The fast as 3 hours and radio. You’re with Brett and kilmeade.
>> Chad green great coverage as
the news broke you sitting
Outside ready to go do some
in sino-us. FOX News’s chief
legal analysts also I think are
of FOX News at night.
You see role of the channel
bestselling author Shannon
thanks for joining us. It was
like yeah, it’s great to be
with you if you Well first off
put in perspective what this
day means for the country I
just said Alan Dershowitz on
projecting.
>> A summer of rage.
>> You know the Department of
homeland security has warned
about that they put out a
collection of weeks ago what
you do get the proportion group
like change
your bench. A self described
themselves as a joint attacking
places they called for quote
open season. Heidi this is not
in some secret
chat room somewhere on their
website. It’s openly out there
they could actually.
It joy carrying out these
attacks in the calling for
things that are not easily
cleaned up as he does vandalism
and graffiti so they’re calling for a night of rage that’s what they’re calling And I think
that there’s a lot of a crash.
There’s a lot of frustration.
It’s you know kind like a
tinderbox much as it was during
covid what people are feeling,
isolated and frustrated now the
economy people are really on
and I think the left is very
upset about a lot of what
they’re getting a Supreme
Court. So I I think that urging
caution as our authorities have
in light of the threats that
are openly there isn’t it.
It built.
>> We see the Nancy poses
beside herself with anger, not
a good day.
The 6, 3 decision one of the
things you have pointed us to
an since owes
Jonathan Turley is John Roberts
is chief Justice.
He wrote up his own opinion and
essentially it’s not that it’s
who he voted with the majority.
But he’s not so much with the
majority and maybe go put in
perspective, one of the lines
is the court opinion and the
descent display is a relentless
is relentless freedom from
doubt on the legal issue that I
cannot hear.
I am not sure for example that
a ban on turning pregnancy from
the moment of concession must
be treated. The same under the
Constitution as a ban after 15
weeks. So he is openly
thinking about this speculative
this in letting us know his
mindset. Number one how rare is
that and how powerless was he
in this.
>> Well I mean if someone says
5 both came together it really
left him with their option he
didn’t feel like he said you
know that opens to be seen a
little bit too sure their legal
position and I could go to
either of those places.
So for him this is where we
sort of saw what we saw that
lead up in kind of thought this
is where he was going to go.
It seems like after the case if
there were plenty to uphold
that Mississippi Bob within the
question was always whether or
not they go after brow and then
the chief once you have narrow upping in their decision fairly dealer solution. He’s always
been about that’s what they
keep go all the
way there and with that when
the court decides to hear a
case they have to fight
so-called question presented
that supposed to be the only
thing the case he’s about and
he fights to that because what
they decided was the question.
We’re pretty by ability bans on
abortion unconstitutional, he
stuck to the Mississippi
question and he tied the court
for going all the way a KC he
does it feel like. This
case necessitated what he
thinks was an overreach on the
original question.
>> He goes on said thoughtful
member this court once Council
this difficulty of a Nudges us
to observe the wise limitations
on our function and to confine
ourselves deciding only what is
necessary to the disposition of
the meat case. I would decide
the question we grand granted
review to answer
with the previous recognized
abortion right bars all
abortion restrictions prior to
viability. So is the ban on
abortions after 15 weeks of
pregnancy is necessary and
lawful the answer to that
question is no and there’s no
need to go further than to
decide the case so he would
have what is he saying there.
>> He didn’t he didn’t want you
to Rome, he doesn’t even want
to issue an opinion on that he
doesn’t feel like that that
where they should go on that he
felt like we have this question
it was about the Mississippi
law and that feeling like that
should be
I said he’s a bit of a list
about this kind of stuff he
doesn’t want you big sweeping
right decision but
he’s the chief there’s only so
much you can do because he’s
outnumbered here there were 5
who are ready to go there the
stick together under a fence,
it sort of internal and
external pressure and that left
him with no place to go the
kind of silent by self.
>> So Shannon, bream our guest
Shannon. What about people that
are saying and tweeting that
now next is going to be
contraception next is going to
be good by same sex marriage
didn’t justice alito to address
this.
>> Yeah he did he talks about
all of those things and
distinguishes them and that
they are taught. That’s what
we’re talking we’re not going
after the other piece of any of
those thanks
and so he made it very clear we
thought that the leak it was
like the people who want to see
at a North it it’s still in
there today, if they’re
ignoring it. People very clear
the decision is not about of
course, politically it makes
sense to the left to say that
exactly what this is about
and to say you got to show the
ballot box and it’s going to be
a fundraising and a rally cry
for them to the polls show it
should be a
the term for the GOP this just
election this fall. So of
the local side of this is
they’re going make about this
they’re going to saturate in
it. This represents some
of what is in it what’s not at
this opinion.
