Conservatives are still out there trying to discredit Cassidy Hutchinson's testimony by
saying that the secret service says that she is lying.
But in reality, the secret service is not saying that she's lying those two agents or
not O an angle are saying that her story isn't exactly accurate parts of it.
At least they haven't, by the way said that the entire story isn't accurate, just parts
of it.
So right off the bat, conservatives are already lying about what these two secret service
agents had to say.
But according to author and journalist Carol linig with the Washington post, who, by the
way, wrote a book on the secret service, she says that many of the secret service agents
immediately around Trump actually supported the insurrection as it was taking place in
the United States capital here is what linig had to say to, uh, Rachel Maddow.
Earlier this week, there was a very large contingent of Donald Trump's detail who were
personally cheering for Biden to fail.
Some of them even took to their personal media accounts to cheer on the insurrection and
the individuals rioting up to the capital as Patriots.
That is problematic.
I'm not saying that Tony ordo or Bobby Engel did that, but they are viewed as being aligned
with Donald Trump, which cuts against them.
However, if they testify under oath, this is what happened.
I think that is going to be important.
So she admits, you know, listen, we had secret service agents.
She has verified this, that they were on their social media accounts, cheering on these insurrections,
calling them Patriots, you know, not necessarily or NATO an angle.
The two that are trying to say that Hutchinson, isn't being a hundred percent honest with
her testimony, but this definitely paints a, uh, very disturbing portrait of what the
United States secret service is.
And of course, more and more reports are starting to come out about how ordo and angle were
both viewed as quote yes, men for Donald Trump.
All they ever wanted to do was make him happy.
They wanted to be a part of that inner circle.
Again, this is according to, you know, new reports and information coming out, um, all
of this, of course, difficult to verify, difficult to disprove.
So I guess we're gonna have to wait for these two gentlemen to go sit in front of that January
6th, select committee testify under oath, under penalty of perjury and tell us their
version of events, but here, and this is what I had said yesterday.
And I wanna repeat it because I think it, you know, bears repeating here, they're really
disputing the language that Hutchinson used.
You know, the president did not lunge for the steering wheel.
He never lunged forward.
He never lunged and put his hands on somebody's clavicles.
They're making very
Sure that they picked their words exceptionally carefully.
You know, he didn't lunge for the steering wheel.
Maybe he just reached for it.
And if they believe that he reached, instead of lunged by saying he didn't lunge, you can
of course act like you're telling the truth.
But in reality, we're just arguing semantics here.
You know, we're just quibbling over which words to use.
So again, I encourage these individuals to go sit and talk under oath.
If you have evidence to dispute what Mrs. Hutchinson says, please do.
So, you know, we wanna make sure all of this is as factually accurate as humanly possible.
We don't wanna get anything wrong.
You know, even with these sensationalistic stories, if they're false, let's prove 'em
false, but that's up to these agents.
And so far the reports coming out in the media, aren't making these two guys look very good,
but if they want to testify under oath, if they can prove that what Ms. Hutchinson said
is in fact, a lie, do it.
If not, you might need to just shut up and let things continue to play out because it's
already making the secret service look pretty bad.