YOU VERY MUCH FOR YOUR
REPORTS, HILLARY.
WE BRING IN COFOUNDER OF
STRIVE AUTHOR OF BOOK,
NATION OF VICTIMS.
VIVEK RAMASWAMY.
GREAT TO SEE YOU.
IT APPEARS AT LEAST THAT
TWITTER OR ELON MUSK AND TIM
COOK HAVE KIND OF BURIED
THIS SUGGESTION THAT TIM
COOK WAS GOING TO ACTUALLY
TAKE TWITTER OFF OF THE APP
STORE, HE LAST NIGHT WROTE
OUT A TWITTER HIMSELF SAYING
GOOD CONVERSATION AMONG
OTHER THINGS WE RESOLVED
MISUNDERSTANDING ABOUT
TWITTER, TIM OF THE CLEAR
APPLE NEVER CONSIDERED DOING
SO, THAT IS WHAT ELON MUSK
SAID THAT LAST NIGHT, WHERE
DID THE RUMOR COME FROM
THEN?
>> ELON MUSK IS.
HE WAS CONCERNED.
I WILL TELL YOU, THE CONCERN
IS NOT NEAR NEAR THEORY
RHETTALTHEORETICAL.
IT PLAYS OUT OF LAST YEAR
WITH PARLOR.
THE PROBLEM IN SILICON
VALLEY TODAY, THE
IDEOLOGICAL CARTEL ENGAGED
NOT IN PRICE FIXING BUT IN
IDEA FIXING, I’M GLAD TO
HEAR THAT WILL NOT BE CASE,
TWITTER IS SUCH A LARGE
PLATFORM, APPLE PROBABLY
CALCULATES THE BACKLASH MAY
BE SO BAD IT WOULD NOT KNOW
WORTHNOT BE WORTH IT.
THIS IS A REAL CONCERN IN
U.S., APPLE HAS ADOPTED A
CONSISTENT POSITION.
DAVID: I WANT TO TALK ABOUT
CHINA.
I WANT TO FIRST TALK ABOUT
HERE, DAVID SAKS, SAYS THERE
IS NOW A NEW DEMOCRATIC
MAGA, MICROSOFT, APPLE,
GOOGLE AND AMAZON.
THE NEW MAGA FROM SILICON
VALLEY AND THEY COLLUDE,
WHICH IS BAD ENOUGH USUALLY
POLITICIANS WORRY ABOUT
MONOPOLISTIC COLLUSION.
BUT THEY ARE NOW COLLUDING
WITH THE GOVERNMENT.
THAT COMBINATION IS DEADLY.
>> I HAVE BEEN WRITING ABOUT
THIS FOR TWO YEARS, I
STARTED WRITING ABOUT IT IN
PAGES OF "WALL STREET
JOURNAL" IN JANUARY OF 2021,
IT WAS DISMISSED AS A
CONSPIRASY THEORY NOW ALMOST
A MUNDANE OBSERVATION OF
EVERY DAY REAL TEENING
GOVERNMENT IS USING
TECHNOLOGY COMPANIES AND
PRIVATE SECOND TO DO THROUGH
BACKDOOR WHAT GOVERNMENT
COULD NOT GET DONE THROUGH
THE FRONT DOOR UNDER THE
CONSTITUTION, THAT INCLUDES
CENSORING POLITICAL VIEW
POINTS, IF FRAMERS OF FIRST
AMENDMENT WOULD SHUTTER AT
ONE THING IT WOULD BE THAT
U.S. GOVERNMENT WOULD USE
ITS POWER TO SILENCE CRITICS
OF THE U.S. GOVERNMENT, THAT
IS WHAT THE WHITE HOUSE IS
DOING TODAY IT COMES TO
LIGHT NOW.
WHITE HOUSE WAS USING TWIT
IRKTWITTER.
WITH PREELON TWITTER TO SILENCE THE CRITICS OF THE
SILENCE THE CRITICS OF THE
GOVERNMENT,.
DAVID: NOW FROM JANET YELLEN
YET, SUGGESTING THEY MAY TRY
TO KILL THE WHOLE COMPANY
WITH CFIUS, AN ORGANIZATION
SHE HEADS UP AS TREASURY
SECRETARY TO 2350EU7BD FIND
OUT WHETHER THERE IS
NATIONAL SECURITY CONCERNS
ABOUT TWITTER, THAT MIGHT
DERAIL THE COMPANY.
TO USE THE REGULATORY POWER
OF CFIUS.
TO GET RID OF TWITTER IS
MORE INSIDIOUS.
>> I THINK THERE ARE
NATIONAL SECURITY CONCERNS
WITH APPLE, THE CCPROGRAM
CCP SAYS JUMP, APPLE SAYS
HOW HIGH.
THE SUPPLY CHAIN EVEN THE
U.S. MARKET DEPENDS ON
CHINA, THIS IS WHY TIM COOK
IS A PUPPET OF XI JINPING,
CRITICIZING ALLEGED SOCIAL
INJUSTICE HERE THIS UNITED STATES, WITHOUT, AS THAT
STATES, WITHOUT, AS THAT
CHIP SHOWS, SLIP CHIP, NOT SAYING A PEOPLE. PIPE.
SAYING A PEOPLE. PIPE.
DAVID: THIS IS MARTHA’S
INTERVIEW WITH JOHN
KERBY YESTERDAY.
