NO QUESTION ABOUT
IT.
THEY ATTACKED STORMY DANIELS
CREDIBILITY, SCORED SOME MAJOR
POINTS THERE.
IF THIS HAD BEEN A CASE WHETHER
A SEX ASSAULT TOOK PLACE, THAT
CROSS-EXAMINATION WOULD MAKE
SENSE, BUT IT'S NOT.
IT IS A CASE ABOUT BUSINESS
RECORDS, ABOUT WHICH STORMY
DANIELS HAS ESSENTIALLY NO
DAMAGE.
>> NO KNOWLEDGE AT ALL.
>> THE FINAL TWO QUESTIONS FROM
THE DEFENSE ATTORNEY SEEMED THE
MOST RELEVANT.
I WONDERED WHY THE PROSECUTOR
PUT HER ON.
WHY THE DEFENSE MADE A MEAL
ABOUT ALL THE ALLEGATIONS AND
THE GOING BACK AND FORTH ABOUT
ALL THIS ALLEGED SEX, WHEN
THAT'S NOT WHAT THE CASE WAS
ABOUT WHATSOEVER.
IT WAS INTERESTING TO BE THERE.
I KEPT TRYING TO THINK ABOUT
WHAT ARE THE CHARGES HERE IN
THIS CASE AND HOW IS THIS
TESTIMONY RELEVANT TO MAKING THE
DECISION FOR THE JURY?
>> AND WHETHER THEY HAVE DONE
ENOUGH TO PROVE-UP THEIR CASE
BECAUSE NOW AS IT'S WINDING
DOWN, THEY KNOW THEY HAVE TO
HEAR FROM MICHAEL COHEN.
BUT THEY MIGHT NOT WANT TO END
WITH MICHAEL COHEN IF THEY'RE
AFRAID OF WHERE HE WILL GO ON
THE WITNESS STAND.
WE ALREADY HEARD FROM THIS
FORMER AID SETTING UP THIS
INFAMOUS MEETING AT THE WHITE
HOUSE WHERE THE PRESIDENT,
FORMER PRESIDENT, TALKED TO
COHEN ABOUT HOW THEY WOULD
ARRANGE THE PAYMENTS.
NOW WE HAVE TO HEAR FROM COHEN,
AND WE HAVE TO SEE HOW HE DOES
AT CROSS.