>> YOU MIGHT CONSIDER THIS WEEK’S SPECIAL SESSION, THE SPEED OF IT, THE FORE GONE
CONCLUSIONS OF IT, YOUR FIRST
LOOK AT WHAT TO EXPECT FROM
FLORIDA’S LEGISLATURE THIS YEAR
WITH A REPUBLICAN SUPERMAJORITY
IN BOTH THE HOUSE AND SENATE.
THIS WEEK DEMOCRATS LITERALLY
DID ALL THEY COULD TO IMPACT THE
OUTCOMES WITH THEIR INPUT.
THEY FILED INSURANCE AND HOUSING
BILLS.
THEY PROPOSED AMENDMENTS.
EVERYTHING REJECTED.
STATE SENATOR TIN-- TINA PULLSKY
REPPING BROWARD AND BOCA RATON
WAS ONE TRYING TO INCOMPLEUNS
THE DIRECT OF THE SESSION RIGHT
HERE WITH US.
RIGHT NOW, SENATOR, TIPA AND
GLENNA WORK FOR YOU ALSO.
>> THAT’S PERFECT.
>> GREAT TO HAVE YOU ABOARD,
THANKS FOR BEING WITH US THIS
SUNDAY MORNING.
BEFORE WE GET INTO A COUPLE OF
THE BILLS I WANTED TO GET YOUR
FIRST HAND PERSPECTIVE WHAT IT
WAS LIKE FOR YOU AND YOUR
COLLEAGUES AND YOUR CAUCUS THIS
WEEK TO BE SITTING IN THOSE
COMMITTEE HEARINGSnd ON THE
FLOOR OF THE, IN YOUR CASE
SENATE, AND SNOW THAT YOU
ARE-- KNOW THAT YOU ARE NOT
GOING TO GET ANYTHING DONE, WHAT
WAS THAT LIKE?
>> WELL, WE DON’T REALLY THINK
WE’RE NOT GOING TO GET ANYTHING
DONE.
I KNOW I PERSONALLY HAVE SOME
GREAT DEALS AND A HEARING NEXT
WEEK, SOME REALLY IMPORTANT
THINGS WE’RE GOING TO WORK ON.
>> I GUESS I’M TALKING ABOUT
THIS PARTICULAR WEEK, THIS ONE
WEEK.
>> OH, OKAY.
>> YEAH, WELL, YOU ARE RIGHT.
NOT ONLY ARE WE IN THE
SUPERMINORITY BUT A SPECIAL
SESSION IS A FORE GONE, AND IT
SAY TERRIBLE WAY TO-- I THINK WE
UNDERSTAND THAT IT IS ONE, TWO
DAY PROCESS WITH EACH BILL AND
THERE IS NO TESTIMONY, THERE IS
NO CHANGES, NO AMENDMENTS, NO
OPPORTUNITY TO MAKE BILLS
BETTER, WHETHER THEY ARE GOOD
BILLS OR BAD BILLS.
AND THERE IS JUST NO
INTERACTION.
NORMALLY IN NORMAL SESSION, A
BILL IS NEVER THE SAME, AND
EVERYONE WORKS ON IT AND THERE
IS A COLLABORATIVE PROCESS.
THE SPECIAL SESSION, ESPECIALLY
THIS ONE IS, THIS IS THE
GOVERNOR SAYING I MAID SOME
MISTAKES AND I’M IN TROUBLE ON A
COUPLE OF IMPORTANT ISSUES.
AND WE NEED TO CHANGE THE LAW TO
ADJUST TO THE THINGS THAT I AM
DOING.
SO THIS IS REALLY AN OVERREACH
BEYOND ANYTHING WE HAVE EVER
SEEN BEFORE.
THE GOVERNOR HIMSELF IS CHANGING
THE LAW TO EFFECT THE EXECUTIVE
BRAND.
SOAR WE ARE NOT A FULLY PART OF
GOVERNMENT AND THAT IS EXACTLY
WHAT HAPPENED.
