BULLET.
THERE ARE SWEEPING CHANGES IN
THE CONCEPT OF CITIZENS AND NOWN
CITIZENS GIVING BIRTH INSIDE THE
U.S.
A REPUBLICAN CONGRESSMAN FROM
ARIZONA THAT COULD SEE CHANGES
BECAUSE OF THESE POLICY CHANGES.
ANDY BIGGS.
THESE CHANGES PRIMARILY ARE MET.
I KNOW THEY AFFECT OUR CITIZENS
OVERSEAS.
BUT THE REAL THING IS THEY WANT
TO STOP BIRTH TOURISM.
THAT'S WHEN YOU HAVE PREGNANT
VISITORS, NOT RESIDENTS.
VISITORS COMING HERE TO HAVE KID
SO THEY BECOME U.S. CITIZENS.
I WANT TO PUT UP THE RULE
CHANGE.
WE HIGHLIGHTED IT.
A U.S. CITIZEN BORN IN THE U.S.
GENERALLY MEETS THE RESIDENTS'
REQUIREMENT AS LONG AS HE OR SHE
CAN PRESENT EVIDENCE TO
DEMONSTRATE THAT HIS OR HER
MOTHER WAS NOT MERELY TRANSITING
THROUGH OR VISITING THE U.S. AT
THE TIME OF HIS OR HERB
THE TIME OF HIS -R HERB
THE TIME OF HIS -- HERB
THE TIME OF HIS -- HISB
THE TIME OF HIS -- HIS OR HER
BIRTH.
THAT MAY CHANGE BIRTH TOURISM.
>> IT MIGHT GET TO SOME
BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP.
IT'S BECOME AN INDUSTRY FOR SOME
PLACES TO SEND MOTHERS,
EXPECTANT MOTHERS HERE AND THEY
STAY HERE FOR SEVERAL MONTHS AT
A TIME.
THAT DEFINITION OF WHAT IS
TRANSIT.
THAT IS GOING TO BE CRITICAL IN
DETERMINING HOW EXTENSIVE THIS
CHANGE IS.
I'M NOT SURE IT'S AS GREAT AS
MOST OF PEOPLE ARE THINKING.
DAVID: ONE WORD CAN MAKE ALL THE
DIFFERENCE.
EXPLAIN HOW THAT HAPPENS.
>> TRANSIT.
IN THE CENTRAL VALLEY OF
CALIFORNIA, THERE WAS A LADY
THAT WOULD COME IN A COUPLE DAYS
BEFORE HER BABY WAS DUE.
SHE WOULD HAVE THAT BABY THEN
RETURN TO MEXICO.
THAT BABY HAD RECEIVED
BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP.
SOME MIGHT SAY THAT'S JUST
TRANSIT, BUT ON THERS MAY SEE
YOU IT'S FLYING IN AND HAVING
THE BABY MOVING FROM AN AIRPORT
TO A HOSPITAL TO HAVE THE BABY.
DAVID: I'M LOOKING HERE.
IT LOOKS AS LONG AS HE OR SHE
CAN PRESENT EVIDENCE THAT HIS OR
HER MOTHER WAS NOT ONLY VISITING
THE U.S.
MAYBE THEY CAN TWEAK IT MORE AND
MAKE IT AIRTIGHT.
BUT YOU HAVE GOT TO APPLAUD THE
DIRECTION IN WHICH IT IS GOING,
NO?
>> BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP HAS
BEEN A DRAW IN THE UNITED STATES
AND WE ARE ONE OF THE FEW
COUNTRIES THAT HAVE IT YET.
WE NEED TO ELIMINATE BIRTHRIGHT
CERTAIN SEASONSHIP.
WE NEED TO MAKE SURE PEOPLE COME
HERE LEGALLY.
AND THEY CAN OBTAIN
CITIZENSHIP.
WE ARE A COUNTRY THAT WELCOMES
LEGAL IMMIGRANTS TO COME IN
HERE.
