EVICTION FROM ADISTRICT OVER
EVICTION FROM ADISTRICT OVER HIS POSITION BUT WHY EXACTLY
EVICTION FROM ADISTRICT OVER HIS POSITION BUT WHY EXACTLY WOULDN'T YOU VOTE FOR JIM
HIS POSITION BUT WHY EXACTLY WOULDN'T YOU VOTE FOR JIM JORDAN?
WOULDN'T YOU VOTE FOR JIM JORDAN? >> I ALSO WANT TO MAKE SURE
JORDAN? >> I ALSO WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT WE DON'T HAVE SOMEBODY WHO
>> I ALSO WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT WE DON'T HAVE SOMEBODY WHO WAS INVOLVED IN THE ACTIVITIES
THAT WE DON'T HAVE SOMEBODY WHO WAS INVOLVED IN THE ACTIVITIES SURROUNDING JANUARY 6th.
WAS INVOLVED IN THE ACTIVITIES SURROUNDING JANUARY 6th. >> I'M CONCERNED THESE EVENTS
SURROUNDING JANUARY 6th. >> I'M CONCERNED THESE EVENTS LEADING UP TO JANUARY 6th
>> I'M CONCERNED THESE EVENTS LEADING UP TO JANUARY 6th INCLUDED CONGRESSMAN JORDAN
LEADING UP TO JANUARY 6th INCLUDED CONGRESSMAN JORDAN PARTICIPATING NOT IN THE RIOTS
INCLUDED CONGRESSMAN JORDAN PARTICIPATING NOT IN THE RIOTS OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT BUT
PARTICIPATING NOT IN THE RIOTS OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT BUT PARTICIPATING IN THE CHALLENGE
OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT BUT PARTICIPATING IN THE CHALLENGE TO THE ELECTION, IN WAYS THAT I
PARTICIPATING IN THE CHALLENGE TO THE ELECTION, IN WAYS THAT I THINK ARE REALLY INAPPROPRIATE.
TO THE ELECTION, IN WAYS THAT I THINK ARE REALLY INAPPROPRIATE. >> KEN BUCK DIDN'T WAVER AND
THINK ARE REALLY INAPPROPRIATE. >> KEN BUCK DIDN'T WAVER AND JIM JORDAN DROPPED OUT OF THE
>> KEN BUCK DIDN'T WAVER AND JIM JORDAN DROPPED OUT OF THE RACE BUT BEFORE WE TALK ABOUT
JIM JORDAN DROPPED OUT OF THE RACE BUT BEFORE WE TALK ABOUT PROFILES ENCOURAGE LET'S TALK
RACE BUT BEFORE WE TALK ABOUT PROFILES ENCOURAGE LET'S TALK ABOUT THE PERSON THAT HE DID
PROFILES ENCOURAGE LET'S TALK ABOUT THE PERSON THAT HE DID END UP VOTING FOR WHO ENDED UP
ABOUT THE PERSON THAT HE DID END UP VOTING FOR WHO ENDED UP BECOMING HOUSE SPEAKER,
END UP VOTING FOR WHO ENDED UP BECOMING HOUSE SPEAKER, CONGRESSMAN MIKE JOHNSON FROM
BECOMING HOUSE SPEAKER, CONGRESSMAN MIKE JOHNSON FROM LOUISIANA.
CONGRESSMAN MIKE JOHNSON FROM LOUISIANA. JOHNSON HAS BEEN CALLED THE
LOUISIANA. JOHNSON HAS BEEN CALLED THE MOST IMPORTANT ARCHITECT OF THE
JOHNSON HAS BEEN CALLED THE MOST IMPORTANT ARCHITECT OF THE PUSH TO OVERTURN JOE BIDEN'S
MOST IMPORTANT ARCHITECT OF THE PUSH TO OVERTURN JOE BIDEN'S 2020 WIN.
PUSH TO OVERTURN JOE BIDEN'S 2020 WIN. IN FACT NOT ONLY DID JOHNSON
2020 WIN. IN FACT NOT ONLY DID JOHNSON VOTE AGAINST CERTIFYING THE
IN FACT NOT ONLY DID JOHNSON VOTE AGAINST CERTIFYING THE ELECTION ON JANUARY 6th, HE
VOTE AGAINST CERTIFYING THE ELECTION ON JANUARY 6th, HE RALLIED HIS COLLEAGUES AROUND
ELECTION ON JANUARY 6th, HE RALLIED HIS COLLEAGUES AROUND THE TEXAS LAWSUIT TO THROW OUT
RALLIED HIS COLLEAGUES AROUND THE TEXAS LAWSUIT TO THROW OUT THE RESULTS FROM KEY STATES
THE TEXAS LAWSUIT TO THROW OUT THE RESULTS FROM KEY STATES THAT BIDEN WON.
THE RESULTS FROM KEY STATES THAT BIDEN WON. THE SUPREME COURT QUICKLY
THAT BIDEN WON. THE SUPREME COURT QUICKLY REJECTED THAT EFFORT.
THE SUPREME COURT QUICKLY REJECTED THAT EFFORT. AND JOHNSON PUSHED THE
REJECTED THAT EFFORT. AND JOHNSON PUSHED THE CONSPIRACY THEORY THAT THE
AND JOHNSON PUSHED THE CONSPIRACY THEORY THAT THE DOMINION VOTING MACHINES USED A
CONSPIRACY THEORY THAT THE DOMINION VOTING MACHINES USED A SOFTWARE SYSTEM THAT CAME OUT
DOMINION VOTING MACHINES USED A SOFTWARE SYSTEM THAT CAME OUT OF VENEZUELA, THE SAME
SOFTWARE SYSTEM THAT CAME OUT OF VENEZUELA, THE SAME CONSPIRACY THEORY WAS PUSHED BY
OF VENEZUELA, THE SAME CONSPIRACY THEORY WAS PUSHED BY FORMER TRUMP ATTORNEY POWELL
CONSPIRACY THEORY WAS PUSHED BY FORMER TRUMP ATTORNEY POWELL AND WE ALL KNOW HOW THAT
AND WE ALL KNOW HOW THAT ENDED.
AND WE ALL KNOW HOW THAT ENDED. NONE OF THAT SEEMS TO MATTER TO
AND WE ALL KNOW HOW THAT ENDED. NONE OF THAT SEEMS TO MATTER TO BUCK OR HIS COLLEAGUES.
