Australia's ABC TV spoke to
Sidney Powell, one of the grifters
who was hovering above Donald Trump
and alleging that the election was
stolen from him.
She's now facing some pretty
serious lawsuits including one
from Dominion Voting Systems for
her lies and intentional
disinformation regarding the 2020
election, and how Dominion
allegedly played a role in that.
Now, I love how this interview went
down because when you ask people
tough questions, which include
follow up questions of course,
people like Sidney Powell, who
have no leg to stand on, crumble.
So let's watch the first clip from
this interview.
>> Let's get a few
simple facts straight.
In how many states were Smartmatic
machines and
software used in the 2020 election?
>> I don't even know the exact
numbers.
>> But you were making some big
statements, very dramatic, critical
statements about Smartmatic.
You must have known what their
involvement was in the election.
>> You'd have to go look at our
complaint with respect to the four
states that we filed legal
complaints in to get the details
of that.
>> A Google search would of shown
you that Smartmatic was operating
in one single county in California.
>> I'm saying I think
their involvement's probably a lot
bigger than that.
>> What research or fact checking
did you do at the time to find out
what Smartmatic's actual
involvement in the election was?
>> Do you work for Smartmatic?
>> You've made an allegation
against Smartmatic that they stole
a presidential election.
I think it's incumbent on both of
us to know what Smartmatic's
involvement was.
It seems like a pretty
foundational fact.
>> I mean, I'm confused right now
about why you're here.
>> Because you made a series of
very strong allegations against
Smartmatic and against Dominion,
containing many errors of fact.
>> I love it, I love it.
I mean, these are people who aren't
used to those types of follow up
questions.
And much like Ben Shapiro and
the way he behaved during
a UK interview, once they get some
pushback, once they deal with some
follow up questions, their first
strategy is attack the the host,
the journalist, the commentator,
whoever it is that they're talking
to, right?
Do you work for Smartmatic?
No, no, she's clearly a reporter
who's asking you common sense
questions about allegations you've
made, and she immediately crumbles.
In fact, I can't wait to show you
the rest of the interview because
she couldn't handle the heat and
decided to run away from it so.
>> But first, so
this is damning of our press.
Our press is so soft and weak.
And she's genuinely outraged that
a perfectly normal question's
being asked.
But I want you guys to know that
Smartmatic was in LA County.
They were going to rig the election
for Biden in LA because he needed
to win LA?
He needed to win California?
He won California by millions of
votes, that would be the single
worse county to rig.
But what I'm amazed by is their
laziness.
She doesn't even know what's in
her own complaint.
>> I know, look at her.
>> She made allegations,
massive, unbelievable
allegations against this company.
She didn't even bother checking
where their machines were.
She's been sued for an unbelievable
amount of money by Smartmatic.
She still doesn't know where
their machines are.
>> Do you know why?
>> It's amazing.
>> Look, she knows that she has no
evidence of widespread voter fraud
in regard to the 2020 election,
she knows.
She genuinely believes that she can
engage in this clear grift and
that there are no consequences to
follow because that's the sense of
entitlement people like
Sidney Powell have.
In fact, she's so entitled, she has
such a sense of entitlement, that
she was incensed that a reporter
would ask her follow up questions.
So when she couldn't stand
the heat, here's how she behaved.
>> Do you accept the fact now that
the company that you accused of
stealing a national election only
operated in one county in LA in
California?
One county, one state?
>> No, I'm not prepared to accept
that fact.
I think Smartmatic's involvement
was far more significant than that.
Do I think they're trying to
minimize their involvement?
Of course I do.
>> You said that Smartmatic owns
Dominion.
How do you justify such
a basic factual error?
>> I'm going to stop this
interview.
It's wholly inappropriate in
the litigation that we're in.
>> But we're not even in
the area of great dispute.
These are the simple facts of
who owns what.
>> No, we're done.
>> That's all right,
these are facts.
>> When we are in litigation
against me personally.
[CROSSTALK] >> I understand that
these are very serious allegations,
but these are also very-
>> I don't get it.
What does Sidney Powell think
anyone would want to interview
her about, right?
So she's concerned about
litigation.
Did you think that there was
anything else about you that
was interesting enough to compel
reporters from Australia to want to
interview you?
What does she expect to happen?
>> Well, so that has a very good
answer, but
I love the question you're asking.
So was she expecting,
we're not talking about
the Patriots cutting Cam Newton?
I was surprised by that too.
I thought that's what this
interview was about.
The election, the election, okay.
Look, Sidney,
there's only two reasons people
would want to interview you.
Your lies about the election, and
when the Kraken's coming out, okay?
So this is weird, you're asking me
about my claims about Smartmatic
and Dominion, which were lies
that I made up about the election.
What are you a journalist?
And there's the answer.
>> Yeah.
>> It's what we alluded to earlier.
She's so
used to American media just never
doing follow up questions.
And it's not like they were soft on
Sidney Powell and Giuliani overall,
they criticized them, but when they
get in the room they melt.
Right?
Any decent reporter
should shred her.
>> And, by the way,
you can be polite,
that reporter was polite >> Yes.
>> But she asked the right
questions, right?
And so believe it or not,
the reporter was polite enough to
encourage Sidney Powell
to come back after she walked
away from the interview.
So let's watch one more clip.
>> After some discussion,
Miss Powell agreed to answer more
questions.
>> I'm highly skeptical of how long
this is going to last.
>> What you're describing is a
massive countrywide fraud involving
the FBI, the DOJ, the Department of
Homeland Security,
the organizations who certify
elections, and on and on,
all the way up to
the Attorney General and thousands
of local election officials.
Are you saying that thousands of
Americans participated in a fraud?
>> I am saying that thousands
of Americans had some role in it
knowingly or unknowingly.
It was essentially a bloodless coup
where they took over the presidency
of the United States
without a single shot being fired.
>> Who's they in that sentence?
>> I don't know who all the they
are.
I would really like to know
the answer to that.
But it's a significant number of
they, and they knew
exactly what they were doing.
And they planned it for
at least three years.
This was no accident.
>> Do you ever hear yourself and
think that it sounds ridiculous?
>> No, I know myself very well.
I've been in me a long time.
[LAUGH] >> I've been in me
a long time.
>> No, that takes the cake, that's
the best thing she's ever said.
That was better than I'm going to
release the Kraken.
I've been in me a long time,
that is uncomfortable [LAUGH].
Okay, I would not have phrased it
that way.
But look, I love the question,
I don't want to glide past that.
And that's the main question that
should always be asked
about conspiracies,
how many people are involved?
That's why I always say on
the show, how did they get 99% of
the world's scientists,
doctors I should say, to say that
you should take the vaccine?
How did they get all those
doctors in India, China, Brazil,
etc, to participate?
How'd they get 99% of the world's
scientists to lie about
the temperature readings and
climate science?
So of course, there was no thousad
of people planning three years.
She's full of crap.
ABC in Australia, thank you for
doing real journalism,
we appreciate it.