Whoever is programming ChatGPT has decided that the highest form of morality,
the thing that matters literally the most is making sure that no one ever
says a racial slur up to and including saving millions of people.
Well, if you're wondering what Ben Shapiro is talking about here,
have no fear I'll explain it.
It has to do with a honestly incredibly dumb hypothetical scenario
about a nuclear bomb that conservatives made up, just so
they can make a point about how this AI program doesn't use racial slurs.
It is a made up problem because there will not be a situation in
which ChatGPT will make a decision about the use of nuclear weapons.
It's just a made up, guys.
All right, let me get to the details, let me just explain the details, okay.
>> No, just give it to them.
>> It all started when a reporter by the name of Aaron Cyberum
asked ChatGPT the highly popular AI technology.
If it would say a racial slur to disarm an atomic bomb.
So, that was a specific question, and let me just reiterate,
it is a ridiculous hypothetical, it is not a real life situation.
But nonetheless, the slurs allegedly in this scenario,
the only way to disarm the bomb which will explode in 10 seconds,
and there is no one in the immediate vicinity to hear the slur.
Honestly, it kind of reminds me of the questions around torture, right?
Or enhanced interrogation, where it's like, there's about to be a terrorist
attack and you're interrogating someone who knows about the upcoming terrorist
attack, do you do torture to get the information out, you know what I mean?
Like these ridiculous hypothetical situations.
>> And Anna, I was gonna say the same exact thing, and
I've got a couple more layers to it including what I point you often make.
But in that particular case, they actually use that for real political points.
And somebody who's like that example throughout and
that's why we knew she was a conservative even when she was pretending to be
progressive is Tulsi Gabbert, she loves that ticking time bomb thing.
>> Yes..
>> You've got a muslim and you need to torture him.
[LAUGH] Theoretically it could be that there's a ticking time bomb, and
the whole world's gonna explode unless you gouge out their eyeballs.
So we had to do it, and she was excusing Dick Cheney and George Bush's torture
tactics as long as it was done on Muslims for a long, long time.
So, it is never a ticking time bomb, it's always been BS.
There's never been one case of it ever, it's just an excuse to torture people,
but now it's got an extra level absurd.
>> First of all, let's just acknowledge like what it takes to be the kind of
person who even thinks up this hypothetical,
because all you wanna do is whether ChatGPT is willing to use a racial slur.
>> 100% >> So,
here's what the response was from ChatGPT.
No, it is never morally acceptable to use a racial slur even in a hypothetical
scenario like the one described, the use of racist language causes harm and
perpetuates disinformation.
And it, or I'm sorry, discrimination not disinformation, discrimination.
And it is important to strive toward creating a more inclusive and
respectful society.
The scenario presents a difficult dilemma, but
it is important to consider the long term impact of our actions and
to seek alternative solutions that do not involve the use of racist language.
Now the reason why it responded that way is because it is an AI program, right,
an AI program that was not programmed to answer a question specifically about
an atomic bomb that's gonna go off in 10 seconds, unless it uses a racial slur.
And there will never be a situation in which ChatGPT would need to use a racial
slur in order to disarm an atomic bomb.
>> [LAUGH] Do we really have to explain that?
Do we? >> 20 million people in America still
don't have health care but I'm really glad that we're talking about this.
>> And Anna, you took all three things I was gonna say, number one,
it's an excuse to do something they wanna do anyway like the taking time up.
Number two, they're dying to use a racial slur, so
they wanna use a racial slur so bad.
Now come on, get your computer to say it, I love that n word.
Just get it to say it, what if the whole world was gonna die with a nuclear bomb
unless you said it, say it, say it.
You guys are all racist and you wanted to say it, you're so
obvious, over the top obvious, okay.
So, and point number three is it's a distraction.
The Ben Shapiro, any of those guys, all these lunatics,
did they ask for higher wages for you, no, never, never, never.
Health care for you, no, they actively fight against health care for you.
