According to multiple legal scholars, it appears that an indictment against Donald Trump.
Another, another indictment, uh, is almost imminent at this point.
And according to Harvard Law Professor Emeritus Lawrence Tribe, who also is a major legal
expert, widely respected, he believes that the charges against Donald Trump, from Jack
Smith could be related to conspiracy to overthrow the United States government.
Now that would be a big one, obviously , but here's why Tribe thinks that it was revealed
this week that special prosecutor Jack Smith, was heading down to Georgia to talk to Secretary
of State Brad Raff.
That conversation happened on Wednesday yesterday, and Raff, of course, is the Secretary of State
that Donald Trump made the infamous phone call to saying, go find the votes.
So why would Jack Smith need that testimony?
Why would he be approaching Raff Ensberg in this investigation, if not, other than to
prove that Donald Trump was attempting to overthrow the election results of the 2020
election.
Beyond that, Raff Asperger is not involved in any of this.
He wasn't involved in the Capitol Riot, he wasn't involved in the fake elector scheme
as far as we know.
This was just a guy who got a phone call from Donald Trump and quickly dismissed it.
But if they're building a case to prove that Trump was trying to overthrow the incoming
government of the United States, cuz obviously at the time Trump was the government and that's
where things get a little murky, legal speaking.
But uh, uh, this definitely does seem like he's building the case for conspiracy.
Now, it could be conspiracy to overthrow the government of the United States, which is
what tribe suggests it could be, or it could be conspiracy to defraud, defraud the United
States.
Big distinction between the two.
But let me, before I get into the distinction, let me just continue on a little more.
In addition to talking to Raff Asperger, we also learned this week that Rudy Giuliani
recently went and sat voluntarily, according to Giuliani's people, to talk to Jack Smith's
grand jury.
And, uh, Giuliani was pretty much the guy working with the states to come up with the
fake electors.
So that also seems to be pointing towards conspiracy.
Now, the distinction between the two charges.
So I get back to that.
We also learned, by the way, you had, uh, multiple Secret service agents that have cooperated
with the grand jury.
Those are the people around Trump all the time.
So
They would've heard things, seen things.
Their testimony is important, but the distinction between the two possible charges, cuz I have
always suggested, and again, , I got nothing on Lauren's tribe in terms of credentials,
uh, legally speaking.
So he's way better than me, way smarter than me.
But I've always said that conspiracy to defraud the United States would be the most likely
path.
But if it is in fact what tribe is suggesting in its conspiracy to overturn the government
of the United States, that would likely under the 14th Amendment Barr Donald Trump from
ever holding a public office again.
So that would be a better charge.
If you can get 'em on that, like a hundred percent do that.
The problem I see, the way I see it and, and based of course on the way our court system
is stacked with conservatives, is they're gonna argue you can't overthrow a government
that doesn't technically exist.
Because while these plans were playing out, right, while Donald Trump was engaged in this
alleged conspiracy, president Biden wasn't President Biden, there was no Biden administration.
They had not been sworn in.
So legally speaking, can you launch a coup against a government that doesn't technically
exist yet.
That's where the legal problems are gonna come in, especially with the way our court
system, again, is skewed way to the right Supreme Court, six to three to the right.
So I think if you did go with those charges, I think conservative courts are gonna, you
know, go the other way on that and let Donald Trump off conspiracy to defraud the United
States, however, which would not bar Trump from running for office again.
I think that would be easier to prove.
And you don't have to, you know, worry about the conservative courts changing the interpretation
of defrauding the government.
That one's pretty clear.
Um, but Lawrence tribe, by the way, is not the only person, the legal expert out there
saying that charges are likely imminent.
We also have former, uh, uh, solicitor General Neil Kacha, who says that yes, it does seem
like Donald Trump is going to be indicted very soon for January 6th in the attempts
to overturn the election.
So legal scholars are, you know, differing on what they think the charges are gonna be,
but they're all pretty much in agreement that there will be charges and that Donald Trump
and all of his alleged co-conspirators are gonna be hit at the same time.