WINTER. BRIAN: SO MUCH BETTER THAN
SHOES, SANDALS.
SHOES, SANDALS. AINSLEY: LET’S BRING IN
CONGRESSMAN DAN CRENSHAW.
YOU KNOW HE IS A FORMER NAVY
SEAL.
SEAL. AUTHOR OF A BRAND NEW BOOK
CALLED "FORTITUDE,
CALLED "FORTITUDE, RESILIENCE IN THE ERA OF
OUTRAGE" TELL US ABOUT YOUR
NEW BOOK.
NEW BOOK. >> SO HAPPY TO BE HERE.
MY WIFE IS HERE AS WELL.
STEVE: GOOD JOB.
DO YOU WANT TO BRING HER
OUT.
OUT. >> I DON’T KNOW IF SHE WANTS
TO COME OUT.
STEVE: MAYBE AT THE END OF
THE SEGMENT.
THE SEGMENT. >> SHE WAS A BIG PART OF
HELPING ME RIGHT WRITE.
THIS.
THIS. >> YOU NEED THAT WOMAN’S
TOUCH.
TOUCH. THIS IS FUNDAMENTALLY ABOUT
MENTAL RESILIENCE AND
TOUGHNESS IN THIS ERA OF
MICRODEPRESSIONS AND OUTRAGE
AND SAN SELL CULTURE.
AND NOT TOO LONG AGO I WAS
HERE IN NEW YORK DOING THAT
"SATURDAY NIGHT LIVE" SKIT.
AND AMERICA SORT OF BREATHE
A SIGH OF RELIEF WHEN WE
MADE AMENDS ON THE SHOW AND
MADE SOMETHING POSITIVE OUT
OF IT.
OF IT. BRIAN: WHO MOCKED YOU.
>> RIGHT.
>> RIGHT. EVERYONE WAS REALLY
SURPRISED.
SURPRISED. THAT SHOULD TROUBLE US.
WHY WAS EVERYBODY SO
SURPRISED ABOUT THAT?
I STARTED WRITING THIS BOOK
AND STARTED WORKING THROUGH
THIS TAKING LESSONS FROM
SEAL TEAM AND PSYCHOLOGY
ANCIENT PHILOSOPHY OUR OWN
HISTORY AS AMERICANS?
EACH CHAPTER IS A SIMPLE
LESSON IN MENTAL RESILIENCE.
HOW TO BE TOUGHER.
AND SO IT’S A BIT ABOUT YOUR
OWN PERSONAL JOURNEY BUT
ALSO ABOUT AMERICA’S STORY
AND HOW WE CAN REALLY BE
MORE RESILIENT CULTURE.
STEVE: PEOPLE WERE PROBABLY
SURPRISED IT BECAME A FUNNY
BIT ON "SATURDAY NIGHT
LIVE."
LIVE." AND YOU CAME TOGETHER
BECAUSE AMERICA IS SO DUG.
IN IT SEEMS PEOPLE ON THE
RIGHT ARE DUG IN.
PEOPLE ON THE LEFT ARE DUG.
IN YOU CAME TOGETHER AND DID
A FUNNY SHOW AND HE SAID HE
WAS SORRY.
WAS SORRY. >> RIGHT.
>> RIGHT. I GET INTO THAT IN THE BOOK.
YOU HAVE TO HAVE A SENSE OF
HUMOR.
HUMOR. I TALK ABOUT THE REALLY DARK
HUMOR OF THE SEAL TEAM AND
WHAT THAT CAN LOOK LIKE
SOMETIMES.
SOMETIMES. I TALK ABOUT THINKING
THROUGH YOUR REACTIONS.
THERE IS A LOT OF OLD IDIOMS
COUNT TO 10 BEFORE YOU
REACT.
REACT. STEVE: OR TWEET.
>> LET’S DIG IN TO THAT.
YOU KNOW, LET’S DIG INTO THE
2,000-YEAR-OLD PHILOSOPHY
2,000-YEAR-OLD PHILOSOPHY THAT WE HAVE BEEN LOOKING AT
FOR A LONG TIME.
DIG IN TO SOME OF THE
LESSONS THAT I HAVE GOTTEN
FROM THE SEAL TEAMS AND HOW
WE REMAIN STILL BEFORE WE
REACT.
