TREATED THE PAPERS AS THEIR
PERSONAL PROPERTY, NEITHER
CONGRESS NOR THE COURT EVER
DISPUTED THAT.
JOINING US NOW IS DAVID SHOWN IN
THE CHAIRWOMAN OF THE NATIONAL
REPUBLICAN LAWYERS ASSOCIATION.
WE THANK YOU BOTH FOR JOINING
US.
THE LATEST LEAKS FROM THE BIDEN
DOJ.
ALL OF THIS IS FEELING FAMILIAR
TO ME.
>> YES, OF COURSE.
A COMPLETE WEAPONIZATION OF THE
PROCESS, IT’S A VERY SCARY
THING.
IN WHICH THE COURTS FOR DECADES
HAVE SAID YOU HAVE TO HAVE A
NEUTRAL AND DETACHED MAGISTRATE.
IF WE CANNOT TRUST THIS PROCESS,
WE ARE IN A LOT OF TROUBLE.
THAT INCLUDES ALL OF US THAT ARE
IN DANGER IF WE CANNOT TRUST THE
INTEGRITY OF THE PROCESS.
WHEN IT IS POLITICIZED, WE ARE
IN A HEAP OF TROUBLE.
>> THE LEGAL BASIS UNDERLYING
THIS SEARCH WARRANT.
WHAT ARE YOUR THOUGHTS ON THAT.
>> WELL, IT WAS A VERY
INTERESTING PIECE.
THEY EVENTUALLY SAID THAT NO
MATTER WHAT IT SAID AT THE
PRESIDENTIAL RECORD SAID IT WAS
A VERY BROAD PROTECTION THAT
GOES TO THE PAPERS ON HOW THERE
ARE FIVE TO 12 YEARS WITH A
PRESIDENT WORKING IN CONJUNCTION
WITH THE ARCHIVES, SO WHAT IS
IMPORTANT IS THAT THE STATUTE
DOES NOT SPECIFY THE HANDOVER OF
THE DOCUMENTS TO THE ARCHIVES
AND SO HERE ARE THE ARCHIVES AND
ARE USING THE DOJ AS THEIR GOONS
AND THEY ARE NOT ENTITLED TO
THESE PAPERS AND THEY ARE
KEEPING THESE DOCUMENTS FROM THE
PUBLIC AND THEY ARE TAKING THEIR
SWEET TIME.
I THINK WE ALL KNOW WHY AND ALSO ABOUT THIS PROCESS THAT IS
ABOUT THIS PROCESS THAT IS
FAIRLY POLITICAL IN NATURE.
>> WE ARE SUPPOSED TO BELIEVE
THAT THE FBI AND THE DOJ ARE
ACTING IN GOOD FAITH WITHOUT
RETRIBUTION FOR ANYONE IN THE
UNITED STATES.
AND WHY DOESN’T MERRICK GARLAND
GET UP, THESE LEAKS HAVE GOT TO
STOP, WE HAVE TO FIND OUT WHO
DID THIS AND THEY ARE SUBJECT TO
PUNISHMENT WERE LEGAL
RAMIFICATIONS THAT ARE POSSIBLE
HERE.
>> YOU ARE 100% RIGHT AND I HAVE
TO SAY THAT AT LEAST HALF THE
COUNTRY WOULD NOT BELIEVE IT IF
THEY SAID IT SAYING THAT THIS
REFLECTS EQUAL APPLICATION OF
THE LAW NOBODY REALLY BELIEVES
THE EQUAL APPLICATION OF THE
LAW.
IT MAKES THIS FILTER TEAM
PROCESS PROBLEMATIC.
THE REPORTS ARE FIXED AS THIS
PROCESS IS A SEGREGATED TEAM
REVIEWING DOCUMENTS AND AT THE
END OF THE DAY THE SAME DOJ
COLLEAGUES AND IT’S THE IMPROPER ALLOCATIONS WITH THE EXECUTIVE
ALLOCATIONS WITH THE EXECUTIVE
BRANCH AND THAT WAS THE OBVIOUS
MOVE IN THIS CASE.
WE SAW IT WITH THIS AND OTHER
CASES.
IN THE OLD DAYS THEY MAY HAVE ASKED FOR THIS, BUT YOU CANNOT
ASKED FOR THIS, BUT YOU CANNOT
HAVE THAT.
>> IT COULD HAVE BEEN BETTER, THIS COULD BE WHY IT DIDN’T.
THIS COULD BE WHY IT DIDN’T. BUT HAVING THAT
BUT HAVING THAT.