According to a major new report from the New York Times, it looks like Donald Trump's former
super Pac that shut down late last year, make America great again.
Again, funneled $155,000 to Donald Trump's wife Melania.
And we don't really have a clear explanation as to why this information of course was revealed
by the New York Times based on the recent financial disclosures from Donald Trump himself.
However, the disclosures from the actual super PAC seem to contradict what Donald Trump has
in his personal financial statements.
So let me read this from the New York Times to just give you the best possible picture
of what happened.
The money was listed on Donald Trump's personal financial disclosures as pay for a quote,
speaking engagement by Ms. Trump in the new filing, uh, personal financial disclosure
by Mr. Trump.
The $155,000 payment was made in December, 2021 by Make America Great Again, again, which
at the time was Mr.
Trump's leading super pac.
Mrs. Trump's name, however, did not appear on the Super PAC's list of expenditures which
were made public last year.
In instead, the Super PACS report shows two payments for 125,000 and 30,000 to Designers
management agency, which lists Mrs. Trump as a client on its website.
The payments were made on December 2nd and December 3rd, 2021.
In the new disclosure, Mr. Trump reported that Mrs. Trump was paid 155,000 on December
2nd, 2021 in the Super PACS filing.
Those two payments were labeled event planning and consulting.
According to federal election, commission's records, federal rules are generally lax when
it comes to requiring that the final destination of money be revealed.
Instead, committees must disclose only the first vendor paid, but Trump on his personal
says, oh, she, she did a speaking engagement, so we gave her $155,000 on the Super pac.
They say, oh, well, she helped plan a dinner, so we gave her $155,000.
Both of those things cannot be true at once.
One of them is lying.
And the problem is nobody cares who's lying because as that last sentence I read, you
said, federal laws are lax, right?
Hey, as long as you say that the money went somewhere and you've got a receipt, we don't
care.
We don't care if you're using money to funnel it to your own family.
We don't care as long as you got a receipt for it.
That's how lax our campaign finance laws here in the United States really are.
Um, but the Super PAC says that Melania for a fundraiser dinner, which yes, did happen
at that time, uh, was paid the money because she helped pick out the, the tableware and,
uh, arranging
Settings and picking floral arrangements.
And apparently that is worth $155,000.
Melania Trump walking in and saying, use these plates, use those forks.
Uh, here's some flowers.
So, uh, pay up 155 grand for that.
So what was the money for?
Did she give a speech at the dinner or did she pick out the tableware?
Did she talk about policy or was she just giving you pretty flowers to look at?
Because again, Trump's financial statement says one thing.
The Super PAC's financial statement says another, we'll never know the truth.
They, we will never know.
There will not be an investigation into this.
A and I guarantee you, I promise you, Donald Trump's not the only one who does this.
Every candidate out there that's running a super PAC is doing shady crap like this, almost
every single one of them.
And the problem is, as shady as it may be, none of it's technically illegal.
As long as they've got a receipt, they can funnel, funnel, uh, funnel money, sorry, they
can funnel money to whoever they want, whenever they want, for whatever they want, as long
as they get that receipt and turn it in at the end of the year, right?
Because that's all that matters.
With our campaign finance rules, you can raise as much money as you want from whoever you
want.
You can pay whoever you want, just write it down on a piece of paper, and it all becomes
totally legit.