THE SPECIAL PROPROSECUTER, THE
MIGRANT BILL AND REEDY CREEK ARE
ALL THINGS THAT HE HAD DONE
WRONG EARLIER.
AND WAS FACING LEGAL
CONSEQUENCES.
>> OKAY, WELL, THAT SAID, LET’S
GET INTO A COUPLE OF THOSE
BECAUSE THAT SAID, YOU HAVE A
MAJORITY OF LAWMAKERS WHO ARE
SUPPORTING THESE BILLS, WHO
VOTED YES, AND YOU HEARD, I KNOW
YOUR COLLEAGUE AND I KNOW YOUR
FRIEND DANNY PEREZ JUST A FEW
MINUTES AGO REALLY BACKING AND
EXPLAINING AND DEFENDING WHY THE
BILLS ARE NECESSARY, SO LET ME
START WITH THE MIGRANT TRANSPORT
BILL.
THERE AGAIN A THREE PAGE BILL
THAT OUTLINES WHY THAT THE BIDEN
ADMINISTRATION ACCORDING TO THE
BILL IS JUST NOT DOING ITS JOB
DEFENDING THE BORDERS THAT
FLORIDA RESIDENTS SHOULD NOT BE
IMPACTED BY THAT.
WHAT IS WRONG WITH ASSISTING THE
TRANSPORT, IF THIS COMES TO
PASS, AS VOLUNTARILY AND
WILLINGLY TAKING PEOPLE TO OTHER
PLACES.
WHILE THEY ARE WAITING FOR THEIR
ASSIGNMENT CLAIM.
I MEAN ESSENTIALLY, WHAT IS
WRONG WITH THAT?
>> SO THERE ARE A COUPLE OF
REALLY IMPORTANT FACTS.
WHAT IS WRONG WITH IT IS THAT
THE BILL AS YOU MENTIONED,
IS-- WRONG AND THAT IS WHAT REP
PEREZ SAID.
THEY ARE GIVING A
POLITICAL-- NOT THE
PRACTICALITIES.
AND THE WAY THAT IT IS GOING TO
GET DONE.
THEY JUST WANT TO SCORE
POLITICAL POINTS, THAT IS WHAT
THIS BILL IS ABOUT.
>> BEFORE YOU GO ON, AND I’M
SORRY TO INTERRUPT, I JUST WANT
TO GET YOUR PERSPECTIVE.
I MEAN THE BORDER SECURITY HAS I
THINK BY ALL ACCOUNTS REALLY HAS
BEEN THE BIDEN ADMINISTRATION’S
ACHILLES HEEL.
AND IT’S ABOUT BORDER SECURITY.
IT’S ALSO ABOUT HUMANITARIAN AND
LEGAL IMMIGRATION.
SO DO YOU THINK THAT FLORIDA HAS
A ROLE TO PROTECT ITS CITIZENS
IN WHATEVER WAY WHILE BORDER
SECURITY IS BEING HANDLED?
IF IT IS HANDLED?
>> I DO THINK FLORIDA HAS A ROLE
TO PLAY.
TO PROTECT ITS CITIZENS.
WHAT IS WRONG WITH THIS BILL,
THAT THIS BILL IS NOT DEALING
WITH, SO WHAT THEY CHANGED FROM
THE PRIOR BILL TO THE ONE WHICH
IS CURRENTLY BEING LITIGATED IN
COURT, AND THE REASON-- THEY
CHAPPINGED THE LAW TO ADJUST TO
THIS PROGRAM.
AND THE NEW PROGRAM TAKES OUT
THE REQUIREMENT THAT THESE
MIGRANTS ARE IN THE STATE OF
FLORIDA.
SO TELL ME HOW IT HURTS
FLORIDIANS TO BE WORRYING ABOUT
MIGRANTS IN OTHER PLACES.
AND IT ONLY HURTS US BY SENDING
OUR TAXPAYER MONEY, GOING INTO
OTHER STATES.
