IF WE GET BACK THE SENATE.
IF WE GET BACK THE SENATE. AND WE‘RE IN CHARGE OF THIS
IF WE GET BACK THE SENATE. AND WE‘RE IN CHARGE OF THIS BODY
AND WE‘RE IN CHARGE OF THIS BODY AND THERE‘S JUDICIAL OPENINGS.
BODY AND THERE‘S JUDICIAL OPENINGS. WE WILL TALK TO OUR COLLEAGUES
AND THERE‘S JUDICIAL OPENINGS. WE WILL TALK TO OUR COLLEAGUES ON THE OTHER SIDE, BUT IF
WE WILL TALK TO OUR COLLEAGUES ON THE OTHER SIDE, BUT IF WE‘RE IN CHARGE, SHE WOULD NOT
ON THE OTHER SIDE, BUT IF WE‘RE IN CHARGE, SHE WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN BEFORE THIS
WE‘RE IN CHARGE, SHE WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN BEFORE THIS COMMITTEE.
HAVE BEEN BEFORE THIS COMMITTEE. YOU HAD SOMEBODY MORE
COMMITTEE. YOU HAD SOMEBODY MORE MODERATE THAN THIS.
YOU HAD SOMEBODY MORE MODERATE THAN THIS. THAT WAS
MODERATE THAN THIS. THAT WAS REPUBLICAN. SENATOR, LINDSEY
THAT WAS REPUBLICAN. SENATOR, LINDSEY GRAHAM, A MEMBER OF THE
REPUBLICAN. SENATOR, LINDSEY GRAHAM, A MEMBER OF THE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE AND ITS
GRAHAM, A MEMBER OF THE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE AND ITS FORMER CHAIR SAYING THE QUIET
JUDICIARY COMMITTEE AND ITS FORMER CHAIR SAYING THE QUIET PART OUT LOUD THIS
FORMER CHAIR SAYING THE QUIET PART OUT LOUD THIS MORNING. HE‘S EFFECTIVELY
PART OUT LOUD THIS MORNING. HE‘S EFFECTIVELY SAYING THERE THAT HAVE
MORNING. HE‘S EFFECTIVELY SAYING THERE THAT HAVE REPUBLICANS TAKE CONTROL OF
SAYING THERE THAT HAVE REPUBLICANS TAKE CONTROL OF THE SENATE. THEY WON‘T LET ANY
REPUBLICANS TAKE CONTROL OF THE SENATE. THEY WON‘T LET ANY SUPREME COURT NOMINEES FROM
THE SENATE. THEY WON‘T LET ANY SUPREME COURT NOMINEES FROM CREDIT PRESIDENT‘S GET A
SUPREME COURT NOMINEES FROM CREDIT PRESIDENT‘S GET A HEARING,
CREDIT PRESIDENT‘S GET A HEARING, GRAHAM WAS SPEAKING OUT OF A
HEARING, GRAHAM WAS SPEAKING OUT OF A PLAN COMMITTEE VOTE TO
GRAHAM WAS SPEAKING OUT OF A PLAN COMMITTEE VOTE TO ADVANCE THE NOMINATION OF
PLAN COMMITTEE VOTE TO ADVANCE THE NOMINATION OF JUDGE, KEETON G BROWN JACKSON
ADVANCE THE NOMINATION OF JUDGE, KEETON G BROWN JACKSON TO THE FULL SENATE
JUDGE, KEETON G BROWN JACKSON TO THE FULL SENATE G. CLAIM. JACKSON ISN‘T
TO THE FULL SENATE G. CLAIM. JACKSON ISN‘T MODERATE ENOUGH, EVEN THOUGH
G. CLAIM. JACKSON ISN‘T MODERATE ENOUGH, EVEN THOUGH HE VOTED JUST LAST YEAR
MODERATE ENOUGH, EVEN THOUGH HE VOTED JUST LAST YEAR TO CONFIRM HER TO HER CURRENT
HE VOTED JUST LAST YEAR TO CONFIRM HER TO HER CURRENT JOB ON THE INFLUENTIAL
TO CONFIRM HER TO HER CURRENT JOB ON THE INFLUENTIAL DC CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS,
JOB ON THE INFLUENTIAL DC CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS, BUT WE SHOULDN‘T BE SURPRISED
DC CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS, BUT WE SHOULDN‘T BE SURPRISED THAT LINDSEY GRAHAM KEEPS
BUT WE SHOULDN‘T BE SURPRISED THAT LINDSEY GRAHAM KEEPS MAKING UP REASONS TO OPPOSE
THAT LINDSEY GRAHAM KEEPS MAKING UP REASONS TO OPPOSE DEMOCRATIC SUPREME COURT
MAKING UP REASONS TO OPPOSE DEMOCRATIC SUPREME COURT NOMINEES. LISTEN TO WHAT HE
DEMOCRATIC SUPREME COURT NOMINEES. LISTEN TO WHAT HE SAID, IN 2016 AS HIS PARTY
NOMINEES. LISTEN TO WHAT HE SAID, IN 2016 AS HIS PARTY WAS REFUSING TO GIVE PRESIDENT
SAID, IN 2016 AS HIS PARTY WAS REFUSING TO GIVE PRESIDENT OBAMA‘S SUPREME COURT NOMINEE,
WAS REFUSING TO GIVE PRESIDENT OBAMA‘S SUPREME COURT NOMINEE, MERRICK GARLAND A
OBAMA‘S SUPREME COURT NOMINEE, MERRICK GARLAND A HEARING.
MERRICK GARLAND A HEARING. IF THERE‘S A REPUBLICAN
HEARING. IF THERE‘S A REPUBLICAN PRESIDENT IN 2016, IN A
IF THERE‘S A REPUBLICAN PRESIDENT IN 2016, IN A VACANCY OCCURS,
PRESIDENT IN 2016, IN A VACANCY OCCURS, IN THE LAST YEAR, OF THE FIRST
VACANCY OCCURS, IN THE LAST YEAR, OF THE FIRST TERM, YOU CAN SAY,
IN THE LAST YEAR, OF THE FIRST TERM, YOU CAN SAY, LINDSEY GRAHAM SAID, LET‘S LET
TERM, YOU CAN SAY, LINDSEY GRAHAM SAID, LET‘S LET THE NEXT PRESIDENT
LINDSEY GRAHAM SAID, LET‘S LET THE NEXT PRESIDENT WHOEVER IT MIGHT BE
THE NEXT PRESIDENT WHOEVER IT MIGHT BE MAKE THAT NOMINATION AND YOU
WHOEVER IT MIGHT BE MAKE THAT NOMINATION AND YOU COULD USE MY WORDS AGAINST ME
MAKE THAT NOMINATION AND YOU COULD USE MY WORDS AGAINST ME AND YOU‘D BE ABSOLUTELY RIGHT.
