lawyers in Florida are defending their clients who snuck up on his neighbors at
their labor day barbecue and shot them to death
well to died 1 survive thank goodness but the lawyers
have a novel defense strategy they are claiming that the Bush Doctrine
is I his excuse for and I should not be prosecuted for this murder
William T Woodward his lawyers filed a motion asking the charges against it to
be dismissed
under Florida's Stand Your Ground law which says gun owners don't have a duty
to retreat in the face
%uh n imminent threat this is where the Bush Doctrine comes in
the imminent threat was really eminent it was just preemptive
preemptively eminent I guess right and he's using stand your ground so so so
preemptive stand your ground right way says
well I guess if they saw that I had a gun
they probably would have wanted to defend themselves and you know which
right in which case I woulda had my right to stand my ground issue new debt
ludmilla seriously this is like the natural evolution of how insane stand
your ground this
right yep like I started the fight obviously he snuck up on him from from
the bushes
when they were having a labor day barbecue he's obviously he came to shoot
them and kill them
says but look at some point they said bad words about me
so I mean I stood my ground and they're going to do something to me after so
maybe I get I doesn't make any sense to me that now they were met they
referenced a motion
in enid converses state which suggests that the imminent threat can include
something that is likely to
occur at some time in the future a his lawyer representing him said I think
legally that term has sort of been evolving
especially giving changes our government's definition
love eminent it's become more expansive than someone putting a gun to your head
it's
things that could become you know and could become
an immediate threat that's what kills me about this is just such a it's a crazy
idea
but you know what so I was worried during the Bush years about this whole
preemptive strikes and the it's a disastrous president I remember saying
before the Iraq war okay so we get to declare war
and invade countries that didn't attack us at all on the off chance that they
might have weapons
that they could use the attackers at a later date
and we call that an imminent threat well why couldn't China do the same thing
Taiwan has a lot of weapons that could use them
at a later date wow okay I'm just gonna take taiwan Russia could go in any
country mill extent
I mean big bets couple weapons right that we view them to be in a min friend
we took that
right so terrible precedent but even I didn't imagine
that they would use at the local level it's pretty creative yet like he's like
look
you drop bombs you kill hundreds of thousands civilians in Iraq
a tip base on the preemption doctrine I killed only two guys
right by the 1i guess the shot 11 times
anything and I arrived I know is that amazing it is so
look is three reasons why vote against the sky first his mug shot
this to just chill two guys think and shop with ergo 11 times
and he's got that smug smile on his face like he thinks he's clever something in
albany is a Brampton this is money shot
yeah happy yeah dunno on mug shot alone
guilty okay number two Cup preemption docked
at a hero cape no given no way no way it's a safe
maybe his lawyer things I got no chance is most obviously guilty and his real
world
let me just you some create abortion and see where it leads me which isn't likely
thing
and looked at by the way it's just a pause there for a second is not just
bush
though Obama administration on Syria Jay Carney came out and I'm paraphrasing
here but he basically said
well in a minute Syrian imminent threat to us
obviously not there's no way serious gun attackers
they don't have the means they don't have the capacity know they have the
intent
but he said and a future date it's possible
that they might which by the way under that definition could invade
any country right right so now the lawyer saying
well look if the new definition a Bimini thread is
someone could possibly tag me at a future date why not
right and look the guy got shot 11 times right
no well when he gets better he will be motivated to go on
shoot other guy of so I am in a thread
that's why the shooting 11 times well okay that's it that's a stretch to do
but you're right he probably could why not
I mean if he's gonna go this far why not and and the third reason
that I would vote against this guy even though it's yes a creative argument in a
go shows: what of course our government has become in terms of their ideology
is that the Stand Your Ground is insanity now I mean
d I mean when you stand your ground for when you
ambush someone literally shoot them to death
would be shows you how ridiculous the lawyers it has a work I want to be clear
about that right
and it has almost no chance a working as a solution is Sam in same thing
but they have you so like they've use it almost all the spectrum but this
so like that's where the lawyer can say with a straight face like her nose
work in cases where people go up start a fight
an issue someone dead here the guy is
do it just without the fight okay he comes with a gun
kinda like somebody that's so sweet his name so dizzy
did right but there's no fighting just you know short-circuited the fight
issue summoner head in the chest is centering tells AFP
so you got together to stand your ground and obviously this guy if the fax a ride
in obviously
jury will decide that is massively you right the judge did not dismiss the case
so I guess the judge didn't fall for it
yep so that's a good yeah