[APPLAUSE]
>> Sean: ALL RIGHT.
WELCOME TO "HANNITY."
WE HAVE A LIVE STUDIO AUDIENCE.
TRUMP ON THE GROUND IN EAST
PALESTINE.
SOMETHING THAT BIDEN OR MAYOR
PETE DIDN’T HAVE THE TIME TO DO.
AND JOE BIDEN IS FALLING UP THE
STAIRS AGAIN YET TO AIR FORCE
ONE.
THE ONLY GOOD NEWS, HE FELL
ONCE.
HE DIDN’T FALL THREE TIMES LIKE
THE LAST TIME.
WE HAVE THAT VIDEO COMING UP.
ALSO HERE THE POTHOLE PETE
TAKING PERSONAL TIME IN
WASHINGTON D.C. AFTER A PRETTY
BIZARRE ENCOUNTER WITH A
JOURNALIST.
WE GOT THAT VIDEO FOR YOU.
OUR TOP STORY TONIGHT INVOLVE AS
SPECIAL GRAND JURY IN THE STATE
OF GEORGIA.
THEY’RE TASKED WITH PROBING
ELECTION INTERFERENCE.
THE GRAND JURY FOREWOMAN HAS
EMBARKED ON A BIZARRE,
POTENTIALLY UNETHICAL
COUNTRYWIDE PRESS TOUR AND
NOBODY HAS BEEN INDICTED IN
GEORGIA AND THE INVESTIGATION IS
SUPPOSED TO BE ON GOING.
THAT IS NOT STOPPING EMILY COORS
FROM GUSHING ABOUT HER
EXPERIENCE IN THE GRAND JURY.
SHE’S TALKED TO "THE NEW YORK
TIMES," THE A.P., FAKE NEWS CNN
AND MSDNC, NBC NEWS.
IT’S APPEARS SHE OVERJOYED WITH
THE PROSPECT OF POTENTIALLY
PUTTING FORMER PRESIDENT TRUMP
BEHIND BARS BUT WILL BE
DISAPPOINTED IF NO CHARGES ARE
FILED.
SHE WAS DYING AS THE FOREPERSON.
WOULD HAVE BEEN HER JOB TO SWEAR
IN THE PRESIDENT.
DO YOU SWEAR TO TELL THE TRUTH,
NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH SO HELP
YOU GOD.
SHE DIDN’T GET THAT OPPORTUNITY.
WATCH AS SHE IS SMIRKING AND
SMILING AND LAUGHING HER WAY
THROUGH A BIZARRE AND INSANE
INTERVIEWS.
TAKE A LOOK.
>> DID THE GRAND JURY RECOMMEND
AN INDICTMENT OF FORMER
PRESIDENT TRUMP?
>> I’M NOT GOING TO SPEAK ON
EXACT INDICTMENTS.
>> SO NOTHING THAT WOULD
SURPRISE PEOPLE THAT HAVE BEEN
FOLLOWING THIS?
>> PROBABLY NOT.
I WOULDN’T WANT TO CHARACTERIZE
ANYBODY ELSE’S REACTION.
PROBABLY NOT.
>> DID YOU PERSONALLY --
>> I WANTED TO HEAR FROM THE
FORMER PRESIDENT BUT I KIND OF
WANTED TO SUBPOENA THE FORMER
PRESIDENT BECAUSE I GOT TO SWEAR
EVERYBODY IN.
I THOUGHT IT WOULD BE COOL TO
GET 60 SECONDS WITH PRESIDENT
TRUMP OF ME LOOKING AT HIM AND
BEING LIKE DO YOU SOLEMNLY
SWEAR?
I THOUGHT THAT WOULD BE AN
AWESOME MOMENT.
>> THERE’S INDICTMENTS
RECOMMENDED.
IS IT MORE THAN 12 PEOPLE OR 20
PEOPLE?
>> I THINK IF YOU LOOK AT THE
PAGE NUMBERS OF THE REPORT,
THERE’S ABOUT SIX PAGES IN THE
MIDDLE THAT GOT CUT OUT.
ALLOW FOR SPACING.