NONE OF THAT SEEMS TO MATTER TO BUCK OR HIS COLLEAGUES. >> [ INAUDIBLE ]
BUCK OR HIS COLLEAGUES. >> [ INAUDIBLE ] >> YES, THE PARTY OF CIVILITY.
>> [ INAUDIBLE ] >> YES, THE PARTY OF CIVILITY. A REMINDER, EVERY SINGLE HOUSE
>> YES, THE PARTY OF CIVILITY. A REMINDER, EVERY SINGLE HOUSE REPUBLICANS WHO VOTED FOR
A REMINDER, EVERY SINGLE HOUSE REPUBLICANS WHO VOTED FOR SPEAKER VOTED FOR MIKE JOHNSON,
REPUBLICANS WHO VOTED FOR SPEAKER VOTED FOR MIKE JOHNSON, THERE ARE NO MODERATES LEFT.
SPEAKER VOTED FOR MIKE JOHNSON, THERE ARE NO MODERATES LEFT. AND AS FOR EXTREMIST, WELL,
THERE ARE NO MODERATES LEFT. AND AS FOR EXTREMIST, WELL, MIKE JOHNSON'S ELECTION TO NOW
AND AS FOR EXTREMIST, WELL, MIKE JOHNSON'S ELECTION TO NOW IS NOT HIS ONLY EXTREMIST
MIKE JOHNSON'S ELECTION TO NOW IS NOT HIS ONLY EXTREMIST POSITION, THE NEW SPEAKER HAS
IS NOT HIS ONLY EXTREMIST POSITION, THE NEW SPEAKER HAS TALKED ABOUT BIBLICALLY
POSITION, THE NEW SPEAKER HAS TALKED ABOUT BIBLICALLY SANCTIONED GOVERNMENT AND SAID
TALKED ABOUT BIBLICALLY SANCTIONED GOVERNMENT AND SAID CANDIDATES FOR OFFICE SHOULD BE
SANCTIONED GOVERNMENT AND SAID CANDIDATES FOR OFFICE SHOULD BE ASKED ABOUT THEIR RELIGIOUS
CANDIDATES FOR OFFICE SHOULD BE ASKED ABOUT THEIR RELIGIOUS WORLDVIEW.
ASKED ABOUT THEIR RELIGIOUS WORLDVIEW. >> YOU BETTER SIT DOWN ANY
WORLDVIEW. >> YOU BETTER SIT DOWN ANY CANDIDATE WHO SAYS THEY WILL
>> YOU BETTER SIT DOWN ANY CANDIDATE WHO SAYS THEY WILL RUN FOR LEGISLATURE AND SAY, I
CANDIDATE WHO SAYS THEY WILL RUN FOR LEGISLATURE AND SAY, I WANT TO KNOW WHAT YOUR
RUN FOR LEGISLATURE AND SAY, I WANT TO KNOW WHAT YOUR WORLDVIEW IS. I WANT TO KNOW
WANT TO KNOW WHAT YOUR WORLDVIEW IS. I WANT TO KNOW WHAT YOU THINK ABOUT THE
WORLDVIEW IS. I WANT TO KNOW WHAT YOU THINK ABOUT THE CHRISTIAN HERITAGE OF THIS
WHAT YOU THINK ABOUT THE CHRISTIAN HERITAGE OF THIS COUNTRY.
CHRISTIAN HERITAGE OF THIS COUNTRY. I WANT TO KNOW WHAT YOU THINK
COUNTRY. I WANT TO KNOW WHAT YOU THINK ABOUT GOD'S DESIGN FOR SOCIETY.
I WANT TO KNOW WHAT YOU THINK ABOUT GOD'S DESIGN FOR SOCIETY. HAVE YOU EVER THOUGHT ABOUT
ABOUT GOD'S DESIGN FOR SOCIETY. HAVE YOU EVER THOUGHT ABOUT THAT, IF THEY HAVEN'T THOUGHT
HAVE YOU EVER THOUGHT ABOUT THAT, IF THEY HAVEN'T THOUGHT ABOUT IT, YOU NEED TO MOVE ON
THAT, IF THEY HAVEN'T THOUGHT ABOUT IT, YOU NEED TO MOVE ON AND FIND SOMEBODY WHO HAS.
ABOUT IT, YOU NEED TO MOVE ON AND FIND SOMEBODY WHO HAS. >> IS WRITTEN IN FAVOR OF
AND FIND SOMEBODY WHO HAS. >> IS WRITTEN IN FAVOR OF CRIMINALIZING SEX CALLING IT A
>> IS WRITTEN IN FAVOR OF CRIMINALIZING SEX CALLING IT A DANGEROUS LIFESTYLE AND TAKEN
CRIMINALIZING SEX CALLING IT A DANGEROUS LIFESTYLE AND TAKEN A STANCE AGAINST NO-FAULT
DANGEROUS LIFESTYLE AND TAKEN A STANCE AGAINST NO-FAULT DIVORCES AND SUPPORTED COVENANT
A STANCE AGAINST NO-FAULT DIVORCES AND SUPPORTED COVENANT MARRIAGES WHICH MAKE IT HARDER
DIVORCES AND SUPPORTED COVENANT MARRIAGES WHICH MAKE IT HARDER TO GET DIVORCED, AND HE HAS
MARRIAGES WHICH MAKE IT HARDER TO GET DIVORCED, AND HE HAS BLAME MáAáSáH SHOOTINGS ON
TO GET DIVORCED, AND HE HAS BLAME MáAáSáH SHOOTINGS ON EVERYTHING FROM THE TEACHING
BLAME MáAáSáH SHOOTINGS ON EVERYTHING FROM THE TEACHING EVOLUTION TO THE RIGHT TO AN
EVERYTHING FROM THE TEACHING EVOLUTION TO THE RIGHT TO AN ABORTION.
EVOLUTION TO THE RIGHT TO AN ABORTION. AND LAST WEEK HE SAID THIS
ABORTION. AND LAST WEEK HE SAID THIS ABOUT THE MASS SHOOTING IN
AND LAST WEEK HE SAID THIS ABOUT THE MASS SHOOTING IN LEWISTON, MAINE.
ABOUT THE MASS SHOOTING IN LEWISTON, MAINE. >> AT THE END OF THE DAY THE
LEWISTON, MAINE. >> AT THE END OF THE DAY THE PROBLEM IS THE HUMAN HEART, NOT
>> AT THE END OF THE DAY THE PROBLEM IS THE HUMAN HEART, NOT GUNS, NOT THE WEAPONS.
