A NEW SET OF DOCUMENTS ALLEGEDLY TAKEN FROM
THE PERSONAL COMPUTER OF NASTY
PELOSI HAVE BEEN RELEASED BY THE HACKED OR GOOSE FOR 2.
WE HAVE
COVERED SOME OF THOSE RELEASES IN THE PAST, THERE IS A SET OF
NEW DOCUMENTS BUT ONE IS GETTING THE MOST ATTENTION BECAUSE IT
SHOWS A STAFFER FOR THE D TRIPLE C SPEAKING WITH SOME
QUESTIONABLE LANGUAGE ABOUT THE
BACK BLACK LIVES MATTER MOVEMENT OUT WE'RE GOING TO SHOW YOU THE
ENTIRETY OF THE MEMO IN THREE PORTIONS AND BREAK DOWN SOME OF
THE PROBLEMS THAT PEOPLE ARE HAVING WITH IT AND SEE WHAT IS
APPELLEE ACTUALLY THERE.
WE DO HAVE TO SAY WE ARE GOING TO SHOW
THE RESPONSE FROM BOTH A REPRESENTATIVE A BLACK LIVES
MATTER AND A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE D TRIPLE C. FROM THE D
TRIPLE C'S RESPONSE I THINK THIS IS AUTHENTIC BECAUSE THEY ARE
NOT JUST COMING OUT AND SAYING THIS DIDN'T EXIST IT ISN'T TRUE,
AND IF IT WASN'T SURE I THINK THEY WOULD'VE DONE THAT.
WE DO
HAVE TO SAY THAT THIS IS FROM AN ANONYMOUS PERSON, WE DON'T KNOW
WHO THE HACKER ACTUALLY IS, WHO THEY MIGHT WORK FOR REPRESENT,
AND WE DON'T KNOW WHAT 100% FOR SURE THAT THESE ARE AUTHENTIC IN
ALL CASES.
THIS APPEARS TO BE.
WE JUST HAVE TO SAY THAT DOING
OUR DUE DILIGENCE.
ANY JOURNALIST THAT REFUSES TO ADMIT
THAT HAS AN AGENDA.
HERE'S THE FIRST SECTION.
YOU ARE SEEING
THERE THAT THEY SPECIFICALLY IN THE BOLD AND ITALIAN SECTION DO
NOT WANT THIS TO BE EMAILED OR HANDED TO ANYONE BECAUSE THEY
DON'T WANTED TO GET OUT.
THAT APPARENTLY DID NOT ACTUALLY WORK
OUT FOR THEM UNFORTUNATELY BUT IT SHOWS THAT THE OBJECTIVE OF
THIS IS THAT PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES THAT SO FAR HAVE
STRUGGLED TO RESPOND TO TACTICS OF THE BLACK LIVES MATTER
MOVEMENT WHICH COULD MADE YOU THINK THAT THIS, LOOK, THEY FEEL
LIKE THEY HAD TO DEFEND THEMSELVES FROM THIS MOVEMENT
WHEN THESE ARE BASICALLY CAN STICK YOU CONSTITUENTS OF THE
DEMOCRATIC PARTY IN SOME CASES AND THEY SHOULDN'T HAVE THAT
DEFENSIVE ORIENTATION AND IT ALSO COULD BE SOMEWHAT REALISTIC
BECAUSE WE HAVE SEEN IN SOME CASES LIKE MARTIN O'MALLEY JUST
REALLY QUESTIONABLE RESPONSES TO BLM IN THE PAST.
LET'S BRING UP
THE SECOND SECTION.
HOW THEY DESCRIBE BLM.
A LOT OF PEOPLE
DON'T LIKE IT BEING CALLED A
RADICAL MOVEMENT AND ANTI- BLACK RACISM.
I THINK THAT'S FAIR.
I
DON'T THINK ONE ANYONE CALLING THEM RADICALS, THAT SAID, I HAVE
READ THEIR PLATFORM AND THEY WORD RADICAL IS USED IN MULTIPLE
PLACES.