COULD USE MY WORDS AGAINST ME AND YOU‘D BE ABSOLUTELY RIGHT. SO MUCH FOR GRAHAM‘S CLAIM
AND YOU‘D BE ABSOLUTELY RIGHT. SO MUCH FOR GRAHAM‘S CLAIM TODAY, THAT A MORE MODERATE
SO MUCH FOR GRAHAM‘S CLAIM TODAY, THAT A MORE MODERATE CANDIDATE JUDGE JACKSON MIGHT
TODAY, THAT A MORE MODERATE CANDIDATE JUDGE JACKSON MIGHT GET A HEARING FROM
CANDIDATE JUDGE JACKSON MIGHT GET A HEARING FROM REPUBLICANS AS IF
GET A HEARING FROM REPUBLICANS AS IF MERRICK. GARLAND WAS THE
REPUBLICANS AS IF MERRICK. GARLAND WAS THE MIDDLE OF THE ROAD MODERATE
MERRICK. GARLAND WAS THE MIDDLE OF THE ROAD MODERATE CHOICE. AND OF COURSE, G
MIDDLE OF THE ROAD MODERATE CHOICE. AND OF COURSE, G WORDS WERE USED AGAINST HIM
CHOICE. AND OF COURSE, G WORDS WERE USED AGAINST HIM FOR YEARS LATER. WHEN
WORDS WERE USED AGAINST HIM FOR YEARS LATER. WHEN JUSTICE RUTH BADER GINSBURG
FOR YEARS LATER. WHEN JUSTICE RUTH BADER GINSBURG DIED ONLY WEEKS BEFORE
JUSTICE RUTH BADER GINSBURG DIED ONLY WEEKS BEFORE ELECTION DAY AND
DIED ONLY WEEKS BEFORE ELECTION DAY AND G HELPED HIS GOLF BUDDY,
ELECTION DAY AND G HELPED HIS GOLF BUDDY, DONALD TRUMP
G HELPED HIS GOLF BUDDY, DONALD TRUMP THEN-PRESIDENT. GET HIS THIRD
DONALD TRUMP THEN-PRESIDENT. GET HIS THIRD SUPREME COURT
THEN-PRESIDENT. GET HIS THIRD SUPREME COURT JUSTICE ON TO THE COURT.
SUPREME COURT JUSTICE ON TO THE COURT. A ME. KONI, BARRETT.
JUSTICE ON TO THE COURT. A ME. KONI, BARRETT. NOTHING MODERATE ABOUT HER
A ME. KONI, BARRETT. NOTHING MODERATE ABOUT HER VIEWS.
NOTHING MODERATE ABOUT HER VIEWS. SO, WITH THE SENATE JUDICIARY
VIEWS. SO, WITH THE SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE MEETING TODAY
SO, WITH THE SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE MEETING TODAY TO ADVANCE.
COMMITTEE MEETING TODAY TO ADVANCE. JACKSON‘S NOMINATION. WE ARE
TO ADVANCE. JACKSON‘S NOMINATION. WE ARE THIS CLOSE
JACKSON‘S NOMINATION. WE ARE THIS CLOSE TO THE
THIS CLOSE TO THE ANTI-DEMOCRATIC SITUATION
TO THE ANTI-DEMOCRATIC SITUATION WHERE ONLY
ANTI-DEMOCRATIC SITUATION WHERE ONLY REPUBLICANS WILL GET TO PLACE
WHERE ONLY REPUBLICANS WILL GET TO PLACE JUSTICES ON THE SUPREME COURT
REPUBLICANS WILL GET TO PLACE JUSTICES ON THE SUPREME COURT WHERE EVERY NOMINEE FROM A
JUSTICES ON THE SUPREME COURT WHERE EVERY NOMINEE FROM A DEMOCRATIC PRESIDENT ASSUMING
WHERE EVERY NOMINEE FROM A DEMOCRATIC PRESIDENT ASSUMING WILL STILL BE ALLOWED TO HAVE
DEMOCRATIC PRESIDENT ASSUMING WILL STILL BE ALLOWED TO HAVE THOSE EITHER.
WILL STILL BE ALLOWED TO HAVE THOSE EITHER. THEN EVERY DEMOCRATIC PICK
THOSE EITHER. THEN EVERY DEMOCRATIC PICK WOULD GET THE MERRICK GARLAND
THEN EVERY DEMOCRATIC PICK WOULD GET THE MERRICK GARLAND TREATMENT IF REPUBLICANS
WOULD GET THE MERRICK GARLAND TREATMENT IF REPUBLICANS CONTROL THE SENATE
TREATMENT IF REPUBLICANS CONTROL THE SENATE TODAY. SENATOR GRAHAM OFFERED
CONTROL THE SENATE TODAY. SENATOR GRAHAM OFFERED NO BOGUS CLAIMS ABOUT ELECTION
TODAY. SENATOR GRAHAM OFFERED NO BOGUS CLAIMS ABOUT ELECTION YEAR. VACANCIES, NO PRETEXT
NO BOGUS CLAIMS ABOUT ELECTION YEAR. VACANCIES, NO PRETEXT ABOUT LETTING THE VOTERS
YEAR. VACANCIES, NO PRETEXT ABOUT LETTING THE VOTERS DECIDE
ABOUT LETTING THE VOTERS DECIDE HE WAS.
DECIDE HE WAS. EAT IT IN SAYING THAT
HE WAS. EAT IT IN SAYING THAT REPUBLICANS WOULD USE ANY
EAT IT IN SAYING THAT REPUBLICANS WOULD USE ANY TACTIC THEY COULD, THEY COULD
REPUBLICANS WOULD USE ANY TACTIC THEY COULD, THEY COULD TO CONSOLIDATE POWER
TACTIC THEY COULD, THEY COULD TO CONSOLIDATE POWER AND CONTROL THE COURT.
