in fact it's not this one you can disagree with the idea of darwin but i tell you very in a way
it kind of distances himself from darwin first of all san viroqua agrees that the physical frame
we possessed hey has been chiseled by natural selection this is the idea of darwin's idea of
you know evolution ryokan has no difficulty with that but the place where vivekananda parts company
with darwin's you can see the depth of swine view you can understanding he says this particular idea
of you know survival of the fitness you see in the animal kingdom is very much so in the theory of
evolution so to survive the fittest fight for the you know best position otherwise you get either
kill or be killed that is the kind of natural way evolution takes place in the animal kingdom
but this is where we are going to drew a line he said when we come into the human kingdom
this particular idea of says the fittest has to be kind of displaced with the idea of helping
the weakest because now in the human kingdom the rational faculty is kind of kind of clicked in in
the animal kingdom there's no rational faculty you just kill or be killed in the human kingdom
this rational faculty says no no he's not trying to kind of overpower others control others rule
others if the idea of working in the spirit of cooperation rather than confrontation this is
where we are compared to darwin so darwin is not the darwin's theory of evolution with something
that we are going to criticize if he was quite happy with it is in which something is missing in
the missing parties when we enter evolution enters the human kingdom some of the rules the darwin's
idea such as you know survival the fittest comes to a hand comes to an end he saw this far earlier
than some of the modern scientists who are now agree with exactly what virginia said okay so
that is uh it is just a different point of view from where uh darwin was thinking but darwin um
and vivekananda both agreed that natural selection is something that is uh it is a reality can i say
one more thing something else that swami you can say which i was immediately you see you can see
how deep he's thinking how clear thing is a very clear thinker he said evolution doesn't take place
because of natural accidents you know the kind of obstacles that get in the way and then evolution
takes place no no you say evolution takes place in spite of obstacles not because of obstacles modern
biologists because of obstacles the evolutionary steps take you know take place you can say no no
in spite of this obstacle stopping evolution the thing that is trying to kind of express itself has
a habit of jumping over its you know obstruction and continuous progress this is in fact this is
true because when you look at the evolution theory there's a big gap here one big gap is they say
if you really look at the statistical idea it is impossible for life to become this complex is the
human frame in 3.5 billion years ago in three 3.5 billion years it is far more complex it requires
more time not 3.5 billion maybe 300 billion years before life can become statistically this complex
according to statistics this is reality so the idea that somehow we may not become this
this complex within 3.5 billion years ago is a mystery for modern modern evolutionary theory
and the answer comes from vivekan he said it is not because of obstacles that we evolve
it can become better because you know there was obstacles for us it is in spite of obstacles or
something saying we'll overpower obstacles and when we ride the back of obstacles and go over
it and become this complex in 3.5 billion this is a wonderful thing again came out from viva canaan
free e-learning course in hinduism to register please visit www.hindudashacademy.com
talks on hinduism sponsored by people care encouraging caring for
the elderly in their own homes for more information please visit peoplecare.com