>>FOLLOWING THE DEMOCRATIC DEBATE ON SATURDAY, TYT'S NEW
POLITICAL REPORTER SPOKE TO CANDIDATE MARTIN O'MALLEY,
WHO WAS NOT AFRAID TO TAKE ON HILLARY CLINTON, WHICH YOU
WILL SEE IN THIS VIDEO.
>>SECRETARY CLINTON DURING THE DEBATE MADE A JOKE, EVERYBODY
SHOULD LOVE ME, IN RESPONSE TO WHETHER WALL STREET WILL LOVE
HER.
DO YOU THINK THE AVERAGE AMERICAN CAN TRUST THAT HER
RECORD SHOWS SOMEONE WHO WILL TRY TO CLOSE THE INCOME
GAP, FOCUS ON CORPORATE GREED?
>>I DON'T BELIEVE THAT SECRETARY CLINTON HAS THE INDEPENDENCE OR
BACKBONE TO STEP UP TO WALL STREET.
SHE HAS SAID HERSELF THAT
SHE REPRESENTED WALL STREET, SHE OPENED BY THANKING ALL HER SWELL
DONORS THERE IN THE CROWD, SHE HAS TAKEN MONEY HAND OVER FIST
FOR BIG SPEAKING FEES AS WELL AS CONTRIBUTIONS TO HER CAMPAIGN
AND HER FAMILY FOUNDATION FROM WALL STREET, AND SHE IS THE ONLY
CANDIDATE OF THE THREE OF US THAT IS NOT IN FAVOR OF
REINSTATING A MODERN VERSION OF GLASS-STEAGALL.
HILLARY CLINTON
SIMPLY DOESN'T BELIEVE THAT THE BIG BANKS ARE ANYTHING BUT
REALLY SWELL, GREAT INSTITUTIONS, AND IT IS TOO BAD.
SHE KNOWS THAT THE REST OF US DON'T FEEL THAT WAY, AND IT IS
THE ONE ISSUE THAT -- WHILE SHE SHOWS AN ABILITY TO FLIP-FLOP ON
OTHER THINGS WHETHER IT IS CLIMATE CHANGE OR GUNS OR THE
TRANSPACIFIC PARTNERSHIP OR KEYSTONE, SHE IS PRETTY DEAD SET
ON PROTECTING BIG BANKS FROM BEING BROKEN UP, AND THAT IS NOT
WHERE THE GENERAL PUBLIC IS.
THE AMERICAN PEOPLE SHOULD EXPECT
THEIR PRESIDENT TO BE ABLE TO PROTECT OUR MAIN STREET ECONOMY
FROM WALL STREET RECKLESSNESS, GREED, AND EXCESSIVE --
>>SOUNDS LIKE A SMART GUY THERE, NOT NECESSARILY THE BEST
DEBATER AND HE IS DOING HORRIBLY IN THE RACE, BUT SOUNDS
LIKE A SMART GUY.
>>PART OF THE REASON HE SOUNDS BETTER THERE IS BECAUSE HE WAS
ACTING MORE NATURALLY.
HE WAS GETTING A QUESTION AND GAVE A
NATURAL ANSWER.
WHEREAS IN THE DEBATES HE SEEMS MORE SCRIPTED.
I DON'T THINK THERE IS ANYTHING WRONG THAT HE SAYS IN THE
DEBATES, IT IS JUST THE MANNER IN WHICH HE SAYS IT, ALL THIS
TALK ABOUT THE GREAT STATE OF MARYLAND AND PEOPLE THAT HE MET,
ETC., SO WHEN YOU HAVE A ONE-ON-ONE, THAT WAS PROBABLY BETTER
THAN ANY ANSWER HE GAVE IN THE DEBATE.
>>HE SOUNDED LIKE A HUMAN.
>>AND I AM SURPRISED THAT THEY DON'T FOCUS ON ONE THING HE SAID
THERE, THE SPEAKING FEES.
IT IS INTERESTING THAT TO A REPORTER
AFTER THE DEBATE HE WILL TALK ABOUT IT, BUT IN THE SPOTLIGHT
OF THE DEBATE, IF I WERE MARTIN O'MALLEY AND I AM RUNNING LOW IN
THE POLLS AND I HAVE A LOT OF ROOM TO MAKE UP, I WOULD GET A
LOT MORE SPECIFIC.
I WOULD SAY, LOOK, IN ONE SPEECH SHE TOOK
$200,000 FROM GOLDMAN SACHS, IN ANOTHER SPEECH SHE GOT ANOTHER
$200,000 FROM THEM, AND LIST A BUNCH OF SPEECHES, AND THEN
TURN TO HILLARY CLINTON, YOU HAVE HER ON STAGE, IT IS THE
ONLY TIME YOU'RE IN THE ROOM WITH HER, EVERYBODY IS WATCHING,
AND CERTAINLY EVERYBODY WILL TALK ABOUT IT AFTERWARDS IF IT
IS A GOOD ENOUGH MOMENT, AND YOU SAY, HILLARY, OR SECRETARY
CLINTON, DO YOU EXPECT THE AVERAGE AMERICAN TO THINK THAT
YOU GOT THAT $200,000 FOR AN HOUR'S WORTH OF YOUR TIME BECAUSE
THEY DIDN'T HAVE AN INTEREST IN INFLUENCING YOU?
IT IS OBVIOUS
TO AN AVERAGE PERSON THAT THEY WANT TO INFLUENCE YOU, SO CAN
YOU ACKNOWLEDGE THAT AND NOT INSULT OUR INTELLIGENCE?