TO CONSOLIDATE POWER AND CONTROL THE COURT. NOW, THIS WEEK IS A
AND CONTROL THE COURT. NOW, THIS WEEK IS A MILESTONE FOR THE SUPREME
NOW, THIS WEEK IS A MILESTONE FOR THE SUPREME COURT AND THIS COUNTRY,
MILESTONE FOR THE SUPREME COURT AND THIS COUNTRY, IT IS ALL BUT GUARANTEED THAT
COURT AND THIS COUNTRY, IT IS ALL BUT GUARANTEED THAT JUDGE. COULD TANGI. BROWN
IT IS ALL BUT GUARANTEED THAT JUDGE. COULD TANGI. BROWN JACKSON WILL BE CONFIRMED AS
JUDGE. COULD TANGI. BROWN JACKSON WILL BE CONFIRMED AS THE FIRST BLACK FEMALE SUPREME
JACKSON WILL BE CONFIRMED AS THE FIRST BLACK FEMALE SUPREME COURT JUSTICE AND IT COULD
THE FIRST BLACK FEMALE SUPREME COURT JUSTICE AND IT COULD HAPPEN AS SOON AS FRIDAY
COURT JUSTICE AND IT COULD HAPPEN AS SOON AS FRIDAY ALREADY THREE REPUBLICAN
HAPPEN AS SOON AS FRIDAY ALREADY THREE REPUBLICAN SENATORS HAVE SAID THEY WILL
ALREADY THREE REPUBLICAN SENATORS HAVE SAID THEY WILL VOTE TO CONFIRM HER NOT
SENATORS HAVE SAID THEY WILL VOTE TO CONFIRM HER NOT LINDSEY GRAHAM KNOW
VOTE TO CONFIRM HER NOT LINDSEY GRAHAM KNOW BUT WE‘RE IN A MIDTERM YEAR
LINDSEY GRAHAM KNOW BUT WE‘RE IN A MIDTERM YEAR AND THE REST OF THE GOP HAS
BUT WE‘RE IN A MIDTERM YEAR AND THE REST OF THE GOP HAS ALREADY GONE. SO SCORCHED
AND THE REST OF THE GOP HAS ALREADY GONE. SO SCORCHED SCORCHED-EARTH THAT
ALREADY GONE. SO SCORCHED SCORCHED-EARTH THAT KRATZ, HAD TO DELAY. TODAY‘S
SCORCHED-EARTH THAT KRATZ, HAD TO DELAY. TODAY‘S COMMITTEE VOTE, BECAUSE ONE OF
KRATZ, HAD TO DELAY. TODAY‘S COMMITTEE VOTE, BECAUSE ONE OF THEIR MEMBERS WERE STUCK ON A
COMMITTEE VOTE, BECAUSE ONE OF THEIR MEMBERS WERE STUCK ON A PLANE AND NOT A SINGLE
THEIR MEMBERS WERE STUCK ON A PLANE AND NOT A SINGLE REPUBLICAN ON THE JUDICIARY
PLANE AND NOT A SINGLE REPUBLICAN ON THE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE WOULD VOTE TO BACK
REPUBLICAN ON THE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE WOULD VOTE TO BACK JUDGE JACKSON. NOT ONE.
COMMITTEE WOULD VOTE TO BACK JUDGE JACKSON. NOT ONE. SO, LET‘S BE CLEAR
JUDGE JACKSON. NOT ONE. SO, LET‘S BE CLEAR REPUBLICANS UNDER TRUMP
SO, LET‘S BE CLEAR REPUBLICANS UNDER TRUMP SECURED FOR THEMSELVES THROUGH
REPUBLICANS UNDER TRUMP SECURED FOR THEMSELVES THROUGH SOME PRETTY DODGY MANEUVERING.
SECURED FOR THEMSELVES THROUGH SOME PRETTY DODGY MANEUVERING. A
SOME PRETTY DODGY MANEUVERING. A 6-3,
A 6-3, SUPER MAJORITY ON THE SUPREME
6-3, SUPER MAJORITY ON THE SUPREME COURT, AND NOW ON THE
SUPER MAJORITY ON THE SUPREME COURT, AND NOW ON THE BIDEN ARE OPENLY SAYING THEY
COURT, AND NOW ON THE BIDEN ARE OPENLY SAYING THEY WON‘T CONFIRM ANY DEMOCRATIC
BIDEN ARE OPENLY SAYING THEY WON‘T CONFIRM ANY DEMOCRATIC NOMINEES TO, THAT CHORD, EVEN
WON‘T CONFIRM ANY DEMOCRATIC NOMINEES TO, THAT CHORD, EVEN JUDGES. THEY THEMSELVES MAY
NOMINEES TO, THAT CHORD, EVEN JUDGES. THEY THEMSELVES MAY HAVE VOTED FOR
JUDGES. THEY THEMSELVES MAY HAVE VOTED FOR PREVIOUSLY.
HAVE VOTED FOR PREVIOUSLY. IF EVER THERE WAS AN ARGUMENT
PREVIOUSLY. IF EVER THERE WAS AN ARGUMENT FOR DEMOCRATS TO
IF EVER THERE WAS AN ARGUMENT FOR DEMOCRATS TO THE COURT TO ADD JUSTICES
FOR DEMOCRATS TO THE COURT TO ADD JUSTICES WHILE THEY CONTROL BOTH THE
THE COURT TO ADD JUSTICES WHILE THEY CONTROL BOTH THE WHITE HOUSE AND CONGRESS.
WHILE THEY CONTROL BOTH THE WHITE HOUSE AND CONGRESS. THIS IS IT.
WHITE HOUSE AND CONGRESS. THIS IS IT. BUT DEMOCRATS FOR SOME STRANGE
THIS IS IT. BUT DEMOCRATS FOR SOME STRANGE SELF-DESTRUCTIVE REASON HAVE
BUT DEMOCRATS FOR SOME STRANGE SELF-DESTRUCTIVE REASON HAVE NEVER TAKEN THE COURTS AS
SELF-DESTRUCTIVE REASON HAVE NEVER TAKEN THE COURTS AS SERIOUSLY AS THE REPUBLICANS
NEVER TAKEN THE COURTS AS SERIOUSLY AS THE REPUBLICANS HAVE
SERIOUSLY AS THE REPUBLICANS HAVE JOINING ME NOW IS A MAN WHO
HAVE JOINING ME NOW IS A MAN WHO WANTS HIS PARTY TO FOCUS MUCH
JOINING ME NOW IS A MAN WHO WANTS HIS PARTY TO FOCUS MUCH MORE ON JUDICIAL PICKS
WANTS HIS PARTY TO FOCUS MUCH MORE ON JUDICIAL PICKS AND THE ROLE OF THE COURTS,
MORE ON JUDICIAL PICKS AND THE ROLE OF THE COURTS, THE PRESIDENT OF THE AMERICAN
AND THE ROLE OF THE COURTS, THE PRESIDENT OF THE AMERICAN CONSTITUTION
THE PRESIDENT OF THE AMERICAN CONSTITUTION SOCIETY AND FORMER DEMOCRATIC
CONSTITUTION SOCIETY AND FORMER DEMOCRATIC SENATOR FROM WISCONSIN, RUSS
SOCIETY AND FORMER DEMOCRATIC SENATOR FROM WISCONSIN, RUSS FEINGOLD. HE SAT ON THE SENATE
SENATOR FROM WISCONSIN, RUSS FEINGOLD. HE SAT ON THE SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE LONG
FEINGOLD. HE SAT ON THE SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE LONG ENOUGH TO SEE FOR SUPREME
JUDICIARY COMMITTEE LONG ENOUGH TO SEE FOR SUPREME COURT.
ENOUGH TO SEE FOR SUPREME COURT. JUSTICE IS CONFIRMED,
COURT. JUSTICE IS CONFIRMED, SENATOR. THANKS SO MUCH FOR
JUSTICE IS CONFIRMED, SENATOR. THANKS SO MUCH FOR COMING.
SENATOR. THANKS SO MUCH FOR COMING. BEING BACK ON THE SHOW.
