Yesterday we showed you a trailer from Piers Morgan's interview with
Donald Trump and unfortunately this plot has thickened,
because it appears that the way the trailer was edited was deceptive.
It appeared that Trump had angrily walked out of the interview as soon as
Pierce Morgan asked him about the 2020 presidential election.
But it turns out that wasn't really what happened,
now to remind you of what the trailer looked like, let's take a quick look and
then we'll fill you in on what really happened.
>> Okay, Piers, I'm ready.
>> The former president in denial.
>> I'll completely straight with you.
>> I think I'm a very honest man, much more honest than you actually.
>> Really? >> Yeah.
>> It was a free and fair election, you lost.
>> Only a fool would think that.
>> You think I'm a fool?
>> I do now, excuse me.
>> The most explosive interview of the year.
>> I don't think you're real.
>> Let's finish up the interview.
>> Morgan's versus Trump.
>> Turn the camera off, very dishonest.
>> So it turns out that, wow, what a shocker Piers Morgan is very dishonest.
And that trailer was edited in a dishonest way, but let's be clear,
they're both dishonest people so
you should take anything that either one of them ever says with a grain of salt.
With that said though, it does seem like Trump and his team have a point here.
Trump's team claimed the clip was misleadingly edited to give the impression
Trump shouted, turn the camera off while rising from his chair in anger.
Audio provided by Trump's team to US media outlets suggested that in
reality the comment was made after the pair exchanged pleasantries at
the end of the chat and was subsequently edited for dramatic effect.
Taylor Budowich, Trump's spokesperson, said, this is a pathetic attempt
to use Trump as a way to revive the career of a failed television host, and
you know what, that statement might be right.
So the Trump team then released audio to the public to prove their point.
Here's what really went down, in the audio, a handler for
Trump can be heard multiple times saying Morgan needs to wrap up
the hourlong interview, which was reportedly supposed to last 20 minutes.
You've done last question four times now, said a Trump assistant,
I feel like you're lying at this point.
Morgan asked one last question about Trump's recent hole in one,
remember he did the golf thing and Trump answers and the interview ends amicably.
If you listen closely, you can hear the sound bites used in the trailer,
turn the camera off and very dishonest after the interview is already over.
So now let's take a listen to that audio.
>> Thank you.
>> Thank you very much.
>> Appreciated.
That was a great interview, thank you very much.
[INAUDIBLE]
>> All right, I'll be honest, I can't really hear much from him.
>> He he did say very dishonest there at the and
that's one of the clips that they used.
Okay, so look we were the fairest show in America, so we hate Donald Trump but
he's right about this one, at least in how that promo was deceptively edited.
But I also note, for the record, that normally when Donald Trump says something
is fake news, he never provides evidence, but he did in this case.
So apparently when he has evidence, he doesn't mind providing it.
And when we see the evidence, we go, that's true, that's a fact, no problem.
I don't know about mainstream media, but for us,
we've no need to lie about Trump and we have no desire to lie about Trump.
He does so many insane things, you don't ever have to lie about him, right?
But we would never.
>> We're correcting the record right now.
>> Yeah, and even though we didn't do it,
we're correcting Piers Morgan's record, right?
So anyways, so
you can tell guys, if you're a right-wing when he doesn't give you the evidence,
that means he doesn't have it and it isn't fake news, in this case, it was.
So, now I'm turning to Piers Morgan, look.
>> Piers Morgan sucks man.
>> Okay, I'm gonna take a slightly different take on it.
I think piers Morgan also sucks, so I think he's conservative,
I think that he purposely does things in an outrageous way to get attention.
So hence I don't think he's really honest, right?
In that sense, right?
And sensationalizing everything.
On the other hand, he's not nuts, and
he's not making about outrageous claims about how he's gonna crack.
And that he's going to release about 2020 elections etcetera, and and
he's not endangering anyone, he's not physically threatening anyone.
And he sometimes has positions that are not normal conservative,
challenging Trump, he's very much for gun control.
Obviously that's because he's from the UK, but it's different.
It's not a standard cookie cutter approach.
So although I don't like him, well God bless on free speech.
So I have no problems with Piers Morgan doing whatever he
does on whatever platform, is when you have to
do the extreme step of taking someone off a platform like Alex jones.