FOR EXAMPLE, GOING BACK TO
TEXAS, ROUNDING UP PEOPLE,
OFFERING THEM FLIGHTSES TO, THEY
CALL THEM SANCTUARY CITIES OR
BLUE STATE, BLUE CITY, AND
SENDING THEM OFF.
THAT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE
STATE OF FLORIDA.
AND HERE WE ARE APPROPRIATING
ANOTHER $10 MILLION.
AND I ASKED THE QUESTION ON THE
FLOOR, ARE WE GOING TO HAVE A
COMPETITIVE BID PROCESS FOR
THESE PRIVATE CHARTER FLIGHTS.
AND THE ANSWER FROM THE SENATOR
WAS NO, THERE IS NO TIME.
SO WHAT KIND OF STEWARTS OF OUR
MONEY, OUR TAXPAYER MONEY ARE
THE REPUBLICANS NOW?
WHERE IS FISCAL CONSERVATISM.
WHERE IS SMALL GOVERNMENT?
THEY ARE GOING INTO LITERALLY
OTHER STATES, FINDING MIGRANTS
AND TAKING THEM TO OTHER STATES.
WE ARE TALKING ABOUT FLORIDIANS.
PEOPLE WHO ARE IN FLORIDA.
MIGRANTS IN FLORIDA WHO ARE
CAUSING TROUBLE, THEN WE HAVE
LAW ENFORCEMENT TO TAKE CARE OF
THAT.
BUT YOU MENTIONED HUMANITARIAN
EFFORTS.
YOU KNOW, THERE IS JUST NOT
CARING ABOUT THE HUMAN BEINGS,
SHIPPING THEM AROUND THE
COUNTRY, AND MAKING POLITICAL
POINTS WITH THEM BY TAKING THEM
TO PLACES LIKE MARTHA’S
VINEYARD.
THIS DOES NOT HELP FLORIDIANS IN
ANYWAY.
IN FACT, IT HURTS US BECAUSE
THEY HAVE ALREADY APPROPRIATED
$10 MILLION, AND SPENT COUNTLESS
MILLIONS ON THE LAST-- AND THERE
IS NO ACCOUNTABILITY WHATSOEVER.
THERE ARE QUESTIONS ABOUT THAT.
WE ASK LOTS OF QUESTIONS, WHAT
DOES IT MEAN TO BE VOLUNTARY.
THEY SAID THEY CAN GO WHERE THEY
WANT.
I AM PICTURING THERE WILL BE
FIVE PRIVATE PLANES AND YOU GET
TO CHOOSE WHAT CITY YOU WANT TO
GO TO.
THAT IS NOT FLEXIBILITY.
>> THEY DON’T UNDERSTAND THE
BILL.
THE BILL LIKE YOU SAID IS TOO
DATED.
DOESN’T STATE IT.
>> WELL, THAT WAS KIND OF FROM
A-- PUBLIC SERVICE NEWS
STANDPOINT, ST CHALLENGING FOR
SOMEONE LIKE ME TO READ A THREE
PAGE BILL WITHOUT DETAILS AND
WONDER HOW THIS IS GOING TO GO.
AND I THINK YOU KNOW, LARGELY
WE’RE GOING TO SART OF SEE HOW
IT PLAYS OUT IN REALTIME.
BUT THE ONE PART OF THE BILL
THAT ALSO WAS NOT ANSWERED WAS
THE FALL FLIGHTS THAT WERE DONE
UNDER THE DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION.
SO WITH A NO BID CONTRACT.
SO A COMPANY CALLED VERTAL
SYSTEMS.
I GUESS MAYBE THAT IS WHY IT WAS
MOVED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SO THAT NO
BID BECAME PART OF AN EMERGENCY.
HOWEVER, THERE, THIS COMPANY IS
SITTING WITH ABOUT A MILLION AND
A HALF DOLLARS FOR SERVICES NOT
YET RENDERED.