COMING. BEING BACK ON THE SHOW. WE KNOW WHAT REPUBLICANS WILL
BEING BACK ON THE SHOW. WE KNOW WHAT REPUBLICANS WILL DO WHEN THEY TAKE POWER
WE KNOW WHAT REPUBLICANS WILL DO WHEN THEY TAKE POWER LINDSEY. GRAHAM IS MAKING IT
DO WHEN THEY TAKE POWER LINDSEY. GRAHAM IS MAKING IT VERY CLEAR.
LINDSEY. GRAHAM IS MAKING IT VERY CLEAR. ISN‘T THIS? THE MOMENT
VERY CLEAR. ISN‘T THIS? THE MOMENT DEMOCRATS NEED TO GET SERIOUS
ISN‘T THIS? THE MOMENT DEMOCRATS NEED TO GET SERIOUS ABOUT EXPANDING THE COURT. I
DEMOCRATS NEED TO GET SERIOUS ABOUT EXPANDING THE COURT. I KNOW I KEEP SAYING ON THE
ABOUT EXPANDING THE COURT. I KNOW I KEEP SAYING ON THE SHOW,
KNOW I KEEP SAYING ON THE SHOW, BUT THEY KEEP SAYING THEY‘RE
SHOW, BUT THEY KEEP SAYING THEY‘RE NOT GOING TO LET THE DEMOCRATS
BUT THEY KEEP SAYING THEY‘RE NOT GOING TO LET THE DEMOCRATS DO ANYTHING WITH THE
NOT GOING TO LET THE DEMOCRATS DO ANYTHING WITH THE SUPREME COURT GOING FORWARD.
DO ANYTHING WITH THE SUPREME COURT GOING FORWARD. WELL, LET ME ANSWER THAT AS A
SUPREME COURT GOING FORWARD. WELL, LET ME ANSWER THAT AS A DEMOCRAT OR REPUBLICAN BECAUSE
WELL, LET ME ANSWER THAT AS A DEMOCRAT OR REPUBLICAN BECAUSE THE AMERICAN CONSTITUTION
DEMOCRAT OR REPUBLICAN BECAUSE THE AMERICAN CONSTITUTION SOCIETY IS A NONPARTISAN
THE AMERICAN CONSTITUTION SOCIETY IS A NONPARTISAN GROUP,
SOCIETY IS A NONPARTISAN GROUP, BUT AS AN AMERICAN AND AS A
GROUP, BUT AS AN AMERICAN AND AS A GROUP OF LAWYERS ACROSS THE
BUT AS AN AMERICAN AND AS A GROUP OF LAWYERS ACROSS THE COUNTRY,
GROUP OF LAWYERS ACROSS THE COUNTRY, WE BELIEVE
WE CANNOT ALLOW
WE CANNOT ALLOW THE DESTRUCTION OF THE SENATE
WE CANNOT ALLOW THE DESTRUCTION OF THE SENATE CONFIRMATION PROCESS, WHICH IS
THE DESTRUCTION OF THE SENATE CONFIRMATION PROCESS, WHICH IS EXACTLY
CONFIRMATION PROCESS, WHICH IS EXACTLY WHAT HAS HAPPENED HERE.
EXACTLY WHAT HAS HAPPENED HERE. AND SO YES, WE DO BELIEVE
WHAT HAS HAPPENED HERE. AND SO YES, WE DO BELIEVE THAT WE HAVE TO TAKE A SERIOUS
AND SO YES, WE DO BELIEVE THAT WE HAVE TO TAKE A SERIOUS LOOK
THAT WE HAVE TO TAKE A SERIOUS LOOK AT WAYS TO REFORM THE
LOOK AT WAYS TO REFORM THE COURT. IN ADDITION TO
AT WAYS TO REFORM THE COURT. IN ADDITION TO FINISHING THIS VERY IMPORTANT
COURT. IN ADDITION TO FINISHING THIS VERY IMPORTANT JOB
FINISHING THIS VERY IMPORTANT JOB OF CONFIRMING,
JOB OF CONFIRMING, JUDGE JACKSON. WE HAVE TO LOOK
OF CONFIRMING, JUDGE JACKSON. WE HAVE TO LOOK AT THE POSSIBILITY OF
JUDGE JACKSON. WE HAVE TO LOOK AT THE POSSIBILITY OF EXPANDING THE
AT THE POSSIBILITY OF EXPANDING THE COURT, THE POSSIBILITY OF LIFE
EXPANDING THE COURT, THE POSSIBILITY OF LIFE TERMS OR GETTING RID OF LIFE
COURT, THE POSSIBILITY OF LIFE TERMS OR GETTING RID OF LIFE TERMS FOR MEMBERS OF THE
TERMS OR GETTING RID OF LIFE TERMS FOR MEMBERS OF THE OF THE
TERMS FOR MEMBERS OF THE OF THE STATE SUPREME COURT AND
OF THE STATE SUPREME COURT AND REFORMS OF THE COURT ITSELF
STATE SUPREME COURT AND REFORMS OF THE COURT ITSELF SUCH AS DEALING WITH THE ABUSE
REFORMS OF THE COURT ITSELF SUCH AS DEALING WITH THE ABUSE OF THE SO-CALLED SHADOW
SUCH AS DEALING WITH THE ABUSE OF THE SO-CALLED SHADOW DOC, ETHICS RULES FOR THE
OF THE SO-CALLED SHADOW DOC, ETHICS RULES FOR THE SUPREME COURT. THESE ALL,
DOC, ETHICS RULES FOR THE SUPREME COURT. THESE ALL, OH, YES, YOU HAVE TO BE PART
SUPREME COURT. THESE ALL, OH, YES, YOU HAVE TO BE PART OF THE AGENDA.
OH, YES, YOU HAVE TO BE PART OF THE AGENDA. ZENNITH. LET‘S JUST TALK ABOUT
OF THE AGENDA. ZENNITH. LET‘S JUST TALK ABOUT THIS CONFIRMATION PROCESS
ZENNITH. LET‘S JUST TALK ABOUT THIS CONFIRMATION PROCESS INVOLVING JUDGE, JACKSON. WE
THIS CONFIRMATION PROCESS INVOLVING JUDGE, JACKSON. WE SAW AND WE COVERED EXTENSIVELY
INVOLVING JUDGE, JACKSON. WE SAW AND WE COVERED EXTENSIVELY ONLY SHOW.
SAW AND WE COVERED EXTENSIVELY ONLY SHOW. YOU WERE HERE AT THE TIME
ONLY SHOW. YOU WERE HERE AT THE TIME SOME OF THOSE
YOU WERE HERE AT THE TIME SOME OF THOSE AWFUL
SOME OF THOSE AWFUL QUESTIONS ABOUT
AWFUL QUESTIONS ABOUT C********* SENTENCING AND SOME
QUESTIONS ABOUT C********* SENTENCING AND SOME OF THE NONSENSE THAT WAS
C********* SENTENCING AND SOME OF THE NONSENSE THAT WAS THROWN
OF THE NONSENSE THAT WAS THROWN AT JUDGE JACKSON CRITICAL RACE
THROWN AT JUDGE JACKSON CRITICAL RACE THEORY, ETC,
AT JUDGE JACKSON CRITICAL RACE THEORY, ETC, ETC.
