Speaker 1: We were on the ground for Trump's rally speech in South Dakota,
where one MAGA said that Joe Biden should be killed for treason. These people vote. We are
going to review all of it. Our correspondent, of course, Luke Beasley, on the ground there. You can
find Luke's YouTube channel doing a hell of a job at David Pakman dot com slash Luke. Here is a man
who straight up says Biden committed treason and should be killed there. Briefly interrupted by an
argument in the background. It was just like a total circus atmosphere. Let's just jump right
into what is extraordinarily disturbing content. Speaker 8: Tell me three Democratic policies that
you support. Inflation Reduction Act, American Rescue Plan, the Infrastructure Law, the PACT,
Act and Science Act. I think it's good that Biden pulled out of Afghanistan. I can
go on and on. I get why. Speaker 1: The guy is
disgusted that Luke is naming policies, I guess. Speaker 8: Would you like to talk about the pull
out of Afghanistan? Right. Why did you feel bother that I just listed policies I think are good
because I think it's great. The lowers prescription drug costs. You don't know
enough about those policies. So one of them and the Inflation Reduction Act is covering
the cost of insulin for Medicare recipients at $35 out of pocket per month. And I think that's
really good. I don't think seniors should be having themselves price gouge. And then also
now Medicare can negotiate drug prices. They rolled out the first ten medications. They're
going to negotiate this man. Speaker 6: He will be. Yeah.
Speaker 8: So now Medicare, want to go to you. Drug prices. I think that's really
good because of Joe Biden and Democrats. Hey, I think Joe Biden is an illegitimate president. I
think the election was stolen and I think he's going to be killed for his treason.
Speaker 1: That escalates very quickly. The guy says to look around, Well, if Biden's so good,
can you name a single policy you like? Yeah, here's five. Forget about policy. He should
be killed. They continue talking and the guy explains, you know all about Biden's
treason for which he should be killed. Speaker 8: Election was stolen. I'm
assuming that's part of the treason. Well, that is treason. Election interference.
Right. So you agree, though, right? In no official capacity has that been proven.
You can't prove a negative. Speaker 1: And so he drops in,
you know, you're in s head to look. Of course, this completely ignores burden of proof. If one
believes that the election was stolen, then they presumably believe it because of some
evidence which they should be able to present. And if they believe it just because they feel it
was stolen but have no evidence, then that is not really something the legal system can work with.
Speaker 8: You cannot prove something that. No, I'm saying it's been proven
that it did not happen. I'm saying that if there indeed was is widespread voter fraud,
this stole the election from Trump. We have a legal process where you can bring that just
right. And my and even Trump do they even Trump even Trump appointed judges said nothing here.
We'll see. That's what happens 60 plus times. We'll see what that means. We'll
see if it's adjudicated. I mean, afterwards, they might going to go back. No, but I'm saying.
Speaker 1: It's been adjudicated, but they just might go back and re
adjudicate all those cases. Why? I don't know. Speaker 8: They just might now, three years away
from the election. Oh, you think it would have happened by now, Right. You think they think
something would have been done about maybe can arguing that everything is okay? Nothing to say.
Speaker 1: All right. Some other. Speaker 8: Guy that I'm assuming has passed.
Speaker 1: And things are going haywire. So. So this is really tough to deal with these
folks. Look, next, spoke to a guy wearing a t shirt that has Trump's mug shot on it that
says Never surrender. Luke points out Trump did surrender. He he literally surrendered. At Fulton
County Jail. And this one's really a doozy. Speaker 8: You would explain the shirt?
Oh, yeah. Well, you know, never surrender. That's what that's what Trump is saying he's not going
to do. I mean, he's he's being. He's been indicted for crimes that he didn't commit. I have to point
out he did surrender technically at the Fulton County Jail. Right. CNN He he did abide by the
law as required by the law. Yeah. I mean, I think he's setting a good example for our country by.
Speaker 1: Saying he will never surrender other than when he was right to surrender.
Speaker 8: You know, he but then abiding by the law as being interpreted by the
prosecutors would mean not doing what he did that they're prosecuting him for. Right.
Could you could you repeat that? There was noise behind. I also agree that individuals should abide
by the law. And prosecutors are alleging that he broke the law in his actions in relation to trying
to overthrow the election in classified documents and some other things. Yeah. I mean, I think the
charges against him are laughable and ridiculous. Speaker 1: I just. This esteemed legal expert does
not buy these charges. He's putting us on notice. Good for him. It.