>> Right now as she just said
that again Nancy Pelosi gets a
short time ago so on the on the
greater story of gun
6, 3, concealed carried to
prevent people from carrying a
gun in New York City
is unconstitutional. What’s the
impact of that I know it’s
going to affect directly 7
states. But in there is a 2
page or from Kavanaugh saying
tell me the places you don’t
want to be able to bring a gun
tell me the limitation tell me
the restrictions like for
example, the state Capitol, a
let’s say a of a school.
A subway. So where does it this
go from here.
>> Well yeah it did in many
many states this is even a
question as you said there are
just a handful of jurisdictions
where the matters. The
interesting thing is though
even though it’s a call about a
state it’s a really
concentrated. You know like a
quarter of the U.S. population
probably gonna have to change
the law what it is if you know
if you’re going in to get a
permit to carry a permitted
concealed carry permit for
example in New York of course
predicate came from pitch.
They can’t have subjective
criteria like we’re going to
decide who gets what and who
doesn’t based on what we decide
it’s something like okay,
everybody subject to a
background check everybody has
that the age limit everybody
has that the residency
requirement, whatever it is
it’s got to be objective not
subjective so it doesn’t mean
that states cannot license
permit or require those things
for gun.
People are impacted by these
are people are trying to do
this in a lawful way they want
to be law abiding gun owners.
And of course there are worries
and of what if people can’t
control it left guns on the
streets, they worry that if
more concealed carry permits
are out there. That it be
focused on the street but you
know that probably logistically
true but it should also be
people who have been fully
vetted. Their baby son training
depends on the it’s not a free
for all this does not just mean
everybody can carry a gun
anywhere anytime still going to
be very
tightly controlled.
>> FOX is a legal expert
Shannon bream is with us for 2
is to have
you on the calendar before this
decision came down, but it came
down about 90 minutes ago, Roe
V Wade has been overturned
24 hours ago. We learned about
this gun laws, 6, 3, with
Clarence Thomas writing the
opinion. Now
we’re going he see a pretty the
president I’d states in 45
minutes address the country.
What are his besides expressing
outrage and going against what
he said the 1970’s when he was
looking to overturn Roe V Wade.
The side saying that you know
he’s going to be outraged by
it. What do you think he can do
executive Lee will he urged his
party to do.
>> It sure what they can do I’m
sure that they’re going to
think about things you know you
you could think about.
And we know that some of the
states have set up a fund to
say hey if your state will
allow you to portion we’re
going to social justice or
reproductive, you know just a
fun that you can come here,
we’re going to beef up what’s
available in 8 you are a
portion clinic, the state so
that we can make sure people
have options to get here.
EU states are going to go you
know into the corners you you
have places like Colorado where
there’s really build about
abortion up until your due date
now they passed that law.
Its response to what they
thought they’d get from the
court today. Any other states
that literally today abortion
becomes illegal in almost all
cases because they have this
trigger laws. To what they can
do at the federal level I’m not
really sure of that offering
funding. It’s probably
something they’re going to do
but when you think of the House
stood up after this opinion and
said this is now a nationwide
of worship and she knows better
he’s smarter than that and I
mean if anything her hope that
California is going to have you
don’t increase if people travel
there because they’re going to
have or abortion freedom in her
state Santa what Nancy Pelosi
just said.
>> And their attempt to destroy
it radical Republicans are
charging ahead with their to
say.
>> Criminalized health freedom.
Be aware of this happened Kunz plotting a nationwide abortion ban.
They cannot be allowed to have
a majority in the Congress to
do that. But that circle.
>> So already plotting to try
to keep the speakership.
>> We’ll of course
that is again one of the
political thing that’s going to
go on there will be fund
raising there will be
mischaracterization. Both sides
and the people need to be
honestly informed about what
this means is it’s going to
spend a lot of where you live.
And they’re still be ongoing
into a different state or
residents of different states
going to abortion clinics where
it’s legal.
There’s no ban on that if you
can travel and you’ll be able
to seek what is you know your
choice. And people will say
well, you know people without
resources will find themselves
in a difficult place and that’s
why think not only
so states are saying we’re
going to set up the fund to
help you travel the Fed may try
to do something like that.
But a number of employers are
thank you we’re going to add
that is a benefit here to get a
package of benefits that.
If you live in a state of work
for us in a place we can easily
get an abortion um we’re now
going to cover the cost if
you’re traveling out of state
so you people have options to
say a nationwide abortion and
at this point would be
accurate. He says that they’re
going to try to do something
that our Congress. I don’t
see this legislative framework
for doing that based on what we
just got from the court.
>> All Thank taisha I can’t
thank you enough where you’re
going to go with the rescued a
look like stay in the Supreme
Court’s Tom.
>> Yes and listen if you are
bored, I don’t see
every hour.
>> so I hear people, yeah we do