THEORY, ETC, ETC. HAVE BEEN OTHER
ETC. HAVE BEEN OTHER QUESTIONS
HAVE BEEN OTHER QUESTIONS POSTER THAT WEREN‘T IN THOSE?
QUESTIONS POSTER THAT WEREN‘T IN THOSE? TELEVISED HEARINGS
POSTER THAT WEREN‘T IN THOSE? TELEVISED HEARINGS BECAUSE COMMITTEE MEMBERS
TELEVISED HEARINGS BECAUSE COMMITTEE MEMBERS OFTEN SUPPLEMENT, THE PUBLIC
BECAUSE COMMITTEE MEMBERS OFTEN SUPPLEMENT, THE PUBLIC HEARINGS WITH WRITTEN
OFTEN SUPPLEMENT, THE PUBLIC HEARINGS WITH WRITTEN QUESTIONS. I WANT TO READ TO
HEARINGS WITH WRITTEN QUESTIONS. I WANT TO READ TO YOU. ONE QUESTION THAT SENATOR
QUESTIONS. I WANT TO READ TO YOU. ONE QUESTION THAT SENATOR TED CRUZ ASKED JUDGE
YOU. ONE QUESTION THAT SENATOR TED CRUZ ASKED JUDGE JACKSON IN WRITING. HE
TED CRUZ ASKED JUDGE JACKSON IN WRITING. HE SAID, JUSTICE KAGAN AS
JACKSON IN WRITING. HE SAID, JUSTICE KAGAN AS MENTIONED PREVIOUSLY THAT SHE
SAID, JUSTICE KAGAN AS MENTIONED PREVIOUSLY THAT SHE WENT HUNTING WITH JUSTICE
MENTIONED PREVIOUSLY THAT SHE WENT HUNTING WITH JUSTICE SCALIA AFTER JOINING, THE
WENT HUNTING WITH JUSTICE SCALIA AFTER JOINING, THE COURT. WILL YOU COMMIT TO
SCALIA AFTER JOINING, THE COURT. WILL YOU COMMIT TO MAKING REASONABLE EFFORTS TO
COURT. WILL YOU COMMIT TO MAKING REASONABLE EFFORTS TO GO TO A SHOOTING RANGE OR GO
MAKING REASONABLE EFFORTS TO GO TO A SHOOTING RANGE OR GO HUNTING PRIOR TO RULING ON
GO TO A SHOOTING RANGE OR GO HUNTING PRIOR TO RULING ON ANY
HUNTING PRIOR TO RULING ON ANY SECOND AMENDMENT
ANY SECOND AMENDMENT CASES SOME ON TWITTER?
SECOND AMENDMENT CASES SOME ON TWITTER? WONDERED IF SENATOR CRUZ WOULD
CASES SOME ON TWITTER? WONDERED IF SENATOR CRUZ WOULD COMMIT TO GETTING PREGNANT
WONDERED IF SENATOR CRUZ WOULD COMMIT TO GETTING PREGNANT BEFORE RULING ON ABORTION
COMMIT TO GETTING PREGNANT BEFORE RULING ON ABORTION CASES. BUT WHAT IS YOUR
BEFORE RULING ON ABORTION CASES. BUT WHAT IS YOUR REACTION TO THAT BIZARRE
CASES. BUT WHAT IS YOUR REACTION TO THAT BIZARRE BIZARRE QUESTION FROM TED
REACTION TO THAT BIZARRE BIZARRE QUESTION FROM TED CRUZ?
BIZARRE QUESTION FROM TED CRUZ? WELL, WE‘VE SEEN A LOT OF
CRUZ? WELL, WE‘VE SEEN A LOT OF BIZARRE AND I GOTTA TELL YOU
WELL, WE‘VE SEEN A LOT OF BIZARRE AND I GOTTA TELL YOU MANY IN THIS PAST COUPLE OF
BIZARRE AND I GOTTA TELL YOU MANY IN THIS PAST COUPLE OF WEEKS. I‘VE GONE FROM
MANY IN THIS PAST COUPLE OF WEEKS. I‘VE GONE FROM EUPHORIA TO
WEEKS. I‘VE GONE FROM EUPHORIA TO DISCUSSED ALMOST ON A DAILY
EUPHORIA TO DISCUSSED ALMOST ON A DAILY BASIS. THIS THIS IS
DISCUSSED ALMOST ON A DAILY BASIS. THIS THIS IS EUPHORIA DAY.
BASIS. THIS THIS IS EUPHORIA DAY. WELL, WE HAVE THREE REPUBLICAN
EUPHORIA DAY. WELL, WE HAVE THREE REPUBLICAN SENATORS SAYING, THEY‘RE GOING
WELL, WE HAVE THREE REPUBLICAN SENATORS SAYING, THEY‘RE GOING TO VOTE
SENATORS SAYING, THEY‘RE GOING TO VOTE FOR
TO VOTE FOR CATAN G. AND AND I THINK
FOR CATAN G. AND AND I THINK THAT‘S A GREAT MOMENT. BUT
CATAN G. AND AND I THINK THAT‘S A GREAT MOMENT. BUT THIS KIND OF BEHAVIOR AND
THAT‘S A GREAT MOMENT. BUT THIS KIND OF BEHAVIOR AND IT SAID YOU HAVE TO USE THE
THIS KIND OF BEHAVIOR AND IT SAID YOU HAVE TO USE THE BEHAVIOR BUT
IT SAID YOU HAVE TO USE THE BEHAVIOR BUT WEIRD BEHAVIOR SORT OF
BEHAVIOR BUT WEIRD BEHAVIOR SORT OF FOR KIDS, BUT WHAT IS IT?
WEIRD BEHAVIOR SORT OF FOR KIDS, BUT WHAT IS IT? THIS IS THE KIND OF BEHAVIOR.
FOR KIDS, BUT WHAT IS IT? THIS IS THE KIND OF BEHAVIOR. I NEVER
THIS IS THE KIND OF BEHAVIOR. I NEVER SAW
I NEVER SAW ANYBODY. I NEVER SAW THAT KIND
SAW ANYBODY. I NEVER SAW THAT KIND OF
ANYBODY. I NEVER SAW THAT KIND OF SILLINESS AND THAT LACK OF
OF SILLINESS AND THAT LACK OF DIGNITY,
SILLINESS AND THAT LACK OF DIGNITY, THE SUPREME COURT MUST BE
DIGNITY, THE SUPREME COURT MUST BE ABOUT DIGNITY
THE SUPREME COURT MUST BE ABOUT DIGNITY AND THE PROCESS FOR
ABOUT DIGNITY AND THE PROCESS FOR CONFIRMING
AND THE PROCESS FOR CONFIRMING SUPREME COURT. DEAF JUSTICES
CONFIRMING SUPREME COURT. DEAF JUSTICES HAVE TO BE ABOUT DIGNITY. AND
SUPREME COURT. DEAF JUSTICES HAVE TO BE ABOUT DIGNITY. AND YES, A NUMBER OF
HAVE TO BE ABOUT DIGNITY. AND YES, A NUMBER OF REPUBLICAN SENATORS HAVE JUST
YES, A NUMBER OF REPUBLICAN SENATORS HAVE JUST TRASHED, THE DIGNITY OF THE
REPUBLICAN SENATORS HAVE JUST TRASHED, THE DIGNITY OF THE SENATE CONFIRMATION PROCESS
TRASHED, THE DIGNITY OF THE SENATE CONFIRMATION PROCESS THIS
SENATE CONFIRMATION PROCESS THIS THIS TIME.
