Mr SPEAKER: Question number 12, Jacinda Ardern
JACINDA ARDERN (Labour) to the Minister for Social Development:
By what percentage have child poverty levels
changed since the Government took office,
based on the constant value, below 60% of median incomes,
and after housing cost measures included
in the Ministry of Social Development’s report on household incomes?
Hon ANNE TOLLEY (Minister for Social Development):
The rate on that one measure specified
went from 22% in the 2008-09 survey to 24% in the 2010-11 survey
and back to 22% in the 2012-13 survey,
which shows that we are recovering from the recession.
There is a range of measures in the Child Poverty Monitor released today,
and the Ministry of Social Development regularly looks at a range of measures,
but the issues around poverty are complex,
and research shows that a number of measures need to be used.
This Government is focused on practical help
rather than arguing over individual measurement.
Things are improving, but there is still a long way to go,
and, as I say, the issues can be complex and often intergenerational.
JACINDA ARDERN: Based on her interview
with Radio NZ this morning, where she stated:
“What you describe as poverty is not what I might describe as poverty.”,
how does she describe poverty and how many children are living in it?
Hon ANNE TOLLEY: Well, that is absolutely correct.
Poverty is a scale and it is very important,
and the research shows that it is very important
to understand what aspect of poverty you are talking about.
So what that member might describe as poverty
may be quite different from what another measure is describing as poverty.
That is exactly what the research shows.
JACINDA ARDERN: I raise a point of order, Mr Speaker.
The member really only reiterated my question.
My question was: how would the Minister describe poverty, therefore,
and how many children are living in it?
She can choose to answer one or the other, but one would be nice.
Mr SPEAKER: She certainly answered one.
The question was not as the member has just said it was;
it was a lot more full than that.
It asked how the Minister would describe poverty,
and the Minister went on to describe it as a scale
and that there were various aspects for measuring it.
Order! If the member wants to question whether the answer is adequate,
she should show the manners to listen
to my justifying that the Minister has addressed the question.
If she wants to make further progress,
she should make it by using concise supplementary questions.
What target will she set to reduce child poverty?
Hon ANNE TOLLEY: This Government has already
set results targets, and reports regularly on progress.
We are finding that that clarity and accountability are well received
and are what matter to NZ'ers.
I remind the member that the Salvation Army said in 2008:
“Our measures of progress at this time next year
should not just be those of how much our economy has grown
more relevant measures could be those of how few people are locked up in prison,
how few violent crimes have been committed
and how much better children in poorer schools are achieving.”
Those are the sorts of targets this Government has set and is reporting on regularly.
JACINDA ARDERN: I raise a point of order, Mr Speaker.
My question was very straightforward and explicit.
It was: what target will she set to reduce child poverty?
Mr SPEAKER: And, again, I accept that the member
may have had difficulty listening to the answer
because I did as well —there
was a lot of noise coming from members around her—
but there was discussion in the answer about targets and measures.
One of them that I did pick up on
was the measurement of incarceration rates.
That is the Minister’s answer.
Order! If the member is going to continue
to raise a point of order every time she considers
an answer to be an unsatisfactory addressing of the question,
I will attempt to explain to the member
why I think it is satisfactory.
But we will make no progress at all if the member
is going to continue to yell at me
when I am standing on my feet.
Does the member have a further supplementary question?
JACINDA ARDERN: Can the Minister explain
how targets to reduce incarceration rates
have anything to do with improving
the well-being of a child living in poverty?
Hon ANNE TOLLEY: I would love to.
There are about 23,000 children
at any one time living in NZ who have a parent in prison.
If the member does not think that that affects long term
the economic, social, and emotional well-being of children,
then that member has a very different concept of poverty from mine.
MR SPEAKER: That concludes questions for oral answer.
Subtitles by the Amara.org community