OPPORTUNITY FOR THOSE WORKERS
IT'S TRANSITIONING TO
HIGH-PAYING JOBS, TRUMP SAID
ISRAEL.
>> Julie: JOE BIDEN PLEDGING
TO KILLED BLUE-COLLAR JOBS FOR A
GREEN ECONOMY.
IT IS A MOVE THAT IS DRAWING
COMPARISONS TO WHAT
HILLARY CLINTON CALLS HER
BIGGEST MISTAKE IN 2016.
WATCH THIS.
>> I AM THE ONLY CANDIDATE WHO
HAS A POLICY ABOUT HOW TO BRING
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY USING CLEAN
RENEWABLE ENERGY AS THE KEY INTO
THE COLD COUNTRY.
BECAUSE WE ARE GOING TO PUT A
LOT OF COAL MINERS AND COAL
COMPANIES OUT OF BUSINESS.
>> Julie: LET'S BRING IN SCOTT
BOLDEN, D.C. PRIMARY CHAIRMAN,
AND CHAIRMAN OF THE NATIONAL
BAR ASSOCIATION ACT.
KILLING BLUE-COLLAR JOBS, IS
THAT NOT LIKE SHOOTING YOURSELF
IN THE FOOT?
ESPECIALLY IF YOU'RE A DEMOCRAT
RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT?
>> I DON'T THINK SO, IN EITHER
ONE OF THOSE CASES, AND I THINK
BIDEN IS MUCH MORE LIKABLE AND
HAS A LOT MORE CREDIBILITY WITH
BLUE-COLLAR WORKERS.
>> Julie: HE WILL NOT BE
LIKABLE IF HE KILLS BLUE-COLLAR
JOBS.
>> THAT'S NOT WHAT HE SAID.
HE SAID WOULD YOU BE WILLING TO
SACRIFICE BLUE-COLLAR JOBS, I.E.
COAL MINERS IN EXCHANGE FOR A
GREEN ECONOMY.
GIVING THEM HIGH-PAYING JOBS AND
TRAINING THEM.
IT WILL ALWAYS BE YES, BECAUSE A
COAL INDUSTRY HAS NOT IMPROVED
UNDER DONALD TRUMP, AND BECAUSE
THE GREEN ECONOMY IS COMING,
BECAUSE GLOBAL WARMING IS REAL.
REGARDLESS IF THE REPUBLICANS
THINK IT IS A HOAX.
IN WHAT YOU ARE GETTING FROM
BIDEN IS STRAIGHT TALK WITH A
LOT OF CREDIBILITY AND HIGHER
PAYING JOBS WITH WELL-TRAINED
WORKERS THAT COULD BE COAL
MINERS, AND THEIR TRANSITION TO
THE GREEN ECONOMY.
IT HAPPENED UNDER OBAMA, AND IT
CAN HAPPEN AGAIN.
IT IS HAPPENING BY ITSELF
ANYWAY.
WE HAVE TO DO SOMETHING ABOUT
GLOBAL WARNING.
>> Julie: DOES IT HURT
PENNSYLVANIA AND MICHIGAN, JUST
SPEAKING IN PENNSYLVANIA ALONE,
AND LIVED IN THE COAL MINING
COMMUNITY.
SO IF YOU TELL ALL OF THE COAL
MINERS WHO ARE OUT OF A JOB, BUT
DON'T WORRY, WE WILL FIND YOU
SOMETHING BETTER, WHERE'S THE
GUARANTEE?
YOU DON'T PUT PEOPLE OUT OF JOBS
UNLESS YOU ABSOLUTELY CAN
GUARANTEE THEM BETTER WORK AND
HIGHER WAGES.
THERE IS NO ONE WHO CAN DO THAT.
>> BIDEN AND THE DEMOCRATS
CERTAINLY HAVE A PLAN.
THAT'S WHAT THEY ARE TALKING
ABOUT.
TRANSITIONING THE COAL MINERS
AND THE BLUE-COLLAR WORKERS TO
HIGHER-PAYING JOBS.
NOW, THE KEY IS THIS, IS HE
BELIEVABLE?
CAN HE CONVINCE THEM THAT THAT
IS A WAY TO MAKE MORE MONEY, GET
BETTER TRAINED, AND BUILD THIS
ECONOMY?
I THINK HE HAS CREDIBILITY.
HILLARY CLINTON ON THE OTHER
HAND, SHE DID NOT HAVE A WHOLE
LOT OF CREDIBILITY, AND YOU SAW
THE RESULTS.
WHETHER THE RUSSIANS WERE
INVOLVED OR NOT.
BUT I THINK THAT BIDEN IS
TELLING THE TRUTH.
HE CAN CONVINCE THEM.
HE HAS A LOT OF CREDIBILITY, AND
IT WILL SELL.
YOU CANNOT KILL BOTH BLUE-COLLAR
JOBS AND GIVE THEM NOTHING.
YOU HAVE TO HAVE A PLAN TO
TRANSITION TO THE GREEN ECONOMY.
THAT IS AN IMPORTANT EXTINCTION
AS YOU KNOW.
