The Boy Scouts of America has been inundated with more than 90,000 claims of sexual abuse and
time's running out for the organization to answer those claims. I have Steve Babin with me who was
smart enough to get out in front of this, who figured out that something was way wrong
with the scout organization. Steve, can you explain what these claims are
alleging and how far back do they go? Yeah, Mike, these claims are alleging
the most egregious thing there is it's child sex abuse, and they go back to the 1950s or the 1940s.
This is one of the most trusted American institutions that we've ever had and we
trusted this institution with our kids. And what we have found out is this has gone on for
decades and decades and decades at numbers that are, well, large enough to have the biggest sex
abuse case in history with over 90,000 victims filing claims in the Boy Scouts bankruptcy.
What caused this? I mean, it seems like a sudden flood of new allegations that nobody's talked
about. Course. We've seen it again and again, with the media, you know, it was like with the Catholic
church for so long, the media, corporate media would not take on the Catholic church. Same way
with, you know, the whole Weinstein kind of stories. The media was terrified by it because
the media, the corporate media will never stand up on issues that they should stand up on if there's
any pushback. So I'm wondering, is it part of that that caused this sudden flood of new allegations?
Was it just the media again, not doing their job? I mean, I think it's a number of things. I think,
yeah, the media was not doing their job. That's one thing. I think that
this is a case where it's young boys that were abused and it's a case that, you know,
I've got over a thousand clients and this is a case that my clients didn't want to talk about.
And what happened is there were sufficient cases filed. There were enough cases filed across the
country where victims saw others stand up and have the courage to speak out against what happened.
And, you know, when there's more than one and there are many, it's easier for those victims
to stand up. And that's what we had here, I think, is we had, you know, a lot of, a lot of men with,
with the courage and women, with the courage to stand up about what happened to them and to
speak the truth and to, you know, explain that the Boy Scouts didn't, didn't do what they were
supposed to do. They didn't take care of our children. And, and it was, it was a result of a,
of a, of an epidemic failure from the top down without having proper policies or procedures in
place or safety procedures or really anything. For many, many years, they had really nothing
in place to safeguard our children's lives when they, when they went with Boy Scouts
camping and on trips that were overnight. You know, no, what, what I wanted to get at
Steve is I, I think back and when we analyzed the whole Weinstein
awful story, we've found out that for example, MSNBC was even un, NBC unwilling to do a story
when there was overwhelming for years overwhelming information, and they refused to do it because of
their political contacts and because of the financial involvement. How, how was this one
of the most prom, one of the most prominent organizations in the country, how did they
manage to get by without having anybody looking at them seriously for so long? What happened here?
I mean, I think that it most certainly was swept under the rug. I know that I had clients that told
members outside of their house about what happened, and there was no,
there was no media on it. There were no court cases on it. Somehow there was that, you know,
the political power behind the Boy Scouts that enabled this to stay swept under the rug
and, and to be kept quiet for decades. So you're heading up Anne Andrews
that by the way, I will tell you that the team that you've put together, Anne Andrews,
superb lawyer out on, out on the West coast. She's put together a program in bankruptcy,
even though the Scouts is, they're trying to hide behind bankruptcy, Anne Andrews figured out
a way to make these people responsible anyway. What you're trying to do in bankruptcy court,
that's kind of a new thing the way you're trying to handle this, isn't, isn't it? It isn't it
something going forward could be important to all claimants, not just in,
not just in the Boy Scouts case? What's your take? I think, I agree. I think it is. I think Anne
Andrews is a brilliant lawyer. I think we've got a great team that she's put together with Adam
Slater. It's the Coalition of Abused Scouts for Justice, and that's essentially the leadership
group in this bankruptcy. And those are the lawyers that are going to get this case settled
and get equitable just compensation for all of the victims. But, what, what she has put together
and the team that she's assembled, who sit in a leadership position in this case, there's really
a lot of deep knowledge and wisdom and skill sets there that come to the table to hopefully get some
compensation on a quick timeline for our clients. Yeah. I'm afraid people might hear about this case
and say, well, it's in bankruptcy. I can't do anything. With what you're doing and Adam
Slater and Anne Andrews, and it really a great leadership team that you have there.
You're changing the way, I mean, look, you've got Lloyd's of London, you've got the,
you've got some of the biggest insurance companies in the world that have insured the Boy Scouts all
the way back to the seventies. So just because the boy Scouts said, okay, we're going to move into,
in, into bankruptcy court, that doesn't mean the fight is over. It means it's just really
started isn't, isn't that what's happening here? The fight has really just started.
I mean,tThe fight is really just started. I think the Boy Scouts have made clear that they know they
mistakes, but everyone's got to come to the table to make this settlement happen. That
means the insurers. That means the local councils who have billions of dollars in assets that need
to help fund this victim's compensation fund. But, yeah, the, this has just started and there
are many parties that need to come to the table in order for us to get our clients just compensation.
Steve, thank you for joining me. Put your team make, make sure they stay with this.
I'm very optimistic you're going to get a good result. Thank you for joining me.
The EPA has known for years about the dangers of an industrial chemical known as TCE, but without
regulations, tens of thousands of businesses today are still exposing their workers to this toxin,
which has made it's way from factories into our drinking water. Attorney Madeline Pendley joins me
to talk about this. Maddie, tell us what TCEs are. So TCE is Trichloroethylene, it's a manmade
chemical. So we came up with this. And it's actually used mostly in factories for cleaning of
medical equipment and metal parts, but it's also found in different cleaning products that we all
use and are therefore exposed to in our own homes. Despite being used in so many different ways, it's
actually extremely dangerous. It's a class one carcinogen, and it has been for a very long time.