PROBLEM IS THE HUMAN HEART, NOT GUNS, NOT THE WEAPONS. >> IT'S NOT GUNS, IT'S THE
GUNS, NOT THE WEAPONS. >> IT'S NOT GUNS, IT'S THE HUMAN HEART.
>> IT'S NOT GUNS, IT'S THE HUMAN HEART. THERE'S A REASON HE'S BEING
HUMAN HEART. THERE'S A REASON HE'S BEING CALLED A CHRISTIAN NATIONALIST.
THERE'S A REASON HE'S BEING CALLED A CHRISTIAN NATIONALIST. AND JUST LISTEN TO THE MAN
CALLED A CHRISTIAN NATIONALIST. AND JUST LISTEN TO THE MAN HIMSELF TWO DAYS AFTER HE WAS
AND JUST LISTEN TO THE MAN HIMSELF TWO DAYS AFTER HE WAS ELECTED SPEAKER.
HIMSELF TWO DAYS AFTER HE WAS ELECTED SPEAKER. >> I'M A BIBLE BELIEVING
ELECTED SPEAKER. >> I'M A BIBLE BELIEVING CHRISTIAN, SOMEONE ASKED ME
>> I'M A BIBLE BELIEVING CHRISTIAN, SOMEONE ASKED ME TODAY THEY SAID, PEOPLE ARE
CHRISTIAN, SOMEONE ASKED ME TODAY THEY SAID, PEOPLE ARE CURIOUS, WHAT DOES HE THINK
TODAY THEY SAID, PEOPLE ARE CURIOUS, WHAT DOES HE THINK ABOUT ANY ISSUE UNDER THE SUN I
CURIOUS, WHAT DOES HE THINK ABOUT ANY ISSUE UNDER THE SUN I SAID WELL, PICK UP A BIBLE OFF
ABOUT ANY ISSUE UNDER THE SUN I SAID WELL, PICK UP A BIBLE OFF YOUR SHELF AND READ IT.
SAID WELL, PICK UP A BIBLE OFF YOUR SHELF AND READ IT. THAT'S MY WORLDVIEW.
YOUR SHELF AND READ IT. THAT'S MY WORLDVIEW. THAT'S WHAT I BELIEVE.
THAT'S MY WORLDVIEW. THAT'S WHAT I BELIEVE. >> COULD YOU IMAGINE IF A
THAT'S WHAT I BELIEVE. >> COULD YOU IMAGINE IF A MUSLIM MEMBER OF CONGRESS SAID
>> COULD YOU IMAGINE IF A MUSLIM MEMBER OF CONGRESS SAID THEIR ENTIRE WORLDVIEW AND
MUSLIM MEMBER OF CONGRESS SAID THEIR ENTIRE WORLDVIEW AND APPROACH TO EVERY POLITICAL
THEIR ENTIRE WORLDVIEW AND APPROACH TO EVERY POLITICAL ISSUE WAS BASED ON THE QURAN,
APPROACH TO EVERY POLITICAL ISSUE WAS BASED ON THE QURAN, AND NO APOLOGY THERE.
ISSUE WAS BASED ON THE QURAN, AND NO APOLOGY THERE. I'M PRETTY SURE THAT SAME
AND NO APOLOGY THERE. I'M PRETTY SURE THAT SAME REPUBLICAN PARTY THAT ELECTED
I'M PRETTY SURE THAT SAME REPUBLICAN PARTY THAT ELECTED MIKE JOHNSON TO LEAVE THEM
REPUBLICAN PARTY THAT ELECTED MIKE JOHNSON TO LEAVE THEM WOULD LOSE THEIR MINDS.
MIKE JOHNSON TO LEAVE THEM WOULD LOSE THEIR MINDS. BUT AN APPARENT CHRISTIAN
WOULD LOSE THEIR MINDS. BUT AN APPARENT CHRISTIAN NATIONALIST AS SPEAKER, THAT'S
BUT AN APPARENT CHRISTIAN NATIONALIST AS SPEAKER, THAT'S JUST FINE.
NATIONALIST AS SPEAKER, THAT'S JUST FINE. AND IF YOU AREN'T ALREADY
JUST FINE. AND IF YOU AREN'T ALREADY THINKING IT, THIS MIGHT BE A
AND IF YOU AREN'T ALREADY THINKING IT, THIS MIGHT BE A GOOD TIME TO REMIND YOU THAT
THINKING IT, THIS MIGHT BE A GOOD TIME TO REMIND YOU THAT YES, THIS MAN WHO YOU AND MANY
GOOD TIME TO REMIND YOU THAT YES, THIS MAN WHO YOU AND MANY ELECTED REPUBLICANS HAVE NEVER
YES, THIS MAN WHO YOU AND MANY ELECTED REPUBLICANS HAVE NEVER EVEN HEARD OF UNTIL THE OTHER
ELECTED REPUBLICANS HAVE NEVER EVEN HEARD OF UNTIL THE OTHER DAY IS NOW SECOND IN LINE TO
EVEN HEARD OF UNTIL THE OTHER DAY IS NOW SECOND IN LINE TO THE PRESIDENCY.
DAY IS NOW SECOND IN LINE TO THE PRESIDENCY. OH, AND AS FOR KEN BUCK, HE'S
THE PRESIDENCY. OH, AND AS FOR KEN BUCK, HE'S RETIRING FROM CONGRESS .
OH, AND AS FOR KEN BUCK, HE'S RETIRING FROM CONGRESS . JOINING ME NOW REPUBLICAN
RETIRING FROM CONGRESS . JOINING ME NOW REPUBLICAN STRATEGIST, THANK YOU FOR
JOINING ME NOW REPUBLICAN STRATEGIST, THANK YOU FOR JOINING US.
