NEIL DeGRASSE TYSON: As inhabitants of Earth, we humans are relative newbies.
In fact, our branch of the evolutionary tree may have split with these apes only about
6,000,000 years ago.
But what if we look further back in our primate family tree?
There must have been some great and wise ancestor who founded this wonderful line of creatures,
right?
Well, as correspondent Peter Standring reports, the latest research is revealing that our
origins may have been quite a bit humbler than we thought.
PETER STANDRING: The Badlands of Wyoming: some of the largest dinosaur bones, ever,
were found right here.
But University of Florida paleontologist Jonathan Bloch is hunting for a set of bones that are
nothing like the giant bones of T-Rex.
JONATHAN BLOCH: Here's a little piece of bone here.
Here's a little piece of bone.
I think that's a little vertebra.
PETER STANDRING: Tiny mouse-sized bones, buried in limestone, that just might be the fossil
remains of our earliest primate ancestors.
An age-old mystery surrounds the origin of primates.
No one knows exactly where we come from or how we got our evolutionary start.
Here's what we do know: giant dinosaurs once ruled this basin, where they dined freely
in a lush forest.
But then, around 65 million years ago, the dinosaurs die off when a massive comet slams
into the planet.
Ten million years later, something extraordinary happens.
The fossil record suddenly shows a new kind of mammal, with unique characteristics: the
primate, our ancient ancestors.
So what is a primate?
What is it that separates us from the rest of the evolutionary pack?
Well, maybe it's our good looks or our superior intelligence.
The truth is brain size does come into play.
We primates, even Noah here, have larger brains than our mammal relatives.
It's a feature that evolved to help us learn complex social behavior and how to do things
like make tools or even outwit our prey.
We also developed forward-facing eyes with stereo vision.
It's a feature that allows us to judge the world around us in 3D.
Over time, we also developed the ability to leap, basically to jump from branch to branch,
where grasping hands, or in Noah's case, grasping feet, equipped with nails instead of claws,
enable us to reach that tasty piece of fruit.
Our earliest ancestors developed these unique characteristics, some time after the extinction
of dinosaurs.
The question is, "When and why?"
So let me get it straight.
If the dinosaurs became extinct 65 million years ago, and then primates suddenly appeared
around 56 million years ago, what happened in between?
I mean that's almost 10 million years that's unaccounted for.
JONATHAN BLOCH: Right.
That's the $6,000,000 question.
And I don't think they just appeared on the face of the planet, they evolved.
PETER STANDRING: But from what?
I mean, something the size of a mouse?
JONATHAN BLOCH: Exactly.
PETER STANDRING: Jonathan believes the evidence to support his theory and help solve this
ancient primate mystery can be found here, hidden inside the limestone of the Bighorn
Basin.
JONATHAN BLOCH: A tiny little piece of broken bone can connect up with an entire skeleton
of a mammal.
This looks like a pretty good limestone.
It should be...should be full of fossils, but we really won't know until we get it back
to the lab.
You see a tiny little piece of bone, and you hope that there's more inside, you have no
guarantees, so it's a little bit of a gamble.
PETER STANDRING: But a gamble worth taking, because these stones might hold ancient clues.
JONATHAN BLOCH: These limestones allow us a window into that world that we've never
had before.
PETER STANDRING: The world of the earliest primate.
It will take a 2,000-mile drive back to his lab in Gainesville, Florida, and a year of
painstaking work, to find out if Jonathan's gamble will pay off.
Back in his lab, Jonathan, along with graduate student Doug Boyer, gets to work.
Their goal?
To free the delicate bones from the rock-hard stone.
They begin by placing the limestone under a microscope.
JONATHAN BLOCH: That immediately starts to open up the world of the block.
We identify all of the bone that's outcropping on the surface.
PETER STANDRING: Doug carefully coats the tiny bones with plastic to protect them from
the powerful acid bath they're about to take.
DOUG BOYER (Graduate Student, Stony Brook University): We leave the block in acid for,
at the most, two to two and a half hours, and that'll remove about a millimeter-thick
rind of limestone.
JONATHAN BLOCH: We repeat the process, again and again and again and again, until all of
the bone is exposed.
PETER STANDRING: Much to their surprise they find hundreds of tiny bones.
But success poses a new problem.
JONATHAN BLOCH: It's not always obvious which bones go to what animal, and so the only way
to document that is by creating a little archeology site, a map of all the bones.
PETER STANDRING: Doug devises a method to meticulously document the relationship between
each and every bone.
The process will take months, but when complete, it will reveal far more than they ever anticipated:
dozens of tiny mammals never before seen, including these three extraordinary skeletons.
And what are these?
JONATHAN BLOCH: These are plesiadapiforms,
PETER STANDRING: Plesiadapiforms are tiny mouse-like creatures that lived during the
mysterious 10-million-year period between the extinction of dinosaurs and the appearance
of primates.
It's a very diverse group, with more than 120 species, including these three.
JONATHAN BLOCH: They represent the most complete skeletons of plesiadapiforms known in the
world.
PETER STANDRING: An extraordinary find, for sure, but will they help Jonathan solve this
primate mystery?
Are plesiadapiforms our earliest ancestors?
JONATHAN BLOCH: If we look here, this nail-like structure makes you think, because the presence
of a nail is a hallmark characteristic of living primates.