REACT. HOW REMIGHT LOOK INTO A FEW
LAYERS OF A POLICY BEFORE WE
INSTANTLY ASSUME THAT THE
PERSON PROPOSING A POLICY IS
SOMEHOW BAD INTENTIONED OR
EVIL.
EVIL. BRIAN: HERE WE ARE GOING
THROUGH IMPEACHMENT FOR A
PHONE CALL IT.
GOES ON FOR FOUR AND A HALF
MONTHS.
MONTHS. PUTS EVERYTHING GRINDING TO
A HALT.
A HALT. THEN THE BUDGET COMES OUT.
THAT IS THE MOST OUTRAGEOUS
THING SENATOR SCHUMER EVER
HEARD OR READ IN HIS LIFE.
NANCY PELOSI WENT CRAZY.
AND THEN ALL OF A SUDDEN THE
PRESIDENT TWEETS ABOUT A
SENTENCE RECOMMENDATION
SENTENCE RECOMMENDATION ABOUT HIS BUDDY ROGER STONE,
AGAIN, PEOPLE ARE TRYING TO
IMPEACH EVERYBODY OVER THE
TOP.
TOP. IN FACT, HERE IS AN EXAMPLE
OF SOME OF THE OUTRAGE.
>> THIS IS AN ABUSE OF POWER
THAT THE PRESIDENT IS AGAIN
TRYING TO MANIPULATE FEDERAL
LAW ENFORCEMENT TO SERVE HIS
POLITICAL INTEREST.
POLITICAL INTEREST. AND THE PRESIDENT IS WHAT HE
IS.
IS. HE THINKS HE IS ABOVE THE
LAW.
LAW. THIS MUST BE INVESTIGATED.
>> SOMETHING EGREGIOUS LIKE
THIS.
THIS. DEMANDS THAT THE INSPECTOR
GENERAL INVESTIGATE.
GENERAL INVESTIGATE. >> IF THAT GUY WON’T RESIGN,
THEN THE HOUSE SHOULD START
IMPEACHMENT.
IMPEACHMENT. >> ATTORNEY GENERAL WILLIAM
BARR OUGHT TO BE ASHAMED AND
EMBARRASSED AND RESIGN.
BRIAN: SO YOU THINK HE IS
GOING TO RESIGN BEING
ASHAMED AND EMBARRASSED?
>> WILLIAM BARR?
NO, I DO NOT.
I THINK WILLIAM BARR IS
DOING SUCH AN INCREDIBLE
JOB.
JOB. AND HE IS FRUSTRATED.
BRIAN: UNFLAPPABLE.
BRIAN: UNFLAPPABLE. >> HE IS FRUSTRATED BY.
THIS.
THIS. [APPLAUSE]
[APPLAUSE] THESE NARRATIVES WILL
CONTINUE.
CONTINUE. WE SHOULDN’T BE SURPRISED BY
WHAT WE JUST SAW.
THESE NARRATIVES WILL
CONTINUE OVER AND OVER
AGAIN.
AGAIN. THEY HAVE GOT THEIR WORDS
THAT THEY LIKE.
AND THEY SOUND SOMETHING
LIKE ABUSE OF POWER.
AND THEY WILL SAY THAT OVER
AND OVER AGAIN BECAUSE IT’S
VAGUE.
VAGUE. BECAUSE YOU CAN MAKE
ANYTHING AN ABUSE OF POWER.
THIS IS WHY THEIR
IMPEACHMENT SCAM WAS SO
SHALLOW AND THINLY VAGUE.
THEY WILL CONTINUE TO DO.
THIS THE REST OF US WILL
REMAIN CALM AND READ
"FORTITUDE."
"FORTITUDE." STEVE: VERY NICE.
MEANWHILE THIS LAST WEEK WE
WERE UP IN NEW HAMPSHIRE
TAKING A LOOK AT THE NEW
HAMPSHIRE PRIMARY, BERNIE
SANDERS AND BUTTIGIEG DID
VERY WELL AND THEN AMY
KLOBUCHAR AS WELL.
BERNIE SANDERS THOUGH
APPARENTLY RIGHT NOW THE
FACE OF THE DEMOCRATIC
PARTY, WHICH IS FREAKING OUT
SOME OF THE PEOPLE NOT ONLY
IN JOE BIDEN’S QUARTER BUT
ELSEWHERE.
ELSEWHERE. >> I HAVE NOTICED.
STEVE: YOU AND BERNIE
SANDERS KIND OF GOT INTO A
LITTLE BACK AND FORTH,
DIDN’T YOU?
