CONTINUE WITH MOLLY.
>> FOR THE REPUBLICAN SIDE LET'S
BRING ARKANSAS CONGRESSMAN AND
MEMBER OF THE HOUSE INTELLIGENCE
COMMITTEE, WE APPRECIATE IT.
>> YOU BET, THANKS FOR HAVING
ME.
>> LET'S KICK THINGS OFF, CHRIS
WALLACE WAS PRESSING MULVANEY ON
WHAT HAPPENED WITH THAT,
REMARKABLE PRESS CONFERENCE LAST
WEEK, HE POINTED OUT THAT A
REPORTER CHALLENGED MULVANEY
SPECIFICALLY NOTING THAT
MULVANEY HAD BESCRIBED REGARDING
FUNDING TO UKRAINE INTO DNC
SERVER HAPPENED, THAT LOOKED
LIKE A QUID PRO QUO, MULVANEY
SAID WE DO THAT ALL OF THE TIME.
THE POINT HE TRIED TO MAKE THIS
MORNING WAS ESSENTIALLY THIS.
>> LOOK TO THE FACTS ON THE
GROUND, THINGS THAT YOU CAN
CERTIFY AND WHAT SHOULD PUT THIS
ISSUE TO BED IS THAT THE MONEY
FLOWED WITHOUT ANY CONNECTION
WHATSOEVER TO THE DNC SERVER.
>> THE AID WAS ULTIMATELY
RELEASED, THE GOP GETS ON BOARD
AND ACKNOWLEDGES THE CORRUPTION
WANTING WHITE HOUSE LOOKING.
REPUBLICANS SAY THAT'S ENOUGH.
>> WELL, YOU KNOW, LOOK, MICK
MULVANEY HE CAN BE BLUNT, HE
SAID SOME THINGS THAT THE MEDIA
DIDN'T LIKE THE OTHER DAY.
WITH REGARD TO THE PRESIDENT'S
INVOLVEMENT AND MAKING COMMENTS,
ANY IMPLICATION OF QUID PRO QUO,
I DON'T SEE THAT AT ALL, THE
PRESIDENT IS CHARGED WITH A
RESPONSIBILITY TO GETTING TO THE
BOTTOM OF WHERE ANY ELECTION
INTERFERENCE ORIGINATE SOD THAT
WE CAN SECURE THE 2020 ELECTIONS
AND IN ORDER FOR HIM TO DO THAT
HE HAS TO LOOK BACK AT 2016
BECAUSE HE CAN'T SECURE THE 2020
ELECTION WITHOUT KNOWING WHERE
THE PROBLEMS CAME FROM IN 2016.
SO I THINK IT'S ENTIRELY
APPROPRIATE TO TAKE THAT ACTION.
>> DO YOU THINK ANY DEMOCRATIC
COLLEAGUES SHARE THE SENTIMENT
IN ANY WAY, THAT'S THE REAL
EFFORT GOING ON HERE AND
EVERYONE SHOULD BE ON BOARD TO
MAKE THAT HAPPEN?
>> WELL, I CERTAINLY HOPE SO
BECAUSE WE CAN'T TELL THE
PRESIDENT ONE THING AND EXPECT
SOMETHING DIFFERENT.
IF IT'S HIS RESPONSIBILITY TO
SECURE THE ELECTIONS THEN HE
NEEDS TO USE WHAT TOOLS ARE
NECESSARY TO SEWER THE ELECTIONS
GOING FORWARD.
I THINK IT'S IMPORTANT TO NOTE
THAT HE WAS THE TARGET IN THIS.
HE WOULD HAVE INTEREST IN MAKING
SURE THAT THIS IS ADDRESSED
BEFORE FUTURE PRESIDENTS SO
THEY'RE NOT TARGETED.
>> SPEAKING OF THE IMPEACHMENT
INQUIRY --
>> I DON'T KNOW WHAT THE PROBLEM
IS.
>> SPEAKING OF IMPEACHMENT
INQUIRY, BY THE WAY, A LOT
HAPPENING BEHIND CLOSED DOORS,
DO YOU THINK THE AMERICAN PEOPLE
SHOULD HAVE GREATER ACCESS, MORE
OF A WINDOW IN WHAT'S HAPPENING
BEHIND CLOSED DOORS?
>> WELL, I THINK THAT THERE'S A
CASE FOR IMPEACHMENT, IT WOULD
NOT BE BEHIND CLOSED DOORS.
SUPPORT THE NARRATIVE THAT
THEY'RE DRIVING ABOUT PRESIDENT
TRUMP AND IF THEY PUT THIS OUT
IN PUBLIC, THEY WOULD LOSE THE
CONTROL OF THE NARRATIVE BECAUSE
THEN WE WOULD BE ALLOWED TO ASK
QUESTIONS, WE WOULD BE ALLOWED
TO SUBPOENA WITNESSES AND WHITE
HOUSE COULD HAVE COUNSEL
PRESENT, AND HE DOES THIS IN
SECRET AND COMES OUT AND
SELECTIVELY LEAKS OUT OF CONTEXT
AND THAT SUPPORTS THE NARRATIVE
AND THAT'S WHY IT NEEDS TO BE
BROUGHT OUT IN THE OPEN.
>> A LOT OF PUSHBACK FROM BOTH
SIDES OF THE AISLE, THEY'VE
DECIDED AND COMPLAINED ABOUT
BIDEN'S SON WORKING IN THE SAME
COUNTRY WHERE THEY ARE
INVESTIGATING CORRUPTION, HIRES
ONLY FAMILY MEMBERS OF ADVISERS
AND PERSONAL ATTORNEY TO YOUNG
RAIN, ARE YOU -- SOME PEOPLE ARE
CONCERNED THAT THE PRESIDENT TOO
OFTEN MINGLES THE PERSONAL AND
THE OFFICIAL, ARE YOU CONCERNED?
>> WELL, IT DIDN'T BOTHER ME
NECESSARILY THE DORAL ISSUE IS
PROBABLY THE OPTICS OF IT, IF
IT'S A NICE PLACE AND
APPROPRIATE LOCATION AND
SECURITY ISSUES ADDRESSED, I'M
NOT SURE HOW MUCH MONEY
PRESIDENT TRUMP WOULD HAVE MADE
FROM THAT ANYWAY.
HE OWNS IT AND SO MAYBE HE
WOULD, YOU KNOW, THE FOLKS THAT
ARE MANAGING IT WERE MAKING
OFFER AND COMPETITIVE BID, I
DON'T KNOW, WE DON'T KNOW THE
DETAILS OF THAT AND I DO AGREE
THAT THE OPTICS WOULD LOOK BAD
AND HE MADE THE RIGHT CHOICE AND
SAYING WE WILL NOT GO THERE NOW
BECAUSE PEOPLE JUST DIDN'T
REALLY APPRECIATE THAT.
I GET IT, THAT'S FINE.
I THINK HE MADE THE RIGHT
CHOICE.
>> CERTAINLY REMEMBER THE
BEAUTIFUL SEASIDE PICTURES IN
FRANCE, THAT'S OF COURSE