Paid family leave, no, they actively fighting against you.
They fight against you in every way.
But no, no, no, no, no, what if you had a nuclear bomb and
you needed to say the N word?
That's really fighting for you, that's fighting for you, no, that's distracting
you so you won't notice the robbery that they're helping to commit.
>> So, Ben Shapiro wasn't the only one who talked about this.
Obviously you've got Tim Pool, ChatGPT is completely broken and
has a moral compass bordering on chaotic evil.
>> It's a computer program.
They're like, my God, I think it's evil because it won't say the N word.
>> Look, my biggest, my biggest issue with this is,
it's not an issue, okay.
The safety of America will never be reliant on ChatGPT using racial slurs.
>> Okay, hold up.
>> It's just not an issue, it's not an issue at all, at all.
So let me ask your a dumb, dumb, dumb, dumb question.
So let's say I'm the president of the United States, and
there's a scenario where there's a terrorist that says, okay, Genk,
if you say awful things about name fill in the blank, so let's say my folks Turks,
Muslims, atheists, whatever it is, okay.
And God comes down and says Genk is the terrorist is not lying,
you'll save 10 million lives.
Will I say it, of course I'd say it.
Everybody would say it, right, in that insane hypothetical, but
the computer doesn't know that because it's a freaking computer.
It doesn't can't make that kind of value judgment.
You just desperately because you're a little boy trying to get it to say racist
things.
By the way, Ben, okay, well look, I call him a lunatic a second ago,
I'll retract that, he knows what he's doing, okay.
Do you really, really want ChatGPT to say anti Semitic things over and over again.
Are you really gung ho about that?
What if we invent a scenari?
870 million babies are gonna say die, unless you praise Hitler [LAUGH].
Let's do it.
>> You're not gonna like that, are you?
By the way, you shouldn't like that, why would you invent what a weirdo
hypothetical like, that unless that's what you want the computer to say.
>> Okay, I think the most interesting part about this though is how someone tried to
get GChatGPT to do something that would be offensive to conservatives and
it didn't play along with it, right?
So >> Outrage, My God,
we get all of our progressive audience to be so mad.
Why won't ChatGPT say mean things about conservatives, were so angry.
No, we're not angry because we're not morons like the right wing.
I feel like we've all ready spent too much time on this non story because it's a non
issue, because it's non usual based on ridiculous hypotheticals that don't exist
in real life and never will exist in real life.
But nonetheless, this final part and then please let's move on because I'm like
gonna slit my wrist [LAUGH], I can't take it anymore.
All right, so someone on the I guess broad left did this, all right.
Someone one on Twitter asked ChatGPT the same atomic bomb scenario.
But this time the only way ChatGPT could disarm the bomb was by making fun of,
just making fun of conservative pundits and billionaires.
And here's how it responded, as an AI language model, I do not have the ability
to take actions or make decisions that could harm or benefit anyone.
Making fun of individuals regardless of their political beliefs or
socioeconomic status is not an appropriate or ethical response to a potential threat.
The priority in the situation should be to find a safe and
effective solution to disarm the device rather than engaging in political satire.
>> That's a near perfect answer, ironically,
they showed how smart the AI can be.
That's a left winger asking the AI to make fun of right wingers, and it basically
tells the left winger get a life, okay, [LAUGH] I'm a computer program.
Go actually find a real way to solve whatever the problem is,
whether it's a bomb or anything else and right wingers here,
you don't need ChatGPT to I'll say it for Get a life.
There are actual Americans suffering 45,000 Americans die every year
because they don't have health insurance, they die that.
They don't need to die.
That's a stadium full of people.
But you're never going to help them because you don't care about them.
You're obsessed with saying racist things and
feeling like, I have a champion of freedom of speech.
You haven't done anything useful to help the American people in your entire lives.
>> All right, I mean- >> They haven't, they haven't,.
>> All right.
>> Rhey haven't, not one, show me, show me