LATER.
THAT'S PRETTY MUCH ACROSS THE
SPECTRUM HERE.
MAYBE SOME TECHNOLOGY STOCKS,
THAT'S ABOUT IT.
IN THE MEANTIME GROWING CONCERNS
ABOUT QUESTIONS THAT WERE LEAKED
THAT WE NOW CAN SEE AND WHY THEY
WERE LEAKED WHEN IT CAME TO THE
PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES,
SOMEHOW THE WORLD GOT EXPOSURE
TO 40-PLUS QUESTIONS DETAILING
WHAT BOB MUELLER WANTS TO KNOW
FROM PRESIDENT TRUMP IF HE HAD
AN OPPORTUNITY TO SIT DOWN WITH
HIM.
THAT IMMEDIATELY RAISED SOME
QUESTIONS AS TO ARE THESE THE
QUESTIONS THAT HE GENUINELY WANT
TO ASK AND WHO THE HECK LEAKED
THEM, WHO KNOWS THIS BETTER THAN
OUR JUDGE ANDREW NAPOLITANO, ONE
OUR JUDGE ANDREW NAPOLITANO, ONO
OUR JUDGE ANDREW NAPOLITANO, ONE
OF THE SMARTEST LEGAL BOOKS.
>> I WISH I KNEW WHO LEAKED
THEM.
NEIL: I WOULD MAKE A POINT THAT
IT WAS SOMEONE IN THE
ADMINISTRATION?
>> I COULD MAKE A POINT THAT IT
WAS SOMEBODY IN THE PRESIDENT'S
LEGAL TEAM WHO WANTED THE
PRESIDENT TO SEE RABIIT HOLES
WOULD BE PRESENTED.
EACH ONE OF THE QUESTIONS BOB
MUELLER KNOWS THE ANSWERS TO AND
IT'S STARTING POINT TO SERIES OF
MANY QUESTIONS OF THE TOPIC OF
THE STARTING POINT.
IT MAY BLUSH LOOK LIKE THE
PRESIDENT HAS THE COMMAND OF
FACTS TO ANSWER A LOT OF THESE
BUT WHEN YOU ANALYZE A LOT OF
THEM THEY ARE TREACHEROUS.
ONE IN PARTICULAR IN THE LIKES I
HAVE NOT SEEN BEFORE IN
LITERATURE, IF YOU FORGIVE ME, I
WANT TO READ IT PRECISELY, WHAT
KNOWLEDGE DO YOU HAVE IF ANY OF
OUTREACH BY YOUR CAMPAIGN
INCLUDING PAUL MANAFORT TO
RUSSIA ABOUT POTENTIAL
ASSISTANCE TO THE CAMPAIGN, THAT
IS WHITE HOT, THAT GOES RIGHT TO
THE ARGUMENT OF WHAT WE ARE
CALLING COLLUSION UNDER THE LAW
IT'S CALLED CONSPIRACY AND
AGREEMENT TO ACCEPT ASSISTANCE
FROM A FOREIGN PERSON, ENTITY OR
GOVERNMENT, WHAT KNOWLEDGE DO
YOU HAVE, IF HE SAYS NO, MUELLER
MUST HAVE EVIDENCE THAT HE HAS
SOME KNOWLEDGE WITH WHICH TO
CHALLENGE THAT F HE SAYS, YES,
THAT'S TEND OF THIS PRESIDENCY
IF HE KNEW ABOUT THIS AND WENT
ALONG WITH IT.
NEIL: DO YOU GET A SENSE THAT --
I UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU'RE SAYING
WITH THE LEGAL TEAM THAT MAYBE
BY THIS COMING TO THE
PRESIDENT'S ATTENTION SEEING
POTENTIAL QUESTIONS, HE MIGHT
THINK TWICE ABOUT TALKING TO
MUELLER.
>> I HOPE HE DOES.
IT'S A VERY DANGEROUS
ENVIRONMENT FOR HIM BECAUSE ANY
WHITE LIE, EVEN ONE THAT'S NOT
INTENTIONAL CAN RESULT IN
INDICTMENT.
THIS IS A STRANGE ENVIRONMENT
THAT THE COURTS HAVE PERMITTED
WHERE THE GOVERNMENT CAN LIE TO
YOU, THE GOVERNMENT CAN USE
TRICKERY AND DECEPTION AND TRAPS
BUT IF YOU LIE TO THE
GOVERNMENT, THIS IS A MARTHA
STEWART CASE, YOU CAN BE
INDICTED.
NEIL: THAT APPLIES TO THE
PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES
AS WELL?
>> YES, IT DOES.
NEIL: THIS IS YOU AND CONGRESS
AND WHETHER IT'S IMPEACHABLE
MANNER?
>> THERE'S QUESTION TO WHAT
MUELLER CAN DO.
MUELLER CAN GET AN INDICTMENT.
MOST JUSTICE DEPARTMENT
REGULATIONS SAY NO.
