN THE
SEVERE RISKS HERE AND THE
LESSONS OF 2016, MEANING TRUMP
COULDCOULD GET ELECTED, WE ARE
ON THE SIDE INCLUDING A WARNING
AND PREVENTING THIS CONTENT FROM
BEINGBEING AMPLIFIED. NOW, THIS
PLAYED OUT TO SOME EXTENT IN
PUBLIC. NOW, WE KNOW IT IS
HAPPENING IN TWITTER. THE WHOLE
COUNTRY KNEW THAT SOMETHING WAS
BEING CENSORED. A LOT OF PEOPLE
COULD NOT READ IT BUT IT WAS
WIDELY KNOWN THAT TWITTER WAS
CENSORINGCENSORING IT AND MANY
ORGANIZATIONS. AT THAT TIME,
TWITTER RECEIVED A COMMUNICATION
FROM A CONSULTANT IN WASHINGTON
WHO HAD TAKEN AN INFORMAL POLL
OF MEMBERS OF CONGRESS.
DEMOCRATS IN CONGRESS SUPPORTS
THE CENSORSHIP AND WE ARE
QUOTING, THEY DON’T THINK THE
FIRST AMENDMENT IS ABSOLUTE. IN
OTHER WORDS, SITTING MEMBERS OF
CONGRESS WERE ENCOURAGING
SENSORSHIP TO AFFECT THE OUTCOME
OF THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION.
THAT’S ILLEGAL. THAT’S
ELECTION-RIGGING AND IT IS A
DIRECT ATTACK BY THE BILL OF
RIGHTS OF OUR PEOPLE WHO SWORN
TO UPHOLD THE BILL OF RIGHTS.
BACK TO THE DOCUMENT, WITHIN
TWITTER, OTHERS ALL VOTING
DEMOCRATS BUT SOME WITH SOME
INTEGRITY KEPT RAISING QUESTIONS
ABOUT THIS. BRANDON FOREMAN
ASKS, "CAN WE ASK THIS IS PART
OFOF THE
OFOF THE POLICY," IS THIS
CONSISTENT WITH THE RULES? THE
GENERAL COUNCIL OF TWITTER, JIM
MAKER, THAT’S THE FORMER FBI
GENERAL COUNSEL WHO WAS INVOLVED
WITH THE INTERVIEW OF MICHAEL
FLYNN SIGNED OFF ON THE
CONTINUEDP CONTINUEDCONTINUE
"CAUTION IS WARRANTED," WE’LL
HEAR FROM MR. BAKER VERY SOON.
THE RECORD SHOWS AS OF RIGHT NOW
ONLY ONE ELECTED OFFICIAL IN THE
ENTIRE DEMOCRATIC PARTY OF
SILICON VALLEY, VOICING ANY
CONCERNS AT ALL. SO CONNER
REACHEDREACHED OUT TO GADDI AND
WHATWHAT HE WROTE. THIS IS A
VIOLATION OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT
OF PRINCIPLES, I SAY THIS AS A
TOTAL BIDEN PARTISAN. SHE WAS
BLOWNBLOWN OFF BY
BLOWNBLOWN OFF BY GADDI, BY THE
GOODP GOOD FOR HIM. HE’S A LIBERAL, TOO. WITHIN
HE’S A LIBERAL, TOO. WITHIN
DAYS, SOMEONE CALLED SABO THAT
ON CAPITOL HILL DEMOCRATS ARE
VERY HAPPY WITH THIS. THEY
SUPPORTED THESUPPORTED THE
SUPPORTED THESUPPORTED THE CENS
THREAT IS STILL ONGOING AND