>> Harris : IT IS COMING, A
JUDGE IN CALIFORNIA ORDERED THE
RELEASE OF THE BODY CAMERA
FOOTAGE FROM THE OCTOBER HAMMER
ATTACK ON PAUL PELOSI, THE
HUSBAND OF FORMER HOUSE
SPEAKER AT NANCY PELOSI.
WE ARE TOLD A DECISION ON WHEN
THAT WILL ACTUALLY HAPPEN THAT
WE WILL SEE THE VIDEO BE
RELEASED COULD TAKE SOME TIME.
MAYBE SOMETIME TODAY, THE JUDGE
SAID IMMEDIATELY WHEN THIS WAS
ANNOUNCED YESTERDAY.
WE WILL BRING YOU THAT AS SOON
AS WE GET IT IN.
MEANWHILE, REPUBLICAN
SENATOR JOSH HAWLEY MADE A
NOT-SO-SUBTLE DIG AT THE PELOSIS
WITH THE NEW BILL CALLED THE
"PREVENTING ELECTED LEADERS FROM
OWNING SECURITIES AND
INVESTMENTS" ACT OR THE PELOSI
ACT FOR SHORT.
THE BILL WOULD BAN MEMBERS OF
CONGRESS AND THEIR SPOUSES FROM
TRADING AND OWNING STOCKS AND IT
COMES AFTER REVELATIONS
OF COURSE THAT LAST YEAR THE
PAUL PELOSI TRADED BETWEEN
1000000-$5 MILLION OF STOCKS FOR
SEMICONDUCTORS JUST DAYS BEFORE
CONGRESS ALLOCATED $52 MILLION
TO THE SAME INDUSTRY.
THE SOCKS WERE STOCKS WERE LATER
LOSS TO ERASE IMPROPRIETY.
BUT YOU CAN’T LOSE FOUL ERASE
THE FACTS.
>> Kara: DURING TO THE
ANTITRUST LAWSUIT AGAINST GOOGLE
THAT WAS JUST ANNOUNCED?
THEY TRADED GOOGLE STOCKS.
IT MAKES SENSE LIKE DAN CRENSHAW
SAID YOU WANT TO BETTER YOURSELF
AND GROW YOUR PORTFOLIO, BUT AT
THE SAME TIME WHAT HAPPENED TO
SELFLESS SERVICE?
TRUMP LEFT OFFICE A POORER MAN
THEN WHEN HE WENT INTO THE
OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENCY, YET WE
ARE SEEING SOME IN CONGRESS
MEMBERS LEAVING WITH GOBS AND
GOBS OF WEALTH.
I MEAN IN MY ESTIMATION I THINK
THAT IS NOT THE SELFLESS SERVANT
LEADERS THAT AMERICA’S FOUNDED
ON PARIS MUST BE FARMERS AND
CITIZENS FIRST NOT LOOKING TO
ENGORGE OURSELVES WITH BIGGER
AND BIGGER GOBS OF MONEY.
>> DO THINK WE HAVE ENOUGH
TRANSPARENCY?
A LOT OF TIMES WHAT CARE IS
TALKING ABOUT IS YOU FIND OUT
AFTER WHAT THEY WERE TRAINING IS
THIS ABOUT TRANSPARENCY OR IS IT
REALLY NEEDING THE LEGISLATION
HOLLY FROM MISSOURI?
>> Dagen: KNEW THEY NEED TO
BAN TRADING OF INDIVIDUAL STOCKS
FUTURES OPTIONS ANYTHING TRADED
ON INSIDE INFORMATION AND I SAY
THAT BECAUSE I HAVE BEEN A
FINANCIAL JOURNALIST ALMOST 30
YEARS AND I HAVE NEVER, EVER
OWNED AN INDIVIDUAL STOCKS.
I HAVE OWNED MUTUAL FUNDS OR
EXCHANGE TRADED FUNDS.
YOU CAN MAKE PERFECTLY DECENT
INVESTMENTS AND YOU CAN REMOVE
ANY APPEARANCE OF IMPROPRIETY BY
NOT OWNING INDIVIDUAL STOCKS.
I DID THAT BY CHOICE BECAUSE I
DIDN’T WANT IT.
I DIDN’T WANT TO LOOK BAD.
THEY DON’T GIVE A FLYING FLIP.
IT NEEDS TO BE FORCED DOWN THEIR
THROATS.
>> Harris : HELPER SAFE DELL
MY PERVASIVE BUSINESS ON
CAPITOL HILL?
>> Sean: I CANNOT AGREE WITH
THAT MORE.
MOST NUMBERS OF CONGRESS DO NOT
HAVE WHAT THE PELOSI’S HAD WITH
GOBS OF MONEY BY THE WAY AND
NEVER FIGURED OUT HOW TO DO THAT
BECAUSE I WAS POURING CONGRESS.
>> Harris : YOU ALSO HAVE 99
CHILDREN.
>> Sean: THAT TOO.
THANK YOU.
BUT CASH WISE I CAN’T FIGURE I
HAD TO DO IT.
BUT YOU SHOULDN’T HAVE TO PAY A
PRICE TO SERVE IN CONGRESS.
THESE PEOPLE HAVE TWO HOMES AND
MAKE HUNDRED $74,000 A YEAR, LET
THEM TRADE STOCKS, LET THEM
TRADE FUTURES IF YOU DO, THE
CONCEPT.
>> Harris : WHAT ARE THE
CONSEQUENCES?
WE NEED A SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE
WAS SO ONE THE CONSEQUENCES?