STILL, IT DOESN'T MEAN THEY SHOULD BE USING THAT
LANGUAGE AND I THINK IT IS A FAIRLY ACCURATE REPRESENTATION
OF SOME OF THE CONCERNS OF THE MOVEMENT ALTHOUGH IT IS A
LIMITED LOOK ON WHAT IS ACTUALLY VERY BROAD SET OF POLICY
OBJECTIVES INVOLVING NOT JUST THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM BUT
ALSO ECONOMIC AND POLITICAL JUSTICE IN A NUMBER OF OTHER
ISSUES.
THIS IS A LIMITED LOOK AT IT.
THE THIRD SECTION IS
WHEN THEY GET IN A LOT OF TROUBLE.
IF APPROACHED BY A BLM
ACTIVIST, YOU SHOULD OFFER TO
MEET WITH LOCAL ACTIVISTS.
THE INVITED ATTENDEES SHOULD BE
LIMITED, DON'T GET SWARMED, PLEASE AIM FOR PERSONAL OR SMALL
GROUP MEETINGS.
LISTEN TO THEIR CONCERNS, DON'T OFFER SUPPORT
FOR CONCRETE POLICY POSITIONS.
THAT IS WHERE PEOPLE ARE A LITTLE BIT ANGRY.
DON'T OFFER SUPPORT.
MIXED FEELINGS ABOUT THIS.
1ST OFF, I DON'T THINK IT'S AS
BAD AS PEOPLE THINK IT IS GENERALLY PARTLY BECAUSE YES,
THEY HAVE TO PREPARE THEIR CONGRESSMEN WHO ARE OFTEN TIMES
LOCAL SMOKES WHO DON'T KNOW WHAT
THE HELL THEY ARE DOING.
UNLESS THEY GET A MEMO ON IT, THEY
DON'T KNOW WHAT IS GOING ON OR HOW TO REACT TO IT.
THAT IS
WHAT THEY SEND MEMOS LIKE THIS.
DON'T OVERSTATE THE BRILLIANCE
OF YOUR LOCAL CONGRESSMAN.
TRUST ME ON THAT.
SOME OF THEM
ARE GREAT AND SOME OF THEM ARE SO-SO.
THEY HAVE TO GET THIS
POSITION OUT THERE.
THE REASON THEY SAY DON'T OFFER SUPPORT FOR
CONCRETE POLICY POSITIONS IS BECAUSE THEY THINK THEN YOU WILL
BE ON THE RECORD FOR SUPPORTING THAT AND WE AS A PARTY MAYBE
HAVE NOT DISCUSSED THAT EVERYONE OF THOSE POLICY POSITIONS, DON'T
HAVE A STANCE ON IT, JUST BE A LITTLE CAREFUL.
LISTEN TO THEIR
CONCERNS.
THEY DO SAY THAT.
THAT IS GOOD.
KEEP THE GROUPS THAT YOUR MEETING WITH SMALL.
AGAIN, THAT IS NOT BAD ADVICE.
I MIGHT GIVE SIMILAR ADVICE.
IF YOU HAVE PEOPLE YOU MEET WITH
LATER, THAT IS GOING TO GET MORE CHAOTIC DIET IS GOING TO BE
HARDER TO HAVE A SUBSTANTIVE, REAL DISCUSSION WHERE YOU TALK
WITH THE LEADERS OF THE GROUPS
AND HAVE A SENSE OF WHAT THEY WANT HEAR THEIR CONCERNS.
I
JUST GAVE YOU THE BEST POSSIBLE SPIN ON IT AND I DON'T MEAN THAT
AS A SPIN ON THEIR SIDE.
LET'S TALK ABOUT THE DOWNSIDES OF IT.
I THINK FRAMING A MOMENT THAT IS NORMALLY ON YOUR SIDE OF THE
FENCE AS RADICAL IS TERRIBLE.
I DON'T CARE IF IT'S AS IN THEIR
OWN DOCUMENTS RADICAL THIS OR THAT.
