Madam Speaker, on 17 January 2014 at 1.58 pm, a woman arrived at Woodlands Checkpoint in her Malaysian car.
She drove past the ICA officer without going through the mandatory checks by tailgating the car immediately in front of hers, and slipping past the drop-arm barrier.
The ICA officer did not immediately trigger an alert.
The car then proceeded to the secondary checking area
for security checks to be carried out
by an Auxiliary Police Officer (APO).
The car did not stop for the APO to carry out its checks
and the APO also did not
sound the alarm. Madam Speaker, there are alarms installed
at all immigration counters and also
the secondary clearance area. The immediate activation of such alarms,
as required in the standard operating procedures
at the checkpoints is critical to stopping cars
that evade immigration and security checks.
If the ICA officer had sounded the alarm
faster than the 2.5 minutes
she took, it would have triggered a lockdown
which would have stopped the car from leaving
the checkpoint. This was compounded
by the APO not raising the alarm
when the car did not stop for secondary
security checks. Indeed the prompt
triggering of the alarm by the officer on duty
was how similar previous attempts
to evade immigration and security checks
either intentionally or inadvertently at the checkpoint have been stopped in the
past. If, however, a vehicle
does make an unauthorized exit from the checkpoint, there
is a security protocol for Police
and ICA to treat the incident
as a breach of border security
and issue a high-priority alert
to all ground resources. In this case, however,
the ICA police ground commanders
did not follow the protocol. They made an error of judgement
and classified the incident as a less
serious one, as an immigration offence.
As a result, police did not
trigger an alert that would have immediately directed patrol cars to mount
road blocks at possible travel routes by the car
in major parts of Singapore.
The ICA and Police also did not issue a heightened and persistent alert
with a description of the car and driver that would have alerted
all ground forces to continue looking for them
when they conducted vehicular searches, checks and screening.
Three days later, on 20 January 2014 at 1.32 pm,
Police received a 999 call from a taxi driver who said
that he was being followed by a Malaysian car.
On Police's advice, the taxi driver
drove to a location outside the Police Cantonment Complex
with the Malaysian car continuing to follow it.
When police officers tried to engage the female driver of the Malaysian car,
she was unresponsive, and then drove off.
The police officers decided not to pursue her and missed the opportunity
to detain the driver for further checks.
The officers showed weak situational awareness and exercised poor judgement.
45 minutes later at about 2:18 pm. the same driver and car intruded into the MFA compound
by tailgating another car. MFA security officers
stopped the car in the compound
and arrested the driver for criminal trespass.
Madam Speaker, when the driver and vehicle
evaded the required checks, they should
have been stopped within the checkpoint.
This is a serious security breach.
It is also unacceptable that the woman
was only arrested three days later
after she had intruded into the MFA compound.
On receiving the incident reports, I expressed my deep dissatisfaction
to the commissioners of ICA and Police
at the way the incident was handled.
I directed them to conduct a thorough investigation,
report to me how this happened and recommend corrective actions to prevent a recurrence.
Madam Speaker, the commissioners of ICA and Police
have presented to me the recommendations on the corrective actions.
I have accepted the findings and recommendations and have directed ICA and Police to implement these measures.
ICA and Police will work closely to improve their coordination and responses,
and ensure that such lapses do not occur again.
Existing SOPs will be thoroughly reviewed to ensure officers act quickly and effectively
to deal with such security threats at the checkpoints.
Police will treat all checkpoint security breaches as high-level security threats
and take all necessary steps to locate the intruder, until such time the threat no longer exists.
Both departments will also conduct more frequent drills and joint exercises at the land checkpoints
to maintain the officers' vigilance and validate the emergency response plans.
ICA will also use more advanced technology as it becomes available,
and improved infrastructural design to depend less on the reaction of the officers on duty,
and enhance the overall security of the checkpoint.
While the bulk of the critical immigration and security functions at the checkpoint
are performed by officers from ICA and the other Home Team agencies,
Auxiliary Police Officers (APOs) are an integral part of checkpoint operations.
They constitute about 20% of the officers deployed at Woodlands Checkpoint for immigration and security clearance functions.
The APOs are trained and equipped to carry out specific security functions.
ICA conducts regular drills, exercises and audits to maintain the vigilance of the APOs
and reviews the operational procedures and responses regularly.
In light of this incident, ICA will also enhance the supervision and deployment of the APOs
to ensure that they carry out their duties in accordance with established procedures.
In the past three years (till the end of 2013),
there have been 26 cases of attempted or inadvertent evasion of immigration checks at Woodlands Checkpoint.
25 of these cases were stopped immediately within the checkpoint upon the prompt activation of the alarm.
The last such case before this incident, occurred on 29 December 2013.
The most recent case was on 14 February 2014 (just last Friday),
when the APO gestured to the driver to stop for checks but the driver drove on.