Speaker 8: It. Why would they have brought these charges against him right in the middle of a
campaign? It's election interference. If it was actually anything that had to do with reality,
they would have done it long ago. It takes a while to do an investigation, right? Well,
really, I mean. Speaker 1: So this gets back to no matter
when they would have brought the charges, these folks would have complained. And it's sort of
by design. I mean, Trump announcing so early that he's running for reelection to create a situation
where any charges that are brought are brought in as Trump is a candidate. And if we said, okay,
let's wait and let the 2024 election happen, Trump wins and becomes president. Oh, well, now he's
president. Now, you definitely can't bring the charges. But even if Trump loses in 2024, listen,
he's now just an old man who is out of politics. Why go after him now? That would also be wrong.
No matter when the charges would be brought, they would say this. And most importantly,
there is not actually any evidence that the timing was calculated beyond simply how much
time do we need to do these investigations and investigations of different durations
being completed at different points in time? There may be future indictments. There could be another
federal indictment. There could be one out of Arizona. There's discussions of Michigan. We don't
know. They there is no evidence at this time that anyone has presented of Joe Biden's involvement,
nor of the idea that it was timed specifically to hurt Donald Trump. We go to the next guy.
Here's a guy who is asked about impeachment. He's just clueless. There's really no other way
to say it. He just doesn't know what's going on. But he's very certain that he is right.
Speaker 8: What evidence do you have to bolster the idea that this isn't just a
fair prosecution based on violations of the law? Speaker 6: They have no evidence to support it.
Speaker 8: The indictments, they are. Speaker 6: Trying to impeach
him so many times and. Speaker 2: He doesn't get impeached.
Speaker 8: Well, he got impeached, but this isn't impeachment. This is prosecution.
What? Huh? This is unrelated to impeachment. This is a prosecution.
Speaker 2: They they think they it's because they don't want him to win. They know he's
going to win again. Speaker 8: Right.
But in for example, the classified documents indictment, it lays out violations of the law
as being alleged in the indictment. And so you're saying those don't exist or
they don't actually violate the law? What's going on there? I don't think they exist.
So like the audiotape of Trump saying that he has a classified document is I could have declassified
it, but I can't anymore. What do I represent the. Speaker 2: Bidens Biden son's been doing
with Ukraine? Speaker 8: Well,
there hasn't been. I mean, this is. Speaker 1: What about ism now? Well,
I don't know what you're talking about. I have
no defense to it. Here's something different. Speaker 8: To prove that something illegal went
on in between Joe Biden and Hunter Biden hasn't. Speaker 6: Because that's Biden.
Speaker 8: But Hunter Biden did something illegal with the gun. He's being prosecuted for it.
Speaker 1: But doesn't know what's going on. But they vote. Here's conspiracy guy who says
Alex Jones told him in the nineties that in 2014 Obama would send the virus somewhere to generate
lockdowns. In 2020, it's very difficult to follow. Speaker 6: Alex Jones warn me on video
of the virus they were going to use to destroy the country in the late nineties.
So you give me a lot of time to prepare for all your guys.
Speaker 8: They were going to me and create the vaccine, but I was concocting the vaccine
the nineties before I was born. Speaker 6: No, but I mean you're
all about what if whatever you're about. Speaker 8: So who created the virus?
Speaker 1: Oh, I hope you're sitting down for this 2014.
Speaker 6: They shifted over there, I guess the unseen force. He handed it, the NIH, the CDC, FDA.
Speaker 8: So Fauci wanted to start COVID because. Speaker 6: Move the vaccine over.
Speaker 8: Obama Want to start go back. Speaker 6: Well, he was the president 2014. Right.
Speaker 8: Okay. And what would be the end goal there.
Speaker 6: All to lock down the country? Yeah. Speaker 1: Yeah.
Don't you understand? Fauci planned the virus in the nineties. Obama shipped it to China, I guess,
in 2014 in order to lock down the country. Except the lockdowns, to the extent that they happened,
took place under Trump's watch. Trump actually, quote, locked down the country. This is some very,
very wild stuff. And what's important to remember is, you know, we're not ridiculing when we say
these people vote. If we don't vote, we cede the power to determine who represents US president,
Senate, House of Representatives, mayors, governors, city council.
These folks decide. And it's not about making fun of this guy, although there's a lot of material
there. It's about if we don't vote, they decide. And that's crazy. Here's. More from the same guy.
Speaker 8: I think it's important not to intertwine a bunch of conspiracy theories
about what the machines are doing. You? No, I'm saying we can have a conversation about
do we want machines or do we not? But that should be connected to a bunch of defamation
against companies like Dominion. Speaker 6: Defamation? Oh,
yeah. I'm going to sue them. I'm going to sue them for destroying my election.