STRATEGIST, THANK YOU FOR JOINING US. DAVID YOU HAVE WRITTEN A LOT
JOINING US. DAVID YOU HAVE WRITTEN A LOT ABOUT MIKE JOHNSON'S RELIGIOUS
DAVID YOU HAVE WRITTEN A LOT ABOUT MIKE JOHNSON'S RELIGIOUS VIEWS AND IN A PIECE LAST WEEK
ABOUT MIKE JOHNSON'S RELIGIOUS VIEWS AND IN A PIECE LAST WEEK YOU WROTE, QUOTE, AND A TIME OF
VIEWS AND IN A PIECE LAST WEEK YOU WROTE, QUOTE, AND A TIME OF POLITICAL UPHEAVAL AND THE WAR
YOU WROTE, QUOTE, AND A TIME OF POLITICAL UPHEAVAL AND THE WAR IT'S CLEAR MIKE JOHNSON
POLITICAL UPHEAVAL AND THE WAR IT'S CLEAR MIKE JOHNSON BELIEVES HE HAS THE SOLUTION,
IT'S CLEAR MIKE JOHNSON BELIEVES HE HAS THE SOLUTION, IT'S NOT GOVERNMENT OF THE
BELIEVES HE HAS THE SOLUTION, IT'S NOT GOVERNMENT OF THE PEOPLE BUT GOVERNMENT SHAPED BY
IT'S NOT GOVERNMENT OF THE PEOPLE BUT GOVERNMENT SHAPED BY HIS FUNDAMENTALIST WORLDVIEWS
PEOPLE BUT GOVERNMENT SHAPED BY HIS FUNDAMENTALIST WORLDVIEWS AND AS HE HAS BECOME SECOND IN
HIS FUNDAMENTALIST WORLDVIEWS AND AS HE HAS BECOME SECOND IN LINE, HE HAS THE OPPORTUNITY TO
AND AS HE HAS BECOME SECOND IN LINE, HE HAS THE OPPORTUNITY TO MELD POWER TO THIS TRUTH AND
LINE, HE HAS THE OPPORTUNITY TO MELD POWER TO THIS TRUTH AND SERVE THE GOAL OF MAKING
MELD POWER TO THIS TRUTH AND SERVE THE GOAL OF MAKING AMERICA A CHRISTIAN NATION.
SERVE THE GOAL OF MAKING AMERICA A CHRISTIAN NATION. WHAT DOES IT MEAN TO HAVE A MAN
AMERICA A CHRISTIAN NATION. WHAT DOES IT MEAN TO HAVE A MAN WHO SOUNDS LIKE A CHRISTIAN
WHAT DOES IT MEAN TO HAVE A MAN WHO SOUNDS LIKE A CHRISTIAN NATIONALIST AS SECOND IN LINE
WHO SOUNDS LIKE A CHRISTIAN NATIONALIST AS SECOND IN LINE TO THE PRESIDENT?
NATIONALIST AS SECOND IN LINE TO THE PRESIDENT? >> I THINK IT'S HIGHLY
TO THE PRESIDENT? >> I THINK IT'S HIGHLY SIGNIFICANT.
>> I THINK IT'S HIGHLY SIGNIFICANT. BUT I WANT TO START OFF BY
SIGNIFICANT. BUT I WANT TO START OFF BY SAYING, HE HAS HIS RIGHT TO HIS
BUT I WANT TO START OFF BY SAYING, HE HAS HIS RIGHT TO HIS RELIGIOUS VIEWS.
SAYING, HE HAS HIS RIGHT TO HIS RELIGIOUS VIEWS. IF HE WANTS TO SAY I'M ONLY
RELIGIOUS VIEWS. IF HE WANTS TO SAY I'M ONLY GOING TO VOTE FOR A CHRISTIAN
IF HE WANTS TO SAY I'M ONLY GOING TO VOTE FOR A CHRISTIAN AND A CHRISTIAN OF A CERTAIN
GOING TO VOTE FOR A CHRISTIAN AND A CHRISTIAN OF A CERTAIN STRIPE THAT BELIEVES THE BIBLE
AND A CHRISTIAN OF A CERTAIN STRIPE THAT BELIEVES THE BIBLE LITERALLY THAT THE EARTH WAS
STRIPE THAT BELIEVES THE BIBLE LITERALLY THAT THE EARTH WAS CREATED IN SIX DAYS BY GOD.
LITERALLY THAT THE EARTH WAS CREATED IN SIX DAYS BY GOD. HE'S ENTITLED TO DO THAT.
CREATED IN SIX DAYS BY GOD. HE'S ENTITLED TO DO THAT. THE QUESTION IS WHETHER WE WANT
HE'S ENTITLED TO DO THAT. THE QUESTION IS WHETHER WE WANT SOMEONE LIKE THAT LEADING THE
THE QUESTION IS WHETHER WE WANT SOMEONE LIKE THAT LEADING THE GOVERNMENT AND TAKING HIS
SOMEONE LIKE THAT LEADING THE GOVERNMENT AND TAKING HIS WORLDVIEW AS HE CALLS IT, AND
GOVERNMENT AND TAKING HIS WORLDVIEW AS HE CALLS IT, AND HIS DEMAND FOR SANCTIONED
WORLDVIEW AS HE CALLS IT, AND HIS DEMAND FOR SANCTIONED GOVERNMENT AND AGAIN, THE REST
HIS DEMAND FOR SANCTIONED GOVERNMENT AND AGAIN, THE REST OF US
OF US DO WE WANT THAT FOR A
OF US DO WE WANT THAT FOR A DIVERSE COUNTRY AND HE IS SO
OF US DO WE WANT THAT FOR A DIVERSE COUNTRY AND HE IS SO FAR OUT OF THE MAINSTREAM, I
DIVERSE COUNTRY AND HE IS SO FAR OUT OF THE MAINSTREAM, I SPENT HOURS LISTENING TO
FAR OUT OF THE MAINSTREAM, I SPENT HOURS LISTENING TO SEMINARS AND PODCASTS AND HE
SPENT HOURS LISTENING TO SEMINARS AND PODCASTS AND HE DISSES A LOT OF OTHER
SEMINARS AND PODCASTS AND HE DISSES A LOT OF OTHER CHRISTIANS, CHRISTIANS WHO
DISSES A LOT OF OTHER CHRISTIANS, CHRISTIANS WHO DON'T TAKE THE BIBLE LITERALLY,
CHRISTIANS, CHRISTIANS WHO DON'T TAKE THE BIBLE LITERALLY, WHO AREN'T FUNDAMENTALIST
DON'T TAKE THE BIBLE LITERALLY, WHO AREN'T FUNDAMENTALIST BAPTIST AND HE SAID AGAIN AND
WHO AREN'T FUNDAMENTALIST BAPTIST AND HE SAID AGAIN AND AGAIN, THERE'S ONLY ONE
BAPTIST AND HE SAID AGAIN AND AGAIN, THERE'S ONLY ONE WORLDVIEW THAT IS CORRECT, THAT
AGAIN, THERE'S ONLY ONE WORLDVIEW THAT IS CORRECT, THAT IS ACCURATE AND THAT IS HIS,
WORLDVIEW THAT IS CORRECT, THAT IS ACCURATE AND THAT IS HIS, ALL THE REST OF US, WE DON'T
IS ACCURATE AND THAT IS HIS, ALL THE REST OF US, WE DON'T HAVE THE TRUTH AND HE IS PART
ALL THE REST OF US, WE DON'T HAVE THE TRUTH AND HE IS PART OF THE SMALL RELIGIOUS BAND,
HAVE THE TRUTH AND HE IS PART OF THE SMALL RELIGIOUS BAND, SELF-RIGHTEOUS, WHO WANTS TO
OF THE SMALL RELIGIOUS BAND, SELF-RIGHTEOUS, WHO WANTS TO FIGHT THE REST OF SOCIETY AND
SELF-RIGHTEOUS, WHO WANTS TO FIGHT THE REST OF SOCIETY AND HE CALLS IT AN AMORAL SOCIETY.