The APO then activated the alarm and the entire arrival car zone was locked down
and the vehicle stopped within the checkpoint as per the SOP.
The matter was investigated and it was determined that the driver had inadvertently driven on with no malicious intent.
The vehicle and driver were allowed to proceed after investigation.
Madam Speaker, every such case is investigated thoroughly.
Most of the 25 cases were found not to have malicious intent.
In 4 cases, the offence was committed without mitigating factors, and the subjects involved were prosecuted.
The maximum punishment is imprisonment of six months.
The one previous case in the last three years that ICA failed to stop within the checkpoint
involved a subject who crashed through a security barrier and exited Woodlands Checkpoint through the staff access lane.
The driver was detained within two hours, prosecuted and sentenced to 12 weeks' imprisonment
for offences under the Immigration Act, Penal Code and Road Traffic Act.
Madam Speaker, the security breach at Woodlands Checkpoint on 17 January 2014,
and the subsequent actions taken until her arrest on 20 January 2014 are not acceptable.
I have described the measures - technical, infrastructural, procedural training and exercises
that ICA and Police together, are taking to prevent a recurrence.
Lapses can fall into two categories.
The first is when there is some negligence on the part of one or more Ground Officers, in carrying out their tasks.
The second, and more serious situation, is when there has been a serious error of judgement.
And this occurred in the current case.
The ICA and Police ground commanders made a serious error of judgement
in deciding to treat this intrusion as a less serious immigration offence,
instead of a serious breach of border security as required in the protocol.
This was a major reason for the subsequent inadequate response
which resulted in the vehicle and driver not being detected and arrested much earlier.
Both ground commanders have been redeployed to non-operational posts pending disciplinary action.
Their supervising officers overseeing operations should also have realized this, and acted to rectify the situation.
They will be subject to the appropriate disciplinary action, along with other officers involved in the incident.
Madam Speaker, as seen in this episode,
the way that our officers and our commanders carry out their duties,
their vigilance, diligence, sense of urgency, operational instincts and judgement are key to operational effectiveness.
I do not underestimate the challenges our officers face at Woodlands Checkpoint.
lt is one of the world's busiest land checkpoints, with more than 300,000 people and 130,000 vehicles passing through each day.
I repeat those numbers: 300,000 people and 130,000 vehicles passing through Woodlands Checkpoint each day.
The security regime there is multi-agency and multi-level, involving various government agencies
such as ICA, Police, Central Narcotics Bureau,
Singapore Customs and Land Transport Authority
as well as the Auxiliary Police Forces.
The incident shows that the coordination between ICA and Police at the checkpoint
needs to be further strengthened. It is important
that home team departments work together closely
in carrying out their duties. They must ensure
that the concept of a Home Team is fully
internalised and operationalised both on the ground,
and by commanders at all levels to tackle our security challenges
as one united entity. Madam Speaker,
the public expects us to do our job well
and MHA holds our Home Team officers
to a high standard of professionalism and takes a
very serious view of the security lapses
that occurred during this episode. I have had
a thorough discussion with the Commissioners of ICA and Police and
their senior leadership. They acknowledge
and apologise for the shortcomings and are implementing
the remedial measures. But apart
from the physical procedural measures, they recognise the need
to set the tone from the leadership
through to every ground unit and every officer
that we have to remain vigilant and alert
and not let our guard down in the face
of serious threats that can arise.
Madam Speaker, I have worked closely with our Home Team officers
for some three years. I have met and
talked with many of our officers on the ground
to understand the work that they do and what they need
to carry out their duties better.
I appreciate the good work of our officers.
They have a good record in ensuring the safety and security of Singapore and Singaporeans.
Our overall crime rate is at its lowest in thirty years.
The number of immigration offenders arrested has been declining since 2001
and is less than half of what it was five years ago.
I have made it clear to the heads of
all our Home Team agencies and departments
that when officers perform well, I will recognise their good work
and commend them publicly. If they act professionally
and discharge their duties properly and to the best of their abilities
but the outcome does not turn out so good,
I will speak for them and support them publicly,
for this is the difficult and challenging nature of the job
that our Home Team officers are called upon to do
and we all need to support and encourage them.
However, if they have not discharged their duties properly
and have fallen short of the required performance standards
as some officers have done in this episode,
I will hold them accountable and where warranted,
admonish and discipline them.
Acknowledging the stakes allows our officers
and our organizations to learn and improve.
Madam Speaker, when Home Team officers
report for duty, when they put on their uniforms,
they carry a heavy responsibility. The duties they discharge,
the decisions they make everyday,
can have immediate and serious consequences
on the safety and security of their fellow Singaporeans in Singapore.
We all depend on them and place our trust in them
to do their duty well. And this is a trust
that has to be earned in all that our officers do,
every day.