ROGUE ARCHIVIST.
HE LIKES TO TAKE THE LAW AS IT IS WRITTEN IN
VARIOUS STATES, AND POST THEM ON HIS WEBSITE.
TURNS OUT THAT SOME
STATES ARE NOT HAPPY ABOUT THIS.
HE IS FACING A LAWSUIT FROM THE
STATE OF GEORGIA, BECAUSE HE TOOK THE STATES LEGAL CODE AND
POSTED IT ON HIS WEBSITE.
THEY ARE SUING HIM FOR COPYRIGHT
INFRINGEMENT, AND POSSIBLE TERRORISM.
ALL COME ON MAN, JESUS.
THEY ARE CONSIDERING HIM A PIRACY OFFENDER, AND ALSO A
FORM OF TERRORISM.
I DON'T KNOW IF THEY KNOW THAT PIRACY IN THIS CONTEXT
DOESN'T MEAN AN ACTUAL PIRATE.
AND THEIR RIDICULOUS.
YOU MIGHT WANT TO TAKE THAT TERRORISM CHARGE DOWN A
LITTLE BIT.
LET ME EXPLAIN TO YOU WHAT HE DID.
KEEP IN MIND, THE LEGAL CODE IS NOT SOMETHING THAT BELONGS
TO SOME INTELLECTUAL AUTHOR OUT THERE WHO CREATED SOMETHING
THAT HE IS PROFITING FROM, IT IS SOMETHING ALONG TO THE TAXPAYER.
IT IS THE LEGAL CODE, IT IS INFORMATION THAT YOU SHOULD
ALREADY KNOW OR HAVE EASY ACCESS TO.
IT'S OUR LAWS, THE LAW THAT WE HAVE TO ABIDE BY.
VISIBLE
SECURITY,?
I KNOW THERE'S A NEW WANTS TO THIS STORY, BUT IT
REMINDS ME OF THAT OLD STORY WITH THE CHURCH WILL LET
YOU PLACE THE BIBLE.
THAT WAS A GRAVE SIN.
GOD.
ANYBODY FIND OUT WHAT'S IN THERE, RIGHT?
SO NOW, IF THE PARTY AND FIND OUT WHAT THE LAW, YOU'RE A
TERRORIST FOR LETTING THEM KNOW.
LET'S DO THAT NEW ONES.
THE NUANCE IS THAT HIS OFFENSE, THE LAWSUIT ASSERTS, IS
THE INCLUSION – INCLUSION IN HIS DOWNLOADED THE ANNOTATION
ATTACHED TO THOSE TEXTS.
THESE INCLUDE SYNOPSIS OF CASES,
INTERPRET THE LAW, SUMMARIES OF OPINIONS OF THE AUTHOR – OF THE
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF GEORGIA AND OTHER SUMMARIES.
EACH IS AN
ORIGINAL AND CREATIVE WORK.
THE STATE OF GEORGIA MEANS THE
PEOPLE, RIGHT?
IF IT BELONGS TO THE PEOPLE IT IS NOT PROTECTED
UNDER COPYRIGHT LAWS.
THE STATE
OF OREGON TRIED TO SUE HIM IN A DIFFERENT WAY, BUT THEY DECIDED
TO DROP THE CHARGES BECAUSE THEY REALIZE IT WAS STUPID.
JORDAN IS
NOT REALIZE HOW STUPID IT IS, SO THEY'RE GOING TO CONTINUE.
THE
ANNOTATIONS, THE ANNOTATED VERSION OF THE LEGAL CODE IS NOT
AVAILABLE FOR FREE.
IF YOU WANT TO HAVE ACCESS TO IT YOU
ACTUALLY HAVE TO SPEND A
CONSIDERABLE AMOUNT OF MONEY.
WHAT PHOTOGRAPHIC EVER TWENTY.
THE ANNOTATED LEGAL CODE IS CURRENTLY AVAILABLE FOR BEER AND
SEVENTY DOLLARS TO LEGAL PUBLISHER LEXIS-NEXIS, OR THREE
COMPETENT SERIES OF STEPS THROUGH THE GEORGIA STATE
WEBSITE.
THEY ARE WILLING TO TAKE ON THE COST OF DISTRIBUTING
IT TO PEOPLE WHO WANT IT, BUT BY TAKING ON THE COSTS THEY
BASICALLY MEAN THAT THEY ARE GOING TO TRANSFER THE COST
ON TO YOU AS A CITIZEN.
TO NOT DOING THAT OF THE GOODNESS OF THEIR HEART.
AND RIGHT NOW THE STATE OF GEORGIA IS ARGUING THAT THE
ANNOTATIONS ARE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, BUT THEY'RE NOT
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY.
IT IS INFORMATION THAT BELONGS TO THE PEOPLE IN THE STATE.
WEST BANK IS DOWN AND UNDERSTAND WHAT IS ACTUALLY
HAPPENING.
