WIKILEAKS HAS RELEASED SOME MORE
EMAILS, IT REVEALS THAT HILLARY CLINTON WAS PRIVATELY FOR THE
TPP WHEN SHE WAS PUBLICLY AGAINST IT.
IT ALSO SHOWS HER
DISDAIN FOR ENVIRONMENTALISTS.
LET'S GO TO OUR FIRST ONE HERE,
THIS WOULD BE THE WIKILEAKS NUMBER 8, THIS IS FROM ROBBIE
MOOK, IF YOU SEE THERE, HE IS TALKING ABOUT THE TPP AND IT
SAYS THIS WEEK THEY ARE RELEASING A LETTER FROM FORMER
DNC CHAIRS ENDORSING THE DEAL, MEANING TPP, PATRICK AND DASCHLE
WILL ROLL OUT A PROGRESSIVE COALITION SUPPORTING IT.
THEY
ARE TOLD SHE WILL BE ASKED ABOUT IT, I DON'T THINK WE WOULD TRY
TO SCREW HER.
AND THEY SAY DO WE THINK THIS WILL MOVE OR SHOULD
WE HANG BACK?
DO WE WANT HER TO ANNOUNCE HER SUPPORT VIA LETTER?
SO RIGHT THERE, WHAT THAT SHOWS IS THAT IF THEY THINK TPP WILL
BE MOVED ON, MEANING THE PASSED,
VOTED ON, WHEN DO WE ANNOUNCE
HER SUPPORT FOR IT?
LET'S GO TO THE VIDEO IF WE CAN BECAUSE AT
THE SAME TIME THESE EMAILS ARE BEING PASSED ALONG, HILLARY
CLINTON WAS SAYING THIS.
>>LOOKING BACK ON IT, IT DOESN'T HAVE THE RESULTS WE THOUGHT IT
WOULD HAVE IN TERMS OF ACCESS TO THE MARKETS, MORE EXPORTS, ETC.
>>ARE YOU SAYING THAT AS OF TODAY THIS IS NOT SOMETHING YOU
COULD SUPPORT?
>>AS OF TODAY I'M NOT IN FAVOR OF WHAT I HAVE LEARNED ABOUT IT.
>>THERE IS ONE MORE THAT GOES WITH THAT, LET'S WATCH THE NEXT
VIDEO TOO.
THIS IS FROM 2016.
>>AS SECRETARY OF STATE YOU SUPPORTED TPP, WHICH OF COURSE
IS A TRADE AGREEMENT WITH A LOT OF ASIAN COUNTRIES, YOU NOW
OPPOSE IT.
IF ELECTED, SHOULD DEMOCRATS EXPECT THAT ONCE YOU
ARE IN OFFICE YOU WILL THEN BECOME SUPPORTIVE OF THE TRADE
AGREEMENT AGAIN?
>>I DID HOPE THAT THE TPP NEGOTIATED BY THIS
ADMINISTRATION WOULD PUT TO REST A LOT OF CONCERNS THAT PEOPLE
HAVE ABOUT TRADE AGREEMENTS, AND I SAID I WAS HOLDING OUT THE
HOPE THAT IT WOULD BE THE KIND OF TRADE AGREEMENT I WAS LOOKING
FOR.
I WAITED UNTIL IT HAD BEEN NEGOTIATED BECAUSE I DID
WANT TO GIVE THE BENEFIT OF THE DOUBT TO THE ADMINISTRATION.
BUT I DO NOT CURRENTLY SUPPORT IT AS WRITTEN.
>>THE EMAIL SHOWS THAT THE OPPOSITE WAS BEING SAID INSIDER
CAMPAIGN, AND ALSO WHEN SHE WAS GIVING A SPEECH LAST YEAR ABOUT
FOSSIL FUELS, SHE WAS RENOUNCING THEM, SHE WAS GIVING A SPEECH,
AND CLINTON'S MEETING WITH THE BUILDING TRADE UNION WAS MADE
PUBLIC WHERE SHE SAID SHE DEFENDED NATURAL GAS AND
FRACKING UNDER THE RIGHT CIRCUMSTANCES, THE MEETING
OCCURRED AT A TIME WHERE SHE WAS FIGHTING OFF A CHALLENGE FROM
VERMONT SENATOR BERNIE SANDERS.
