>>> WE HAVE EVIDENCE OF HOW THEY
FLIPPED THE VOTES AND HOW IT WAS
DESIGNED TO FLIP THE VOTES.
>> THE MACHINES CAN BE HACKED.
THERE IS NO QUESTION ABOUT THAT.
>> WE ARE GOING TO CLEAN THIS
MESS NOW.
PRESIDENT TRUMP WON BY A
LANDSLIDE.
WE ARE GOING TO PROVE IT.
>> JOINING ME NOW IS JOHN
FLANNERY WHO WORKS WITH RUDY
GIULIANI IN THE SOUTHERN
DISTRICT OF NEW YORK.
I HAVE TO START WITH THIS
BECAUSE I FIND ALL OF THIS
BIZARRE AND STRANGE AND I DONT
KNOW HOW ALL OF THESE HAVE NOT
LOST THEIR LICENSES AT THIS
POINT.
RUDY GIULIANIS ARGUMENT WAS I
WAS JUST SHARING WHAT WITNESSES
SAID.
>> EVERYTHING I SAID ABOUT THIS
CASE COMES FROM A WITNESS.
SOMETIMES TWO OR THREE
WITNESSES.
I HAVE A WOMAN WHOS WILLING TO
TESTIFY THAT SHE WAS TAUGHT HOW
TO CHEAT BY DEMOCRAT PARTY IN
DETROIT.
YOU GOT TO LISTEN TO THIS --
>> IN OTHER WORDS -- HIS
ARGUMENT IS BASICALLY LIKE THE
OTHER PEOPLE LIED TO ME SO I AM
JUST LYING FOR THEM.
DOES THAT WORK IN COURT UNLESS
IT IS NIGHT COURT OR SOMETHING?
>> IT MAY DELAY THE CONVICTION
IN A FEW MINUTES BUT IT ENDS UP
IN THE SAME PLACE.
I AM TOLD THE NUMBER OF
PROSECUTIONS IN WHICH YOU HAVE
THE I DONT KNOW PERJURY.
USUALLY YOU CAN PROVE THAT.
EVERYTHING AROUND IT EXCEPT THE
INCIDENT THEY CLAIM NOT TO
REMEMBER WHICH IS EXCULPATORY.
HE MADE A BIG MISTAKE HERE.
WHEN HE WAS IN PENNSYLVANIA AND
THIS IS WHY NEW YORK HAS A
STAKE.
IT WAS BECAUSE HE HAD A NEW YORK
LICENSE AND APPEARED IN
PENNSYLVANIA.
WHEN HE WAS TALKING TO THE
COURT, HE WAS SAYING FRAUD,
FRAUD, FRAUD, AND THE COURT AT
ONE POINT SAID, "WELL, WAS THAT
IN YOUR COMPLAINT" AND HE SAID
AT FIRST IT WAS AND THEN IT WAS
NOT.
THAT IN ITSELF WAS A LIE.
IT EVEN SAID JOE FRAZIER IS STILL VOTING IN 2021.
STILL VOTING IN 2021.
WHEN HE DIED IN 2012 FOR A KPOUM
COUPLE OF MONTHS HE WAS ON THE
ROLE.
HIS LIES ARE PETTY AND BIG.
75% OF REPUBLICANS THINK THE
ELECTION WAS STOLEN BECAUSE OF
HIS LIES.
THIS HAD AN EFFECT.
WHEN THEY SAY IN NEW YORK WE ARE
GOING TO SUSPEND YOU, THEY ARE
SUS
SUSPENDING YOU AND MAY GAVE YOU
A CHANCE TO REBUT IT.
WHAT HE SAYS IS SO DANGEROUS.
AT THE END OF THE DAY THERE IS A
GOOD CHANCE IT WILL BE
DISBARRED.
I WOULD LIKE TO THINK THAT THIS
IS THE SPRING OF THE RECKONING
AND WE ARE ABLE TO SURFACE THE
RECKONING.
