PRESIDENT TRUMP WAS A CANDIDATE.
I WANT TO BRING IN CHRIS BEDFORD
NOW, HE IS "DAILY CALLER"'S
EDITOR-IN-CHIEF.
CHRIS, LET'S FIRST TALK ABOUT
CONGRESSMAN SCHIFF AND HIS
INVESTIGATION BECAUSE, IT IS ALL
BEING DONE IN SECRET.
HE SAID THERE IS NOTHING
CLASSIFIED THAT IS BEING
DISCUSSED.
IF THERE IS NOTHING CLASSIFIED,
WHY IS IT BEING DONE IN A SCIF
IN SECRET?
>> IT IS GAME OF HOCUS-POCUS
FROM CONGRESSMAN SCHIFF WHETHER
OR NOT IT WILL BE ALLOWED TO BE
OUT OR WHETHER IT WILL BE OUT.
ESSENTIALLY HE IS SAYING HE
WANTS TO GET ALL THE FACTS TO
MOVE FORWARD WITHOUT ALLOWING
REPUBLICANS TO ANSWER QUESTIONS.
THIS IS NOT LINED UP WITH WHAT
HE HAS DONE PREVIOUSLY.
THE SCHIFF'S PROBLEM IS IS
PUBLIC RELATIONS WAR.
THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
LIKELY TO IMPEACH PRESIDENT
TRUMP REGARDLESS.
THEY WILL NOT GET IT THROUGH THE
SENATE.
THE QUESTION FOR SCHIFF CAN HE
USE THE INVESTIGATION TO CHANGE
WHAT VOTERS AT THIS.
IF HE WANTS TO HIDE BEHIND
CLOSED DOORS, NOT GIVE
REPUBLICANS ACCESS TO THIS, NOT
IT IS NOT A GOOD PR STORY.
DAVID: DOESN'T IT ALL HAVE TO
COME OUT?
THIS IS IMPEACHMENT.
THIS IS NOT INVESTIGATION OF
BENGHAZI.
THIS IS AN IMPEACHMENT, AN
ATTEMPT TO OVERTURN AN ELECTION.
THE PEOPLE DESERVE TO KNOW.
THAT PRESSURE WILL MOUNT ON
SCHIFF AND OTHERS.
>> IT WILL AND SHOULD.
THE PEOPLE DESERVE TO KNOW.
IT IS MIDDLE OF A DEMOCRATIC --
DEMOCRATIC PARTY HAS BEEN TRYING
TO PUSH PRESIDENT TRUMP OUT OF
OFFICE BEFORE THE ELECTION, EVEN
AFTER HE TOOK OFFICE.
IT WILL ALL COME OUT EVENTUALLY.
THE WORRY, EVIDENCE THAT MAY NOT
BACK UP THINGS THAT SCHIFF WANTS
TO ALLEGE MAY NEVER COME OUT.
DAVID: I HAVE TO SWITCH TOPICS,
THERE IS OTHER NEWS.
FACEBOOK IS COMING OUT UNVEILING
ITS NEWS TAB.
YOUR ORGANIZATION WILL BE A PART
OF THAT.
THIS IS AN ATTEMPT TO PUT SORT
OF NEWS SEARCHING ON ONE STOP
AREA INSIDE OF FACEBOOK.
NOT EVERYBODY IS HAPPY THAT YOU
ARE A PART OF THAT.
ALEXANDRIA OCASIO-CORTEZ AMONG
THEM.
LET ME PLAY A SOUND BITE WHAT
SHE SAID ABOUT THAT, GET YOUR
REACTION.
>> YOU HAVE NAMED
"THE DAILY CALLER," A
PUBLICATION, WELL-DOCUMENTED
WITH TIES TO WHITE SUPREMACISTS
AS OFFICIAL FACT CHECKER FOR
FACEBOOK.
>> CONGRESSWOMAN, WE DON'T
APPOINT INDEPENDENT FACT
CHECKERS.
THEY GO THROUGH THE INDEPENDENT
ORGANIZATIONS A INDEPENDENT FACT
CHECKING NETWORK THAT HAS
RIGOROUS STANDING FOR WHO THEY
ALLOW TO SERVE AS FACT CHECKER.
>> SO YOU WOULD SAY THAT WHITE
SUPREMACIST TIED PUBLICATIONS
MEET A RIGOROUS STANDARD FOR
FACT-CHECKING?
THANK YOU.
>> CONGRESSWOMAN, I WOULD SAY
WE'RE NOT THE ONE ASSESSING THAT
STANDARD.
THE INTERNATIONAL FACT-CHECKING
NETWORK IS THE ONE WHO IS
SETTING THAT STANDARD.
DAVID: CLEARLY, CHRIS, SHE IS
NOT SETTING ANY STANDARDS, AT
LEAST IN THEIR DISCUSSION OF
YOUR PUBLICATION BUT HOW WOULD
YOU RESPOND?
>> SHE CERTAINLY NOT SETTING ANY
FACTS.
IT IS FUN TO WATCH THE CLIP.
SEEM'S LIKE MARK ZUCKERBERG
BRAIN RESTARTS WITH THE
STUPIDITY OF HER FINAL QUESTION.
HE REVERTS BACK TO STARING
STRAIGHT AHEAD.
THIS IS OFFENSIVE, HURTFUL TO
OUR STAFF.
WE ARE A COMPANY WHICH, OUR
REPORTING AT GREAT RISK TO OUR
REPORTERS PUT NUMEROUS WHITE
SUPREMACISTS BEHIND BARS,
VIOLENT, MEAN, TERRIBLE PEOPLE.
MINE ANOTHER OWNED COMPANY,
INDIAN-AMERICAN PUBLISHER RUNS
DATA DAY.
WE HAVE JEWISH EMPLOYEES,
HISPANIC, EMPLOYEES, ASIAN
EMPLOYEES, TO BE CALLED BY A
WHITE SUPREMACIST BY
CONGRESSWOMAN, IT IS NOT HURTFUL
TO ALL OF THEM, WHAT SHE IS
TRYING TO DO SCARE BUSINESSES
AWAY.
IF OUR NEWS REPORTING DOESN'T
LIKE IT, TOUGH, FAIR, SHE
DOESN'T LIKE IT MAKE SURE
ADVERTISERS DON'T WORK WITH US,
TECH COMPANIES DON'T WORK WITH
US.
AMERICAN PEOPLE CAN'T GET IT.
THE WAY TO SCARE CORPORATE
AMERICA WITH ACCUSATIONS OF
RACISM.
IT IS INSIDIOUS.
DAVID: WE WISH YOU THE VERY BEST