THIS IS FROM THE INTERNATIONAL
BUSINESS TIMES --
>>LET'S GO TO THE NEXT GRAPHIC, SHE SAYS --
>>MOST ORGANIZED AND WILDEST OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL MOVEMENT, SHE
IS TALKING ABOUT --
>>IT WAS REVEALED SHE WAS SAYING THAT.
ALONZO, I DON'T
WANT TO MAKE YOUR POINT FOR YOU, I WILL MAKE MY POINT -- A
GOES
TO SHOW YOU WHAT EVERYONE WAS AFRAID OF.
IN THE PREVIOUS
EMAILS RELEASED WHEN SHE SAID YOU HAVE TO HAVE A PRIVATE
STANCE AND A PUBLIC STANCE, NOW WE SEE WHAT HER PRIVATE STANCE
WAS.
WE SEE THAT SHE WANTS TO DEFEND -- SHE HAS MADE NO BONES
THAT SHE WILL DEFEND FRACKING AROUND THE WORLD, WE KNOW THAT
IS A BIG CLIMATE CHANGE PUSHER, AND WE KNOW SHE WILL FIND A WAY
TO SUPPORT THE TPP, RIGHT?
THAT'S WHAT I THINK THIS
REVEALS, IT DOESN'T REVEAL ANYTHING CRIMINALLY BUT
CERTAINLY REVEALS OUR WORST SUSPICIONS.
WHAT DO YOU THINK, ALONZO?
>>ON THE TPP, I LOOKED AT THE DATE ON THIS EMAIL.
THE DATE ON
THIS EMAIL IS MARCH 2015.
THIS IS THE ONE WHERE THEY SAID YOU
HAVE TO SAY, IN CASE YOU HAVE TO SUPPORT IT, SAY THIS.
THE VIDEO
YOU SHOWED WAS MARCH 2016, AND SHE IS SAYING SHE IS AGAINST IT,
WHICH MEANS SHE MAY HAVE CHANGED HER OPINION -- IN OTHER WORDS
THIS IS ONE YEAR LATER.
>>THE FIRST VIDEO WAS FROM OCTOBER 2015.
>>BUT THAT IS STILL FIVE MONTHS, FOUR OR FIVE MONTHS --
SHE MAY HAVE CHANGED HER OPINION, I'M NOT GOING TO SAY
SHE DOESN'T CHANGE HER OPINION BASED ON POLLS OR WHICH WAY THE
WIND BLOWS, SHE DOES.
BUT I DON'T KNOW THAT -- I DON'T KNOW
IF I'M GOING TO LOSE MY MIND OVER THIS.
IS THIS HORRIBLE?
IS
THIS, SHE'S A TERRIBLE PERSON?
NOT IN MY OPINION, PEOPLE ARE
ENTITLED TO THEIR OPINION.
ON CLIMATE CHANGE YOU HAVE TO LOOK
AT WHAT SHE IS SAYING.
WILL YOU PROMISE NEVER TO TAKE ANY FOSSIL
FUELS?
NO ONE WILL PROMISE NOT TO TAKE ANY FOSSIL FUELS OUT OF
THE EARTH EVER AGAIN.
AT THIS POINT IN THE LIFE OF THE EARTH,
IN OUR ENERGY, THE FACT THAT WE HAVE I DON'T KNOW HOW MANY
HUNDRED MILLION CARS ON EARTH THAT RUN ON FOSSIL FUEL, AND YOU
ARE GOING TO PROMISE TO NEVER TAKE FOSSIL FUEL OUT OF THE
EARTH?
IT'S IMPOSSIBLE.
SO YOU MAKE A CRAZY STATEMENT LIKE GET
A LIFE.
SHE IS NOT SAYING IT TO EVERYONE, SHE LITERALLY
SAYS THAT THE MOST ORGANIZED AND WILDEST, THE ONES OUTSIDE
YELLING TO HER, THIS IS WHAT SHE WOULD SAY TO THEM IF SHE
WAS ALLOWED TO SAY WHATEVER SHE COULD.
>>I HEAR YOU.
YOU ARE SAYING SHE'S ONLY SAYING TO LIFE TO THE MOST EXTREME
ENVIRONMENTALISTS.
>>TO PEOPLE WHO SAY WILL YOU PROMISE NEVER TO TAKE ANY
FOSSIL FUELS OUT OF THE EARTH?