Speaker 8: Okay. And why do you think FOX News, which could have been a defense for
the defamation lawsuit of FOX News? Speaker 1: So, by the way, he's now
against now Fox News has fixed news. Speaker 6: That Fox News. Fox News.
Yeah. What about that? Speaker 8: Why would they
have just gone into court and proved that the machines were stealing the election from Trump.
Speaker 6: Was a payoff to Dominion for $700 million?
Speaker 8: No, no, because they settled. Speaker 1: So think. Think about what
Luke is pointing out. Something very important,
which is there's a defense to defamation, which is showing the truth of the things you said.
The reason that Fox News was sued and ultimately settled for 787 and a half billion
was that they did not apparently feel they had at their disposal as a defense to the defamation
claim from Dominion that Dominion voting machines really did the things that were alleged on air.
If Fox News had proof of that, they could have made that case. So Luke says they could have
avoided that huge payout, nearly 800 million, just by proving the voting machines really did
the thing that that you're saying. And the guy says, well, no, that's because it was a payoff to
Dominion. Well, but they wouldn't have needed to do the payoff if they demonstrated that the thing
really just over over the guy's head. Speaker 8: That's what I'm
saying. I'm saying I'm saying that. Speaker 6: Both the MACCALLUM and them ran cover
and then they said Trump. Trump was. And it was a payoff. It's a backdoor payoff.
Speaker 8: So. So here's what happened on election night. They ran cover for the election being
stolen. Then after election night, they pushed conspiracy theories about the election being
stolen, the opposite of what they did on election night. And then after that, they looked around and
admitted they were lying to protect themselves legally and they had to settle with dominion.
Speaker 6: Over what Fox News did. Speaker 2: Oh, that's genius.
Speaker 1: At the end of it all, when when it all falls apart is like, listen, I don't know
what the hell they did. It's it's anyone's guess what they did. Here's the last guy. This guy tries
to pull out some election fraud nonsense on Luke. Luke's ready for it. Doesn't go well.
Speaker 8: For example, Trump's attempts to overturn the election.
Wrong. So to protest against that, I would say, would be correct. Right.
Speaker 6: Well, you're saying that he over tried to overturn an election win election.
You're trying to say you overturn 2020. So you haven't heard anything
about election fraud, this happening at all? Speaker 8: Well, I look to are you saying all the
recounts, investigations, audits and court cases? Speaker 6: Have you watched the Georgia the
Georgia election? Did you see where they pulled. Speaker 8: The ballots out from under the
cabinet and they realized that was. Speaker 4: Scandium and scandium and.
Speaker 6: Risking enemies? Can you know that lady got arrested, right?
Speaker 8: Don't you think of that, actually. I know a lot of people are suing for defamation
because of lies about people like that. No. Speaker 6: Yes, she definitely.
Speaker 8: Ruby Freeman. Ruby. Speaker 6: Yes.
Speaker 8: She definitely got it. Turned out that even Giuliani acknowledged she was lying. True.
She lost a defamation case. And in that case, he had to concede that he was not correct about those
statements about Ruby Freeman. Speaker 6: Oh, no, no. She's
definitely been arrested. Speaker 8: She has an iPhone.
Speaker 1: And it is true. It is absolutely true what Luke Beasley is saying. He even had the proof
up on the screen during this. So what are the takeaways here? The takeaways here are numerous,
but the most important actionable one. You know, I get that these videos are a combination of sort of
entertaining disaster porn, but also potentially the last gasps of American democracy, as these are
the people who are glad to look the other way or even participate when it comes to saying, you know
what, the guy who lost should become president, which is one of the most dangerous things that you
can do to a democracy. So the most important practical takeaway is we all need to vote,
because when we don't vote, these are the people who decide. But that, of course, isn't enough.
And we need to fix critical thinking, Even though these people might not want everybody
to have health care, we still have to work to get everybody health care. Even though these folks
don't want to fix education, we still have to work to fix education and do something about the
climate. So the takeaway is. We don't want this to be the group of folks that guides the country
and influences policy and decides who represents us. So as demoralizing as it can be to see this,
it should actually be a reminder to get engaged. And on that note, make sure you're following
Luke David Packman dot com slash Luke. We are ramping up an election season here. Maybe the
most important one I will have ever covered. Make sure you are subscribed to this YouTube channel.
Three and a half million of you in the last month watched my clips but are not subscribed.
Hit that subscribe button. Let's get to 2 million. Let's do this thing. We've
got to continue building independent media because what we're doing, quite literally,
is fighting against these folks being the ones who decide we can't have that.
And every time you subscribe to this channel, to Luke's channel, to other progressive channels,
you're taking a half step in that direction. Quick break. So much more right after this