>> WE WERE TOLD THE OTHER
DAY THAT THE WHITE HOUSE IS
KEEPING AN EYE ON ELON MUSK
AND TWITTER.
WHY WOULD YOU SAY THAT PRO
PODIUM, JEAN-PIERRE SAID IT
AND NOT CALL APPLE OUT FOR
HELPING CHINESE GOVERNMENT
TO SUPPRESS THEIR OWN
PEOPLE’S ABILITY TO
COMMUNICATE.
>> WE’VE BEEN CLEAR ON THIS
PUBLICLY, WE HAVE BEEN OPEN
ABOUT OUR DESIRE TO SEE IS
THE CITIZEN CALM KATE, AND
KATE, IF THIS IS APP’S
DECISION, THEY SHOULD SPEAK
TO THAT, WE’RE NOT IN
BUSINESS OF TELLING PRIVATE
COMPANIES HOW TO EXECUTE
THEIR INITIATIVE.
>> TWITTER IS ALSO A PRIVATE
COMPANY, WHY IS TWITTER
GETTING ONE TREATMENT AND
APP WILL EL, THATAPPLE IS
ANOTHER THAT IS MY QUESTION.
>> THESE ARE TWO DIFFERENT..
DAVID: SHE NAILED THEM.
>> I HAVE CONCERNS ABOUT TIM
COOK AND APPLE.
I HAVE MY CONCERNS ABOUT
ELON MUSK AS WELL.
HE HAS MADE COMMENTS IN
RECENT WEEKS ABOUT TAIWAN
THAT I FOUND PROBLEMATIC.
IT SHOULD ANNEX ITSELF.
BUT I THINK THERE IS A
BROADER PROBLEM WITH
AMERICAN CAPITALISM, CHINA
IS DEPUTIZING AMERICAN
COMPANIES.
TO SAY YOU CAN’T DO BUSINESS
IN CHINA OR GET FAVORS FROM
THE CCP, IF YOU SAY
SOMETHING UNFAVORABLE ABOUT
THE CCP, IT IS PREPOSTEROUS
TO SEE.
TELL THEM WHO THEY ARE
SUPPOSED TO SENSOR ON
INTERNET, IT HAS HAPPENED.
WHEN THEY LOOK THE OTHER WAY WITH MORE FAVORED DARLINGS.
WITH MORE FAVORED DARLINGS.
DAVID: A TALKING ABOUT
FAVOR’S DARLINGS, SAM
BANKMAN-FRIED WAS
MISMANAGING THE COMPANY.
AT WORST HE WAS USED
INVESTORS MONEY THEY THOUGHT
WAS TIED UP IN THEIR CRYPTO
TO MAKE HORRIBLE BETS OR
JUST TO POCKET THE MONEY.
HE HAD A PLATFORM CNBC
BROADCAST IT "NEW YORK
TIMES" THING AND YOU HAD
PEOPLE SAYING, WE THOUGHT HE
WAS THE TELLING THE TRUTH.
WHAT DOES THIS WHOLE PROCESS
ABOUT?
WE KNOW THIS GUY WAS PAYING
OFF PEOPLE IN THE BELTWAY,
TO STEAR CLEAR OF LOOKING AT
HIS ACCOUNTS TOO CLOSELY.
IS THAT CONTINUING NOW AS HE
GETS THE ROYAL TREATMENT BY
SOME QUARTERS?
>> HE WAS DOING WHAT LEADERS
OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS
HERE DO TOO OFTEN, BUYING
PROTECTION.
BUYING AN INSURANCE POLICY,
THE QUESTION NOW, WHETHER
THAT INSURANCE POLICY PAYS
OUT, HE GAVE OVER 30 MILLION
TO DEMOCRATS IN LAST CYCLE,
WILL THAT PAY OUT WE’LL SEE.
BUT I THINK THAT IS
IMPORTANT TO REMEMBER HE IS
NOT ALONE, HE IS GETTING THE
ATTENTION TODAY, KEEP IN
MIND, GOLDMAN SACHS, J.P.
MORGAN, BANK OF AMERICA THEY
GOT THEIR SHARE OF BAILOUTS
ON THE BACK OF 2008
FINANCIAL CRISIS, THEY
BOUGHT THEIR INSURANCE
POLICIES, THEIRS PAID OUT
THIS YOUNG ARE GUY YOUNGER
GUY, LET’S SEE IF HE DID A
GOOD ENOUGH JOB, THE IRONY
HE PLEDGED TO GIVE OVER 2
MILLION.
SOME PEOPLE ARE MAD AT HIM
FOR NOT LIVING UP TO THAT
OBLIGATION.
>> TO SEE HIM GETTING
APPLAUSE AND LAUGH LINES, HE
RIPPED OFF A MILLION
AMERICANS, MONEY THEY WILL
NEVER GET BACK.
THERE WAS NOTHING FUNNY
ABOUT MILLION AMERICANS
GETTING RIPPED OFF.
>> THIS IS NOT A JOKING
MATTER, I HOPE MOST --
SERIOUS NOTE WE LEARN FROM
IT THIS TIME.
PEOPLE WHO PRETEND TO BE
VIRTUOUS AND REGULATE THEIR
OWN DIRECT, THAT IS THE
LESSEN OF THE DAY.