♪
♪ >> I WANT TO TELL YOU, GORSUCH,
I WANT TO TELL YOU, KAVANAUGH,
YOU HAVE RELEASED THE WHIRLWIND
AND YOU WILL PAY THE PRICE.
[CHEERS AND APPLAUSE]
BRIAN: WHAT THE HECK WAS THAT.
SENATOR CHUCK SCHUMER UNDER FIRE
FOR THOSE COMMENTS AGAINST THE
PRESIDENT’S SUPREME COURT PICKS
AND THE SUPREME COURT OVERALL.
OUR NEXT GUEST ARGUES IT’S NOT
THE FIRST TIME HE HAS TALKED
THIS WAY POINTING TO THIS REMARK
TO DONALD TRUMP.
>> TAKE ON THE INTELLIGENCE
COMMUNITY.
COMMUNITY. THEY HAVE SIX WAYS FROM SUNDAY
AT GETTING BACK AT YOU.
SO, EVEN FOR A PRACTICAL
SUPPOSEDLY HARD NOSIED
BUSINESSMAN IS HE BEING REALLY
DUMB TO DO THIS.
BRIAN: G.O.P. CONGRESSMAN MARK
MEADOWS AND JIM JORDAN JOIN US
RIGHT NOW.
RIGHT NOW. THEY SEE SIMILARITIES BETWEEN
THOSE TWO REMARKS.
FIRST, GUYS, WOULD YOU BOTH
COMMENT ON WHAT YOU JUST HEARD
ON THE STEPS OF THE SUPREME
COURT?
COURT? JIM?
JIM? >> JIM, GO AHEAD.
>> WELL, IT’S INAPPROPRIATE, BUT
YOU ARE RIGHT, BRIAN, THIS IS
NOT THE FIRST TIME CHUCK SCHUMER
HAS TRIED TO INTIMIDATE SOMEONE.
IT DIDN’T WORK WITH PRESIDENT
TRUMP.
TRUMP. I DON’T THINK IT’S GOING TO WORK
WITH JUSTICE GORSUCH AND JUSTICE
KAVANAUGH.
KAVANAUGH. BUT IT STILL IS WRONG.
YOU DON’T DO THOSE KIND OF
THINGS.
THINGS. AND HE IS RIGHT.
THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY DID
TRY TO GO AFTER PRESIDENT TRUMP
AND WE HAVE UNCOVERED THAT, AND
HOROWITZ REPORT FURTHER EXPOSED
WHAT THEY TRIED TO DO.
SO, YOU KNOW, HE SHOULDN’T BE
TRYING TO INTIMIDATE.
IT DIDN’T WORK WITH PRESIDENT
TRUMP.
TRUMP. I DON’T THINK IT’S GOING TO WORK
WITH THE SUPREME COURT JUSTICES.
>> AND, BRIAN, JIM IS EXACTLY
RIGHT.
RIGHT. HERE IS THE INTERESTING THING
IS, HIS SPOKESMAN PUTS OUT THIS
UNBELIEVABLE DECLARATION THAT
SUPPOSEDLY HE WAS TALKING TO
SENATE REPUBLICANS.
SENATE REPUBLICANS. THERE IS ONLY TWO PROBLEMS WITH
THAT.
THAT. HE WAS STANDING IN FRONT OF THE
SUPREME COURT AND HE MENTIONED
TWO SUPREME COURT JUSTICES.
LISTEN, THIS IS TYPICAL CHUCK
SCHUMER.
SCHUMER. WHAT HE WANTS TO DO IS ACTUALLY
RILE UP THE BASE AND MAKE SURE
WHAT THEY DO IS PUT AS MUCH
POLITICAL PRESSURE IN THE MEDIA
NOT ONLY ON THE SUPREME COURT
BUT ON THE PRESIDENT, BUT THESE
KIND OF TACTICS WON’T WORK
BECAUSE THE AMERICAN PEOPLE
WON’T STAND FOR IT.
BRIAN: SEE THE OTHER THING JUST
A CLUE YOU KNOW HOW HE LOOKS AT
HIS COPY ON EVERYTHING.
HE PUTS IT RIGHT UP TO HIM AND
READS IT.
READS IT. HE WAS WINGING THAT.
>> YEAH.
>> YEAH. BRIAN: WE ALL SOMETIMES GET IN
FRONT OF CROWDS AND SAY THINGS
YOU REGRET.
YOU REGRET. HAVE SO MUCH RESPECT FOR HIM TO
SAY WOW, I WAS OFF THE HANDLE
YESTERDAY.
YESTERDAY. I’M JUST VERY EMOTIONAL ABOUT A
VERY TOUCHY ISSUE.
THAT WOULD GO A LONG WAY,
WOULDN’T IT, EITHER ONE OF YOU
MARK OR JIM?
>> IT WOULD.