DIDN’T YOU? >> YEAH.
>> YEAH. DID HE RESPOND BACK TO ME?
I ACTUALLY DIDN’T NOTICE IF
HE DID.
HE DID. AINSLEY: CAN WE TELL THE
AUDIENCE WHAT HE TWEETED
OUT.
OUT. I MAKE NO APOLOGIES FOR
PROPOSING THE BOLDEST AND
MOST AGGRESSIVE CLIMATE WITH
OUR GREEN NEW DEAL.
THIS IS A CLIMATE EMERGENCY.
AND THEN YOU TWEETED BACK
THEN WHY DIDN’T YOU VOTE YES
FOR THE GREEN NEW DEAL WHEN
IT CAME TO THE SENATE FLOOR?
MAYBE BECAUSE IT’S NOT A
PLAN OR A GOOD DEAL OR EVEN
GREEN.
GREEN. IT’S A 3RD GRADE SCIENCE
PROJECT.
PROJECT. [LAUGHTER]
[LAUGHTER] >> WHICH IS GENEROUS.
I WAS BEING A BIT GENEROUS
WITH THAT ACTUALLY.
FIRST GRADE.
FIRST GRADE. AINSLEY: ISN’T BASED ON
SCIENCE OR ENGINEERING.
CARE ABOUT REDUCING
EMISSIONS QUESTION MARK?
AINSLEY: YOU ARE NOT AFRAID
TO GO ON "SATURDAY NIGHT
LIVE" AND MAKE UP BUT YOU
ARE ALSO BOLD.
>> I’M NOT INSULTING THE
GUY.
GUY. I’M NOT CALLING HIM NAMES.
WE ARE NOT DOING WHAT THEY
DO TO PRESIDENT TRUMP.
AND MORE IMPORTANTLY, ON
THIS STUFF FROM, A POLICY
PERSPECTIVE.
PERSPECTIVE. THE GREEN NEW DEAL IS KNOT
AN ACTUAL PROPOSAL.
THERE IS NO ACTUAL PLAN IN
THE GREEN NEW DEAL.
IT JUST SAYS EVERYTHING IS
GOING TO BE WIND AND SOLAR
AND WE’RE GOING TO GET RID
OF AIRPLANES AND COWS.
THAT’S NORTH A PLAN.
THAT’S NOT A SERIOUS
PROPOSAL.
PROPOSAL. THAT’S WHY IT’S MORE OF A
3RD GRADE SCIENCE PROJECT.
IN THE IRONY OF IT, IF YOU
CARE ABOUT REDUCING
EMISSIONS YOU CAN’T DO WHAT
THEY ARE SAYING.
THEY SABAN FRACKING, BAN
FRACKING.
FRACKING. WE JUST REDUCED EMISSIONS IN
THIS COUNTRY THIS PAST YEAR
BY ALMOST 3%.
MORE THAN ANY OTHER COUNTRY
IN ABSOLUTE TERMS.
WE HAVE REDUCED MORE IN THE
LAST COUPLE DECADES THAN THE
LAST 12 COUNTRIES COMBINED.
THAT’S A REALLY BIG DEAL?
WHY IS THAT?
NATURAL GAS FRACKING.
THAT’S WHY BECAUSE NATURAL
GAS IS A CLEANER ENERGY AND
WE SHOULD EXPORT IT TO THE
REST OF THE WORLD.
BRIAN: YOU ALSO SAY, TOO
YOUNGER PEOPLE, REPUBLICANS
AND DEMOCRATS, CLIMATE
CHANGE MATTERS AND THERE IS
SOMETHING THERE.
SOMETHING THERE. AND THERE IS A
RESPONSIBILITY.
RESPONSIBILITY. THERE IS A WAY BETWEEN --
THERE IS A PLACE BETWEEN THE
GREEN NEW DEAL.
>> RIGHT.
>> RIGHT. BRIAN: AND NO DEAL.
>> EXACTLY.
>> EXACTLY. BRIAN: WHERE ARE YOU.
>> NEW ENERGY FRONTIER.
LEADER MCCARTHY.
LEADER MCCARTHY. GRAVES, WALD DONE, PUT
TOGETHER ALL OF THESE
DIFFERENT PLANS.
DIFFERENT PLANS. MY PART OF THAT IS NEW
ENERGY FRONTIER.