FIGHT THE REST OF SOCIETY AND HE CALLS IT AN AMORAL SOCIETY. I THINK IT'S DANGEROUS TO HAVE
HE CALLS IT AN AMORAL SOCIETY. I THINK IT'S DANGEROUS TO HAVE SOMEONE WITH SUCH A NARROW VIEW
I THINK IT'S DANGEROUS TO HAVE SOMEONE WITH SUCH A NARROW VIEW OF LIFE AND AMERICAN SOCIETY
SOMEONE WITH SUCH A NARROW VIEW OF LIFE AND AMERICAN SOCIETY BEING IN CHARGE OF SO MUCH.
OF LIFE AND AMERICAN SOCIETY BEING IN CHARGE OF SO MUCH. >> I THINK YOU HIT THE NAIL ON
BEING IN CHARGE OF SO MUCH. >> I THINK YOU HIT THE NAIL ON THE HEAD WITH YOUR POINT ABOUT
>> I THINK YOU HIT THE NAIL ON THE HEAD WITH YOUR POINT ABOUT CHRISTIANS OF HIS STRAIGHT.
THE HEAD WITH YOUR POINT ABOUT CHRISTIANS OF HIS STRAIGHT. SUSAN, MIKE JOHNSON HAS MADE IT
CHRISTIANS OF HIS STRAIGHT. SUSAN, MIKE JOHNSON HAS MADE IT CLEAR THAT HIS VERSION OF
SUSAN, MIKE JOHNSON HAS MADE IT CLEAR THAT HIS VERSION OF CHRISTIANITY AND HIS READING OF
CLEAR THAT HIS VERSION OF CHRISTIANITY AND HIS READING OF THE BIBLE
THE BIBLE DEEPLY INFLUENCES HIS
THE BIBLE DEEPLY INFLUENCES HIS POLICY AND WORLDVIEW.
THE BIBLE DEEPLY INFLUENCES HIS POLICY AND WORLDVIEW. WE'VE BEEN DEALING WITH THE
POLICY AND WORLDVIEW. WE'VE BEEN DEALING WITH THE REPUBLICAN PARTY FOR YEARS.
WE'VE BEEN DEALING WITH THE REPUBLICAN PARTY FOR YEARS. HOW DOES THIS GO BEYOND THE
REPUBLICAN PARTY FOR YEARS. HOW DOES THIS GO BEYOND THE USUAL CONSERVATIVE RIGHT-WING
HOW DOES THIS GO BEYOND THE USUAL CONSERVATIVE RIGHT-WING CHRISTIANITY THAT ALREADY
USUAL CONSERVATIVE RIGHT-WING CHRISTIANITY THAT ALREADY DEFINED THE MODERN GOP.
CHRISTIANITY THAT ALREADY DEFINED THE MODERN GOP. IS THIS SOMETHING VERY NEW?
DEFINED THE MODERN GOP. IS THIS SOMETHING VERY NEW? >> IT'S VERY EXTREME AND IT'S
IS THIS SOMETHING VERY NEW? >> IT'S VERY EXTREME AND IT'S NOT TYPICAL OF MOST POLITICIANS
>> IT'S VERY EXTREME AND IT'S NOT TYPICAL OF MOST POLITICIANS IN THIS COUNTRY, TO HAVE SUCH
NOT TYPICAL OF MOST POLITICIANS IN THIS COUNTRY, TO HAVE SUCH AN EXTREME RELIGIOUS VIEW IN
IN THIS COUNTRY, TO HAVE SUCH AN EXTREME RELIGIOUS VIEW IN GOVERNMENT.
AN EXTREME RELIGIOUS VIEW IN GOVERNMENT. AND THAT IS THE DIFFERENCE.
GOVERNMENT. AND THAT IS THE DIFFERENCE. LIKE DAVID SAID, YOU CAN HAVE
AND THAT IS THE DIFFERENCE. LIKE DAVID SAID, YOU CAN HAVE YOUR OWN BELIEFS.
LIKE DAVID SAID, YOU CAN HAVE YOUR OWN BELIEFS. AS LONG AS YOU DON'T BELIEVE
YOUR OWN BELIEFS. AS LONG AS YOU DON'T BELIEVE THAT YOU SHOULD GOVERN THE REST
AS LONG AS YOU DON'T BELIEVE THAT YOU SHOULD GOVERN THE REST OF THE COUNTRY.
THAT YOU SHOULD GOVERN THE REST OF THE COUNTRY. I HAVE NOT SEEN AND TRUE, I
OF THE COUNTRY. I HAVE NOT SEEN AND TRUE, I DON'T -- I DEAL WITH MORE
I HAVE NOT SEEN AND TRUE, I DON'T -- I DEAL WITH MORE SOCIALLY LIBERAL REPUBLICANS ON
DON'T -- I DEAL WITH MORE SOCIALLY LIBERAL REPUBLICANS ON SOCIAL ISSUES, BUT WHAT'S SO
SOCIALLY LIBERAL REPUBLICANS ON SOCIAL ISSUES, BUT WHAT'S SO DISTURBING ABOUT THIS GUY, IS I
SOCIAL ISSUES, BUT WHAT'S SO DISTURBING ABOUT THIS GUY, IS I MEAN, THAT'S WHAT HE SAYS,
DISTURBING ABOUT THIS GUY, IS I MEAN, THAT'S WHAT HE SAYS, THAT'S HIS INTRODUCTION TO THE
MEAN, THAT'S WHAT HE SAYS, THAT'S HIS INTRODUCTION TO THE MAIN STAGE IS THAT THE BIBLE IS
THAT'S HIS INTRODUCTION TO THE MAIN STAGE IS THAT THE BIBLE IS MY WORLDVIEW.
