Following Matt Vibes confirmation that Twitter often gave into requests
from both the Trump campaign and the Biden campaign.
To censor content on the Twitter platform,
Trump sprang sprang into action and asked for.
Well, exactly what you would expect Trump to ask for?
The suspension of our constitution because he is convinced the election was stolen
from him due to the lack of reporting on hunter Biden's freaking laptop.
Now let's not forget the fact that in 2020,
what was really fresh in the minds of American voters was just how
much Donald Trump bungled the response to the Coronavirus.
Okay you have close to a million people dying from the virus.
You have Donald Trump talking about injecting your body with disinfectant.
I kinda feel like Trump did a better job in destroying his chances
of getting reelected than the lack of reporting on a freaking laptop and
the salacious material within it.
Nonetheless on truth social he wrote this.
So, with the revelation of massive and widespread fraud and deception
there is no evidence of widespread fraud at all or really deception.
In working closely with Big Tech Companies, the DNC and the Democrat Party,
do you throw the Presidential Election Results of 2020 out and
declare the rightful winner?
Or do you have a new election?
You do neither Trump because as Matt Vibes' Twitter thread made abundantly
clear.
Your campaign often reached out to Twitter and demanded that content be taken down.
And oftentimes they listened to those requests and carry them out.
So the idea that there was like this extreme favoritism over
Twitter is laughable.
He continues though, a massive fraud of this type and
magnitude allows for the termination of all rules,
regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution.
Our great Founders I don't know why he has Founders in quotations but okay are great
Founders did not want and would not condone, false and fraudulent elections.
Okay, again, the idea that [LAUGH] the hunter Biden laptop
story would change the outcome of the election is laughable.
And even though Elon Musk has provided cover for
Nazis on the platform, he's now the owner of,
even though he as a billionaire CEO of multiple companies should be doing.
The work that you would expect the head of any company to do and
he spends all of his time on Twitter trolling.
Instead, he did have a good response to Trump here where he says the Constitution
is greater than any President.
End of story.
Now when you have Elon Musk of all people turn on you and
basically slap down your request to suspend the Constitution might
make you rethink what you're asking for here.
So I wanna go to the very last tweet or I should say post from Trump.
It's not a tweet from truth social where he claims that we're all lying.
Okay, what he posted on truth social, we just imagined it.
We totally imagined it.
He didn't actually write it.
He said the fake news is actually trying to convince the American People that I
said I wanted to terminate the Constitution.
No, they said you wanted to suspend it and that is literally what you said.
Okay, but let me continue.
This is simply more disinformation and lies, just like Russia, Russia,
Russia, and all of their other hoaxes and scams.
What I said was that when there is massive and widespread fraud and deception,
as has been irrefutably proven, it has not been in the 2020 Presidential Election,
steps must be immediately taken to right the wrong.
Only fools would disagree with that and accept stolen elections.
Mag.
Nice touch at the end Trump.
Nice touch at the end.
You said that the election was stolen.
That there was widespread fraud.
Those things are untrue and as a result you wanna suspend the Constitution.
That's what he said.
But he's denying it, luckily this time around no one's buying it.
And during a fundraiser earlier,
prior to the suspend the Constitution posts on True Social,
he had recorded a video where he gives the January 6 Capitol rioters some love.
Okay, so let's take a quick look at that.
>> We have been treated unconstitutionally in my opinion and very unfairly and
we're gonna get to the bottom of it.
So I wanna thank everybody for working so hard.
I know how hard you're working to get justice for
people that are imprisoned right now and people that are being tormented.
Can't let it happen.
We're going to stop it, we're going to win.
>> So keep in mind he films that video makes it seem like
the individuals who stormed the Capitol on January
6 are innocent victims who are political prisoners.
Essentially that is what he's making them out to be when we know they broke the law.
You have members of the patriot front [LAUGH] a militia
groups being charged and convicted for what they did for.