ENERGY FRONTIER. IT’S ABOUT CARBON CAPTURE.
ABOUT INVESTING IN WHAT IS
ACTUALLY NOT SCIENCE FICTION
BUT REALLY INTERESTING
STUFF.
STUFF. YOU HAVE PLANTS IN HOUSTON
TAKING IN NATURAL GAS,
CREATING ELECTRICITY FOR
5,000 HOMES.
5,000 HOMES. RECIRCULATING THE CO 2
THROUGH THAT PROCESS ZERO
EMISSIONS.
EMISSIONS. THIS IS NOT SCIENCE FICTION.
WE WANT TO INVEST MORE INTO
THAT KIND OF TECHNOLOGY,
CREATE CARBON INNOVATION
FIGURE OUT WHAT TO DO WITH
CARBON DIOXIDE.
CARBON DIOXIDE. MAKING IT A COMMODITY NOT A
WASTE PRODUCT.
WASTE PRODUCT. CREATE A MARKET FOR IT.
BRIAN: REAL QUICK, MATTERS
TO YOU AS MUCH AS ANYBODY.
YESTERDAY SEVEN OR NINE
REPUBLICAN SENATORS VOTED
ALONG WITH DEMOCRATS TO
LIMIT THE PRESIDENT’S
ABILITY TO DECLARE WAR OR
TAKE OUT A SOLEIMANI IN THE
FUTURE.
FUTURE. >> RIGHT.
>> RIGHT. BRIAN: HE WILL OVERRIDE THIS
WAR POWERS ACTRESS LUCIEN.
AND HE WILL VETO IT AND IT
WON’T BE OVERRIDDEN.
>> RIGHT.
>> RIGHT. BRIAN: YOUR REACTION TO THE
FACT IT’S BROUGHT UP.
>> REALLY MUDDIES THE
WATERS.
WATERS. REALLY GREAT FOR IRAN.
NOT THE IRANIAN PEOPLE BUT
THE IRANIAN REGIME.
I’M NOT SURE I UNDERSTAND
THE PREMISE HERE.
BASED ON FALSEHOOD OF TWO
THINGS.
THINGS. ONE, THAT THE PREMISE OR ONE
THAT THE PRESIDENT ACTED
ILLEGALLY IN THE FIRST PLACE
BY ATTACKING SOLEIMANI.
BRIAN: HE DIDN’T.
>> HE DIDN’T.
ABSOLUTELY NOT.
ABSOLUTELY NOT. SECOND FALSE PREMISE IS THAT
HE PLANS TO CONTINUE ATTACKS
ON IRAN WHICH IS NOT BASED
IN REALITY EITHER.
WE ACTED IN SELF-DEFENSE.
THERE IS NO REASON TO
OVERREACT.
OVERREACT. AND, AGAIN, NOT ACT WITH
FORTITUDE, I’M GOING TO KEEP
BRINGING THIS BACK TO MY
BOOK SINCE THAT’S THE
SUBJECT OF OUR INTERVIEW
TODAY.
TODAY. BUT, SO, THEN THE QUESTION
BECOMES WHY DO THIS?
WHY DO THIS AT ALL?
IT STATES IN THERE THIS
ISN’T ANY DIFFERENT FROM THE
WAR POWERS ACT.
THEN WHY ARE WE PASSING IT?
STEVE: SURE.
STEVE: SURE. >> WHAT IS THE POINT HERE?
JUST FOR PROPAGANDA
PURPOSES, TO SIGNAL TO THE
IRANIAN REGIME THAT YOU
SUPPORT NOT DOING ANYTHING
AGAINST THEM?
AGAINST THEM? I TRULY DON’T UNDERSTAND
THAT POLICY.
THAT POLICY. BRIAN: MIKE LEE AND RAND
PAUL AMONG THOSE.
>> I THINK THEY FELT
INSULTED BY THE PROCESS
EARLIER AND THIS IS THEIR
WAY OF SHOWING IT.
AINSLEY: DAN THE AUDIENCE
LOVES YOU AND SUPPORTS YOU
NOT ONLY IN CONGRESS BUT
FIGHTING FOR OUR COUNTRY.
WE WANTED TO ASK ANY OF YOU
DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS?
STEVE: RON DOES.
RIGHT OVER THERE.
AINSLEY: HI, RON.
>> CONGRESSMAN, I’M IN FAVOR
OF TERM LIMITS.