WHAT HAPPENS TO THAT AMOUNT OF
MONEY WITH THAT PARTICULAR
VENDOR?
>> I WISH I KNEW THE ANSWER TO
THAT.
WE HAVE-- THE MINORITY LEADER
SENT A LETTER TO THE DEPARTMENT
OF TRANSPORTATION, MONTHS AND
MONTHS AGO.
HE HAS NOT.
>> PURDUE CAME BEFORE US IN
COMMITTEE, AND APPROPRIATIONS
AND WE ASKED HIM TO, WE ASKED
HIM TO EXPLAIN AND THERE WAS NO
TIME IN THE BUDGET TO TALK ABOUT
IT.
SO THE BUDGET COMMITTEE HEARING.
WE ASKED HIM TO COME BACK AND
THEY HAVEN’T DONE IT.
SO THEY REFUSED TO ANSWER THE
QUESTIONS.
>> ALL RIGHT, TINA, SENATOR BOCA
RATON AND BROWARD, SIT TIGHT IF
YOU WOULD.
WE HAVE A COUPLE OF MINUTES FOR
A BREAK AND WE WILL DO MORE WHEN
A BREAK AND WE WILL DO MORE WHEN THE OTHER SIDE. >> WE ARE BACK WITH FLORIDA’S
STATE SENATOR TINA PULLSKY,
DEMOCRAT REPRESENTING BOCA RATON
AND PARTS OF BROWARD, TALKING
ABOUT A FEW OF THE SPECIAL
SESSION BILLS.
TINA, WHAT I CALL THE ELECTIONS
POLICE BILL WHICH IS NOT THE
NAME OF IT, STATEWIDE PROSECUTE
ERBIL, ESSENTIALLY LOOKS LIKE IT
MORE CLEARLY DEFINES WHAT
ELECTION RELATED CRIME THE
ATTORNEY GENERAL’S OFFICE AND
STATE WIDE PROSECUTOR CAN GO
AFTER, OF COURSE, IN LIGHT OF
THE VERY HIGH PROFILE ARREST OF
VOTING FELONS LAST SUMMER.
WHAT DOES THAT CHANGE?
>> SO LAST YEAR WE CAME UP WITH
THE GENIUS IDEA TO HAVE, AS YOU
SAID, THE ELECTION POLICE SQUAD.
AND AGAIN AS I MENTIONED IN THE
PRIOR SEGMENT, TO CLEAN UP THE
MISTAKES THE FIRST TIME WHERE
THE GOVERNOR HAD THE STATEWIDE
PROSECUTOR PROSECUTING THESE 20
FOLKS WHO WERE ARRESTED, YOU
KNOW, MAN HANDLED BECAUSE THEY
WENT TO VOTE BECAUSE THE STATE
HAD GIVEN THEM A VOTER
REGISTRATION CARD.
SO THEY WERE ARRESTED AND
DETAINED.
SIMPLY FOR VOTING.
PERHAPS ILLEGALLY BUT YOU KNOW,
IT WAS WAY TOO EXTREME, THE
MEASURE THASES THEY TOOK.
SO THE STATEWIDE PROSECUTOR WAS
ASSIGNED TO THESE CASES AND
SEVERAL OF THOSE WERE DISMISSED
BY THE JUDGE SAYING THEY DIDN’T
HAVE THE PROPER JURISDICTION.
WHY ARE THEY USING THE STATEWIDE
PROSECUTOR, BECAUSE CERTAIN
LOCAL STATE ATTORNEYS WON’T
PROSECUTE THESE NONDANGEROUS,
POTENTIALLY NONILLEGAL CRIMES
THAT THEY ARE BEING ACCUSED OF,
THESE FOLKS.
YOU KNOW T IS HARD TO SAY
WHETHER IT IS ILLEGAL FOR THEM
TO VOTE SO LOCAL STATES AND
STATE ATTORNEYS ARE NOT GOING
AFTER THESE PEOPLE.