IF THAT IS THE QUESTION, SHE IS RESPONDING TO LIFE.
>>LET ME SPEAK ON BEHALF OF THE WILDEST AND MOST EXTREME
ENVIRONMENTALISTS.
FIRST OF ALL, GET A LIFE IS THE LEAST OF MY
PROBLEMS.
THAT'S ONE OF THOSE PHRASES WHERE YOU COULD SAY TO
ME, WEAR A PURPLE SHIRT WITH A JACKET -- GET A LIFE.
THAT COULD
MEAN ALMOST ANYTHING AS FAR AS I'M CONCERNED.
I WAS WORKING FOR
BERNIE AT THE TIME SO I WAS PAYING CLOSE ATTENTION, SHE WENT
UP IN FRONT OF BERNIE AND A DEBATE AUDIENCE AND SAID I --
THEY ASKED DO YOU OR DO YOU NOT OPPOSE FRACKING -- SHE DIDN'T
ANSWER TRUTHFULLY.
SHE SAID I WANT TO PUT SO MANY RESTRICTIONS
ON FRACKING THAT PRACTICALLY SPEAKING, IT WAS AN ENTIRE LONG
PARAGRAPH, IT WILL NEVER HAPPEN.
YOU MIGHT REMEMBER THEY TURNED
TO BERNIE AND SAID TO YOU SUPPORTED OR NOT, HE SAID NO.
THAT WAS A GOOD MOMENT FOR BERNIE.
BUT THE FACT IS HERE SHE
IS IN PRIVATE SAYING I WANT TO DEFEND FRACKING AT THE SAME TIME
SHE GOES OUT IN PUBLIC AND SAYS I WILL PUT SO MANY RULES ON IT
IT WILL NEVER HAPPEN.
NONE OF THIS IS A REVELATION, WE KNOW
WHO HILLARY IS, IF YOU ARE PAYING ATTENTION YOU KNOW.
ALONZO, I DON'T THINK THAT THE TPP CHANGED A LOT IN ITS LAST
YEAR.
IT DID IN CERTAIN DETAILS, RICE QUOTAS AND ALL THAT STUFF,
BUT TO GO OUT AND BE TALKING ABOUT WHAT I'M GOING TO SUPPORT
-- I WILL TELL YOU WHAT CHANGED IN BETWEEN MARCH 2015 AND 2016,
BECAUSE I WENT TO WORK FOR BERNIE IN MARCH 2015, AND MARCH
2015 HE WAS AT 3% IN THE POLLS AND HE WAS A JOKE TO THE
DEMOCRATIC PARTY ESTABLISHMENT, BY MARCH 2016 SHE WAS RUNNING
FOR HER POLITICAL LIFE, THAT IS WHAT CHANGED.
IS THAT A
NEWSFLASH ABOUT HILLARY CLINTON THAT SHE WILL SAY WHAT SHE HAS
TO SAY IN ORDER TO GET BY?
TO ME IT ISN'T, WHERE I AM OUT OF THIS
IS THAT IT'S NICE TO HAVE THE CONFIRMATION, AND I QUARREL WITH
ALL OF MY DEMOCRATIC FRIENDS WHO SAY WE'VE GOT TO TALK ABOUT HER
AS IF SHE IS A WONDERFUL PERSON -- SHE DOESN'T REPRESENT WHAT I
DO.
SHE IS NOT A WONDERFUL PERSON IN MY EYES, I DO WANT TO
STOP TRUMP, THAT IS WHERE I COME FROM.
BUT DON'T MAKE ME PRETEND
SHE IS A WONDERFUL PERSON BECAUSE YOU KNOW SHE IS PROBABLY
GOING TO GET ELECTED, AND NOVEMBER 9, THOSE OF US WHO CARE
WILL HAVE TO BE OUT IN THE STREETS PREVENTING HER FROM
DOING A LOT OF THINGS SHE WANTS TO DO.
>>REGARDING THIS STATEMENT, I WANT TO DEFEND FRACKING UNDER
THE RIGHT CIRCUMSTANCES, AGAIN, WHAT AUDIENCE IS SHE TALKING TO?
MEETING WITH THE BUILDING TRADES UNION.
IF YOU ARE MEETING WITH
THE BUILDING TRADES UNION, YOU SAY I WANT TO DEFEND FRACKING.