MAIN STAGE IS THAT THE BIBLE IS MY WORLDVIEW. HE HAS NO INTEREST IN OBVIOUSLY
MY WORLDVIEW. HE HAS NO INTEREST IN OBVIOUSLY GETTING THE JOB DONE THAT NEEDS
HE HAS NO INTEREST IN OBVIOUSLY GETTING THE JOB DONE THAT NEEDS TO BE DONE.
GETTING THE JOB DONE THAT NEEDS TO BE DONE. BUT I CAN GIVE YOU ONE SILVER
TO BE DONE. BUT I CAN GIVE YOU ONE SILVER LINING ABOUT HIS APPOINTMENT HE
BUT I CAN GIVE YOU ONE SILVER LINING ABOUT HIS APPOINTMENT HE HAS DESTROYED THE CHANCE OF
LINING ABOUT HIS APPOINTMENT HE HAS DESTROYED THE CHANCE OF REPUBLICANS HOLDING ONTO THE
HAS DESTROYED THE CHANCE OF REPUBLICANS HOLDING ONTO THE HOUSE COME NEXT NOVEMBER.
REPUBLICANS HOLDING ONTO THE HOUSE COME NEXT NOVEMBER. HIS AGENDA WILL NOT GET PAST OR
HOUSE COME NEXT NOVEMBER. HIS AGENDA WILL NOT GET PAST OR SIGNED INTO LAW
SIGNED INTO LAW.
SIGNED INTO LAW. >> HE DOESN'T SEEM TO BE THE
SIGNED INTO LAW. >> HE DOESN'T SEEM TO BE THE GREAT DYNAMIC LEADER THAT'S
>> HE DOESN'T SEEM TO BE THE GREAT DYNAMIC LEADER THAT'S GOING TO LEAD THEM TO VICTORY.
GREAT DYNAMIC LEADER THAT'S GOING TO LEAD THEM TO VICTORY. DAVID LAST WEEK ONE OF HIS
GOING TO LEAD THEM TO VICTORY. DAVID LAST WEEK ONE OF HIS FIRST MOVES AS HOUSE SPEAKER
DAVID LAST WEEK ONE OF HIS FIRST MOVES AS HOUSE SPEAKER WAS TO SUGGEST THAT FUNDING FOR
FIRST MOVES AS HOUSE SPEAKER WAS TO SUGGEST THAT FUNDING FOR ISRAEL BE SEPARATED FROM
WAS TO SUGGEST THAT FUNDING FOR ISRAEL BE SEPARATED FROM FUNDING FOR UKRAINE, GOING
ISRAEL BE SEPARATED FROM FUNDING FOR UKRAINE, GOING AGAINST BIDEN'S PACKAGE FOR
FUNDING FOR UKRAINE, GOING AGAINST BIDEN'S PACKAGE FOR BOTH AND IN THE MOVIE PROPOSED
AGAINST BIDEN'S PACKAGE FOR BOTH AND IN THE MOVIE PROPOSED CUTTING THE IRS BUDGET TO FIND
BOTH AND IN THE MOVIE PROPOSED CUTTING THE IRS BUDGET TO FIND ISRAEL.
CUTTING THE IRS BUDGET TO FIND ISRAEL. AND THAT HE ACTED SHOCKED WHEN
ISRAEL. AND THAT HE ACTED SHOCKED WHEN THE INDEPENDENT ANALYST SAID
AND THAT HE ACTED SHOCKED WHEN THE INDEPENDENT ANALYST SAID THIS IS GOING TO INCREASE THE
THE INDEPENDENT ANALYST SAID THIS IS GOING TO INCREASE THE DEFICIT.
THIS IS GOING TO INCREASE THE DEFICIT. THIS GREAT CHRISTIAN MAN JUST
DEFICIT. THIS GREAT CHRISTIAN MAN JUST BASICALLY LIED BECAUSE HE KNOWS
THIS GREAT CHRISTIAN MAN JUST BASICALLY LIED BECAUSE HE KNOWS PERFECTLY WELL WHEN YOU CUT THE
BASICALLY LIED BECAUSE HE KNOWS PERFECTLY WELL WHEN YOU CUT THE IRS BUDGET YOU CUT TAX REVENUE
PERFECTLY WELL WHEN YOU CUT THE IRS BUDGET YOU CUT TAX REVENUE AND RAISE THE DEFICIT.
IRS BUDGET YOU CUT TAX REVENUE AND RAISE THE DEFICIT. WHAT DID YOU MAKE OF THAT
AND RAISE THE DEFICIT. WHAT DID YOU MAKE OF THAT INITIAL MOVE BY HIM?
WHAT DID YOU MAKE OF THAT INITIAL MOVE BY HIM? >> I DIDN'T QUITE UNDERSTAND.
INITIAL MOVE BY HIM? >> I DIDN'T QUITE UNDERSTAND. AS A GUY WHO IS THIS SELF-
>> I DIDN'T QUITE UNDERSTAND. AS A GUY WHO IS THIS SELF- RIGHTEOUS, WHO FOLLOWS THE
AS A GUY WHO IS THIS SELF- RIGHTEOUS, WHO FOLLOWS THE BIBLE AND THERE'S AT LEAST ONE
RIGHTEOUS, WHO FOLLOWS THE BIBLE AND THERE'S AT LEAST ONE LINE IN THE BIBLE ABOUT NOT
BIBLE AND THERE'S AT LEAST ONE LINE IN THE BIBLE ABOUT NOT LYING AND HE'S BEEN OUT THERE
LINE IN THE BIBLE ABOUT NOT LYING AND HE'S BEEN OUT THERE SUPPORTING DONALD TRUMP'S BIG
LYING AND HE'S BEEN OUT THERE SUPPORTING DONALD TRUMP'S BIG LIE AND HE WAS BEING
SUPPORTING DONALD TRUMP'S BIG LIE AND HE WAS BEING DISINGENUOUS WHEN HE SAID THE
LIE AND HE WAS BEING DISINGENUOUS WHEN HE SAID THE OTHER DAY, YOU KNOW, WE ARE
DISINGENUOUS WHEN HE SAID THE OTHER DAY, YOU KNOW, WE ARE GOING TO CUT $14 BILLION FROM
OTHER DAY, YOU KNOW, WE ARE GOING TO CUT $14 BILLION FROM THE IRS AND PEOPLE ARE CALLING
GOING TO CUT $14 BILLION FROM THE IRS AND PEOPLE ARE CALLING THIS INCREASING THE DEFICIT, IT
THE IRS AND PEOPLE ARE CALLING THIS INCREASING THE DEFICIT, IT DOES INCREASE THE DEFICIT
THIS INCREASING THE DEFICIT, IT DOES INCREASE THE DEFICIT BECAUSE YOU ARE TAKING AWAY THE
DOES INCREASE THE DEFICIT BECAUSE YOU ARE TAKING AWAY THE PEOPLE WHO COLLECT THE MONEY.