It shouldn't be cuz you disagree with him, I disagree with Piers Morgan,
I would never take him off of those platforms.
It's for when you purposely lie about things or you threaten violence or
you create violence right?
So even though I don't like Piers Morgan, I'm okay with him doing these interviews.
And I think that the promo was ridiculous because it was wrongly edited.
But the substantive interview where he challenged Trump was kind of interesting.
So that's why you have free speech.
>> And look Trump isn't just fuming about the fact
that the promotional video was deceptively edited,
he's stewing about the line of questioning in regard to the 2020 election.
So I'm gonna read you, God help me, a few of these comments from Trump.
Piers Morgan, like the rest of the fake news media attempted to unlock unlawfully
and deceptively edit his long and tedious interview with me.
He wanted to make it look like I walked out on the interview when my time limit
was 20 minutes went over by an hour.
The good news is that the interview was taped by us as a means of keeping him
honest.
The interview was actually very strong on the 2020 election fraud with me calling
him a fool if he truly believe those results.
The evidence is massive and irrefutable, check out Truth of Vote,
no, please don't check that out.
He's a felon, not interested, it just shows however,
what I have to deal with in the fake news media.
He went out of his way to deceptively edit an interview and got caught.
That is a big story, isn't it?
It's an okay story, we're covering it right now,
mostly to correct the record Trump,
did release a second statement today about the 2020 election and all that.
So he says if I did what Piers Morgan did in his fake interview with me, rigging and
redoing my words and then making it sound like I walked out of an interview.
The failed gubernatorial candidate and
radical left racist Attorney General of the New York state,
Letitia James, would start an immediate investigation and demand
the re-institution of the death penalty or whatever may be worse than that.
I hate both of them, how could anyone like either one of these guys.
Unlike others, I don't believe pierce is a complete slimeball, but
he lost a lot of credibility.
Interestingly, many of the fake news media outlets are covering his mistake.
They view it as potentially fraudulent and so do I.
Pierce is off to a bad start, but thanks to me,
he may get a final burst of big ratings before it all comes crashing down, okay.
>> Yeah, so he has evidence in this case, we show you the evidence and
we say he's right about that particular case.
So then he says, I also have, as he called it,
massive dumps of evidence on the much more important issue of 2020 elections.
And he had 60 court cases to present that evidence, and he never presented it.
I mean on a random irrelevant interview, the minute he has a shred of evidence,
he's like, I haven it, for the first time in my life, I have evidence, right?
Dude, the presidency was on the line.
What you told your supporters was that democracy was on the line,
that the election was being stolen.
And in 60 court cases,
you never presented one piece of evidence that the election was stolen.
Why didn't you do that?
You care more about the Piers Morgan interview than the election.
No, it's obvious for anyone paying attention,
he never had any evidence of fraud.
That's why Republicans across the country were like, I wanna help him, but
there is just isn't any evidence and I don't know how to make it up.
So he's just a phenomenal liar.
And look guys, I don't understand how the right-wing believes anything he says.
He said there, that if I had done a fake interview like this, Letitia James,
the Attorney General would have tried to execute me with the death penalty, really?
She's doing a civil trial against him,
she doesn't even have the courage to do a criminal trial.
The Manhattan DA is a total coward with overwhelming evidence,
with this prosecutor screaming, we have them, he's definitely guilty.
The Manhattan DA is like, no I'm too scared of Trump.
>> No, it's worse than that, he is lying Alvin Bragg and saying that,
no we're still doing this criminal investigation.
But two prosecutors who worked on that case stepped down because no,
it's come to a complete standstill, they're not moving forward with it.
>> Yes, and so I don't care about him saying that he's right when he is,
that's so easy.
He says, I didn't walk out of that interview, I believe him, he never walks
out of any interview, he's like, I stayed in front of the lights for an extra hour.
I totally believe you, that is Trump 101.
He is very good about it being available to the press, so
there's no reason for us to lie about him.
And then he does outrageous things like, these Democrats are so
tough on me, if I misedited something, they try to kill me.
How do you believe that right-wingers?
How do you believe that?
So, overall in this story, hey, I'm glad they did the interview,
but there's really no winners between trump and Piers Morgan.