I think we've seen those games throughout the 2020 campaign.
They don't think that they don't want the American people to hear directly from, you
know, the biggest leader of the greatest political movement in our history.
So I do suspect they'll try to, you know, censor and cut away.
However, the people are anxious to hear from him and
we do not have the first amendment, it's under attack.
Okay, I understand that there's not a single right winger there,
scarcely anybody in America who actually understands what the First Amendment is
about, but there is no constitutional right to having major broadcast news
networks playing the entirety of your live speech.
That's not in there.
I don't know how it would be.
The Founding Fathers had never heard of MSNBC that's just not a thing.
It's not censorship for them to cut away or to not broadcast it at all.
There are lots of speeches going on as I sit here.
Lots of speeches will be made, you don't have to cover all of them.
And by the way, many of the networks did play significant portions of it.
Yes, some cut away and I will add, you know, Fox News was one of those and
by the way, Rupert Murdoch has apparently told trump that he and Fox News will not
be defending trump and supporting him during this presidential bid.
But again, Liz that is not at all the first amendments about that's
a ridiculous claim to make.
Isn't that a horrible admission by Murdoch?
We will not be supporting and defending him this time around?
Which means you supported and defended him the last time around.
Is that based off of truth or is that based off of partisan politics Coming from
a place that talks about fair and balanced all the time.
Come on bro.
There was another part of Liz Harrington.
Yo so I mean my my daily calls to CNN to have them air
my show the watch list every morning.
Still they still haven't picked up on it yet.
My First Amendment rights have been violated and I want some satisfaction.
I'm an american.
Damn it.
I'm gonna make my call tomorrow.
See if this gets fixed.
It's a shame.
I know there has not been a violation of first minute writes this bad since I
told in fours they have to put T.
D. R.
On because he was claiming when he was taken off of Youtube but
that was a violation of his rights.
Well okay I want access to your audience.
Put me on buddy.
I don't I don't actually want to be on enforced.
But anyway.
No they don't they don't understand any of this.
And again as I said many people did play.
I mean hell t T t.
Y t.
Played the majority of the speech and it was covered pretty much everywhere.
In some cases pretty irresponsibly though C span tweeted out a section of
the speech with this this is the caption former president trump concludes we
will make America powerful again.
We will make America wealthy again?
We will make it I'm gonna stop there at that point.
It goes on and on and on.
I don't necessarily understand why C span like broadcast the speech.
That seems weird.
But if they're gonna broadcast a jerry can we put that tweet back up again?
Am I crazy or is that not how C span would normally put up a section of a speech?
I think that looks like trump's campaign tweeted that out because I
mean they can go with is what he said were just saying what he said.
I've noticed some I've been a very loyal C span watcher for about 15, 20 years now.
It's weird.
I go to I go to that side a lot.
There are some changes, they're doing different things with how they break it
down, how they have access to different speeches.
I actually appreciate c span as far as the way they break it on.
I didn't know they tweeted this out this way but
I do think maybe there you know the the escape route this is he said these things
all we're doing is saying what he said not that you have to agree or disagree.
So I'm okay with them on that but I think they're trying to get more accessible
accessibility or at least more people going to them versus the I guess O.
A. N.
S. That carried this since it's
an announcement.
I guess it's just that they put a lot of it up that doesn't how did they even fit
that many letters in a tweet that looks like twice as much of a tweet as most
people get.
I don't I don't understand it.
The new blue check.
Maybe it's a new feature.
Yeah. No and
look I checked it is the actual c span it's official by the way,
according to twitter for whatever that's worth.
And other people covered it to the new york post,
made sure that people knew about it with this,
which I just I just love the florida man makes announcement page 26 ouch.
But some people did like it what Fox officially might not support him,
but Mike Huckabee was on Fox saying that Trump was unbeatable in 2020 for
which that's a bold claim.
He literally lost the last time he raced.
Now he did also say that he didn't get why he was announcing now he thinks it was
a bad idea.
So even the guy who says No he's totally gonna win is like can you like wait until
her show walker has a chance of winning this thing is gonna
make him look really bad and it's pretty clear coming out of that
speech that trump continues to want you to tie in your mind Herschel walker to him.
I'm perfectly happy with the voters having that in mind.
I don't think it's gonna help out Herschel walker in this runoff.
Can I say one small thing about the, what's his name?
Idiot Huckabee.
So you can say and criticize and talk about his timing of it, but
at the same time say he's unbeatable.
