your reaction. I don't pl
100%. But I haven't had f
my attorney since the jud
there were some things th
the bench that I wasn't 1
the center of the attorne
for the order was whether
evidence or whether we tu
the state police investig
crime lab personnel. Um,
on that. I do not plan on
were in the process. In f
cameras data transfer is
now. It's sad that such a
of legislation. Well, one
crafted okay, but raised
that it had to come to a
um, answer questions if y
again, if anyone who foll
saw the efforts from our
going back to two months
effect and this should ha
a tragic incident. Unfort
that defeated attorney ge
in the sand and didn't wa
dialogue. And that's what
But yes, I do plan on tur
in this case, a copy to t
by the judge. It's a out
Get these things that sho
one of the things I'm con
the judge and I understan
but the word cooperation
word cooperation means wh
general says it means um
that's not the cooperatio
The word I understand, wh
to work together to an en
was put into the legislat
I need clarity from my at
that I've said from the b
we still have a role, the
always have a role in the
When when when minutes ma
investigators from iu or
to be on scene. We have t
things and I haven't, if
I heard today, I haven't
makes me think contrary t
evidence collection point
to talk to my attorneys,
the court decision. But u
a confusing matter and I
diligence in trying to re
facts you have sent also
yourself type. I can't sp
case at all. But as I hav
before, the tragic events
here in Harford County th
I came to think of an ins
use of force that results
have some other criminal
it. So really, I will say
the victim has passed awa
no other crimes to be inv
there are crimes that nee
I can't I cannot I cannot
going to speculate that i
case. Would you articulat
in your reaction? Right?
And again, I think it's a
because we've been confus
enacted it. We've been co
beforehand. I wrote a len
Attorney General outline
and in that response, the
wrote me back things that
and then when I wrote my
he kind of conceded that
were right. And I actuall
of our other points were
this matter, as far as th
evidence and the Attorney
Investigation unit abilit
evidence, they've always
from our office since sat
hand in hand. They had ac
They will now have full p
are able to 1, 1 of their
the earlier today, no evi
think there's a narrative
the police reform that th
trusted. And it plays to
as an elected sheriff her
people that yes, I believ
should. And I will say, I
County community puts a l
than they do the Attorney
a fact. I'm sure statisti
with that, I think it can
think those who want to r
policing have used specif
can find in any professio
create a narrative that r
or that narrative or that
can. So regardless of whe
one way or not, the Gener
put this into effect. And
writings on all of this,
today, we've offered noth
that that unit exists by
signed into law by Govern
with it, understanding th
this one going back to sa
Now that you're giving ev
more investigating this o
there. That's a good ques
sure that the judge answe
So that is something I ha
with my attorneys with co
and here in the building
because you all were wait
a lengthy discussion, but
are always going to have
If I missed something and
were removed from it. Tha
the citizens in our state
a use of force incident h
loses their life. No. Fir
if we're supposed to put
and sit there and watch e
or something like that. T
You guys are help potenti
I think another thing I h
say that they would not r
if it had the ability to
I hope that that is the w
forward now that they are
for a law enforcement age
investigation person? No.
circumstances. Sure. No,
SB 600 as I believe it ca
written in that it would
level of transparency for
wouldn't, it wouldn't sup
to it. So you would have
done by the local agency,
state's attorney who is a
intricately involved in t
to make sure that should
charges that everything e
T is crossed. It would ha
a civil rights investigat
is on the up and up. I th
they passed. I think it h
are dis serviced by a mor
by the attorney general t
confidential. So it's not
But again, words have dif
you end up in the legisla
sure if I miss it. Sure.
right now? I haven't had
my attorney. The judge ha
decision short time ago.
challenge or fight in any
to turn the evidence in t
that not only again that
access to it unfettered a
incident, but now they ar
of the evidence so we are
There's no intention to f
Everything else I would s
to my attorneys. I'm not
because I'm not sure on e
in the judge's order. Eve
law takes effect. Thanks.
correct. Does the judges
I don't think so again, I
to sit down with my attor
this was just a hearing o
order, a temporary order
at midnight. So I need to
and see the best way I wo
And I told Mr Frost after
we had to end up in court
from our end we extended
or outreach would be much
be much better served if
had a good agreement and
everybody is going to han
And even if each jurisdic
they're handled different
there's a consent order,
handled different when th
They do investigate thems
one down on the lower sho
State police are investig
IU So each jurisdiction i
I would hope. And and on
to sit with Mr Cross and
or his designate and have
and maybe find the best w
of our citizens and ensur
trustworthy, transparent