IS IT A POLITICAL MOVE?
ABSOLUTELY.
WITH 95% OF
POLITICIANS DO IT?
ABSOLUTELY.
SHE IS NOT COMMITTING, SHE IS
SAYING I WANT TO.
POLITICIANS ALWAYS MAKE THIS QUALIFIED
STATEMENT.
IT IS LIKE USED CAR SALESMEM.
IS IT GUARANTEED?
WELL, IT'S GREAT.
IT IS ALWAYS A QUALIFIED STATEMENT THAT WHEN
YOU COME BACK -- WELL, YOU DIDN'T LIE, BUT YOU MADE A
POLITICAL STATEMENT, AND THAT IS WHAT I BELIEVE SHE IS DOING
HERE.
YOU ARE TALKING TO A BUILDING TRADE UNION AND YOU SAY
I WANT TO DEFEND FRACKING?
AGAIN, I THINK THAT IS A POLITICAL MOVE AND I'M OKAY
WITH IT.
>>BUT ELIZABETH WARREN WOULDN'T HAVE SAID IT, BERNIE
SANDERS WOULDN'T HAVE SAID IT.
>>WE DON'T KNOW WHAT ELIZABETH WARREN WOULD HAVE SAID.
>>I COULD DEBUT 30 POLITICIANS WHO WOULDN'T HAVE SAID IT.
>>AND NONE OF THEM ARE THE CANDIDATE FOR PRESIDENT.
>>RIGHT, BUT LET'S NOT PRETEND SHE IS WHAT SHE ISN'T.
>>I WILL SAY THAT ABOUT THESE "REVELATIONS" -- PEOPLE DEFEND
IT BY SAYING THERE IS NOTHING NEW, AND THERE REALLY ISN'T, BUT
AT THE SAME TIME IT CONFIRMS THAT SHE IS GOING TO PASS TPP,
BUT WE ALL KNEW THAT.
RIGHT NOW BARACK OBAMA IS TRYING TO PASS
IT, AND SHE'S NOT SAYING ANYTHING AGAINST IT, NOBODY IS.
SO NO, THERE ISN'T A SMOKING GUN WHERE SHE HAS TO RESIGN FROM THE
CAMPAIGN OR ANYTHING, OR SHE DID ANYTHING ILLEGAL, IT JUST GOES
TO THE SURLINESS OF HOW BOTH POLITICAL PARTIES HAVE TURNED
THEIR BACK ON BEING PROGRESSIVES, ON THE ENVIRONMENT
-- FRACKING IS HORRIBLE FOR THE ENVIRONMENT, IT IS WORSE THAN
COAL BURNING, BECAUSE THE METHANE TRAPS SOMETHING LIKE 80
TIMES MORE CARBON, 80 TIMES MORE WARMTH THAN CARBON DIOXIDE.
>>THEY ARE HAVING ALL THOSE EARTHQUAKES IN ORACLE HOUMA
CAUSED BY FRACKING.
>>AND IN TEXAS AND OTHER PLACES.
I'M NOT DEFENDING FRACKING, TO
ME FRACKING IS FUNNY, BECAUSE IT'S LIKE, OKAY, HOW ABOUT IF WE
CRACK THE SURFACE OF THE EARTH AND GET ENERGY.
WHAT COULD GO
WRONG?
IT'S CRAZY, I JOKE ABOUT IT LIKE MILLENNIALS, WE HAD A
GOOD RUN -- SORRY, WE HAD TO CRACK THE EARTH TO DRIVE SUVs.
IT'S LIKE VAPING, IT'S THE SAME THING, YOU CAN SMOKE THESE
STEAMED CHEMICALS, WE DON'T KNOW IF IT IS HEALTHY -- SO DON'T GET
ME WRONG, DON'T THINK I'M DEFENDING IT ALL THE WAY, BUT
THIS IS THE REALITY OF THE WORLD WE LIVE IN, AND I THINK
POLITICIANS OPERATE IN REALITY.
AND I LOVE BARACK OBAMA, DOES HE
LIKE TO ME NOW AND THEN?
YEAH HE DOES, I KNOW HE DOES.
IT'S LIKE
MY UNCLE PROMISING ME A BICYCLE FOR CHRISTMAS WHEN I KNOW HE'S
UNEMPLOYED.