YOU FILE THE INDICTMENT TO STOP
THE RUNNING OF THE STATUTE OF
LIMITATIONS BUT YOU CAN'T
PROSECUTE UNTIL AFTER HE LEAST
OFFICE OR NOT INDICT THE
PRESIDENT, SHIFT THIS OVER TO
THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES,
WHICH IF DEMOCRATS TAKE CONTROL
-- ABSOLUTELY, ALL BETS ARE OFF.
NEIL: THIS IS THE PRESIDENT, SO
MANY FINE APPEARANCE ON TWO
NETWORKS, HE'S SUPREMELY
COMPETENT, SO HE MIGHT FEEL LOOK
AT THE 40-SOME ODD QUESTIONS, I
CAN HANDLE THESE.
>> I CAN HEAR RUDY GIULIANI WHOM
WE KNOW VERY WELL,
MR. PRESIDENT, WE HAVE TO
PREPARE YOU, I WILL GIVE YOU ONE
OR TWO MINUTES IN EACH
QUESTIONS.
THERE ARE POTENTIALLY THOUSANDS
OF DOCUMENTS BEHIND EACH OF
THESE 40 QUESTIONS.
NEIL: THAT'S FROM EVERY ONE OF
THE ANCHORS, OH, MY GOD, DO I
HAVE TELL YOU ABOUT THE LAW.
[LAUGHTER]
NEIL: I NOTICED SOME OF THE
QUESTIONS GO BACK TO OBSTRUCTION
OF JUSTICE, OBSTRUCTION OF
JUSTICE, I'M WONDERING, WE ARE
TOLD THAT THE PRESIDENT IS NOT A
TARGET, A, DO YOU BELIEVE THAT
AND, B, ON THE OTHER MATTERS
WHERE HE SEEMS THAT MUELLER TO
BE GETTING INTO OBSTRUCTION OF
JUSTICE, HE IS ONTO FRYING OTHER
FISH?
>> I THINK THAT BOB MUELLER TOLD
THE TRUTH WHEN HE SAID THE
PRESIDENT IS NOT A TARGET, IT'S
A TECHNICAL TERM.
TARGET MEANS WE ARE GOING TO
INDICT YOU, DO YOU WANT TO GIVE
US SOME REASON THAT COULD MAYBE
GIVE US A LITTLE PAUSE, A
SUBJECT IS A PERSON STILL UNDER
CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION, ONE CAN
GO FROM A SUBJECT TO TARGET LIKE
THAT DEPENDING UPON WHAT ANSWERS
COME OUT OF ONE'S MOUTH.
NEIL: WOULD AN INVESTIGATOR,
PROSECUTOR HOLD IT AGAINST YOU
IF YOU NEVER TALK?
>> PROBABLY EMOTIONALLY BUT NOT
LEGALLY.
I STRONGLY ENCOURAGE HIM TO
EXERCISE THAT RIGHT.
NEIL: RICHARD NIXON NEVER TALK
TODAY PROSECUTORS IN THE
WATERGATE?
>> CORRECT.
NEIL: BILL CLINTON DID AN IT
DIDN'T GO WELL.
THE HISTORY IS WHAT?
>> PROSECUTORS ARE THINKING OF
INDICTING IS THAT USUALLY MAKES
IT WORSE FOR THEM BECAUSE THE
PROSECUTORS KNOW THE CASE FAR
BETTER THAN THE SUBJECT OF THE
INVESTIGATION POSSIBLY COULD.
BUT YOU HAVE A VERY STRONG WILL
PERSON WHO IS EXTREMELY
SELF-CONFIDENT WHO DOESN'T LIKE
TO USE ECONOMY OF WORDS, IF HE
GOES ON ONE OF THE RANTS ON "FOX
& FRIENDS" WHERE HE ADMITS TO
THINGS THAT HE HASN'T BEEN ASKED
ABOUT OR ACCUSED OF, THE
PROSECUTORS WILL HAVE A FIELD
DAY.
NEIL: SEPARATELY REPUBLICANS ARE
LOOKING TO FIND IMPEACHMENT
GROUNDS ON ROD ROSENSTEIN, WHERE
IS THAT ALL GOING?
>> TO ME THAT'S NOT GOING
ANYWHERE.
IF THE GOVERNMENT SUBPOENAED --
IF CONGRESS SUBPOENAS AN
OFFICIAL OF EXECUTIVE BRANCH AND
DOESN'T COMPLY WITH THE
SUBPOENA, THE REMEDY IS CONTENT.
IMPEACHMENT OF ROD ROSENSTEIN IS
THE SAME AS PRESIDENT, TREASON,
NO, BRIBERY, NO, OTHER HIGH
CRIMES OR MISDEMEANORS, BUT YOU
WANT TO HOLD HIM IN CONTEMPT OR
INCARCERATE YOU BECAUSE HE
DOESN'T WANT TO GIVE YOU A
DOCUMENT, THAT'S A REMEDY.
NEIL: TRUMP ORGANIZATION IS
VEERING OUT OF CONTROL?
>> YES.
YES.
NEIL: JUDGE, YOU'RE THE BEST.
>> PLEASURE, NEIL.
NEIL: I'M GLAD I WAS ABLE TO
TEACH YOU ABOUT THE LAW.
>> YOU'RE A GOOD TEACHER.
NEIL: YOU HAVE TO BE HERE DURING