THAT IS DIFFERENT, THAT
IS THE CONTEXT OF APPEALING TO GRASSROOTS SUPPORTERS.
THIS IS
IN THE CONTEXT OF POLITICAL DEBATE IN THE COUNTRY AND IF YOU
THINK YOUR OWN SITE IS RADICAL, IT'S NOT THE PRESENTLY DON'T
SUPPORT YOUR ONSIDE.
THEY MEET IN THE DOCUMENT THAT THEIR GOALS ARE RADICAL
BECAUSE THEY ARE ABOUT RESHAPING VERY BIG, LONG-STANDING
INSTITUTIONS IN THE ECONOMY AND POLITICS.
IF YOU SIMPLY CALL
THEM RADICAL, WE KNOW HOW THAT IS USED IN THE MEDIA.
THAT IS
USED TO MEAN I GUESS YOU COULD LISTEN TO THEM, BUT THEY DON'T
REPRESENT ANYTHING.
IS A VERY DIFFERENT USE OF THE SAME WORD.
ICED THINK NOT OFFERING SUPPORT FOR POLICY POSITIONS,
THE DOWNSIDE OF THAT OBVIOUSLY IS WE DON'T WANT TO HELP THESE
GUYS TOO MUCH.
TAKE IT EASY.
LET'S HEAR THINGS OUT, LET'S GET
COMMITTEES ON AND HOPEFULLY PEOPLE FORGET IN A COUPLE OF
YEARS.
THEY DON'T LIKE BEING PUT IN A POSITION WHERE THEY
HAVE TO DEFEND PROGRESSIVE
POSITIONS.
THAT IS NOT WHAT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY LIKES WHICH
REALLY GOES TO THE CORE OF THIS.
THE REASON I AM SAYING THAT I
UNDERSTAND THEIR POSITION IS
BECAUSE THERE IS A MISUNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE TWO
SIDES.
BLACK LIVES MATTER THINKS THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY IS
KIND OF ON THEIR SIDE, ALTHOUGH TO BE FAIR TO THEM, THEY DON'T
THINK THAT TOO MUCH.
THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY DOESN'T VIEW
BLACK LIVES MATTER IS ON THEIR SIDE.
THEY HAVE A TOTALLY
DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVE OF LOOKING AT THINGS.
BLACK LIFE MATTERS
ONCE CHANGED.
WE DESPERATELY WANT YOU TO CARE ABOUT OUR LIVES
AND CHANGE THE POLICY POSITIONS THAT POLICE DO THROUGHOUT THE
COUNTRY BECAUSE OTHERWISE MY COUSIN MICAH KILLED, MY BROTHER
OR MY SON MIGHT GET KILLED
TOMORROW.
I HAVE TO GO.
THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY THINKS LOOK,
LET'S DO WHAT'S IMPORTANT AND BEST OF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY AND
GET ELECTED, SO WE NEED THESE GUYS VOTES, BUT I DON'T WANT TO
LOSE ANY INDEPENDENT VOTES OR BE
SEEN AS WITH THE RADICALS, SO TO THEM, THE DEMOCRATS LOOK AT
THIS MEMO AND SAY WHY ARE WE IN TROUBLE?
I DON'T GET IT.
OF COURSE THIS IS WHAT WE SHOULD DO.
SOME ACTIVISTS WILL LOOK AT IT AND SAVE COURSE YOU ARE IN
TROUBLE, LOOK AT THE THINGS YOU ARE SAYING.
THE ANSWER IS, YES THAT IS YOUR TWO PERSPECTIVES.
I LOOK AT THIS AND I THINK THE REASON IT IS INTERESTING AND
WORTH US BREAKING DOWN IS IT DOES GIVE YOU A LITTLE WINDOW
INTO THE REALLY SCARED
PHILOSOPHY THAT DRIVES THESE INCREDIBLE ESTABLISHMENT TYPES.