All that's doing is normalizing.
Every time you hear something from even people who support him like Huckabee say
something that's bad about his approach, strategy, technique, policies, principles,
that stuff.
If you're anything negative about this guy, you can bypass it and
go back to don't forget he's unbeatable though.
That's the way that you do.
You put these people in these trances so that no matter you hear about accusations,
criminal issues, ineptitude when you're in office.
All those things you hear constantly, you can always separate and go, yeah,
those things happened.
But he's unbeatable from the same mouth.
The guy who said he's unbeatable.
He has issues, you can't say, hey,
the books in the NFL are gonna win the Super Bowl this year.
But they keep fumbling.
Well they can't win.
If they keep turning the ball over bro, which one is it?
You can't say they're the best team.
But then also they suck at what they do.
One of the small, intricate parts of the game that will determine wins and
losses, Let's keep it real.
Yeah, no, I think you're right.
And as a person who recently went to a game, I get that analogy and
I'm right there with you.
sports all on board john if he, you guys john's not here next week.
He's got picked up for the head coaching position with the rams.
I pretty much get it.
You know, there's some passing, there's some running, you switch back and
forth between two and then you probably get it done.
Anyway.
I want to talk about one other aspect of this.
I would like to make a special comment slash request to the doj
following trump's announcement and a little bit to the media to,
I'm not as mad at the media when they say things like, well indicting trump is gonna
be messier now because they're not necessarily expressing their values.
They're describing a situation.
I still think it's a little bit apathetic and passive, but whatever,
I'll give the media pass on that.
But when it comes to the doj, I know that even as I speak right now,
Merrick Garland and a bunch of other people whose obligation.
The entire point that they're drawing a salary as a member of the Department of
Justice is to enforce the law.
Instead they're sitting cloistered in a room like I don't
know if we can indict him.
I mean think about the things he will say and everyone is worried about the things
that he will say and the things his defenders will say and his spokespeople
will say and his surrogates will say and here's the thing they're right in that he
will say many things he'll say they're only doing this because I'm a candidate.
They're only doing this to take me down there trying to stop our movement.
They will bleed and bleed and bleed that their victims.
But I will remind you members of the Doj and Merrick garland.
Did you know that you have mouths to like the media figure.
Do you get that?
You can speak as well that the people who will craft the narrative
of what an indictment means will not exclusively be defenders of donald trump.
Or at the very least,
they don't have to exclusively be those people that when they come out and
say you're only coming after me because I've announced for the presidency.
You can respond quite accurately and quite rationally that you you only announced so
early historically early to ward off an indictment that you knew was coming and
regardless you did the crime at the end of the day.
Maybe if you didn't want to be targeted, don't make it so eminently easy to target
you when you're committing the crime in the open and admitting it in your rallies.
You guys can respond to this biden can give speeches the january 6th commission
that maybe gone with the house being destroyed.
But every member of it for Liz Cheney and Kinzinger are still there and
they can still go on the news.
You guys can press the advantage and in doing so you can feel, I don't know,
you can have the wind at your back by knowing the, that
the american people in race after race after race have rejected donald trump.
They've already given you the strong signal in rejecting so
many of his strongly endorsed candidates that they're not on his side.
They don't buy his claims about him being a massive martyr and a victim and
they do actually want some semblance of sanity and respect for the law.
If that isn't going to make you feel comfortable waiting into this messy area
of indictment that I don't know what will at this point here, what do you think?
It's, it's hard to add to that john, that was excellent.
It puzzles so many people trying to figure out the next steps here and
the way they squeeze in.
You talk about the loss of the house where they squeezed in those last couple of
january 6th committee hearings to allow people to see and give the opportunity for
them to follow up on what we've seen, what we've heard and what has been said.
I believe there was, there was even more things still coming out.
Who was his accountant at the trump or Wiesel burg?
Yeah, still things happening there.
Those things continue to change and if you think trump doesn't realize that and
the timing is Huckabee was then saying,
hey, that's the one weird thing with his timing.
The one thing these guys who are now suddenly have the courage to
say donald trump is a loser and we can't keep following him down this road.
What they won't say is he's doing this because he's trying to get away
from any and all responsibility for the things that he's been accused of.
I was gonna say all the crimes he committed, we'll get there.
But those things he's been accused of, they can't still can't say that part,
that's the main reason because then maybe it might sweep them into this whole thing
too because they supported him while he was committing those crimes.