WHETHER
OR NOT YOU GET INFLUENCED MIGHT BE A DIFFERENT STORY, BUT THE
ATTEMPT IS OBVIOUS.
SAY IT IN THE DEBATES.
>>AND ASK A FAMILY WATCHING THE DEBATE, YOU AND YOUR ENTIRE
FAMILY ARE GOING TO WORK FOR A COUPLE OF YEARS, PERHAPS, TO
MAKE AS MUCH MONEY AS SHE MADE IN AN HOUR.
WOULDN'T THAT
INFLUENCE YOU?
REGARDLESS OF THE COMPANY, IF IT IS MONSANTO,
DOESN'T MATTER WHAT THE COMPANY IS.
THAT WILL INFLUENCE YOU,
ESPECIALLY IF YOU KNOW THAT IT IS NOT A ONE-TIME THING, IT HAS
HAPPENED OVER AND OVER AND CAN HAPPEN IN THE FUTURE, MAYBE EVEN
AFTER YOU ARE PRESIDENT.
MAYBE YOU CAN MAKE A COUPLE MILLION
DOLLARS BY DOING A COUPLE CRAPPY SPEECHES.
YOU DON'T THINK THAT
WILL AFFECT YOU?
EVERYBODY WATCHING WILL SAY, OF COURSE.
I
CAN'T IMAGINE ANYTHING MORE CORRUPTING.
BUT WE DON'T WORRY
ABOUT THAT.
AND HE SPOKE BRIEFLY ABOUT SHOULDN'T WE BE WORRIED
ABOUT WHETHER WALL STREET LOVES YOU, AND SHE SAYS, EVERYBODY
SHOULD LOVE ME.
THAT IS A HORRIBLE ANSWER, I DON'T CARE
WHAT GROUP YOU ARE TIED TO.
YOU SHOULD TRY TO REASSURE PEOPLE
THAT PEOPLE DON'T HAVE SOME SPECIAL REASON TO DESPERATELY NOT
WANT YOU IN THE WHITE HOUSE.
SHE DID NOTHING TO DISSUADE PEOPLE
FROM THAT AND SHE IS SHIELDED BY THE FACT THAT THE MEDIA HAS NO
INTEREST IN ACCURATELY REPORTING ON THE ANSWERS, THEY JUST WANT
TO DECLARE HER THE WINNER REGARDLESS OF WHAT HAPPENS OR
THE PEOPLE SAY, AND SHE GETS PROTECTED IN THAT WAY SO
EVERYBODY THINKS SHE WINS THE DEBATES.
>>IT REMINDS ME UNFORTUNATELY OF DONALD TRUMP, BECAUSE WHEN
DONALD TRUMP IS ASKED ARE YOU CONCERNED THAT VLADIMIR PUTIN
THINKS YOU ARE FABULOUS, HE IS LIKE, I LOVE IT WHEN PEOPLE
THINK I AM GOOD.
THAT SHOULD BE CONCERNING.
ARE YOU NOT
CONCERNED THAT WHITE SUPREMACISTS FIND YOU FANTASTIC,
THEY ARE BRAGGING ABOUT YOU ON STORM FRONT?
ONE OF THE BIG HATE
WEBSITES?
WELL, PEOPLE LIKE ME.
WHAT CAN I DO?
NO, IT SHOULD BE
A MOMENT OF REFLECTION.
WHY DOES STORM FRONT LIKE ME?
WHY IS WALL STREET GIVING ME ALL THIS CASH?
>>PROBABLY BECAUSE SHE PROTECTED THEM AFTER 9/11.
>>HILLARY CLINTON KNOWS WHY WALL STREET IS SUPPORTING HER, SHE
JUST DOES NOT WANT YOU TO KNOW.
SO AS YOU CAN SEE FROM EVEN THE
FIRST FORAY OF OUR CAMPAIGN REPORTER, WE WILL ASK SOME
QUESTIONS THAT THE MEDIA DOES NOT OFTEN ASK, CERTAINLY ABOUT
THE MONEY AND POLITICS.
SO WE ARE A COMIN'.
THAT WAS THE FIRST
TIME THAT WE HAVE HAD A FIELD REPORTER AT A DEBATE, THAT IS
FANTASTIC, WE WILL BE COVERING THE CAMPAIGN THROUGHOUT, WE WILL
PLACE HIM ON THE MAIN SHOW FOR YOU GUYS, BUT CHECK OUT
YOUTUBE.COM/TYTPOLITICS FOR ALL THE CLIPS.
HE ALSO TALKED TO A
HILLARY CLINTON SPOKESPERSON WHO TALKED ABOUT WHAT THEY ARE GOING
TO TAKE IN TERMS OF EXECUTIVE ACTION IN FAVOR OF GUN CONTROL,
THAT WAS INTERESTING NEWS.
HE TALKED TO BERNIE SANDERS'S
CAMPAIGN MANAGER, THEN HE TALKED TO SOME PEOPLE AT THE DEBATE,
AND ONE WAS A VETERAN WHO IS IN FAVOR OF BERNIE SANDERS, AND HE
EXPLAINED WHY HE WAS SO PASSIONATE ABOUT BERNIE SANDERS.
SOME GREAT STUFF THERE, AND NOW THAT WE ARE IN THE FIELD AND WE
GET TO ASK THE POLITICIANS SOME QUESTIONS, IT OUGHT TO GET
INTERESTING.
>> YOU HOOKED ME BECAUSE NOW I WANT TO KNOW WHAT SHE SAID
ABOUT GUN CONTROL.
>>ONLY ONE WAY TO FIND OUT.