>>I HAD AN UNCLE LIKE THAT.
>>I KNOW THAT BIKE AIN'T COMING BUT I LOVE THAT UNCLE.
>>ARE WE COUSINS?
BECAUSE I HAD AN UNCLE LIKE THAT TOO.
BUT I
RELATE TO WHAT YOU ARE SAYING, WHAT YOU ARE SAYING ISRAEL,
UNLIKE WHAT SOME PEOPLE SAY TO ME, SHE IS GREAT -- BE REALER
THAN THAT.
BUT WHERE I DIFFER IS THAT I DO THINK THAT ONE OF THE
THINGS WE GOT OUT OF THE BERNIE CAMPAIGN AND A COUPLE OTHER
THINGS GOING ON IS THAT WE DON'T HAVE TO SETTLE FOR THAT ANYMORE.
IT MIGHT TAKE A FEW MORE CYCLES, A LOT OF WORK, ELECTION REFORM,
ALL THE THINGS THAT CENK AND WOLF-PAC.COM ARE TRYING TO DO,
BUT I THINK THE DAY IS GOING TO COME -- I THINK WE HAVE TO STAND
HERE AND NOT BE CONTENT THAT POLITICS ARE PRACTICED THIS
WAY ANYMORE.
>>IN A PERFECT WORLD.
>>NOT EVEN, IN THIS WORLD.
>>YOU TALK ABOUT CAMPAIGN REFORM, OR EVEN THIS -- POLITICS
IS ALWAYS FOLLOW THE MONEY.
WHEN YOU LOOK AT SOMETHING LIKE
FRACKING VERSUS ENVIRONMENTALISM -- FRACKING HAS OIL COMPANIES
BEHIND IT, OIL COMPANIES ARE PAYING THESE POLITICIANS AND
SOMEONE AND SO FORTH, IT IS POSSIBLE TO CHANGE BUT IT'S A
HARD FIGHT BECAUSE YOU ARE ASKING A POLITICIAN, HEY, GO
AGAINST THE MONEY, AND THEY JUST DON'T DO THAT.
IT IS ALMOST
INSTINCTIVE TO THEM.
A LOT OF THEM GO IN EARLY IN THEIR
CAREER, AND OVER TIME THE SYSTEM BEATS THEM DOWN.
THE UNFORTUNATE
THING ABOUT OUR POLITICS IS A POLITICIAN'S ONLY JOB IS TO
GET REELECTED, NOT TO DO ANYTHING.
>>I WOULD SAY IT IS WORSE THAN WE ARE KIND OF FRAMING IT RIGHT
NOW.
WE KNOW FROM THE PRINCETON STUDIES AND OTHER STUDIES THAT
WE DON'T LIVE IN A DEMOCRACY ANYMORE, WE LIVE IN AN
OLIGARCHY, MEANING THAT YOU AND I DON'T HAVE ANY INFLUENCE AS
FAR AS WHAT HAPPENS IN TERMS OF LAWMAKING, ONLY THE TOP 10% OF
WAGE EARNERS, IT IS THEIR VIEWS THAT CORRELATE WITH LEGISLATION,
THE BOTTOM 90% HAS ALMOST NO CORRELATION.
EVEN PEOPLE LIKE
KRUGMAN, WHO IS IN THE TANK FOR HILLARY, WILL FREELY ADMIT THAT
WE LIVE IN AN OLIGARCHY, THERE IS NO QUESTION ABOUT IT.
SO IT
IS LIKE THIS IS A SHAM ANYWAY, THIS IS PROVING TO ME THAT WE
HAVE A SHAM GOVERNMENT.
WHEN SHE SAYS SHE HAS A PRIVATE POSITION
AND SHE TELLS THAT TO HER DONORS -- NOT THE VOTERS -- YOU KNOW
THIS IS THE REAL ONE BECAUSE I'M TELLING YOU I HAVE TWO
POSITIONS, I WOULD NEVER SAY THAT IN A SPEECH.
SO THAT IS THE
THING, I THINK OUR GOVERNMENT HAS ALREADY BEEN TAKEN FROM US.
THAT IS NOT HYPERBOLE, RIGHT?