BECAUSE YOU ARE TAKING AWAY THE PEOPLE WHO COLLECT THE MONEY. THE MOST BASIC EXPENDITURES IN
PEOPLE WHO COLLECT THE MONEY. THE MOST BASIC EXPENDITURES IN GOVERNMENT THAT RINGS MONEY IN.
THE MOST BASIC EXPENDITURES IN GOVERNMENT THAT RINGS MONEY IN. IF YOU SAY YOU'RE GOING TO SHUT
GOVERNMENT THAT RINGS MONEY IN. IF YOU SAY YOU'RE GOING TO SHUT DOWN THE TOLLBOOTH TO THE
IF YOU SAY YOU'RE GOING TO SHUT DOWN THE TOLLBOOTH TO THE HIGHWAY AND WILL HAVE MORE
DOWN THE TOLLBOOTH TO THE HIGHWAY AND WILL HAVE MORE MONEY BECAUSE OF THAT, THAT'S
HIGHWAY AND WILL HAVE MORE MONEY BECAUSE OF THAT, THAT'S NOT TRUE.
MONEY BECAUSE OF THAT, THAT'S NOT TRUE. SO HE KNOWS THIS, AND HE HAS
NOT TRUE. SO HE KNOWS THIS, AND HE HAS THIS VENEER OF BEING VERY
SO HE KNOWS THIS, AND HE HAS THIS VENEER OF BEING VERY GENTLE AND RIGHTEOUS AND
THIS VENEER OF BEING VERY GENTLE AND RIGHTEOUS AND RELIGIOUS AND I LIVE BY THE
GENTLE AND RIGHTEOUS AND RELIGIOUS AND I LIVE BY THE BIBLE BUT HE'S BEEN OUT THERE
RELIGIOUS AND I LIVE BY THE BIBLE BUT HE'S BEEN OUT THERE PROMOTING ALL SORTS OF LIES AND
BIBLE BUT HE'S BEEN OUT THERE PROMOTING ALL SORTS OF LIES AND I DON'T KNOW, --
PROMOTING ALL SORTS OF LIES AND I DON'T KNOW, -- >> THOU SHALT NOT LIE.
I DON'T KNOW, -- >> THOU SHALT NOT LIE. >> HE'S THE HEAD OF THE
>> THOU SHALT NOT LIE. >> HE'S THE HEAD OF THE REPUBLICAN STUDY CONFERENCE
>> HE'S THE HEAD OF THE REPUBLICAN STUDY CONFERENCE WHICH IS THE BIGGEST COLLECTION
REPUBLICAN STUDY CONFERENCE WHICH IS THE BIGGEST COLLECTION OF CONSERVATIVES IN THE HOUSE.
WHICH IS THE BIGGEST COLLECTION OF CONSERVATIVES IN THE HOUSE. SO HE'S BEEN A CONSERVATIVE AND
OF CONSERVATIVES IN THE HOUSE. SO HE'S BEEN A CONSERVATIVE AND HAS BROUGHT A LOT OF THEIR
SO HE'S BEEN A CONSERVATIVE AND HAS BROUGHT A LOT OF THEIR HYPOCRISY SINCE HE'S BEEN IN
HAS BROUGHT A LOT OF THEIR HYPOCRISY SINCE HE'S BEEN IN CONGRESS.
HYPOCRISY SINCE HE'S BEEN IN CONGRESS. SO IN THAT WAY, IT'S NOT
CONGRESS. SO IN THAT WAY, IT'S NOT SURPRISING.
SO IN THAT WAY, IT'S NOT SURPRISING. >> I REMEMBER ANOTHER LINE FROM
SURPRISING. >> I REMEMBER ANOTHER LINE FROM MY BIBLE --
>> I REMEMBER ANOTHER LINE FROM MY BIBLE -- >> GO TO ROMANS, WHICH SAYS,
MY BIBLE -- >> GO TO ROMANS, WHICH SAYS, YOU SHOULD PAY YOUR TAXES AND
>> GO TO ROMANS, WHICH SAYS, YOU SHOULD PAY YOUR TAXES AND HONOR THE AUTHORITY
HONOR THE AUTHORITY.
HONOR THE AUTHORITY. >> WE CAN DO THIS ALL DAY,
HONOR THE AUTHORITY. >> WE CAN DO THIS ALL DAY, DAVID.
>> WE CAN DO THIS ALL DAY, DAVID. SUSAN, LAST QUESTION, HERE'S
DAVID. SUSAN, LAST QUESTION, HERE'S WHAT I THOUGHT WAS INTERESTING
SUSAN, LAST QUESTION, HERE'S WHAT I THOUGHT WAS INTERESTING ABOUT MIKE JOHNSON.
WHAT I THOUGHT WAS INTERESTING ABOUT MIKE JOHNSON. A LOT OF PEOPLE DON'T REALIZE
ABOUT MIKE JOHNSON. A LOT OF PEOPLE DON'T REALIZE THIS, IN THE WAKE OF GEORGE
A LOT OF PEOPLE DON'T REALIZE THIS, IN THE WAKE OF GEORGE FLOYD'S MURDER, HE SPOKE ABOUT
THIS, IN THE WAKE OF GEORGE FLOYD'S MURDER, HE SPOKE ABOUT RAISING HIS ADOPTED BLACK SON
FLOYD'S MURDER, HE SPOKE ABOUT RAISING HIS ADOPTED BLACK SON IN AN INTERVIEW WITH PBS.
RAISING HIS ADOPTED BLACK SON IN AN INTERVIEW WITH PBS. HAVE A LISTEN.