THERE IS A CORPORATION OUT THERE MAKING A
BUCK OFF OF THIS, AND THIS GUY IS A RATING ON THEIR PREY BY
PUTTING IT OUT THERE FOR FREE.
APPARENTLY FROM THE ARTICLE YOU
CAN GET A MAJORITY WEBSITE.
HE GOT IT FROM THE WEBSITE OF THE
STATE OF GEORGIA.
THAT'S IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN, RIGHT – NO,
SUMMARY WAS MAKING A DOLLAR OUT OF THAT.
WHO IS THE GOVERNMENT
OF GEORGIA REPORT?
IT DOESN'T WORK FOR THE CITIZENS, IT WORKS
FOR THE CORPORATIONS.
SO THEY ARE GOING TO GO AFTER THIS GUY AND CHARGED HIM
WITH EVERYTHING THEY CAN THINK OF, INCLUDING TERRORISM.
IT'S CRAZY.
I DON'T BEGRUDGE THEM THEIR SERVICE, THEY PROVIDE A SERVICE.
AND WHEN I WAS A LAWYER I USED TO LEXIS-NEXIS, IT IS A
PERFECTLY FINE COMPANY.
YOU PAY FOR IT AND YOU GET THAT SERVICE.
BUT WE DO NOT HAVE ANY OBLIGATION TO PROTECT THE
CORPORATION AS THE CITIZENS OF THIS COUNTRY.
IF IT TURNS OUT SUMMARY ELSE WANTS TO THAT EFFECT IN
SERVICE FOR FREE, THEY ARE ALLOWED TO.
YEAH, EXACTLY.
BUT NO, THE BIGGEST CRIME IN AMERICA IS MESS WITH A
COMPANY, AND YOU ARE IN A WORLD
OF HURT.
THIS IS INSANE.
BY THE WAY, REALLY?
WE AS CITIZENS HAVE TO PAY HUNDREDS OF DOLLARS TO GET
ACCESS TO ANNOTATED VERSIONS OF THE LEGAL CODE?
THAT'S CRAZY.
THE ANNOTATIONS EXIST BECAUSE IT GIVES YOU THE REASONING AND
THE INFORMATION TO MAKE SENSE OF THE LEGAL CODE.
WITHOUT THE ANNOTATIONS IT IS REALLY DIFFICULT TO UNDERSTAND.
WE'RE SUPPOSED TO GET THE LAW, BUT NOT REALLY UNDERSTAND A
LOT.
AND IF YOU GET CHARGED WITH A CRIME THEY WILL SAY IGNORANCE
OF THE LAW IS NO EXCUSE.
YOU INVISIBLY GUIDED WAS TRYING TO
TAKE AWAY THAT IGNORANCE AND LET ME KNOW WHAT THE LAW IS AND WHAT
IT STANDS FOR.
IT REMINDS ME A LITTLE BIT OF THE ERRANDS WITH
GAYS, AND THE GOVERNMENT WENT
AFTER HIM AT ALL THAT THEY HAD, AND HE ENDED UP COMMITTING
SUICIDE.
HE WAS DOING ESSENTIALLY A SIMILAR THING BUT
DOING IT MORE EFFICIENTLY.
TOO MANY TIMES AMERICA, THIS IS
LEADING A POLICE OFFICER AND
DISRESPECTING A CORPORATION.
NOW YOUR HEAD DOWN TO AUTHORITY,
OTHERWISE THE STATE WILL
LITERALLY CALL YOU A TERRORIST.
ISN'T THAT AMAZING?
IT SHOWS YOU HOW MUCH WE HAVE PERVERTED THE WORD TERRORIST.
IT IS A TERRIBLE WAY WITH A TERRIBLE DENOTATION, BUT AT
THE SAME TIME IT IS NOW BEING UTILIZED FOR EVERYTHING.
YOU DO SOMETHING THAT GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS DON'T AGREE WITH,
YOU ARE NOW A TERRORIST.
IT CAN BE AS SIMPLE AS GIVING PEOPLE INFORMATION.
ALL THIS GUY IS DOING IS GETTING PEOPLE INFORMATION ON HIS
WEBSITE.
TERRORIST USED TO MEAN KILLING CIVILIANS.
NOW IT IS
EVERYTHING THAT IS A THREAT TO THE ESTABLISHMENT.
NOW WE
DISCOVER THAT’S A TERRORIST.
RIGHT, WRONG, ATTACKS CIVILIANS,
DOESN'T, ENDANGERS PEOPLE'S LIVES, DOESN'T… NO, YOU ARE
ENDANGERING SOMETHING FAR MORE IMPORTANT: THE ESTABLISHMENT.
SO, NOW, IRONICALLY, IF YOU ARE HELPING CIVILIANS FIND OUT THE
LAWS, THEY USE THOSE LAWS AGAINST YOU AND CALL YOU A
TERRORIST.
YOU ARE TELLING ME THAT OUR SYSTEM IS NOT CORRUPT?
THIS IS DEEPLY, PREPOSTEROUSLY
CORRUPT.