Hey internet friends.
Do y’all remember the ebola epidemic that struck Western Africa in 2014—the events
of which played across television screens like some kind of reality TV show about the
apocalypse?
The media stuck to their usual script for the plague, using the name of a disease with
no agreed upon cause or cure to embody the general public’s greatest fear—and that
fear manifested as panic.
The end of the world was happening, then suddenly it wasn’t.The powerful agent of disease
was overshadowed by other agents of human tragedy like social collapse and war…
Well, until now.
This summer, the plague has been renewed for another season, back for its tenth recorded
outbreak in Africa, but this time in the war-torn Democratic Republic of Congo.
As of today, August 23, 2018, sixty-one deaths have been attributed to Ebola, with an estimated
two thousand potential hosts having contact with victims.
This season, Ebola is serving us a plot-twist: aggressive use of an experimental vaccine.
However, before we all line up for our trial inoculations, why don’t we first dabble
in a bit of preventative alternative medicine: the kind that anyone can afford and certainly
doesn’t require a prescription.
Let’s examine the past, analyze the present, and prepare for the future by taking a critical
look at not only the information being propagated this time around, but the information being
suppressed about this virus.
Let’s discuss what the media won’t tell us about Ebola.
While some researchers have argued the plague of Athens that ended in 425 BC was an isolated
Ebola epidemic, recorded history available for public consumption points to 1976 as the
year the hemorrhagic fever was identified, named after the location around which it was
discovered: the Ebola River in the DRC.
“Ebola” translates to “black”, and this black fever is without a cause or a cure—though
scientists have named animals like bats and monkeys, part of the Western African diet
of bushmeat, as carriers of the virus.
Ebola is spread through bodily fluids, with victims presenting with non-specific symptoms
like that of the common flu: high fever, weakness, diarrhea, and vomiting, and when left untreated
over the course of two weeks, the body breaks down, bleeding internally and externally,
resulting in the gruesome and dramatic death associated with Ebola—a death that has been
seared into the public imagination through mainstream media efforts.
A few tests for Ebola exist, but according to some experts in the field, these tests
are not without their flaws in detecting the various strains of ebola, which has led to
skewed data reporting in attributing deaths to the virus’s high fatality rate, with
reports of up to 90% of infected humans dying within a couple of weeks.
It’s also important to note that the United States Department of Defense, as well as the
Centers for Disease Control, classifies the Ebola virus as biological warfare agent.
The 1976 Ebola outbreak wasn’t the first viral scare the world had seen, nor would
it be the last.
However, this particular outbreak inspired a number of novels, video games, television
programs, and films, with storylines following easily spread germs and pandemics originating
in places like China or Africa.
Scenes of a single, wet cough heard by every passenger aboard a too-crowded airplane bound
for a densely populated destination like New York City are followed by apocalyptic images
of a global population infected, dying, with loved ones lost as the hysteria swells, and
subsequently, scenes of public transport shut down, martial law implemented, and the remaining
survivors corralled into FEMA camps to duke it out over the last rations—all while a
solution is being concocted, the distribution of which is debated—should we pump it into
the water supply like flouride or make it mandatory for all to get jabbed?
Well, either way, the most vital information in these programs and films is being relayed
to the general public through familiar faces in the form of newscaster cameos —making
the lines between reality and fiction blurry for the viewer.
Are these so-called journalists actually actors playing the role of journalists for day jobs,
just like they’re hired to do in the movies?
For the last several decades, millions if not billions of dollars have been funneled
into media programming surrounding diseases like Ebola.
This programming follows the adventure and tragedy of searching for a lab-grown solution
to a lab-grown problem, conditioning all who consume this type of entertainment to accept
vaccines as the best solution to illness.
But what happens when fiction becomes reality, and the images on the silver screen play out
in real life?
It’s said that no one really knows where Ebola skips off to during its respites, but
in 2014, Ebola popped up for the 9th time in West Africa, dwarfing all previous outbreaks
as it spread from Guinea to Liberia to Sierra Leone and beyond, with the World Health Organization
(an arm of the global government called the United Nations) attributing over eleven thousand
deaths to Ebola from 2014 to 2016.
In August of 2014, Liberia’s largest newspaper shook up the western narrative by publishing
a series of articles, starting with a report that a man had been caught dumping formaldehyde
into the local water supply—even tiny doses of formaldehyde can cause ebola-like symptoms
when ingested.
The man claimed to be one of many agents around the country.
The newspaper also published reports of American Red Cross nurses injecting healthy individuals
with ebola vaccines, the trials of which were taking place during that time, and those individuals
were the ones to die from Ebola symptoms.
Other sources claimed foreign humanitarian interventionists were reusing needles on patients
who were already immune-suppressed.
The western media responded to these allegations by labeling the Liberian journalists as “conspiracy
theorists”, and a propaganda campaign was unleashed, featuring the “Ebola is real”
slogan across clothing, signs, artwork, and even the title of a hit song.