THE IDEA OF DON'T GO OUT THERE AND LEAD OR BE SPECIFIC OR TRY
TO FIRE PEOPLE UP, DON'T AGREE WITH THEM JUST LEAD FROM BEHIND,
PACKED THEM ON THE HEAD AND SAY MAYBE OVER TIME THERE WILL BE
SOME CHANGES, IT IS A VERY LEADING FROM BEHIND, GRADUALIST,
FAIRLY PATHETIC WAY TO APPROACH POLITICS IN THE VERY LEGITIMATE
CONCERNS OF PEOPLE WHO FEEL LIKE FOR HUNDREDS OF YEARS THEY HAVE
BEEN ABUSED BY THEIR COUNTRY AND MOST OF THE POLITICIANS.
THAT
IS WHAT IT IS.
BUT IT ALSO JOIN PERRY AT THE D TRIPLE C. IT IS
NOT HILLARY CLINTON OR DEBORAH WASSERMAN SCHULTZ.
IT'S NOT
EVEN THE DNC.
THEY ARE RELATED ORGANIZATIONS BUT NOT THE SAME.
WE CAN'T DRAW TOO MUCH FROM THIS.
IT'S SOMETHING THAT I
LOOKED UP AND I WAS ABLE TO FIND ONE REFERENCE ON SOME EMPLOYMENT
WEBSITE THAT HE EVEN WORKED AT THE D TRIPLE C. THIS IS NO JOE
BIDEN WRITING THIS MEMO THAT THIS ISN'T LIKE WE ARE GOING TO
DISTILL ALL OF THE PHILOSOPHY
AND WE HAVE DISCOVERED IT NOW.
WE CAN ATTACK IT FOR WHAT APP ACTUALLY REPRESENTS WHICH IS
ACTUALLY PATHETIC AND COWARDLY WITHOUT TRYING TO MAKE IT OUT
TO MORE THAN IT ACTUALLY IS.
MAYBE IT'S MORE AN INDICATION OF WHAT THE ESTABLISHMENT OF
WASHINGTON DC IS IN A POLICY LIKE THIS THAT WE WAS TALK ABOUT
WE PUT THE SAME STORY ANOTHER TERMS.
CAN YOU IMAGINE A MEMO
COMING OUT TALKING ABOUT WHAT THE TEACHABLE C SHOULD BE PREP
FOR BECAUSE THEY ARE TOO STUPID.
SAY IT IS AN IMMIGRATION ISSUE
SO YOU TELL THEM WE WORRY ABOUT WHAT YOU ARE GOING THROUGH BUT
AT THE SAME TIME DON'T GIVE THEM ANY POSITIVE POSITIONS.
THAT IS
WHAT DONALD TRUMP HAS BEEN DOING.
HE HAS RADICAL POLICY
POSITIONS BUT WHEN HE HAS TO ANSWER IT TO HE SAYS THAT HE
DIDN'T MEAN IT THAT YOU ARE
AFRAID YOU HAVE TO ANSWER BACK TO CONSTITUENTS.
HE CAN HAVE A
POLICY THAT HAS ANYTHING TO DO WITH ANYTHING POSITIVE FOR
IMMIGRANTS.
ALL THIS DOES IS CONTINUE TO ALLOW PEOPLE TO SAY
THAT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY IS JUST USING BLACK PEOPLE.
THE
WAY TO STOP GETTING THE ARGUMENT, TO GET PROGRESS, IS TO
STOP USING BLACK PEOPLE.
IT'S
PRETTY SIMPLE TO OUTSIDE OF GIVING LIP SERVICE THIS IS A
MEMO THAT SAYS GIVE LIP SERVICE, WERE REALLY GOOD AT IT.
MAYBE
DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT THAT WE TALK ABOUT THE TRANSFORMATION OF
OBAMA AND CLINTON ON GAY-RIGHTS DIET DIDN'T COME AROUND AND SELL
IT WASN'T BURDENSOME ANYMORE FOR
THEM TO HAVE POLICY AGAINST GAY-RIGHTS.
START FROM THE
BOTTOM UP BUT THE PROBLEM WITH THE BOTTOM UP IS THE LEAST
AMOUNT OF POWER.