IT'S THE OTHER ISSUE WE SEE A
LOT OF THAT I THINK THEY ARE
TRYING TO GET AT HERE.
DAVID: I'M LOOKING AT THE CHANGE
IN THE ASYLUM RULES AND THE NEW
WALLS AND FORTIFICATION OF THE
WALLS GOING UP.
I'M SEEING SIGNIFICANT CHANGES
AND FOLLOW THROUGH ON THE
PROMISES PRESIDENT TRUMP MADE TO
SECURE OUR BORDER.
>> THE PRESIDENT WANTS A SECURE
BORDER.
HE UNDERSTANDS.
IT'S LIKE WE HAVE A LEAK IF OUR
HOUSE.
WE SHOULDN'T BE PUTTING UP
DRYWALL AND PAINT UNTIL WE FIX
THE LEAK.
THE MEXICAN GOVERNMENT HAS BEEN
A BIG HELP LATELY.
AND THE M CAN PV PROGRAM HAS
BEEN A DETERRENT.
IF WE WERE CERTAIN TO EVEN 40s
REMOVAL OF NEARLY A MILLION
PEOPLE WITH REMOVAL ORDERS, YOU
WOULD SEE I THINK AN ALMOST
STAND STILL OF PEOPLE TRYING TO
GET INTO THIS COUNTRY ILLEGALLY.
DAVID: I WANT TO GO TO ANOTHER
STORY.
YOUR JUDICIARY COLLEAGUE JERRY
NADLER IS IN HOT WATER BECAUSE A
LEGAL FILING MADE BY DEMOCRATS
MONDAY SAYING THEIR IMPEACHMENT
PROBE STARTED MARCH 4.
BUT THE MUELLER REPORT DIDN'T
GET TO A.G. BAR UNTIL MARCH 22
AND IT WASN'T RELEASED UNTIL
APRIL 18.
DID THE DEMOCRATS DECIDE TRUMP
WAS WORTHY OF IMPEACHMENT
WITHOUT ANY EVIDENCE OF THAT?
>> JERRY NADLER SINCE HE BECAME
CHAIRMAN, I THINK THAT WAS HIS
GOAL.
BUT HE NEVER TOOK ANY OFFICIAL
POSITION.
I THINK THERE IS A PROBLEM
FILING WITH THE COURT SAYING WE
HAVE THIS OFFICIAL
INVESTIGATION, A SERIOUS
INVESTIGATION GOING ON.
THEY HAVE DONE NOTHING BUT
HARASS THE PRESIDENT WITH THEIR
HEARINGS.
BUT HE DID NOTHING ACCORDING TO
THE RULES OF THE HOUSE AND THE
CONSTITUTION TO ACTUALLY GO WITH
IMPEACHMENT.
IF YOU WANT TO IMPEACH THE
PRESIDENT, START THE PROCEDURE.
DAVID: I'M WONDERING, YOU ARE ON
THAT COMMITTEE.
ARE YOU GOING TO START A
PROCEDURE TO SANCTION YOUR
CHAIRMAN FOR SOME PART OF THIS?
>> YOU KNOW, WE MAY NEED TO LOOK
INTO THAT.
WHAT HAPPENED IS HE SENT TWO
CONFLICT MESSAGES.
ONE THING WE KNOW FOR SURE IS
THEY WANT TO IMPEACH THE
PRESIDENT.
BUT THEY WANT TO HAVE IT BOTH
WAYS.
THEY DON'T WANT TO DO ANYTHING
OFFICIAL BECAUSE IT'S GROSSLY
AND HIGHLY UNPOPULAR WITH THE
AMERICAN PEOPLE.
DAVID: WHAT KIND OF SANCTION
WOULD YOU ENVISION?
>> I THINK WE WOULD SAY IT WOULD
BE A CENSURE-TYPE THING SAYING
YOU DID SOMETHING WRONG.
ADMIT IT.