I'm forgetting the word right now, but essentially committing an insurrection or
attempting to commit an insurrection.
And Trump's providing cover for them.
At the same time he's calling for a suspension of the Constitution.
The thing is if there's no backlash,
if there's no one telling Trump, you can't do that, he'd do it.
But because there was a little bit of backlash, he's like, I mean,
I didn't say that.
By the way in a September interview, I don't believe this for a second.
Trump said he was financially supporting some January 6 defendants and
promised he would issue pardons and
a government apology to those being prosecuted if he were reelected.
Okay,Trump, won't even pay his own lawyers.
There is no way he's financially supporting Capital 6 January 6th
Capitol writers.
I don't believe that for a second.
But nonetheless he's trying to send a message out there,
this is the kind of behavior he supports and wants to provide cover for.
Now, what are Republicans saying?
You got mealy mouth, wishy washy answers from people like
Representative Mike Turner who is a Republican,
here's what he had to say on face the nation.
>> Should the standard Bearer for the Republican Party, the frontrunner for
the nomination for the Presidency for your party in 2020 for say this?
>> Well, I don't know.
I first of I vehemently disagree with the statement that Trump has made.
Trump has made 1000 statements in which I disagree.
There is a political process that has to go forward before anybody.
>> Constitutional Conservatives were pretty clear about where they value
the constitution.
>> Exactly. [CROSSTALK]
>> You do get to pick the questions, but
I do get to pick my answer.
>> [CROSSTALK] >> There is a political process that has
to go forward before anybody's a front runner or
anybody is even the candidate for the party.
>> [CROSSTALK] >> Absolutely, and
I believe answering your question that people certainly are gonna take into
consideration a statement like this as they evaluate a candidate.
>> You could just answer the question and say no,
I don't think that he should be the Republican representing our party.
Calling for the suspension of the Constitution because you
didn't like the results of the presidential election is undemocratic.
Unamerican.
We fully rejected, but he can't give a strong answer because
all little Whip Mike Turner is thinking about here is, well,
I mean what if he gets, what if he wins the ticket?
What if he's the Republican nominee for President?
I don't wanna have to answer for this comment somewhere down the line.
They're all incredible cowards.
You have another one.
Representative Dave Joyce, who's asked a similar question.
He says this, I will support whoever the Republican nominee
is meaning even if it's Trump.
Representative Dave Joyce, a Republican from Ohio is like I jump in it.
I just don't think that at this point he'll be able to get there because there
are a lot of other good quality candidates out there.
Really are there?
Are there?
Because I know that the Republican establishment,
meaning all of the power players.
Republican politicians, Republican leadership, Republican media or
Conservative media, I know they're trying to prop up Ron DeSantis as we speak.
We see it.
But is it actually translating to Republican voters wanting to
support DeSantis or someone else before they support Trump?
I haven't seen it yet.
There hasn't really been much evidence.
There have been polls here and
there but we know how unreliable polling can be on issues like this.
So until I actually see some really evidence that the base of Republican
voters has really shifted away from Donald Trump that ridiculous
statement is really a cop out.
Answer the question the way you really wanna answer it.
And I think that first part from Representative Joyce's statement is what
he really means.
I will support whoever the Republican nominee is because they don't care if that
individual doesn't care about the Constitution, is undemocratic.
Wants to literally suspend the Constitution because he didn't like
the results of the election.
They don't care about any of that.
What they care about and
what they understand better than anything is the quest for power and
doing anything and everything necessary to get it and maintain it.
That's what that's about.
Now we do have Representative elect Mike Lawler who's also
a Republican from New York who says obviously I
don't support that meaning suspending the Constitution.
The Constitution is set for a reason, to protect the rights of every American.
So I certainly don't endorse that language or that sentiment.
There we go.
Republican Congressman elect saying what needs to be said.
It wasn't so difficult.
I wish there was a chorus of Republican lawmakers saying something similar, but
of course we don't see that today.