Speaker 1: Let's go to Aubrey from Wisconsin. Aubrey from Wisconsin.
Welcome to the program. What's on your mind today?
Speaker 4: Hello. Speaker 1:
Hi, Aubrey. What's going on? Speaker 4: Hey, can you hear me okay?
Speaker 1: Yes, I can. Speaker 4: Oh, okay. Hey,
Mr. Parkman. I don't know. I haven't talked to your mom, and I hope you're better. You know.
I'm fabulous. I was just wondering, I guess, do you think that the Supreme Court can. Oh,
right. Sorry. That was, like, wrong. Do you think that the left I guess, in general, we can still,
like, get successes even with, like, a super right wing, like, really gross Supreme Court?
I just. But your views on that? I guess. Speaker 1: So. I think the answer is yes. The
left doesn't give up because the remember, Aubrey? The Supreme Court only weighs in on a few issues
a year or per you know, per cycle, for lack of a better term, twice a year. And they tend to end up
weighing in in areas that are actually legally controversial and politically controversial in
some cases. There are lots of things that are politically controversial, but they really would
not be legally controversial, such that if there was the will to make changes at the state level or
etc., it simply wouldn't rise to be a situation that the Supreme Court could interfere in. So I
think there's plenty of areas where the Supreme Court would not prevent the left from making
progress, particularly at the state level. But let me also say another thing. This is
another opportunity to remind everybody that whoever wins in November of 2024, I feel like
a broken record. Whoever wins in November of 2024 has a real chance of selecting one or two
Supreme Court justices. And we went through this in 2016. If that is Donald Trump or Ron DeSantis,
it is going to be very bad and make the Supreme Court situation even worse. So just putting it
out there, Aubrey. Let's not forget about that and the fact that this is happening again in 2024. We
don't want to end up in the same scenario. Speaker 4: Yeah, my state actually counts.
Speaker 1: So Wisconsin counts big, Wisconsin counts big. And it could be. I mean, listen,
there's there's not I'm not going to lie to you, Aubrey. There's not a lot of scenarios
where Wisconsin is the difference maker, but it's not impossible. It's way more
likely Wisconsin will be the difference maker than it will be California, if you understand.
Speaker 4: Yeah, you're from New York. So like, I mean, your state you married is even less.
Speaker 1: New York matters even less. That's not right. That's not wrong. There's more.
Speaker 3: Yeah. Speaker 1: All right. Things
are otherwise. Everything otherwise is good. Speaker 4: I'm no terrible. I hate insults,
but, yeah. No, it's great. Thank you. Speaker 1: You hate Incels. Hmm.
How does that affect you? Day to day? Speaker 4: No, I have not had, like,
a really bad. Like where I'm going to get into a cycle really bad.
Speaker 1: But if you. If you. If you dated an incel, by definition,
they were not an incel. Right? Speaker 4: No, no, no.
Speaker 1: They want me to know they were. Speaker 4: No, they were like, I think I
think people can internally, like spiritually, still be in cells, like unironically, Right?
Speaker 1: Oh, like in other words, they weren't literally celibate, but they had in cell energy.
Speaker 4: Huh?
Speaker 1: What was there? Wow. That's. That's interesting. Well.
Speaker 4: Well, you don't think I'm right? Speaker 1: No, I think that that's possible. I
think that that's totally plausible. Yeah. Speaker 4: Yeah. I mean, like,
unironically. Like there's such. Like a little. Speaker 1: Okay. All right. All right. Thank
you. We're going to have to bleep that. We. It's been a pleasure having you on. Thank you very,
very much. When Aubrey starts swearing, it just gets bad. It and then we it ends. We
have to pay her bleep. Shockingly so. I don't want to rack up a huge bill,
Thanks to Aubrey. All right, everybody, Thank you for calling in. We'll take calls again,
that I promise you, if I have anything to say about it.