>> Julie: THERE HAS TO BE A
SMOOTH TRANSITION.
MY QUESTION TO YOU IS, DO YOU
THINK THAT BIDEN REALIZES THAT
HE REALLY HAS TWO APPEASED
PROGRESSIVES IF YOU ACTUALLY
REALLY WANT TO WIN THE
NOMINATION.
I MEAN, WE JUST TALKED ABOUT THE
FACT THAT SOME DEMOCRATIC
INSIDERS BELIEVE THAT NOW
BERNIE SANDERS HAS A REAL SHOT
OF WINNING THE NOMINATION.
I HOPE THAT BIDEN IS LISTENING.
>> I THINK HE IS.
BERNIE SANDERS HAS BEEN THE MOST
CONSISTENT DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE IN THIS
RACE.
PRETTY CONSISTENT IN THE PRIOR
RACE TOO.
SO THE OTHER CANDIDATES HAVE
GONE UP AND DOWN IN THE POLLS,
INCLUDING BIDEN AND BUTTIGIEG,
AND SO FORTH AND SO ON.
BUT I THINK BIDEN IS DIFFERENT
IN THIS CASE.
I THINK HE TRIES TO DO WHAT HE
CAN WITH THE LEFT.
YOU CANNOT IGNORE THEM.
BUT THEY WILL NOT BE DEPOSITED
IN THIS RACE.
I'VE SAID IN THE NETWORK THAT
THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY IS MORE
MODERATE AND MORE CONSERVATIVE
THAN THE G.O.P. AND THE MEDIA
GIVE THEM CREDIT FOR.
THEY COVER THE AOCS OF THE
WORLD, BUT THE MAJORITY OF THE
VOTERS ARE MODERATE AND
CONSERVATIVE, THAT'S WHY JOE IS
LEAVING BECAUSE OF THE BLACK
VOTE.
>> Julie: CONGRESSWOMAN
ALEXANDRIA OCASIO-CORTEZ HAS
RAILED AGAINST BILLIONAIRES
DURING HER TIME IN WASHINGTON.
SHE HAS FAILED TO MENTION THAT
BILLIONAIRE AND 2020 DAN TOM
STIER DONATED TO HER 2018
CAMPAIGN.
HERE SHE IS DURING A CAMPAIGN
RALLY FOR BERNIE SANDERS.
>> FOR ANYONE WHO ACCUSES US FOR
INSTITUTING PURITY TESTS, IT IS
CALLED HAVING VALUES.
IT IS CALLED HAVING STANDARDS
FOR YOUR CONDUCT TO NOT BE
FUNDED BY BILLIONAIRES.
BUT TO BE FUNDED BY THE PEOPLE,
WHICH IS DIFFERENT!
>> Julie: IT IS CALLED HAVING
A BAD MEMORY, APPARENTLY.
IS THIS TOTALLY HYPOCRITICAL?
COULD THIS HURT BERNIE SANDERS?
WHEN HE HAS AOC RAILING AGAINST
BILLIONAIRE MONEY WHEN SHE
HERSELF HAS BENEFITED FROM
BILLIONAIRE DONATIONS?
>> IT IS CALLED WINNING, AND YOU
CAN'T WIN WITHOUT MONEY.
AND WHEN SHE TOOK THAT DONATION,
NOT FROM TOM, BUT FROM HIS
FORMER FUND MANAGER FAMILY THAT
HE WAS A PART OF, SHE WAS A
CANDIDATE TO WIN.
AND SHE UPSET THE INCUMBENT.
SO I DON'T THINK $2700 FROM ONE
BILLIONAIRE IS DISPOSITIVE OF
WINNING, BUT YOU ARE NOT GOING
TO BE TURNING DOWN ANY MONEY.
LISTEN, MONEY IS ALWAYS GOING TO
BE A PART OF POLITICS.
YOU HAVE THE SUPREME COURT THAT
SAYS YOU HAVE A FIRST AMENDMENT
RIGHT, I AM GOING TO UNITE THE
DECISION.
WHILE THE USE TESTS ARE
IMPORTANT, WHAT THEY ARE REALLY
TALKING ABOUT IS MONEY THAT
CORRUPTS THE ELECTION, THE
CAMPAIGN, AND THE ELECTED
OFFICIAL.
BECAUSE MONEY IS NOT CORRUPTIBL
CORRUPTIBLE.
INDIVIDUALS, OR CANDIDATES ARE
THE ONES THAT ARE CORRUPTIBLE.
BUT WHAT SHE IS REALLY THINKING
ABOUT ON A MUCH BROADER BASIS IS
LED TO WHO GIVE MILLIONS TO THE
INDEPENDENT PACKET, IF THEY
DOMINATE AND OVERWHELM THE VOTE,
AND SKEW THE RESULTS, THAT IS A
PROBLEM.
>> Julie: POOR PEOPLE DO NOT
DONATE $2700 TO A CAMPAIGN,
WHETHER YOU ARE A MILLIONAIRE OR
A BILLIONAIRE.
>> THEY DONATE $10 OR $100, AND