A LOT OF MORE PEOPLE WANT TO
SEE TERM LIMITS.
A LOT OF LIFELONG
CONGRESSMAN AND SENATORS
THERE HOW DO WE CHANGE THAT.
>> YOU NEED A CONSTITUTIONAL
AMENDMENT.
AMENDMENT. DO I SUPPORT THAT I ALSO
LOOK AT THIS WITH A GREAT
DEGREE OF NUANCES.
YOU KNOW, A LOT OF PEOPLE
SAY THEY WANT TERM LIMITS
BUT YOU ASK THEM ASK MY OWN
CONSTITUENTS.
CONSTITUENTS. DO YOU WANT ME TO BE
TERMINATED IN FOUR YEARS?
THAT’S KIND OF EXTREME NO,
NO, NO.
NO, NO. I WANT EVERYONE ELSE TO BE
TERM LIMITED.
TERM LIMITED. TAKE A STEP BACK AND WONDER
WHAT YOU ARE ASKING FOR.
A LOT OF PEOPLE WANT THOSE.
ONCE YOU START SHOWING
PEOPLE SOME OF THE DOWN
SIDES THERE IS A NUANCED
CONVERSATION HERE IT.
ALSO GIVES A LOT MORE POWER
TO THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH.
RIGHT?
RIGHT? IF YOU ALWAYS HAVE JUNIOR
CONGRESS PEOPLE IN CONGRESS.
WHO IS IN CHARGE?
STAFF AND THE EXECUTIVE
BRANCH.
BRANCH. THE BUREAUCRACY.
THE BUREAUCRACY. BRIAN: THEY ARE ALWAYS GOING
TO BE THERE.
>> IT’S NOT OBVIOUS THAT
THIS WILL MAKE THINGS
BETTER.
BETTER. BRIAN: EVERYONE TERM LIMITED
EXCEPT DAN.
EXCEPT DAN. EDWARD, YOU ARE OUT THERE.
EDWARD, DO YOU HAVE A
QUESTION FOR DAN?
>> YES, DIME CONGRESSMAN,
THANK YOU FOR YOUR SERVICE,
FIRST OF ALL.
WHAT IS THE OBSESSION THE
LEFT HAS WITH ILLEGAL
IMMIGRANTS AND PROTECTING
THE RIGHTS OF ILLEGAL
IMMIGRANTS AND NO ONE TALKS
ABOUT CITIZENS AND WHEN WE
DESERVE AND OUR SAFETY?
>> THAT’S EXACTLY RIGHT.
BRIAN: BORDER STATE.
>> AND THERE WAS A NEW
PROPOSAL RECENTLY I THINK
IT’S THE NEW PATH FORWARD.
ISN’T THAT RIGHT?
NEW PATH FORWARD.
44 CO-SPONSORS, DEMOCRAT
CO-SPONSORS WHICH IS ONE OF
THE MORE UNBELIEVABLE NOT
ONLY AMNESTY BUT REFUSAL TO
ENFORCE THE LAW AT ALL WITH
RESPECT TO CRIMINAL ILLEGAL
ALIENS.
ALIENS. NOT JUST ILLEGAL ALIENS BUT
ONES WHO HAVE COMMITTED
OTHER CRIMES WHILE HERE IN
THE UNITED STATES.
AND THIS IS 44 CO-SPONSORS.
YOU KNOW, IF ONE CRAZY
PERSON HAD PROPOSE YOU HAD,
THIS I DON’T THINK WE WOULD
HAVE A RIGHT TO BASH IT TOO
MUCH.
MUCH. BUT 44 CO-SPONSORS IS
SIGNIFICANT.
SIGNIFICANT. THAT’S A MOVEMENT WITHIN THE
PARTY.
PARTY. WE SHOULD BE FOCUSING ON
AMERICAN CITIZENS.
AMERICAN CITIZENS. WE SHOULD MAKE -- YOU SHOULD
BE ABLE TO MAKE THE CASE
THAT WE HAVE A RIGHT AS A
COUNTRY TO PROTECT OUR OWN
SOVEREIGNTY AND PROTECT OUR
OWN BORDERS.
OWN BORDERS. THERE IS NOTHING WRONG WITH
THAT THERE IS NOTHING TO BE
ASHAMED OF THERE.
WE ARE PRO-LEGAL
IMMIGRATION.
IMMIGRATION. WE ARE ANTI-ILLEGAL
IMMIGRATION.