THIS THIS TIME. HOW MUCH DO YOU THINK THE
THIS TIME. HOW MUCH DO YOU THINK THE APPOINTMENT OF
HOW MUCH DO YOU THINK THE APPOINTMENT OF JUSTICE JACKSON? JUDGE JACKSON
APPOINTMENT OF JUSTICE JACKSON? JUDGE JACKSON BECOMING JUSTICE JACKSON
JUSTICE JACKSON? JUDGE JACKSON BECOMING JUSTICE JACKSON ON THE SUPREME COURT THAT
BECOMING JUSTICE JACKSON ON THE SUPREME COURT THAT HISTORIC MOVE. HOW MUCH WILL
ON THE SUPREME COURT THAT HISTORIC MOVE. HOW MUCH WILL THAT HELP PRESIDENT
HISTORIC MOVE. HOW MUCH WILL THAT HELP PRESIDENT PUT YOUR DEMOCRATIC HAT ON NOW
THAT HELP PRESIDENT PUT YOUR DEMOCRATIC HAT ON NOW PUT OFF THE AMERICAN
PUT YOUR DEMOCRATIC HAT ON NOW PUT OFF THE AMERICAN CONSTITUTION BODY AS A
PUT OFF THE AMERICAN CONSTITUTION BODY AS A DEMOCRAT. HOW MUCH DO YOU
CONSTITUTION BODY AS A DEMOCRAT. HOW MUCH DO YOU THINK IT‘LL HELP PRESIDENT
DEMOCRAT. HOW MUCH DO YOU THINK IT‘LL HELP PRESIDENT BIDEN AND THE DEMOCRATS IN THE
THINK IT‘LL HELP PRESIDENT BIDEN AND THE DEMOCRATS IN THE MIDTERMS?
BIDEN AND THE DEMOCRATS IN THE MIDTERMS? I‘M NOT GOING TO PUT THE
MIDTERMS? I‘M NOT GOING TO PUT THE DEMOCRAT HEAD-ON. I CAN‘T
I‘M NOT GOING TO PUT THE DEMOCRAT HEAD-ON. I CAN‘T BECAUSE OF WHAT I DO RIGHT
DEMOCRAT HEAD-ON. I CAN‘T BECAUSE OF WHAT I DO RIGHT NOW, BUT WHAT I WILL SAY IS
BECAUSE OF WHAT I DO RIGHT NOW, BUT WHAT I WILL SAY IS THIS IS THAT THIS PROCESS
NOW, BUT WHAT I WILL SAY IS THIS IS THAT THIS PROCESS HAS BEEN COMPLETELY FAIR AND
THIS IS THAT THIS PROCESS HAS BEEN COMPLETELY FAIR AND DIGNIFIED,
HAS BEEN COMPLETELY FAIR AND DIGNIFIED, PRESIDENT BIDEN, DIDN‘T TURN
DIGNIFIED, PRESIDENT BIDEN, DIDN‘T TURN OVER HIS
PRESIDENT BIDEN, DIDN‘T TURN OVER HIS PROCESS THAT THE CONSTITUTION
OVER HIS PROCESS THAT THE CONSTITUTION GIVES TO HIM OF
PROCESS THAT THE CONSTITUTION GIVES TO HIM OF DECIDING, WHO SHOULD BE THE
GIVES TO HIM OF DECIDING, WHO SHOULD BE THE NOMINEE,
DECIDING, WHO SHOULD BE THE NOMINEE, THE SENATE DIDN‘T TURN IT OVER
NOMINEE, THE SENATE DIDN‘T TURN IT OVER TO ANOTHER GROUP LIKE
THE SENATE DIDN‘T TURN IT OVER TO ANOTHER GROUP LIKE PRESIDENT TRUMP DID THE
TO ANOTHER GROUP LIKE PRESIDENT TRUMP DID THE PROCESS FROM THE POINT OF VIEW
PRESIDENT TRUMP DID THE PROCESS FROM THE POINT OF VIEW OF THOSE WHO ARE THE MAJORITY
PROCESS FROM THE POINT OF VIEW OF THOSE WHO ARE THE MAJORITY WAS CLEAN,
OF THOSE WHO ARE THE MAJORITY WAS CLEAN, AND IT WAS DIGNIFIED.
WAS CLEAN, AND IT WAS DIGNIFIED. AND SO ALL OF THIS LEADS TO
AND IT WAS DIGNIFIED. AND SO ALL OF THIS LEADS TO THE
AND SO ALL OF THIS LEADS TO THE CONFIRMATION
THE CONFIRMATION LATER, THIS WEEK IS
CONFIRMATION LATER, THIS WEEK IS SAID OF SOMEBODY WHO CLEARLY
LATER, THIS WEEK IS SAID OF SOMEBODY WHO CLEARLY IS GOING TO BE AN EXCELLENT
SAID OF SOMEBODY WHO CLEARLY IS GOING TO BE AN EXCELLENT JUSTICE, WHO‘S ALREADY BEEN
IS GOING TO BE AN EXCELLENT JUSTICE, WHO‘S ALREADY BEEN CONFIRMED BY THE SENATE THREE
JUSTICE, WHO‘S ALREADY BEEN CONFIRMED BY THE SENATE THREE TIMES. AND SO THIS
CONFIRMED BY THE SENATE THREE TIMES. AND SO THIS ALL HELPS IN THE LONG RUN
TIMES. AND SO THIS ALL HELPS IN THE LONG RUN SHOWING THE AMERICAN PEOPLE
ALL HELPS IN THE LONG RUN SHOWING THE AMERICAN PEOPLE THAT THERE IS A DIGNIFIED WAY
SHOWING THE AMERICAN PEOPLE THAT THERE IS A DIGNIFIED WAY TO GOVERN THIS COUNTRY,
THAT THERE IS A DIGNIFIED WAY TO GOVERN THIS COUNTRY, INSTEAD OF
TO GOVERN THIS COUNTRY, INSTEAD OF USING
INSTEAD OF USING RACE RISK. WHISTLES DOG.