IT’S NOT A SHORT LIST.
>> NOT A SHORT LIST.
>> AFTER EVERYTHING THAT YOU’VE
SEEN, WHAT WOULD YOUR REACTION
BE IF THE D.A. DECIDES TO BRING
ANY CHARGES AFTER WHAT YOU’VE
SEEN?
>> I WOULD BE SAD IF NOTHING
HAPPENS.
LIKE THAT IS MY ONLY REQUEST
THERE. IS FOR SOMETHING TO HAPPEN.
IS FOR SOMETHING TO HAPPEN.
>> Sean: DOES SHE SEEM
IMPARTIAL?
DOES SHE SEEM COMPETENT?
LAUGHING AT THE PROSPECT OF
RUINING PEOPLE’S LIVES, TAKING
AWAY THEIR LIBERTY AND FREEDOM,
THIS IS NOT ACCEPTABLE, IT’S NOT
APPROPRIATE.
IT’S NOT HOW JUSTICE IS SUPPOSED
TO WORK.
THAT WHAT WE SAW IS A TRAVESTY.
IT MIGHT EVEN BE AGAINST THE
LAW.
WE’LL CHECK IN WITH OUR EXPERTS
IN A FEW MINUTES.
ACCORDING TO THE GRAND JURY
HANDBOOK, THERE’S ONE IN THE
STATE OF GEORGIA.
JURORS "SHALL KEEP THE
DELIBERATIONS OF THE GRAND JURY
SECRET UNLESS CALLED UPON TO
GIVE EVIDENCE THEREOF IN SOME
COURT OF LAW IN THIS STATE."
OH, IS CNN OR "THE NEW YORK
TIMES" OR MSDNC IS THAT A
COURTROOM?
I DON’T THINK SO.
THE SAME HANDBOOK MAKES THE
FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATIONS, DO
NOT DISCUSS CASES WITH YOUR
FELLOW JURORS OR ANYONE ELSE
OUTSIDE OF THE JURY ROOM.
ACCORDING TO THE RULING FROM THE
U.S. SUPREME COURT, THE PROPER
FUNCTIONING OF OUR GRAND JURY
SYSTEM DEPENDS UPON SECRECY OF
GRAND JURY PROCEEDINGS.
SHE WAS TELLING US EVERYTHING
THAT SHE THOUGHT ABOUT ANYBODY.
ANY FAIR JUDGE WILL THROW OUT
ANY CONCLUSIONS OF THIS SPECIAL
GRAND JURY.
IT’S UNCLEAR IN THE JURY
FOREWOMAN BROKE ANY LAWS, BUT
TONIGHT THE MEDIA MOB ARE DEEPLY
CONCERNED ABOUT HER ACTIONS AND
HER BEHAVIOR AND THEY SHOULD BE.
TAKE A LOOK.
>> GOOD LORD.
THE MERE FACT THAT YOU HAVE THE
RIGHT TO DO SOMETHING AND SHE
HAS A RIGHT TO SPEAK AS A
CITIZEN AND EVEN THE GRAND JURY
RULES IN GEORGIA, AS LONG AS
SHE’S NOT SPEAKING ABOUT
DELIBERATIONS SHE’S ALLOWED TO.
SHE’S UNDERMINED THE INTEGRITY
OF THE GRAND JURY.
>> IN MY EXPERIENCE COVERING
COURTS, IT’S NOT HELPFUL TO A
DISTRICT ATTORNEY WHEN THEY’RE
TRYING TO PUT THEIR CASE
TOGETHER.
>> THIS IS A HORRIBLE IDEA.
I GUARANTEE YOU THAT PROSECUTORS
ARE WHENCING WATCHING HER.
>> I WAS WHENCING WATCHING HER
EAGERNESS TO LIKE HINT AT STUFF.
>> I THINK SHE COULD DESTROY
THIS CASE.
>> I WAS THOROUGHLY ENJOYING THE
INTERVIEWS LIKE EVERYONE ELSE.
I WAS GIGGLING AND CRACKING UP.
BUT THEN WHEN I PUT MY FEDERAL