AND THE GOVERNOR WANTS TO THEN
HE IS GOING TO ASK THE STATEWIDE
PROSECUTOR TO.
THE STATEWIDE PROSECUTOR DIDN’T
HAVE JURISDICTION OVER THESE
CASES.
SO ONCE AGAIN, THE EXECUTIVE
BRANCH TOLD THE LEGISLATIVE
BRANCH TO CHANGE THE LAW TO FIT
HIS NARRATIVE AND WHAT HE WOULD
LIKE TO DO AND THE LEGISLATIVE
BRANCH ROLLED OVER AND DID
EXACTLY WHAT HE WAS ASKING FOR.
SO THIS NEW BILL, ONE THE SIX
THAT WE PASSED IN THIS SPECIAL
SESSION CREATED A CHANGE TO SOME
OF THE CASES THAT THE STATEWIDE
PROSECUTOR CAN PROSECUTE TO
ENABLE THEM TO GO AFTER PEOPLE
WHO ARE VOTING POTENTIALLY
ILLEGALLY.
>> SO THERE IS SO MUCH
CONFUSION, IF THERE WAS
CONFUSION ABOUT THE STATE WIDE
PROSECUTOR’S JURISDICTION, THERE
CERTAINLY WAS CONFUSION WITH
SOME OF THE VOTING FELONS.
I THINK TO, FOR SOME OF THE ONES
THAT WE REPORTED ON LOCALLY, THE
STATUTE THEY WERE CHARGED WITH
HAD TO INCLUDE INTENT AND
CLEARLY TO US ANYWAY, SOME OF
THESE FELONS HAD NO IDEA.
AND WEREN’T INTENDING TO GO, TO
YOUR POINT, THEY JUST HAD A
VOTER REGISTRATION CARD.
BUT CAN I PLAY JUST DEVIL’S
ADVOCATE FOR A MOMENT HERE, IS
IT VALID THAT LAWMAKERS,
REPUBLICAN LAWMAKERS, OR
GOVERNOR WANT TO REALLY FINE
TUNE ELECTION SECURITY AND MAKE
SURE THAT NOBODY VOTES WHEN
THEY’RE NOT SUPPOSED TO BE
VOTING.
AND THIS MIGHT BE THE WAY TO DO
THAT?
>> YOU WILL NOT FIND A DEMOCRAT,
WHO DISAGREES WITH FINE TUNING
OUR ELECTION SECURITY.
THAT IS NOT THE ISSUE
WHATSOEVER.
BUT HAVING A POLICE FORCE,
EXACTLY WHAT WE THOUGHT WOULD
HAPPEN WOULD HAPPEN.
AND THAT STAR GETTING PROFILING,
AND GOING AFTER THESE PEOPLE.
THERE WERE PEOPLE WHO VOTED
ILLEGALLY, THERE WERE SEVERAL IN
THE VILLAGES, THEY VOTED
MULTIPLE TIMES, VOTED IN A DEAD
PERSON’S NAME.
AND THOSE PEOPLE PROSECUTED
PROPERLY UNDER THE LAW.
THERE ARE STATES ATTORNEY CAN
HANDLE THESE VERY FEW INSTANCES
OF ELECTION FRAUD THAT GO ON
ANYWHERE ACROSS THE STATEMENT
BUT CREATING A POLICE FORCE,
THEY HAVE TO JUSTIFY THEIR
EXISTENCE.
AND IF YOU RECALL, IN BROWARD,
RIGHT WHERE WE ARE, THE GOVERNOR
CAME DOWN WITH YOU KNOW,
SHERIFF’S BEHIND HIM AND TRIED
TO SCARE PEOPLE ABOUT VOTING.
AND I BELIEVE IT WAS BEFORE THE
ELECTION, IF I AM RECALLING
CORRECTLY.
AND WE THOUGHT IT WAS VOTER
INTIMIDATION.
DON’T VOTE IF YOU DON’T THINK
YOU CAN.