Kidney cancer, liver cancer, birth defects, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. It has the capacity
to do that. Right.
It's in cleaning, as you point out it's in, it's,
they use it to clean electronics. They use it in refrigeration.
They use it in dry cleaning. Many, many uses of it and they, the industry, Dow chemical.
Yes. And it has known for a very long time,
how dangerous this is. There's some countries they don't, there you can't even use it. It's banned
totally. Right.
I'm wondering what kinds of health problems besides those are emerging? Where are we
seeing the biggest clusters of health problems? Really all over the country. So geographically,
there's, there's a little bit in every state it seems like. They're mostly central,
centralized around these factories or these manufacturing facilities. So either the air around
those facilities is polluted and it actually seeps down into the water table. So TCE will leach down
in and so the communities around these factories are drinking the water and they're being exposed
to it as well. So really all over the country, just demographically affecting factory workers.
Well, there's no way to even warn about it. I mean, if you're working around a factory
where we're really seeing this as on military bases, right? I mean.
We are seeing it on military bases, as well, yes. And what, why are we seeing it so much on military
bases? We actually see military bases being shut down as super fund sites because the government
can't clean up the disaster. Talk about that. Right. So this stuff gets into the environment,
whether it's through on a military base or the factories or wherever,
mostly through dumping, spilling or leaks. So you can have leaks
in the pipelines that seeps out into the environment, or just negligent, you know,
care when they're transporting this stuff. It dumps and contaminates the entire community.
Well, you know, what, is anything being done on the federal level?
It seems like the EPA, as usual, has just kicked the can down the, down the road.
Absolutely. And let industry tell
them what industry wanted to do. EPA leadership and the white house leadership has been, almost,
has been totally non-existent on this. Right.
Wasn't just the Obama administration that knew about this. It goes all the way back
to George Bush. I mean, Bush knew what the potential problems are and they just let the,
they just let the FDA just slide on this. Just do whatever you want to do.
Right. We've known how dangerous TCE is for a very long time. And as you mentioned, some flags were
raised during the Obama administration. Some bans were suggested, you know, they wanted to
start enforcing protections to try and reduce the levels of TCE exposure, try to stop these
facilities and these factories from using it. But unfortunately the EPA confusingly kind of
blocked some of those measures. They actually, especially during the Trump administration,
actually works to protect TCE so that these businesses did not have to stop using it.
So, okay. We've seen, the, the problem is that it's, it's not, as, as we said, you talked about
the factory and we talked about the fact that it's used on military bases, a lot for de-greasing
all types of industrial size equipment. But the problem is it's then moving from the base,
it's seeping down into the aquifer to where we have 34% of the drinking water supply in this
country right now has TCE in it. Exactly.
And people have no idea what that means to them, right?
Right, right. And so the problem is this could have been prevented, had, as you mentioned, these
companies and these military bases done the right thing from the jump. But now the problem is the
contamination is so much further spread than those factories and military bases. So one thing you can
do is if you think your water supply has been contaminated, you can order tests for it. There
are blood tests and breath tests that you can get yourself to see how much TCE has accumulated
in your body. But otherwise, the only thing to really do at this point is to avoid those areas
if possible, and get your drinking water tested. Well, it's not going to go away. I mean,
it's like, it's, it's not as bad as PHOS. PFOS is in the environment for a million years.
Right. This simply just,
the environment just recharges this as it moves through the aquifer, it doesn't really just go
away. It moves into your drinking water. Utah, really interesting story there in Utah, where
you had the military base was hugely affected. And then they started having cancer clusters outside
the military base, all around the military base, kidney cancer, liver cancer. They had some birth
defects. Talk about that. What are the places that we know are kind of hotspots for this?
So there are actually pretty significant pockets in almost every state. Some of
the biggest offenders are, you know, Utah, Arizona, California has several. New York,
New Jersey, North Carolina specifically at Camp Lejeune another military base,
as well as Florida. Specifically West Virginia and Oregon. So if you know somebody who potentially
has TCE contamination in West Virginia and Oregon, and has experienced some of those side effects,
we talked about Parkinson's, cancer, kidney and liver failure, you can give us at Levin
Papantonio Rafferty a call and we'll look into it. You know, what's interesting, Jan Schlichtmann
used to be, he was a law, he was a partner of mine. Law, law partner, he was of counsel
with this law firm and has been a friend a long time. He's the lawyer that tried, that there's a
book it's called A Civil Action. They made a movie out of, out of it, it's called A Civil Action. He
actually tried the first TCE case decades ago. Yeah.
He gave all the information to the government, to the EPA. Jan Schlichtmann had worked the case up
from ground on and all he got from them was, we're not interested. We don't think this is a problem.
Right. This killed
people all up and down this area where he tried the case. The case was unsuccessful. But what
he did is he took all of that information. It's worth seeing. It's called A Civil Action. It's,
it's a great movie. But the book is suburb. And this, this is where it all started, really.
Right. And like you mentioned, the problem is that the EPA has enough information to do something
about this. You know, and they should. I mean, if no one, if they're not going to who else is?
But they're not interested and they're actually taking steps to protect TCE and these facilities.
I hope you'll go after them. We will.
Thanks a lot, Maddie. Thanks.