AMERICA IS NUTS FOR SOMEBODY
THAT ACTUALLY BE PUNISHED FOR
THE WRONGS THEY HAVE DONE.
RUDY GIULIANI AT THE TOP, RIGHT
NEXT TO TRUMP AND SEVERAL OTHER
PEOPLE.
>> SO, JOHN, AND I HEAR YOU AND
CLEARLY WHEN EVER RUDY GIULIANI
GETS IN TROUBLE.
IT IS SOMEBODY ELSE AND HE
INITIALLY GOES TO THE SHAGGY
DEFENSE, "IT WAS NOT ME, IT WAS
SOMEBODY ELSE."
THE DANGER HE CAUSED BY
SPREADING THE LIES AND WHAT THE
CONSEQUENCES THE HAVE BEEN.
I WANT TO PLAY A QUICK SOUND
BYTE IN HIS OWN WORDS
QUESTIONING THE ELECTION.
WELL TALK ABOUT IT ON THE OTHER
SIDE.
>> THOSE ARE THE BALLOTS THAT
WERE STUCK IN THE MACHINE EIGHT
OR NINE OR TEN TIMES.
I DONT KNOW WHAT THE VOTE IN MICHIGAN IS.
MICHIGAN IS.
OUR VOTE IS OWNED BY TWO --
>> IF THEY CLAIM THIS ELECTION,
WHY DONT THEY MAKE ALL THE
MACHINES AVAILABLE IMMEDIATELY?
>> THE SAME ARGUMENT BEING MADE
BY DEMOCRATIC ACTIVISTS AND
ORGANIZERS ALL SAID THEY WERE
CRAZY.
JOHN, AFTER HEARING SOMETHING
LIKE THIS, WHAT KIND OF DEFENSE?
THE SUSPENSION NOW HE COULD BE
DISBARRED.
WHAT WOULD BE THE LINE?
WHAT ELSE DOES RUDY GIULIANI
HAVE TO DO TO BE DISBARRED IN NEW YORK?
NEW YORK?
>> WELL, WE HAVE A LIMP OF PROSC
PROSECUTORIAL TEAM.
WHAT WE REALLY HAVE IS AN
INTERFERENCE IN THE ELECTION OF
THE 2016 ELECTIONS AND THE 2020
ELECTIONS AND EVERY PLACE IN
BETWEEN AND COVER UP TO AVOID
IT.
NOBODY IS PUNISHED FOR IT.
IT IS NOT ENOUGH TO RING YOUR
HANDS TO SAY OH, YOU SHOULD NOT
DO IT AND WE DO NOTHING FOR IT.
NO MAN IS ABOVE THE LAW AND
PLAINLY THESE GUYS ARE.
I WISH THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT AND
THE DAS OFFICE AND GEORGIA
WOULD DO IT.
WE START TALKING ABOUT RIOTERS.
LETS LOOK AT WHAT THE
INTELLIGENCE PEOPLE WERE DOING
OR NOT DOING.
THATS THE BIG CASE, IT IS NOT
ABOUT THE RIOTERS, THEYRE THE
FACILITY FOR INCITEMENT AND
INSURRECTION
INSURRECTION.
>> REALLY QUICK.
NOW THAT RUDY GIULIANIS LICENSE
IS SUSPENDED, DOES THIS MEAN
CONVERSATIONS HE HAD WITH PEOPLE
HAVE NO ATTORNEY/CLIENT
PRIVILEGE?
WOULD THAT BE AN OPENING?
>> FEW OF THE CONVERSATIONS WE
WOULD BE INTERESTED,
ATTORNEY/CLIENT PRIVILEGE IN THE
PAST THROUGH THE PRESIDENT EVEN
WHILE HES SUSPENDED.
IF I TALK TO HIM NOW, HIS
LICENSE IS SUSPENDED, CAN HE
ADVISE ME?
A, I DONT ASK AND B, WHY WOULD