In the wake of Tucker Carlson's text messages, which are generally referred to,
I think, as the white men don't jump a text.
A number of different right wing chuds are tripping over themselves to reassure
their audience that they are at least as racist as Tucker Carlson.
Here's a great demonstration by Charlie Kirk.
>> You're not allowed to even say the W word.
You can't say the white world.
In fact, MSNBC says it's kind of this statement that white people are better
than this, that white people would never do such a thing.
That's not what he said at all.
In fact, if you wanna actually get to the truth that Tucker was saying here is that
there is a disturbing this is a fact.
No one wants to say this.
There is a disturbing pattern of blacks jumping people of all races
in the urban corridors in America.
That is a fact.
I don't like it.
You shouldn't like it.
It's horrifying.
But it's a pattern that we are seeing.
Tucker Carlson was sending a private text message basically piggybacking on
that fact.
By the way, you know who the blacks are jumping more than anybody else?
Asians in the streets.
There are thousands of videos of blacks ganging up on their victims.
It's not racist to say that.
It's not racist to see pattern recognition and say, wow, we usually don't see this.
It's not to say that one race is better than the other.
I know Tucker Carlson, unlike these mockingbird media apparatrics,
he does not have a racist element of an entire being.
In fact, he deplores racism.
He hates racism.
He argues against the black only dormitory, the wokism.
>> I love that his defense against the idea that Tucker Carlson is racist is to
then him point out some of the reverse racism narratives that they try to spread.
Good job.
Charlie Kirk, you natural broadcaster.
Okay, so there's a lot there that sucks.
I'm going to leave it to Nina in 1 second to explain it.
I'm just gonna say that if I could go to my grave, never once again hearing
him yell the word blacks over and over, I would really be fine with that.
I don't even like repeating it.
But the way he says that just has a lot baked into it and I don't like it.
Nina, what did you make?
What you just saw?
>> I'm with you, John.
This is what some of your viewers were referring to the show yesterday
cuz this set me all the way off, got all of my adrenaline flowing.
The blacks first of all, Charlie Kirk is a bold faced liar.
Now that is a fact.
And never let the truth get in the way of a good story.
And because there is in this country a predisposition to always see
black people as somehow it was more criminal than anybody else.
Is the reason why him and
people like Tucker Carlson can get this off because there is a predisposition.
And unless white people in this country are willing to deconstruct their
construction on that,
we are all socializing a society that says just that about black people.
And it plays out time and time again for Tucker.
And because it was a personal text, then it makes his racism and bigotry and
anti blackness okay.
The fact that he said that white men wouldn't comport themselves that way,
he didn't use the word comport is a damn lie.
Most of the race riots of the 20th century were started by white men.
I'm remembering very clearly the summer of the red summer of
1919 following World War I.
When black soldiers came back, white people were up in arms.
They even attacked black soldiers.
Riots broke out in 26 cities across the United States of America.
And guess what, family and friends.
It wasn't just fringe groups like the KKK and other white supremacy groups.
It was good old down home white people who decided to gang up and fight and
beat and kill and maim black people all across the United States of America.
Mainly white men.
I ain't gonna let the white women off the hook, but it was mainly white men.
So spare me, Tucker Carlson, where white men don't do that.
No, they do it.
They've been doing it historically, and they still doing it to this damn day.
What Charlie Kirk is saying and what Tucker said, John, is a historic period.
>> 100%.
>> They're a bunch of fools.
>> Also, by the way, they're completely ignoring that the video Tucker was
responding to was a group of white men jumping someone.
>> Right. >> So that doesn't bother them,
by the way.
Yeah, it doesn't bother them as a representation of the fact that
their point is wrong.
It also doesn't bother them that it happened to be clear and instead in there.
>> I wouldn't mind if they killed him.
But then he said, I got to pull myself back from that.
>> Then he backed up a little bit.
Exactly, yeah.
Also, we're just gonna show this graphic for one sec.
Matt Walsh effectively said the same exact thing, and
I don't wanna hear his voice today, so we're not gonna play it.
Both of them saying, you all are kidding yourselves.
Every video I see is of black men jumping people.
Is it possible just I'm gonna leave you with this thought that the videos you're
seeing on the sorts of websites that you go to.
And the people you fall on social media are not, in fact,
representative of reality.
Is it possible that you guys are spreading those videos because it's convenient to
you to spread a narrative.
Not because it's an accurate reflection of what's really going on?
Consider that.
[MUSIC]