USING RACE RISK. WHISTLES DOG. WHISTLES AND OTHER THINGS
RACE RISK. WHISTLES DOG. WHISTLES AND OTHER THINGS WHICH WERE BEING DEMONSTRATED
WHISTLES AND OTHER THINGS WHICH WERE BEING DEMONSTRATED AT THE COMMITTEE
WHICH WERE BEING DEMONSTRATED AT THE COMMITTEE HEARING.
AT THE COMMITTEE HEARING. SENATOR, YOU MENTIONED A FEW
HEARING. SENATOR, YOU MENTIONED A FEW TIMES. NOW, THE
SENATOR, YOU MENTIONED A FEW TIMES. NOW, THE COURT BEING DIGNIFIED OR NOT
TIMES. NOW, THE COURT BEING DIGNIFIED OR NOT BEING DIGNIFIED
COURT BEING DIGNIFIED OR NOT BEING DIGNIFIED AND KEEPING DIGNITY
BEING DIGNIFIED AND KEEPING DIGNITY FOR THE SUPREME COURT. THE
AND KEEPING DIGNITY FOR THE SUPREME COURT. THE LAST TIME I SENT IT CONTROLLED
FOR THE SUPREME COURT. THE LAST TIME I SENT IT CONTROLLED BY ONE PARTY
LAST TIME I SENT IT CONTROLLED BY ONE PARTY APPROVED A NOMINEE FROM A
BY ONE PARTY APPROVED A NOMINEE FROM A PRESIDENT OF A DIFFERENT PARTY
APPROVED A NOMINEE FROM A PRESIDENT OF A DIFFERENT PARTY WAS IN 1991.
PRESIDENT OF A DIFFERENT PARTY WAS IN 1991. JUSTICE CLARENCE THOMAS,
WAS IN 1991. JUSTICE CLARENCE THOMAS, WHO IS OF COURSE, IN THE NEWS
JUSTICE CLARENCE THOMAS, WHO IS OF COURSE, IN THE NEWS RIGHT NOW,
WHO IS OF COURSE, IN THE NEWS RIGHT NOW, ON THE SUBJECT OF THE DIGNITY
RIGHT NOW, ON THE SUBJECT OF THE DIGNITY OF THE COURT AND THE ETHICS OF
ON THE SUBJECT OF THE DIGNITY OF THE COURT AND THE ETHICS OF THE COURT AND THE INTEGRITY OF
OF THE COURT AND THE ETHICS OF THE COURT AND THE INTEGRITY OF THE COURT,
THE COURT AND THE INTEGRITY OF THE COURT, GIVEN, HIS
THE COURT, GIVEN, HIS WIFE‘S TEXT MESSAGES
GIVEN, HIS WIFE‘S TEXT MESSAGES TO WHITE HOUSE, THEN WHITE
WIFE‘S TEXT MESSAGES TO WHITE HOUSE, THEN WHITE HOUSE CHIEF OF STAFF,
OVERTURNING OF THE ELECTION
OVERTURNING OF THE ELECTION RESULT CALLING FOR THE SENDING
OVERTURNING OF THE ELECTION RESULT CALLING FOR THE SENDING OF THE BIDEN FAMILY TO
RESULT CALLING FOR THE SENDING OF THE BIDEN FAMILY TO GUANTANAMO BAY AND YET THE
OF THE BIDEN FAMILY TO GUANTANAMO BAY AND YET THE STRONGEST
GUANTANAMO BAY AND YET THE STRONGEST REACTIONS. WE‘VE HEARD FROM
STRONGEST REACTIONS. WE‘VE HEARD FROM DEMOCRATIC LEADERS IN THE
REACTIONS. WE‘VE HEARD FROM DEMOCRATIC LEADERS IN THE SENATE IN THE HOUSE.
DEMOCRATIC LEADERS IN THE SENATE IN THE HOUSE. ARE THAT MAY BE JUSTICE,
SENATE IN THE HOUSE. ARE THAT MAY BE JUSTICE, THOMAS SHOULD RECUSE HIMSELF
ARE THAT MAY BE JUSTICE, THOMAS SHOULD RECUSE HIMSELF FROM JANUARY 6, RELATED CASES
THOMAS SHOULD RECUSE HIMSELF FROM JANUARY 6, RELATED CASES AS YOU MENTIONED EARLIER.
FROM JANUARY 6, RELATED CASES AS YOU MENTIONED EARLIER. THERE‘S NO ETHICS CODE FOR THE
AS YOU MENTIONED EARLIER. THERE‘S NO ETHICS CODE FOR THE SUPREME COURT. THAT‘S THE KIND
THERE‘S NO ETHICS CODE FOR THE SUPREME COURT. THAT‘S THE KIND OF REFORM THAT WE NEED, BUT
SUPREME COURT. THAT‘S THE KIND OF REFORM THAT WE NEED, BUT THAT DOESN‘T GO FAR ENOUGH.
OF REFORM THAT WE NEED, BUT THAT DOESN‘T GO FAR ENOUGH. WHY ARE WE NOT HAVING HEARINGS
THAT DOESN‘T GO FAR ENOUGH. WHY ARE WE NOT HAVING HEARINGS INTO THIS?
WHY ARE WE NOT HAVING HEARINGS INTO THIS? WHY IS THERE NO TALK OF
INTO THIS? WHY IS THERE NO TALK OF IMPEACHMENT.
WHY IS THERE NO TALK OF IMPEACHMENT. THE ONLY WAY YOU CAN GET RID
IMPEACHMENT. THE ONLY WAY YOU CAN GET RID OF A LIFETIME APPOINTEE FROM
OR NOT YOU SUPPORT, IMPEACHING
OR NOT YOU SUPPORT, IMPEACHING CLARENCE.
OR NOT YOU SUPPORT, IMPEACHING CLARENCE. DON‘T SURELY. WE SHOULD HAVE A
CLARENCE. DON‘T SURELY. WE SHOULD HAVE A CONVERSATION ABOUT HOLDING A
DON‘T SURELY. WE SHOULD HAVE A CONVERSATION ABOUT HOLDING A JUSTICE TO ACCOUNT GIVEN
CONVERSATION ABOUT HOLDING A JUSTICE TO ACCOUNT GIVEN THE MULTIPLE CONFLICTS OF
JUSTICE TO ACCOUNT GIVEN THE MULTIPLE CONFLICTS OF INTEREST AND ARE NOW BEING
THE MULTIPLE CONFLICTS OF INTEREST AND ARE NOW BEING REVEALED INVOLVING CLARENCE
INTEREST AND ARE NOW BEING REVEALED INVOLVING CLARENCE THOMAS.
REVEALED INVOLVING CLARENCE THOMAS. NO, YOU‘RE ABSOLUTELY RIGHT.
THOMAS. NO, YOU‘RE ABSOLUTELY RIGHT. THIS SHOW. HOPEFULLY, IS JUST
NO, YOU‘RE ABSOLUTELY RIGHT. THIS SHOW. HOPEFULLY, IS JUST THE BEGINNING OF THIS PROCESS.