I THINK PROBABLY THE BIGGEST
THING THAT WE HAVE HERE, BRIAN,
IS THAT HE JUST SHOULD APOLOGIZE
AND SAY I MISSPOKE.
I SEND AN APOLOGY.
HE CAN CRITICIZE THEIR DECISIONS
ALL DAY LONG, BUT, WHEN YOU
START MAKING THREATS, WHETHER
THEY ARE VEILED THREATS OR NOT,
IT’S JUST INAPPROPRIATE.
BRIAN: I WANT TO BRING ELECTIONS
INTO THIS BECAUSE I WOULD ARGUE
THAT MAYBE PRESIDENT TRUMP
DOESN’T WIN IF THERE WASN’T A
VACANT SUPREME COURT SEAT.
THERE WAS A REASON WHY A LOT OF
REPUBLICANS SAID THERE IS AN
URGENCY TO GET A CONSERVATIVE ON
THE SUPREME COURT.
DO YOU BELIEVE THIS IS BEGINNING
TO HEAT UP IN THE SAME WAY
BECAUSE OF JUSTICE GINSBURG’S
AGE AND OBVIOUSLY HEALTH
CHALLENGES THAT WOULD TAKE PLACE
OVER THE NEXT FOUR YEARS?
DO YOU SEE THE BASE, JIM JORDAN,
GETTING JUST AS EXERCISED
BECAUSE THAT’S AT STAKE WITH
THIS NEXT ELECTION?
>> IT’S ALWAYS AN IMPORTANT
ISSUE BECAUSE THE
COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF, THE
COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF, THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES
GETS TO NOMINATE THE SUPREME
COURT JUSTICE.
COURT JUSTICE. THAT’S ALWAYS AN ISSUE FRONT AND
CENTER AND PARTICULARLY ON THE
LIFE ISSUE.
LIFE ISSUE. REMEMBER, THIS PRESIDENT WAS THE
FIRST PRESIDENT IN AMERICAN
HISTORY TO GO IN PERSON TO THE
MARCH FOR LIFE RALLY.
THE DEMOCRATS ARE TRYING TO MAKE
THIS ISSUE.
THIS ISSUE. BUT OUR SIDE WILL, TOO.
WE APPRECIATE THAT PRESIDENT
TRUMP HAS STOOD UP FOR THE
SANCTITY OF HUMAN LIFE.
BRIAN: MARK, I’M GOING TO CHANGE
SUBJECTS REAL QUICK.
YOUR REACTION TO SENATOR JOHNSON
CALLING NOW FOR SUBPOENAS TO GET
PAPERWORK ON WHAT EXACTLY HUNTER
BIDEN WAS UP TO WITH BURISMA AND
A BUNCH OF UKRAINIAN NAMES WE
CAN’T PRONOUNCE.
CAN’T PRONOUNCE. THEY ARE SAYING IT’S ALL ABOUT
JOE BIDEN’S RESURGENCE.
IS IT?
IS IT? >> WELL, OBVIOUSLY NOT.
BECAUSE SENATOR JOHNSON HAS BEEN
WORKING ON THIS.
HE HAS ACTUALLY TRAVELED TO
UKRAINE WHEN HE ACTUALLY LOOKED
AT THE INVESTIGATION INTO JOE
BIDEN, IT WAS BEFORE THE
COMEBACK IN SOUTH CAROLINA.
SO IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH
POLITICS.
POLITICS. IT HAS EVERYTHING TO DO WITH
INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR ON THE
PART OF THE VICE PRESIDENT AND
HIS SON.
HIS SON. I MEAN, WHEN YOU GET PAID THE
KIND OF MONEY THAT HE GOT PAID,
IT’S JUST NOT ONLY
INAPPROPRIATE, BUT IT’S NOT A
JOB THAT THE AMERICAN PEOPLE
COULD HAVE QUALIFIED FOR.
AND IT CERTAINLY IS NOT ONE THAT
THE RESUME FOR HUNTER BIDEN
QUALIFIED FOR.
QUALIFIED FOR. SO HE NEEDS TO LOOK AT IT.
AND IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH
POLITICS.
POLITICS. BRIAN: JIM, REAL QUICK.
>> REMEMBER, THE STATE
DEPARTMENT IN THE OBAMA
ADMINISTRATION WAS LOOKING INTO
THIS ISSUE WAY BACK WHEN IT
HAPPENED.
HAPPENED. SO THIS IS NOTHING NEW.
>> EXACTLY.
>> EXACTLY. BRIAN: YEAH.
BRIAN: YEAH. AND IF BERNIE SANDERS WANTS TO
WIN, LAST TIME HE SAID I’M NOT
INTERESTED IN YOUR DAMN EMAILS,
HILLARY, AND HE LOST.
IF HE ACTUALLY WANTS TO WIN AND
POINTS OUT WEAKNESS IN JOE
BIDEN’S CANDIDACY, HE WILL DO
THAT.
THAT. IF NOT, HE DOESN’T WANT TO WIN