bigger problems at the susan g common foundation obvious here's the the
backstory as as you know if you've been paying attention to the show you're
aware that this is an g common foundation came under fire for
creating essentially
new
rule that would prevent them from giving money to planned parenthood
we found out there was so much
shady dealings with found out that uh... their vp
karen handel who ran for governor honest retention anti-trust platform and it has
been involved in the decision
she resigned
the monies back to planned parenthood we heard it all listed with we heard the
whole thing
however now we're getting information that they missed
there may even be bigger problems of the susan g common foundation
you know lewis how a number of different products have that tiny pink ribbon
on different items different products presumably which are are some of the
money goes to the susan g common foundation
we are getting more and more evidence that
a lot of those items may actually
cancer-causing agents one example isn't automated
dryer at a nail salon which has that tiny pink ribbon
and when you see it almost makes you think of health you see that you say
this thing must really be healthy
and this must be a safe item to use
this is helping to send money for the cure i wouldn't expect that using this
device could actually give me
that's what it seems to be
we're seeing more and more evidence and there's there's no indication anywhere
on the machine
that's uh... that it may cause cancer
you would think it's just hot air and u_v_ light when you look at this mail
drying machine
and it will just evaporate the drying agent in the nails turns out that allot
of those agents into an email so long as include toluene
formaldehyde and i do you know if they wait chemicals that are called the toxic
trio
by the women's health group the national healthy nail and beauty salon alliance
and many of the chemical still used in these actually elevate cancer risk
in women
coleman also has partnerships with you while italy you i really uh... happens
to be the sole producer of are gvhd the bovine growth hormone
which if it ends up in our dairy products is known to also increased
cancer risk
partnership with the susan g coming foundation
let's talk about the two lawyers here layer number one
is is this indifferent
okays this simply
indifference about we partner with layer number two
is is it not strategy
for some of these companies
considering how much money is made from cancer treatment
so no that you're putting products out there which may increase breast cancer
risk is it bad
is it that despicable what's going on lois what's your reaction to this
uh...
hard to say i mean i i assume from the point of comin
there is a lot of uh...
negligence
with who they partner with i mean i really doubt the people who were forming
these partnerships are digging through
the companies that incinerator harder in with some of these products cause cancer
yet
and i mean by a male dryer role who would assume that something like that
would cause cancer let me ask you a different question if
you were to confront susan g comment about this and they said well listen
those companies are donating money to cancer research
so that's why we partner with them
with that stand opera would you say well but why uart giving them publicity and
they are causing
potentially
to have cancer
with that explanation stand up for a would stand up for your time
that particular explanation wouldn't stand up for me because i think uh...
philip morris and other tobacco companies
have programs to get people not to smoke exact same very contradictory cuz
clearly it in their profit line
the more people smoke you know the more money than to make seltzer i don't know
if this means i think whoever forms partnerships as you seeing green
excel
cynthia's this reason enough for susan g commons partnerships of these companies
reason to continue not supporting susan g common
and to change some of the other uh... organizations which are mentioned on the
last show
uh... this in combination with uh... the last two par kal
i think so
and uh...
another question is would be having learned about this at all if that's the
real question
if none of this error happen in the first place susan g common now is being
scrutinized in a way that you know that the scary thing is
if we were to scrutinize
charitable organizations
this closely
we would probably also find a lot of disturbing stuff
this has uh... and again
it proves i think it's great that these things are coming out that it proves
this was just a horrible p_r_ decision because it has brought so much negative
attention
and so many people digging through the records of susan g common now they may
never recover from this that is really the way that it is said that it is
appearing they may never recover from this spot but i was first public
relations co definitely completely video move
this book dot com slash to the package of please like the day the package show
on face book
good david packard dot com slash gear to get your t-shirts to get your goodies
unrelated to package should t-shirt today
you go to david packard dot com slash birthday you can get a free t-shirt with
a one-year membership will take a break
will be back after this with martin butterick former professional gambler
so many questions for him from the audience can't wait to talk to a back
after this
david hackman shelves and david happening dot com