PETER STANDRING: This is an enlarged image of the extraordinary nail Jonathan found.
Next to it, the claw he expected–a startling difference.
JONATHAN BLOCH: This nail might actually be the first nail in the history of primate evolution.
PETER STANDRING: Concrete evidence to support his theory of primate evolution.
Could there be more hidden within these tiny bones?
To find out, Jonathan enlists the help of Mary Silcox, evolutionary anthropologist at
the University of Winnipeg.
She's been busy zapping primitive skulls with an industrial-strength CAT scanner, large
enough to fill an entire room.
Mary takes the skull of one of the limestone skeletons and prepares it for scanning.
MARY T. SILCOX (University of Winnipeg): The x-ray goes through the specimen, and we collect
2,400 separate views, which produce a cross-sectional image.
A structure that had been identified as just a little piece of bone in the middle ear actually
had the form of a tube.
And the reason that was exciting was because there's a structure running through the ear
of particularly primitive primates–things like lemurs–which is a tube for a large
vessel that goes to the brain.
PETER STANDRING: A tiny tube, a tiny nail, the evidence is mounting.
But to prove his theory of primate evolution, Jonathan still needs more.
He adds another member to the team.
Eric Sargis, professor of anthropology at Yale University, and the world's leading expert
on tree shrews.
Why a tree shrew expert?
Scientists believe that tree shrews–a primitive species of tiny tree-living mammals–are
actually related to early primates.
ERIC SARGIS: Tree shrews are not primates, but they're close relatives.
They share a number of characteristics that separates them from other groups of mammals.
PETER STANDRING: Would plesiadapiforms pass the ultimate primate test?
Are they the first step on the primate family tree or just another relative on the tree
shrew family tree?
MARY SILCOX: What we were interested in was to test whether or not plesiadapiforms were
the earliest primates.
PETER STANDRING: The team goes to work bringing together all the information they had collected
independently into a single comprehensive study: Jonathan and Doug's plesiadapiform
skeletons; Mary's scans of dozens of ancient skulls; and Eric's anatomical data on a close
living relative, the tree shrew.
ERIC SARGIS: The way we start is by comparing all these specimens.
PETER STANDRING: Detail by detail, feature by feature they combed through all the data
using a numerical system to compare and contrast.
JONATHAN BLOCH: After we studied the different characteristics of these animals, and reduced
them down to numbers–you know, absence of a nail is a 0, presence of a nail is a 1–we
then ran this through a computer algorithm.
PETER STANDRING: The algorithm sifted through the complex data in search of simple relationships:
which fossils have the same characteristics, the same numbers.
Using this information, the computer was programmed to create family trees illustrating the potential
relationships each mammal has to the next.
The team expected the computer to come up with several possible scenarios in the form
of several possible family trees.
Instead, the program came up with only one.
JONATHAN BLOCH: I was a little surprised to see it so unambiguous.
PETER STANDRING: This single family tree could lead to only one conclusion.
JONATHAN BLOCH: I think the evidence, as it stands today, is pretty compelling that yes,
in fact, these are primates.
MARY SILCOX: Every new piece of data that we had coming out of our study of this material
seemed to be consistent with that idea.
PETER STANDRING: Not only that.
One of the plesiadapiform skeletons Jonathan and Doug painstakingly etched out of limestone,
a species by the name of Dryomomys, turns out to be far more primitive than the other
two, possessing only one primate characteristic, the shape of its teeth.
ERIC SARGIS: It's sort of a transitional specimen between more primitive things, like tree shrews,
and later primates.
PETER STANDRING: One part primate, other parts not.
ERIC SARGIS: I mean, it really starts to tell us something about the base of the primate
tree, what the earliest primates look like.
So, if we're one leaf on the branch, so are chimpanzees, gorillas, orangutans, among apes;
all the different monkeys in the old world and the new world; lemurs from Madagascar;
lorises and galagoes; all those animals are living today, but you can trace it all back
to a single common ancestor.
And as you get closer and closer to that common ancestor, dryomomys is one of the animals
that's closest to the base there.
It's the most primitive primate skeleton ever found, to date.
PETER STANDRING: Jonathan had evidence to support his theory.
Primates didn't just appear on the planet, they evolved over a 10-million-year period.
And just as he thought, the earliest primates were the size of a mouse.
Still one question remains.
What sparked this amazing transformation?
The team believes our ancient ancestors evolve on the heels of a mass extinction.
Without the mighty T-Rex around, the tiniest of mammals are free to forage and explore,
and they discover a world filled with flowering plants and succulent fruit.
MARY SILCOX: We have this sort of co-evolutionary relationship, where fruits were evolving to
get tastier for primates to eat; the primates were then eating them and helping the plants
actually spread their seeds further.
PETER STANDRING: With tempting fruit growing at the end of tiny branches, our ancestors
have plenty of motivation to change.
So they begin to evolve, developing long fingers for climbing trees, specialized teeth, hands
and feet, uniquely designed for grasping and eating the tiniest, tasty berry.
Over 10 million years, they slowly develop unique characteristics that we recognize in
our primate relatives and ourselves.
ERIC SARGIS: So that if plesiadapiforms don't evolve, we're probably not standing here talking
about this right now.