IN AN INTERVIEW WITH PBS. HAVE A LISTEN. >> I THOUGHT OFTEN THROUGHOUT
HAVE A LISTEN. >> I THOUGHT OFTEN THROUGHOUT THESE ORDEALS IN THE LAST
>> I THOUGHT OFTEN THROUGHOUT THESE ORDEALS IN THE LAST COUPLE OF WEEKS ABOUT THE
THESE ORDEALS IN THE LAST COUPLE OF WEEKS ABOUT THE DIFFERENCE IN THE EXPERIENCES
COUPLE OF WEEKS ABOUT THE DIFFERENCE IN THE EXPERIENCES BETWEEN MY 214-YEAR-OLD SONS,
DIFFERENCE IN THE EXPERIENCES BETWEEN MY 214-YEAR-OLD SONS, MICHAEL BEING A BLACK AMERICAN
BETWEEN MY 214-YEAR-OLD SONS, MICHAEL BEING A BLACK AMERICAN AND JACK BEING WHITE,
MICHAEL BEING A BLACK AMERICAN AND JACK BEING WHITE, CAUCASIAN.
AND JACK BEING WHITE, CAUCASIAN. THE REALITY IS AND NO ONE CAN
CAUCASIAN. THE REALITY IS AND NO ONE CAN TELL ME OTHERWISE, MY SON
THE REALITY IS AND NO ONE CAN TELL ME OTHERWISE, MY SON MICHAEL HAD A HARDER TIME THAN
TELL ME OTHERWISE, MY SON MICHAEL HAD A HARDER TIME THAN MY SON JACK WILL HAVE SIMPLY
MICHAEL HAD A HARDER TIME THAN MY SON JACK WILL HAVE SIMPLY BECAUSE OF THE COLOR OF HIS
MY SON JACK WILL HAVE SIMPLY BECAUSE OF THE COLOR OF HIS SKIN.
BECAUSE OF THE COLOR OF HIS SKIN. >> MIKE JOHNSON SEEMS PRETTY
SKIN. >> MIKE JOHNSON SEEMS PRETTY AWARE OF THE RACIAL DISPARITIES
>> MIKE JOHNSON SEEMS PRETTY AWARE OF THE RACIAL DISPARITIES HIS BLACK SON FACES, AND YET
AWARE OF THE RACIAL DISPARITIES HIS BLACK SON FACES, AND YET MOST OF HIS REPUBLICAN
HIS BLACK SON FACES, AND YET MOST OF HIS REPUBLICAN COLLEAGUES WOULDN'T AGREE WITH
MOST OF HIS REPUBLICAN COLLEAGUES WOULDN'T AGREE WITH HIM.
COLLEAGUES WOULDN'T AGREE WITH HIM. THEY WOULD SAY, THAT'S CRITICAL
HIM. THEY WOULD SAY, THAT'S CRITICAL RACE THEORY, SO THERE MIGHT BE
THEY WOULD SAY, THAT'S CRITICAL RACE THEORY, SO THERE MIGHT BE A DIVISION ON THIS ISSUE.
RACE THEORY, SO THERE MIGHT BE A DIVISION ON THIS ISSUE. >> YOU KNOW, I DON'T SEE IT
A DIVISION ON THIS ISSUE. >> YOU KNOW, I DON'T SEE IT QUITE THAT WAY.
>> YOU KNOW, I DON'T SEE IT QUITE THAT WAY. THERE WILL BE NO DIVISION, AND
QUITE THAT WAY. THERE WILL BE NO DIVISION, AND SO FAR, SPEAKER JOHNSON HAS
THERE WILL BE NO DIVISION, AND SO FAR, SPEAKER JOHNSON HAS PROVEN HIMSELF SOMEONE WHO WILL
SO FAR, SPEAKER JOHNSON HAS PROVEN HIMSELF SOMEONE WHO WILL JUST THROW OUT WHATEVER HIS
PROVEN HIMSELF SOMEONE WHO WILL JUST THROW OUT WHATEVER HIS CORE BELIEFS MAY BE AND YOU
JUST THROW OUT WHATEVER HIS CORE BELIEFS MAY BE AND YOU JUST HIGHLIGHTED THE, ONE OF
CORE BELIEFS MAY BE AND YOU JUST HIGHLIGHTED THE, ONE OF HIS CORE BELIEFS IS HIS FAITH
JUST HIGHLIGHTED THE, ONE OF HIS CORE BELIEFS IS HIS FAITH AND HE CLEARLY THREW IT OUT
HIS CORE BELIEFS IS HIS FAITH AND HE CLEARLY THREW IT OUT WHEN HE WAS WILLING TO
AND HE CLEARLY THREW IT OUT WHEN HE WAS WILLING TO DECERTIFY THE ELECTION OF 2020.
WHEN HE WAS WILLING TO DECERTIFY THE ELECTION OF 2020. BUT THIS THING ABOUT MIKE
DECERTIFY THE ELECTION OF 2020. BUT THIS THING ABOUT MIKE JOHNSON THAT JUST REALLY AGAIN,
BUT THIS THING ABOUT MIKE JOHNSON THAT JUST REALLY AGAIN, JUST TO GO BACK TO THE FUNDING
JOHNSON THAT JUST REALLY AGAIN, JUST TO GO BACK TO THE FUNDING OF ISRAEL, IS, WE ARE TALKING
JUST TO GO BACK TO THE FUNDING OF ISRAEL, IS, WE ARE TALKING ABOUT EMGENCY FUNDING FOR AN
OF ISRAEL, IS, WE ARE TALKING ABOUT EMGENCY FUNDING FOR AN ALLY, THAT WAS ATTACKED, WHICH
ABOUT EMGENCY FUNDING FOR AN ALLY, THAT WAS ATTACKED, WHICH KILLED THE JEWS AND HIS
ALLY, THAT WAS ATTACKED, WHICH KILLED THE JEWS AND HIS RESPONSE IS FILED DEFUND THE
KILLED THE JEWS AND HIS RESPONSE IS FILED DEFUND THE TAX GUYS.
RESPONSE IS FILED DEFUND THE TAX GUYS. THAT'S WHAT HE SAYING TO THE
TAX GUYS. THAT'S WHAT HE SAYING TO THE REST OF THE WORLD.
THAT'S WHAT HE SAYING TO THE REST OF THE WORLD. I DON'T THINK HE UNDERSTANDS
REST OF THE WORLD. I DON'T THINK HE UNDERSTANDS THE IMPORTANCE AND RELEVANCE OF
I DON'T THINK HE UNDERSTANDS THE IMPORTANCE AND RELEVANCE OF THE POSITION HE HOLDS.