IT HAS HAPPENED, THIS IS A SHAM
ELECTION, THOSE ARE SHAM DEBATES RUN BY THE PARTIES, AND IT'S
VERY CLOSE TO FASCISM BECAUSE CORPORATION GOVERNMENT --
GOVERNMENT SERVES CORPORATIONS, NOT THE OTHER WAY AROUND EVEN
ANYMORE.
SO I THINK THAT ALL THIS SHOWS THE ROT AT THE
MIDDLE, THE CENTER OF OUR POLITICAL LIFE IN AMERICA, OF
OUR POLITICS.
IT HAS COMPLETELY TAKEN OVER, AND IT HAS HAPPENED
GLOBALLY BECAUSE CAPITALISM IS FAILING GLOBALLY.
BREXIT IS AN
EXAMPLE OF WHAT PEOPLE DO WHEN THEY HAVE A CHANCE TO REBEL
AGAINST IT.
GREECE HAS BEEN SCREWED OVER BY THE CAPITALISTS,
NEXT IS ITALY, 20% OF ALL THEIR LOANS ARE GARBAGE.
>>SPAIN -- I AGREE WITH EVERYTHING YOU SAID EXCEPT THIS.
TO ME THE BIG ENEMY IS NOT HILLARY CLINTON, IT ISN'T EVEN
MONEY IN POLITICS, THE BIG ENEMY IS DESPAIR, THE BIG ENEMY IS
ACCEPTING THE SITUATION THE WAY IT IS.
I DON'T WORK FOR BERNIE
ANYMORE, I CAN SAY, HE WAS NOT THE PERFECT CANDIDATE.
BUT HE
ALMOST GOT THAT NOMINATION.
CAN YOU IMAGINE WHAT A DIFFERENT
KIND OF CANDIDATE -- WE CAN TURN THIS THING AROUND, AND WHAT
THESE GUYS ARE DOING, CENK AND THE OTHER GUYS, I AGREE WITH
EVERYTHING YOU ARE SAYING EXCEPT THE PART -- EXCEPT ANY KIND OF
VIBE THAT SAYS THIS IS THE WAY IT IS.
IT'S THE WAY IT IS TODAY BUT WE CAN CHANGE IT.
>>I AGREE.
>>I THINK THE BIG PROBLEM IS INFORMATION.
PEOPLE DON'T HAVE
INFORMATION.
YOUNG TURKS IS A PERFECT EXAMPLE OF SOMETHING
OUTSIDE THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA, BUT HOW MANY PEOPLE WATCH
COMPARED TO WATCH THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA?
YOU TALK ABOUT THE
DEBATES AND SO ON, WE DON'T HAVE A MODERATOR IN THE DEBATE THAT
SAYS HEY, THAT'S NOT THE QUESTION, THE QUESTION IS BLANK.
WHEN YOU TALK ABOUT BREXIT, WHAT WAS THE MOST GOOGLED TERM THE
DAY AFTER THEY VOTED?
BREXIT.
BECAUSE A LOT OF PEOPLE DIDN'T
KNOW WHAT THEY WERE VOTING FOR, A LOT OF PEOPLE VOTED AGAINST
THEIR OWN ECONOMIC INTERESTS BECAUSE THEIR LOCAL PLANT OR
WHATEVER WILL SHUT DOWN BECAUSE PEOPLE DON'T HAVE INFORMATION.
IT IS UNFORTUNATE BUT IT GETS BACK TO WHAT YOU ARE SAYING --
IF YOU HAVE A MORE EDUCATED POPULACE, IF PEOPLE UNDERSTAND
WHAT THE ISSUES ARE AND HOLD POLITICIANS ACCOUNTABLE VERSUS
THE STUMP SPEECHES OR CALLING EACH OTHER NAMES, THEN WE WOULD
HAVE A BETTER SYSTEM.
THE SYSTEM WOULD WORK BECAUSE THEY WOULD BE
HELD ACCOUNTABLE.
AND I THINK THE BIG PROBLEM THERE IS THE
FOURTH ESTATE, THE MEDIA HAS BECOME JUST ANOTHER CORPORATION,
JUST ANOTHER FOR-PROFIT ENTERPRISE, WHEREAS YEARS AGO
THEY USED TO GET IN PEOPLE'S FACES, THEY HELD PEOPLE
ACCOUNTABLE.
NO ONE IS HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR WHAT THEY SAY ANYMORE.