Meanwhile, around-the-clock Ebola coverage continued to play across the news.
The scientist who originally identified the Ebola virus in 1976 called for ‘quasi-military
intervention’ to stop the epidemic from spreading in West Africa, and while President
Obama sent three thousand military personnel to Africa to work alongside the Bill Gates
Foundation, as well as health workers from Britain, China, Cuba, and even Israel, Ebola
left Africa and managed to make its way across the Atlantic, with some cases actually transported
to the United States to receive treatment.
This outbreak came only a few years after the CDC patented a strain of Ebola, which
they reported was in an effort to keep the virus in the public domain, away from private
companies seeking to make pharmaceutical dollars off of the hysteria.
The media failed to mention any existing patents on Ebola in their coverage of the epidemic,
just as they did with their coverage of the Zika virus, omitting any mention of the patent
held by Rockefeller Medicine dating all the way back to 1947.
To include this data in any coverage of these viral outbreaks would educate the public on
exactly who owns disease, which might lead to a series of pesky questions beginning with:
why are some diseases promoted while others are ignored?
In 2012, three million Africans died from lower respiratory infections, diarrhea, stroke,
and complications from the murky and controversial HIV virus.
Do you recall around the clock coverage of those deaths?
Any moral outcries for cures or solutions?
No?
That’s because cleaning up contaminated water supplies and installing basic sanitation
does not produce profit.
Disease is a money-maker.
Medicine is a business that requires marketing in order to sell products and services.
The media labels these products and services as the solution while ignoring environmental
factors causing illness and death.
If the media actually cared about African lives, then they would run stories on African
eugenics, with Western Africa being used as both a testing ground for experimental medicine
and a dumping ground for chemicals produced by global corporations.
So now we arrive at the present, Ebola has resurfaced, claiming sixty-one lives this
summer in the war-torn African state of DRC, with over 2000 people feared to have come
into contact with the virus.
This time, health officials have an experimental vaccine that’s been administered to over
2000 health workers and Ebola patient contacts, but it’s been reported that only 5000 doses
are still available.
The vaccine was codeveloped by Merck & co., which is known as the “world’s oldest
pharmaceutical company”, planting roots centuries ago in Germany, originally founded
by the Merck family of bankers and industrialists.
When WWI began, the United States division was seized by the US government for its ties
to Germany, but Merck bounced back during WWII when company president, George Merck,
in tandem with running his pharmaceutical company, became a leader in the United States
biological warfare program—involving the development of weapons which were tested on
citizens without their informed consent, both at home and on foreign lands.
Over the years, Merck has become one of the world’s largest pharmaceutical companies,
and they’ve used their money and influence to lobby in Washington, DC in support of the
drugs, vaccines, and animal-health products they manufacture.
Merck is the maker of the Vioxx drug and the Gardasil vaccine that resulted in scandals
and lawsuits, revealing a laundry list of allegations among which included Merck’s
creation of a “hit list” of doctors who criticized Vioxx, and the bribing of “scientists”
and “researchers” to falsify their studies on the safety and effectiveness of Merck’s
vaccines.Right now, other pharamecutical companies besides Merck are circling Western Africa
like vultures.
These companies have a similar history of scandals and lawsuits, none of which the media
would ever dare mutter in their coverage of Ebola.
The media would never tell you that the growing trend with these new vaccines is the alteration
of the human genome.
Meaning that, by receiving these inoculations, your DNA is being altered.
Permanently.
The effects and consequences of which have not been measured over the course of a human
lifespan, and of course this information is not being relayed to the human guinea pig
into which the experimental vaccine is being injected—a vaccine that the patient lined
up for in response to the hysteria and panic of a potential viral outbreak.
Science and technology is changing our world and our bodies at such a rapid pace,and this
medicine that we were told would heal us is, in some cases, destroying us.
But many of the valuable remnants of the past that we could learn from go unheard, and any
real history fades as it’s replaced by whatever is beneficial to this make-believe order that’s
been imposed globally.
And these global corporations, like pharmaceutical companies, who our politicians bow down to
for the right price, are they deserving of your blind trust?
What have they done to earn it?
The global government has demonstrated how little it values human life through endless
war disguised as fighting for peace and eugenics programs paraded as humanitarian efforts.
Confronted with any sort of imminent doomsday brought on by invisible germs, this government
will seek the power to make medical decisions on the behalf of its citizens, and many will
line up for a manufactured solution to a manufactured problem, because the only thing that spreads
faster than germs is fear.
And that’s exactly what the media won’t tell you about Ebola.
What do you think, internet friends?
Let me know!
You know I always look forward to your comments.
Thank you so much for watching, subscribing, and supporting my channel on Patreon.
Bye!
Make sure to wash your hands.