WE ARE COMING AFTER YOU.
AND THEN THIS VERY HIGH PROFILE
ARREST, PHYSICAL ARREST LIKE
PUTTING PEOPLE IN HANDCUFFS FOR
VOTING.
THINK ABOUT THAT.
AND THERE WAS A LOT OF
CONFUSION.
BECAUSE THE STATE DID PLAY A
ROLE IN THEM VOTING.
SO WE ARE ALL FOR ELECTION
INTEGRITY, AND THAT IS NOT THE
ISSUE HERE.
THE ISSUE IS PROMOTING A
POLITICAL AGENDA, NOT WANTING
CERTAIN PEOPLE TO VOTE, AND
TRYING TO INTIMIDATE OTHERS FROM
VOTING IF THEY ARE NOT SURE THAT
THEY CAN, THEN WHAT ARE THEY
GOING TO DO THEY WILL JUST STAY
HOME BECAUSE THEY SAW PEOPLE
ARRESTED.
>> IN THE SHORT TIME THAT WE
HAVE LEFT, THIS WAS NOT PART OF
SPECIAL SESSION BUT IT IS GOING
TO BE A VERY BIG PART OF SESSION
COMING UP, THE PERMITLESS CARRY
BILL THAT WAS FILED.
WE ARE WHAT, TWO DAYS FROM THE
FIVE YEAR MARK OF THE PARKLAND
CATASTROPHE.
I KNOW YOU WERE SO INVOLVED IN
THAT.
I BELIEVE YOU FILED JAMIE’S LAW
THIS SESSION, NAMED FOR JAMIE
GUTTENBERG, THAT CLOSES THE
BACKGROUND CHECK LOOPHOLE ON
AMMUNITION, AM I RIGHT?
IS THAT FILED?
>> YES, THAT IS CORRECT.
I DID FILE THAT THIS YEAR WITH
REPRESENTATIVE DAILY.
OUR SECOND YEAR DOING IT
TOGETHER.
YOU KNOW, IF WE WERE WORKING ON,
IF WE CARED ABOUT THE NUMBER ONE
CAUSE OF DEATH IN CHILDREN,
WHICH IS GUN VIOLENCE, WE WOULD
BE LOOKING TO REFORM OUR GUN
LAWS AND MAKE EVERYONE SAFER.
IF YOU NEED A BACKGROUND CHECK
FOR A GUN, YOU SHOULD HAVE I
ABACK GROUND CHECK FOR
AMMUNITION.
AMONG OTHER LAWS THAT, YOU KNOW,
WE ARE TRYING TO PASS AND THAT I
HAVE BEEN WORKING ON THE WHOLE
TIME HAVE I BEEN IN THE
LEGISLATURE, SAFER STORAGE OF
GUNS, BANNING GHOST GUN, BANNING
ASSAULT WEAPONS.
NONE OF THESE ARE NECESSARY,
JUST SOMEONE WHO WANTS TO HAVE A
GUN FOR THEIR SELF-DEFENSE.
BUT WHEN YOU HAVE TWO ENORMOUS
MASS SHOOTINGS IN OUR STATE AND
WE MADE A LITTLE PROGRESS ON GUN
SAFETY AFTER THE PORKLAND MASS
AKARY, AND TO GO BACKYARDS NOW
WITH THIS BILL, THIS YEAR,
PURELY FOR POLITICAL REASONS TO
HELP THE GOVERNOR RUN FOR
PRESIDENT, PERMITLESS CARRY IS
PUTTING PEOPLE ON THE STREETS
WITH GUNS, HIDDEN ON THEIR
PERSON OR IN THEIR CAR WHO ARE
UNTRAINED AND UNVETTED AND
UNCHECKED.
AND I DON’T KNOW WHY ANYONE
THINKS THAT MORE GUNS IS SAFER.
IF HAVING MORE GUNS WILL MAKE US
SAFER, WE WOULD BE THE SAFEST
COUNTRY IN THE WORLD.