IMMIGRATION. STEVE: TIME FOR ONE MORE
QUESTION OVER ON THAT SIDE.
KEVIN, GOOD MORNING TO YOU.
>> GOOD MORNING.
KEVIN FROM HOUSTON TEXAS.
BORDER SECURITY IS EVEN
IMPORTANT TO ME.
I HAVE WRITTEN THE WHITE
HOUSE AND ASKING THE
PRESIDENT IS THERE SOMETHING
WE CAN DO AS FAR AS FUND
MAYBE LIKE A GO FUND ME OR
WHATEVER.
WHATEVER. THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ARE
INTERESTED IN THIS PROBLEM.
AND WE WANT TO DO SOMETHING
TO HELP GET THAT BORDER WALL
PROVIDED QUICKER.
PROVIDED QUICKER. IT’S NOT JUST ILLEGAL
IMMIGRANTS BUT IT’S ALSO FOR
NATIONAL SECURITY REASONS AS
WELL.
WELL. IS THERE SOMETHING WE AS
PEOPLE CAN COULD TO GET THAT
GO IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION.
STEVE: ISN’T THAT FUND
CALLED OUR TAXES?
>> THAT’S A GOOD POINT.
THEY ACTUALLY DID DO.
THIS THERE IS A SECTION OF
BORDER WALL BUILT IN EL PASO
THAT WAS PRIVATELY BUILT
WITH THAT REASON.
NOW, BUT, THE REALITY IS,
THE PRESIDENT IS STILL
DIVERTING FUNDS FROM CERTAIN
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS TO BUILD THE BORDER
WALL.
WALL. IT’S ALSO ABOUT ENFORCEMENT.
WHAT CAN YOU DO AS A
CITIZEN, HONESTLY?
CITIZEN, HONESTLY? GET OUT AND KNOCK ON DOORS
AND EXPLAIN TO PEOPLE THAT
WE ARE PRO-LEGAL
IMMIGRATION.
IMMIGRATION. BUT WE ARE AGAINST ILLEGAL
IMMIGRATION.
IMMIGRATION. YOU CAN’T JUST HAVE PEOPLE
WALKING ACROSS THE BORDER.
WE HAVE TO ENFORCE THE LAWS.
THE BORDER WALL FIXES
SUPPORT OF THE PROBLEM.
A HUGE PART OF THE PROBLEM
THOUGH IS THE CATCH AND
RELEASE NONSENSE THAT HAS
BEEN HAPPENING FOR YEARS.
NOW, OUR CURRENT HOMELAND
SECURITY DEPARTMENT HAS
GOTTEN THEIR ARMS AROUND
THIS PROBLEM IN A VERY BIG
WAY.
WAY. WE SHOULD BE VERY PROUD OF
THAT THAT DOESN’T GET REALLY
MUCH ATTENTION.
MUCH ATTENTION. BUT IT SHOULD.
THEY ARE DOING A MUCH BETTER
JOB OF ACTUALLY -- ONCE HAVE
YOU CROSSED ILLEGALLY,
GETTING YOU BACK AND
DEPORTED AS OPPOSED TO JUST
RELEASED INTO OUR
POPULATION.
POPULATION. BRIAN: I THINK THERE IS A
LOT OF GOOD NEWS HERE.
ESPECIALLY REBUILDING THE
WALL.
WALL. 4 BILLION.
4 BILLION. THE PRESIDENT ONLY NEEDED
2 BILLION.
2 BILLION. HE SAID I BASICALLY HAVE
ENOUGH MONEY.
ENOUGH MONEY. AND GOTTEN DEALS WITH A LOT
OF PRIVATE LANDOWNERS.
A LOT OF THEM ARE GIVING IN
NEED THE WALL.
100 MILES BUILT.
REAL SHOT BY JANUARY 1st
OF 220 GETTING 400 MILES
BUILT.
BUILT. PUTTING TECHNOLOGY ON TOP.
CAMERAS AND LIGHTS.
I THINK THERE IS A REAL GOOD
STORY TO TELL.
>> THERE IS.
IT’S GOING IN A GOOD
DIRECTION.
DIRECTION. AINSLEY: THANK YOU,
CONGRESSMAN.
CONGRESSMAN. STEVE: SO THE BOOK COMES OUT
ON APRIL 7TH.
IT’S CALLED "FORTITUDE."