NO ONE CARES ABOUT BLACK FOLKS UNTIL SOMEONE
ACTUALLY DOES, THEN WE WILL DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT POLICY WISE.
WE WILL SAY WE CARE ABOUT AND NOT DO ANYTHING UNTIL SOMEONE
ELSE HAS ENOUGH COURAGE AND BACKBONE TO BACK UP A SIMPLE
THING LIKE YOU WILL RIGHTS.
CONSIDERING EVERYONE IS A HUMAN
AND EVERYONE HAS A RIGHT TO LIVE.
THOSE LITTLE THINGS ARE
THINGS THAT NEED TO SOMEHOW GET ENERGIZED IN THE DEMOCRATIC
PARTY TO UNDERSTAND THAT YOU
NEED THAT 1ST.
PEOPLE LIKE BLACK LIVES MATTER START THAT AND THEY ADDRESS
THEM DIRECTLY IS A FUNKY.
THIS IS REALLY IMPORTANT AND JR GOT TO THE HEART OF IT.
WHEN
DEMOCRATS SAY LISTEN GUYS YOU HAVE TO MAKE SURE WE GET
ELECTED.
IF WE DON'T GET ELECTED NOTHING HAPPENS.
THAT
IS THE END-ALL BE-ALL.
REMEMBER, ME, ME, ME.
I HAVE
THE POWER.
GIVE IT TO ME.
THAT WILL BE IT.
THAT IS YOUR MAGIC
SOLUTION.
OH, THAT IS YOUR MAGIC SOLUTION?
NO WAY.
POLITICIANS ARE MOST ALWAYS LEAD FROM BEHIND.
THIS IS NOT
ENDEMIC ONLY TO THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY OR JUST THIS MOMENT OF
TIME IN POLITICS.
LUTHER KING HAD TO PUSH LBJ.
EVERYBODY HAD
TO GET PUSHED AND YOU DON'T KNOW
THE LABOR MOVEMENT THAT FORCED FDR AND I'M GIVING YOU GREAT
EXAMPLES.
FDR IS AS GOOD AS YOU
CAN HOPE AND HE WAS PUSHED.
WHEN THE DEMOCRATS TELL YOU TO
LEAVE THEM ALONE AND UNDERSTAND THAT THE BEST WAY YOU CAN GET
PROGRESS IS TO JUST BLINDLY VOTE FOR THEM, UNDERSTAND THAT THAT
IS A COORDINATED LIE.
THAT IS A
LIE FOR THEIR BENEFIT.
THAT DOESN'T MEAN YOU SHOULDN'T VOTE
FOR THEM.
THOSE ARE TWO DIFFERENT THINGS.
YES, A
DEMOCRAT MIGHT BE A MONTH MUCH BETTER FOR A CAUSE AND A
REPUBLICAN BUT THEN, YOU HAVE TO PUSH THEM.
THERE MEMO.
IF YOU
DON'T PUSH THEM, THEY ARE NOT GOING TO MOVE.
ALL THEY CARE
ABOUT IS GETTING REELECTED.
IT IS NOT LIKE THEY ARE, AND THERE
ARE A COUPLE GUYS THAT ROLL UP THEIR SLEEVES AND SAY HOW DO WE
FIX THOSE PROBLEMS, BUT THE OTHER 90% OF POLITICIANS, 95, 98
WHATEVER PERCENTAGE YOU WANT TO GIVE HER SITTING THERE GOING OH,
I GOT ELECTED.
I'M DONE.
NO, YOU HAVE TO MAKE SURE THAT YOU
ARE UP IN THEIR BUSINESS AND
MAKE SURE THAT THEY REALIZE THAT THEY ARE NOT DONE.
THE POINT OF
THEM GET ELECTED IS NOT THEM GETTING ELECTED IT IS TO
ACTUALLY DO THINGS THAT WHEN THEY TELL YOU TO BE QUIET AND
SIT DOWN, NEVER SIT DOWN.