It was previously disclosed
Blinken's Dialogue Policy Speech
Originally, it was to build momentum for Biden's visit to Asia
Create an atmosphere of solidarity with allies to suppress China
now
Biden's front foot just ended his Asia trip and returned to Washington
Backfoot Blinken announces restart of speaking
Changes in the world situation during the first three weeks
and a series of external effects carried out by the United States
on the content of the dialogue policy announced by Blinken
What new factors to inject
It has also become the focus of attention from the outside world.
What about the Biden administration?
how about recently
There are a series of small actions
It can be said that the action is frequent.
And what about Blinken?
Choose After Biden's Asia Trip
After the US-ASEAN summit
to give this speech
Actually it is
I hope that with the help of such a series of events
give a general speech
What about the Biden administration?
What about the behavior of past China policy?
explain
at the same time
Also on the future Biden administration's China policy line
be a forward-looking
take oath
When the global focus was mainly on the Russian-European crisis
Blinken's speech
rated by the Wall Street Journal
The U.S. government is ready to send such a message to the outside world
America's biggest geopolitical rival is China
instead of Russia
although
Russia distracts from the U.S. government and its partners
Dealing with Attention to China Relations
But in recent months
The Biden administration's China policy is slowly taking shape
Agence France-Presse said
one of the key components
is recovery
U.S.
Economic and Security Leadership in Hard-Stage Regions
Of course, I hope to throw dirty water on China
hope
Taking advantage of Russia-Ukraine conflict to further pollute China
But on the other hand
It does reflect the policies of the Biden administration
strategic anxiety
That's it
The Biden office doesn't want a conflict over Russian affairs.
U.S. resources
The U.S. experiences too much investment in Europe
The Biden House still hopes to focus on ah
Solve the so-called China problem
So what?
We can see the current worship government though
very much hope that in the Russian-Ukrainian conflict
Very effective containment of Russia
But on the other hand
He really doesn't want it because
Too much focus on Europe
while ignoring the situation in the Asia-Pacific in his eyes
To this end, Biden administration officials have let India
Vietnam, Malaysia and Singapore
Join the so-called Taiwan-oriented economic framework
But so far the plan has been slow
Part of the reason is
Partners in Taiwan
damage to their trade relations with China
cautious
on the other hand
on trade and economic issues
How tough should we take on China?
Opposition has also emerged within the U.S. government
What about Biden?
most of the following
Inheriting the Trump-era China policy
What about the United States in the future?
Fully regard China as the first strategic competitor
The positioning of this strategic competition
It's been the past 20 years
This is a time when the US policy toward China
Major tweaks and upgrades
But how to be sure?
only treat strategic competitors
The intensity and pace of this coping
Actually in America
there are huge differences
Because if they over stimulate China
Well, in the end, it's them who hurt themselves
Singapore Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong
Speak with an international exchange meeting in Tokyo
of growing tensions between China and the US
challenges to Asian development
Asia must try to avoid mistakes in Russian conflict
Enhance security and economic cooperation at the same time
If Asian countries are forced to choose between China and the US
no good results
the us
china rivalry is inevitably affecting all countries in asia
it's natural for some countries to be closer to one side
or to the other
but most countries would prefer not to be forced to choose
between the us and china
there will be no good outcome
if asian countries are split between the two camps
each siding with one or the other
In addition, Blinken has a core statement on the Taiwan issue
also a major concern
several years
The US frequently makes small moves on the Taiwan issue
play word games
Biden is in Japan this Monday
Mainly because the United States is willing to use force to protect Taiwan
Then the White House urgently clarified
No fundamental change in U.S. policy toward Taiwan
And Biden himself changed his tune a day later
U.S. strategy toward Taiwan is vague
Strategy has not changed
Analysts from American think tanks pointed out
The White House has been doing what it can
Prevent the worst off-stage situation
Therefore, it is not expected that Lincoln will carefully consider the language
Cautious Expression of Washington's One-China Policy
Chinese Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Wang Wenbin
also on tuesday
pointed out at the press conference
The U.S. made every effort
Playing word games on one China principle
But there is no power in the world
including the US
can stop the Chinese people
The pace of achieving complete national unity
There is no power in the world
including the US
Can save the fate of the failure of the Taidu forces
On the one hand
we can see
What about the Biden administration?
on taiwan objects
What about the basic line of using Taiwan to control China?
still very clear but on the other hand
What about the Biden administration?
also reluctant to take too much risk on the issue
Such as
If they really want to subvert the original one-China principle
What about the situation in the Taiwan Strait?
for Sino-US relations
must be subversive
catastrophic impact
This kind of disaster is for the United States
also unbearable