>> Sean: A GOES TO DAGAN’S
POINT IF YOU ARE THE ELITE RULES
DON’T APPLY TO YOU.
>> Harris : TAKE IT AWAY.
WHY NOT TAKE IT AWAY?
>> Sean: OR PROSECUTOR.
>> Harris : THAT’S NOT GOING
TO HAPPEN.
THEY WILL NOT PROSECUTE AN 80
SOMETHING-YEAR-OLD WOMAN AT THIS
POINT.
>> Sean: THEY SHOULD.
>> Harris : GOD BLESS HER EYE
WANT TO LIVE LONG TOO BUT
THEY’VE BEEN MAKING MONEY
FOREVER, THIS ISN’T
BREAKING NEWS.
>> Sean: BUT WE PASSED LAWS
AND MAKE THINGS ILLEGAL AND HAVE
PENALTIES FOR THEM FOR A REASON.
THEY SHOULD APPLY TO EVERYONE.
THE NANCY PELOSI’S OF THE WORLD
TO NOT BE EXCLUDED FROM THAT SO
WE ARE CREATING NEW LAWS.
>> Harris : I FEEL LIKE I AM
ON YOUR SHOW SITTING BETWEEN YOU
AND DAGAN.
HE WAS THROWING HIS BROW AT ME.
WAY SAID ABOUT MUTUAL FUNDS IT’S
A CONGLOMERATE OF THINGS NOBODY
REALLY GETS A TIP ON ANY ONE
THING.
SO WHY NOT DO THAT?
>> Dagen: IT’S NOT A HARDSHIP.
[LAUGHTER]
>> Harris : THIS IS A HAPPY
PLACE RIGHT NOW.
>> Dagen: YOU DON’T GET TO
SPECULATE IS WHAT IT IS.
AND IF THAT IS SUCH A HARDSHIP
ON YOU, NANCY, AND YOUR HUSBAND
THEN LEAVE.
>> Sean: MOST MEMBERS OF
CONGRESS ONLY HAVE A LITTLE BIT
OF MONEY AND THEIR TRADING IF
YOU STOCKS HERE AND THERE HAVING
FUN AND THEY ARE NOT USING
INFORMATION.
>> Harris : --
>> Emily: THE AVERAGE MEMBER
HAS FIVE TO $6,000 WORTH OF
STOCK IN CONTRAST TO HER HUSBAND
THAT HAS $500,000 WORTH OF STOCK
VERY REMEMBER BEFORE YOU AT A
HEARING A CONGRESSIONAL SUBSIDY
HEARING AND HE BOUGHT
MULTIMILLION DOLLAR PURCHASES AT
THE TIME AND WE WERE TOLD TO
ASSUAGE THE APPEARANCE FOR
OPTICS ESSENTIALLY HE WAS CAUGHT
AND THEY CARED MORE ABOUT
PRESENTATION THAN ABOUT THE
SERVICE AND THE SERVITUDE OF
THEIR POSITION.
SO I THINK WHERE THIS BILL
NAVIGATES THAT LINE BETWEEN
BEING A SERVANT AND ALSO
ALLOWING CONGRESSMEN TO TAKE
PART IN CAPITALISM IS THAT SIX
MONTH MARK AND I THINK THAT’S
THE IMPORTANT THING BECAUSE
BOTTOM LINE, THE PELOSI
PLURALISTS HAVE BENEFITED TIME
AND TIME AGAIN THAT, PURCHASES,
REPRESENTATIVE COMMERCE AT ITS
ANOTHER BAD EXAMPLE OF
NANCY PELOSI’S LEADERSHIP
COMMENTS ON THE FIRST TIME HER
HUSBAND HAS DONE THIS.
HE IT REPEATEDLY AND HE SAYS IT
IS NOT ABOUT JUST THAT DESPERATE
PART I SAID ABOUT THE DIFFERENCE
ON THE COST BUT THE FACT THEY
CONTINUE TO DO IT.
YOU MAKE A HUGE PROFIT IF YOU
KNOW THE STOCK WILL MOVE AND HE
SAID THIS IS ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF
THE MEDIA TURNING A BLIND EYE TO
NANCY PELOSI BAD BEHAVIOR AND
UNETHICAL BEHAVIORS OR TO YOUR
POINT, HARRIS WHEN YOU SAY THEY
WON’T PROSECUTE AN 80-YEAR-OLD
AND YOU SAY YOU SHOULD THAT’S
INSTANTLY RIGHT.
IF SOMEONE IS BREAKING THE LAW
IT DOESN’T MATTER HOW OLD THEY
ARE, BUT THE MEDIA IS WHO HAS
BEEN COMPLICIT BECAUSE THEY HAVE
NORMALIZED THESE GUYS AND
GORGING THEMSELVES.
>> Harris : AND THE REASON I
POINTED OUT SHE IS AN
OCTOGENARIAN IS HOW LONG THEY’VE
BEEN DOING THIS.
IF ANYONE THINKS YOU AND YOUR
SPOUSE WHEN YOUR SPOUSE DOES
SOMETHING DOESN’T TOUCH YOU THEN
SHE OUGHT TO REALLY MAKE THAT
POINT VERY, VERY CLEAR.
BECAUSE FOR ALL THE REASONS BOTH
OF YOU JUST ENUMERATED, IT LOOKS
LIKE THERE’S SOMETHING UNFAIR
GOING ON.
THAT OUGHT TO BE ENOUGH FOR HER
TO COME FORWARD.
>> Dagen: HOW ABOUT PEOPLE IN
LEADERSHIP?
>> Sean: FIND.