WE HAVE MORE GUNS THAN PEOPLE.
SO IF WE DON’T TAKE A HARD LOOK
AT WHAT WE ARE CREATING AND
CREATING MORE OPPORTUNITY FOR
VIOLENCE, AND SOMEONE WHO LOSES
THEIR TEMPER AND THE BACK OF
THEIR PANTS AND THEY ARE ONLINE
IN PUBLIX AND WHAT IS TO STOP
PEOPLE FROM LOSING THEIR TEMPER
OR ON THE ROAD, ROAD RAGE.
MI SO SCARED FOR WHAT MIGHT BE
HAPPENING.
>> WE TALKED A LITTLE BIT ABOUT
THIS LAST WEEK WITH
REPRESENTATIVE RANDY FINE FROM
BRA VARD WHO WAS ONE OF THE
SPONSORS OF THE BILL.
INTERESTING TO ME THAT IN THIS
PERMITLESS CARRY, WHICH IS, YOU
KNOW, HAS MANY SUPPORTERS, MANY,
MANY OPPONENTS, BUT THERE ARE
ALSO COMPONENTS TO STRENGTHEN
SCHOOL SECURITY WHERE IT COMES
TO FIRE ARMS.
I AM GUESSING YOU WOULD
WHOLEHEARTEDLY SUPPORT THOSE
THINGS.
>> FOR SURE.
I MEAN THE SENATE VERSION OF THE
BILL HAD SEVERAL SCHOOL SAFETY
INITIATIVES.
I HAVE HAVE HAVE VOTED AND
COSPONSORED SCHOOL SAFETY
INITIATIVES ON THEIR OWN.
BUT GLENNA T IS SO POLITICAL.
THEY ARE COUCHING A VERY
DANGEROUS BILL WRAPPED UP IN,
YOU KNOW, SOMETHING THAT IS MORE
PALATABLE, LIKE SCHOOL SAFETY.
THERE IS EVEN A CANINE PROGRAM.
WHO DOESN’T LOVE DOGS AND SAFETY
DOGS, RIGHT?
BUT YOU KNOW, HOW CAN WE VOTE
FOR A BILL THAT IS GOING TO
INCREASE THE NUMBER OF GUNS AND
INCREASE THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE
WHO ARE UNTRAINED AND NOT BEING
VETTED CARRYING GUNS AROUND.
THERE SAY REASON WHY THOUSANDS
OF PEOPLE DO NOT PASS THE
CONCEALED CARRY WEAPON PERMIT
TEST.
AND SO NOW NO MORE TESTS.
AND THEY ARE JUST OUT THERE WITH
GUNS.
SO WRAP IT IN SCHOOL SAFETY TO
MAKE THEMSELVES FEEL BETTER,
THAT IS FINE.
I STILL CAN’T VOTE FOR THE BILL.
THAT DOESN’T MEAN I DON’T CARE
ABOUT SCHOOL SAFETY AND THE
PEOPLE I REPRESENT IN PARKLAND,
IT’S MY NUMBER ONE ISSUE ALL THE
TIME.
I LOVE THESE PEOPLE, I LOVE
THESE PARENTS, I’M IN TOUCH WITH
THEM ALL THE TIME.
BUT YOU KNOW, IT IS SO POLITICAL
T IS SO OBVIOUS WHAT THEY ARE
DOING.
AND YOU NOARKS TI KNOW IT IS
GOING TO PASS SO I KNOW THERE
WILL BE SOME GOOD PARTS TO IT.
BUT DID IS SO CYNICAL AND TRULY
SCARY.
>> IT IS SO POLITICAL IS GOING
TO BE 9 HEADLINE STARTING MARCH
FOR SESSION, I THINK.
AND SO I HOPE YOU WILL JOIN US
AGAIN AS THE BILL, THIS AND
OTHERS, GO THROUGH.
WE CERTAINLY DO APPRECIATE YOUR
TIME TODAY, STATE SENATOR