>> Dana: L.A. DODGERS FACING
CRITICISM FROM A DEMOCRATIC
CONGRESSMAN AFTER DROPPING PLANS
TO HONOR A TRANS NUN GROUP.
THEY WERE GOING TO GIVE AN AWARD
TO THE SISTER OF PERPETUAL
INDULGENCE.
THEY DRESS UP AS NUNS.
GIVEN THE STRONG FEELINGS OF
PEOPLE WHO BEEN OFFENDED BY THE
SISTER’S INCLUSION IN OUR
EVENING IN AN EFFORT NOT TO
DISTRACT FROM THE GREAT BENEFIT
WE’VE SEEN OF PRIDE NIGHT WE ARE
DECIDING TO REMOVE THEM FROM
THIS YEAR’S GROUP OF HONOREES.
OUTKICK FOUNDER CLAY TRAVIS.
I’VE DONE THAT BEFORE, CALLED
YOU TREY CLAVIS.
>> Bill: I DIDN’T KNOW WHAT YOU
WERE GOING TO SAY.
WE GOT IT.
WHAT’S HAPPENING?
>> Dana: WHAT DO YOU THINK OF
ALL THIS?
HOW IS THIS A THING?
IT’S A THING A MONTH AHEAD OF IT
BEING A THING.
>> THIS HAS BECOME A BIG DEAL IN
THE WORLD OF SPORTS.
YOU REMEMBER THE PHILADELPHIA
FLYERS PLAYER WHO REFUSED TO
WEAR THE PRIDE JERSEY AND I
THINK WHAT YOU ARE SEEING TO A
CERTAIN EXTENT IS A DISCONNECT
BETWEEN THE GAY COMMUNITY AND
THE TRANS COMMUNITY IN THE WAY
THAT SOME OF THESE THINGS ARE
BEING PERCEIVED.
I THINK IN PARTICULAR IN THE
WORLD OF SPORTS, IF YOU ARE A
SPORTS FAN, THE IDEA THAT A MAN
WHO IDENTIFIES AS A WOMAN SHOULD
BE ABLE TO BE A WOMEN’S
CHAMPION.
I THINK IT’S REJECTED BY 80 OR
90% OF THE AMERICAN SPORTING
PUBLIC.
I THINK THERE IS THIS PUSHBACK
NOW BECOMING MORE PREVALENT.
I WOULD PUT IT THIS WAY.
AT SOME POINT, INCLUSION BECOMES
EXCLUSION.
YOU ARE KNOCKING A WOMAN OUT OF
THE ABILITY TO WIN A
CHAMPIONSHIP OR TAKING AWAY AN OPPORTUNITY FROM A WOMAN.
OPPORTUNITY FROM A WOMAN.
YOU GUYS SAW THIS CRAZY A DEE
-- AT THING WHEN YOUR LIFE
CHOICES INFRINGE UPON THE
ABILITIES OF REAL BIOLOGICAL
WOMEN.
>> Bill: THEY SAID GO FORTH AND
SIN SOME MORE.
WHO THOUGHT THAT WOULD FLY?
>> IT FLIES IN THE FACE OF THE
RELIGIOUS ELEMENT AS WELL.
INCLUSION IS EXCLUDING
POTENTIALLY SOME RELIGIOUS
PEOPLE.
I THINK YOU ARE FINALLY SEEING
PUSHBACK.
FOR A LONG TIME IT WAS SO
POWERFUL TO SAY ARE YOU A TRANS
PHOBE.
MAKE YOUR OWN LIFE CHOICES BUT I
DON’T KNOW WE NEED TO BE DOING
SURGERY ON 12 AND 13-YEAR-OLD.
>> TALKING ABOUT MASKS.
THE REQUIREMENT TO HAVE.
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF
APPEALS.
YOU WANT TO TAKE THE BAR EXAM.
AT THIS TIME APPLICANTS WILL BE
REQUIRED TO WEAR A MASK FULLY
COVERING THEIR MOUTH AND NOSE
DURING THE EXAM.
ANY ADDITIONAL COVID-19 SAFETY
AND HEALTH PROCEDURES WILL BE
ANNOUNCED CLOSER TO THE EXAM.
I THINK IT MIGHT BE 12 HOURS.
>> Dana: THE PRESIDENT DECLARED
THE PANDEMIC IS OVER ON MAY 11.
NOW THE GOVERNMENT GOING A STEP
FURTHER.
>> THIS IS BALDER DASH AND
LUNACY.
THE PROBLEM AS I SEE IT.
MASKING HAS BECOME.
YOU SEE IT FLOWING AROUND THE
COUNTRY, MASKING IS A POLITICAL
STATEMENT.
THERE IS NOTHING ELSE ASSOCIATED
WITH IT AT ALL.
BAR EXAMS ARE STRESSFUL, NOT
ENJOYABLE DAYS.
TO HAVE TO SIT WITH A MASK ON
FOR 12 HOURS WHEN IT IS COSMETIC
THEATER IS INDEFENSIBLE.
I THINK SOME OF THE LAW
ASSOCIATIONS OUT THERE SHOULD
STAND UP AGAINST THIS VERY IDEA
THAT YOU WOULD HAVE TO DO IT.
MY WIFE IS TAKING THE BAR EXAM
IN JULY IN TENNESSEE.
THANK THE LORD WE HAVE SOME SANE
PEOPLE IN TENNESSEE AND THAT
WON’T BE GOING ON.
>> Dana: AT WHAT POINT DO PEOPLE
LET IT GO?
THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED
STATES HAS LET IT GO.
SIGNED A LAW AND ALSO THE
DECLARATION SAYING THE PANDEMIC
IS OVER.
>> Bill: TITLE 42 OVER.
>> HERE IS WHAT HAPPENED.
PEOPLE’S BRAINS BROKE AND SOME
OF THESE PEOPLE PROBABLY GERM
PHOBES IN THE FIRST PLACE NEED
TO IN MASKS FOR SAFETY.
WHEN I SEE A 3 OR 4-YEAR-OLD KID
BEING FORCED TO WEAR A MASK I
FEEL SO AWFUL FOR THEM THAT THAT
WOULD BECOME NORMAL.