THIS SHOW. HOPEFULLY, IS JUST THE BEGINNING OF THIS PROCESS. WHAT WENT ON THERE IS
THE BEGINNING OF THIS PROCESS. WHAT WENT ON THERE IS VERY TROUBLING
WHAT WENT ON THERE IS VERY TROUBLING OF COURSE, THE JANUARY 6
VERY TROUBLING OF COURSE, THE JANUARY 6 COMMISSION WILL HAVE SOME WORK
OF COURSE, THE JANUARY 6 COMMISSION WILL HAVE SOME WORK TO DO ON THIS,
COMMISSION WILL HAVE SOME WORK TO DO ON THIS, BUT I SUSPECT THAT THE SENATE
TO DO ON THIS, BUT I SUSPECT THAT THE SENATE AND THE HOUSE WILL BE PURSUING
BUT I SUSPECT THAT THE SENATE AND THE HOUSE WILL BE PURSUING THIS QUESTION, NOT
AND THE HOUSE WILL BE PURSUING THIS QUESTION, NOT PROBABLY FROM THE POINT OF
THIS QUESTION, NOT PROBABLY FROM THE POINT OF VIEW OF IMPEACHMENT,
PROBABLY FROM THE POINT OF VIEW OF IMPEACHMENT, BUT FROM THE POINT OF
AND POTENTIALLY DISCIPLINARY
AND POTENTIALLY DISCIPLINARY ACTIONS. IF IN FACT, THERE WAS
AND POTENTIALLY DISCIPLINARY ACTIONS. IF IN FACT, THERE WAS SOME INAPPROPRIATE
ACTIONS. IF IN FACT, THERE WAS SOME INAPPROPRIATE CONNECTIVITY BETWEEN THE
SOME INAPPROPRIATE CONNECTIVITY BETWEEN THE JUSTICE AND AND HIS SPOUSE,
CONNECTIVITY BETWEEN THE JUSTICE AND AND HIS SPOUSE, BUT THAT HAS TO WAIT FOR THE
JUSTICE AND AND HIS SPOUSE, BUT THAT HAS TO WAIT FOR THE PROCESS OF REVIEWING THE
BUT THAT HAS TO WAIT FOR THE PROCESS OF REVIEWING THE INFORMATION AND NOT
PROCESS OF REVIEWING THE INFORMATION AND NOT JUMPING TO ANY CONCLUSIONS.
INFORMATION AND NOT JUMPING TO ANY CONCLUSIONS. I THINK IT DESERVES A FULL
JUMPING TO ANY CONCLUSIONS. I THINK IT DESERVES A FULL INVESTIGATION.
I THINK IT DESERVES A FULL INVESTIGATION. I MEAN, THE PROBLEM WITH
INVESTIGATION. I MEAN, THE PROBLEM WITH SAYING, YOU‘RE GOING TO BRING
I MEAN, THE PROBLEM WITH SAYING, YOU‘RE GOING TO BRING IN RULES IN THE FUTURE
SAYING, YOU‘RE GOING TO BRING IN RULES IN THE FUTURE IF THAT‘S A FORWARD-LOOKING
IN RULES IN THE FUTURE IF THAT‘S A FORWARD-LOOKING PROCESS, WHICH IS GREAT. WHAT
IF THAT‘S A FORWARD-LOOKING PROCESS, WHICH IS GREAT. WHAT ARE WE DOING TO TALK ABOUT
PROCESS, WHICH IS GREAT. WHAT ARE WE DOING TO TALK ABOUT INVESTIGATIONS NOW ABOUT THIS
ARE WE DOING TO TALK ABOUT INVESTIGATIONS NOW ABOUT THIS INCIDENT? OKAY, AS WELL AS
INVESTIGATIONS NOW ABOUT THIS INCIDENT? OKAY, AS WELL AS RULES FOR THE FUTURE.
INCIDENT? OKAY, AS WELL AS RULES FOR THE FUTURE. WHAT HAPPENED AT THE
RULES FOR THE FUTURE. WHAT HAPPENED AT THE INVESTIGATION COMES BACK, BUT
WHAT HAPPENED AT THE INVESTIGATION COMES BACK, BUT WHAT HAPPENS IF THE
INVESTIGATION COMES BACK, BUT WHAT HAPPENS IF THE INVESTIGATION COMES BACK AND
WHAT HAPPENS IF THE INVESTIGATION COMES BACK AND SAYS, YOU KNOW WHAT CLARENCE
INVESTIGATION COMES BACK AND SAYS, YOU KNOW WHAT CLARENCE THOMAS IS IN THE WRONG HERE
SAYS, YOU KNOW WHAT CLARENCE THOMAS IS IN THE WRONG HERE YOU AND I BOTH KNOW THE
THOMAS IS IN THE WRONG HERE YOU AND I BOTH KNOW THE LITERALLY THE ONLY INSTRUMENT
YOU AND I BOTH KNOW THE LITERALLY THE ONLY INSTRUMENT THAT CONGRESS HAS UNDER THE
LITERALLY THE ONLY INSTRUMENT THAT CONGRESS HAS UNDER THE CONSTITUTION TO HOLD ADJUSTED
THAT CONGRESS HAS UNDER THE CONSTITUTION TO HOLD ADJUSTED CORRECTLY THE BEACH MAN.
CONSTITUTION TO HOLD ADJUSTED CORRECTLY THE BEACH MAN. THERE‘S NO LESSER VERSION OR
CORRECTLY THE BEACH MAN. THERE‘S NO LESSER VERSION OR HIGHER THAT IT‘S JUST A THERE
THERE‘S NO LESSER VERSION OR HIGHER THAT IT‘S JUST A THERE ARE
HIGHER THAT IT‘S JUST A THERE ARE CENSURE POSSIBILITIES. THERE
ARE CENSURE POSSIBILITIES. THERE IS
CHIEF JUSTICE HIMSELF ACTING.
CHIEF JUSTICE HIMSELF ACTING. I AGREE WITH YOU THAT THE
CHIEF JUSTICE HIMSELF ACTING. I AGREE WITH YOU THAT THE THE FORMAL ONE, BUT THAT
I AGREE WITH YOU THAT THE THE FORMAL ONE, BUT THAT HAS NEVER ACTUALLY WAIT FOR
THE FORMAL ONE, BUT THAT HAS NEVER ACTUALLY WAIT FOR THE FACTS TO UNFOLD.
HAS NEVER ACTUALLY WAIT FOR THE FACTS TO UNFOLD. THE HAS BEEN A SUPREME COURT
THE FACTS TO UNFOLD. THE HAS BEEN A SUPREME COURT JUSTICE, IT BEACH, BUT NOT
THE HAS BEEN A SUPREME COURT JUSTICE, IT BEACH, BUT NOT CONVICTED.
JUSTICE, IT BEACH, BUT NOT CONVICTED. RUSS FEINGOLD. THANK YOU SO
CONVICTED. RUSS FEINGOLD. THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR YOUR TIME AND YOUR
RUSS FEINGOLD. THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR YOUR TIME AND YOUR ANALYSIS AS EVER.