(jazzy piano music)
- [Beth] Describing something can seem very straightforward
but in fact describing a work of art can take time,
and should take time,
because the more you describe something
the more you understand what you see
and the closer you'll get to interpreting what you see.
So this is why describing is one of those first skills
that art historians learn.
- [Steven] And really anybody who goes to the museum
should have conversations about what they see.
And the associations that it brings to mind
in addition to pure description.
- [Beth] And so here's what we're not gonna do.
We're not gonna talk about when the sculpture was made,
we're not gonna talk about the historical context,
we're not gonna talk about the artist's biography.
We're only going to describe what we see.
- [Steven] I see a human body and it's large.
One that's abstracted,
that's not a careful rendering of human anatomy.
- [Beth] I see what look like arms and legs
and a reclining figure.
- [Steven] There's no question
that we immediately recognize
the legs,
the knees,
the torso,
the elbows,
the neck.
But the more that we look
at those individual parts of the body,
the more that we see the choices that the artist has made,
the more that we recognize
that this is not an actual elbow,
that's not really a neck,
that's not really a head.
But we still see it that way.
- [Beth] And most obviously,
what makes this not really a body
is the giant cavity.
That giant open space where we expect to see a torso.
- [Steven] But before we begin to describe
the individual elements of the sculpture
I think it's also important to make a few observations
about the material and the surface.
The sculpture is a dirty white,
and it's so smooth that it invites us to touch it,
even though the museum would rather we didn't.
- [Beth] Well it does have these lovely curvilinear forms
that feel like they would be very pleasurable to touch.
But there's also a way in which that dirty ivory color
feels like bone, feels organic.
- [Steven] And that's complicated
because bones are on the inside
but what we're seeing is the outside.
Or is this a fossil?
Has the flesh been removed?
Except that the figure seems animated.
It seems as if it's still intact.
- [Beth] As we look closer
we see forms that seem to be missing.
Hands, or at least the fingers.
Feet and parts of the body also seem to be duplicated.
What read to me as breasts
occur in two places in this sculpture.
What read to me as hips
occurs in two places in this sculpture.
- [Steven] So we can't be too literal at any point.
You said a moment ago that there are no fingers.
But there's a reference to fingers,
that is the fingers have been abstracted.
If you look at the figure's left hand,
it seems to be a fist with its fingers curled in,
described by an oval of string
that's embedded in the surface.
- [Beth] Nevertheless the artist has decided
not to give us individual fingers.
He's decided not to give us an ankle and a foot
with toes and an arch in it.
- [Steven] But that is still a foot
because of the angle at which the leg ends.
I get the sense of a heel, of toes.
And I get the sense of where the ankle would be.
It's as if the artist is inviting me
to fill in what he's left out.
- [Beth] In a way the negative space,
the space between the forms
feels just as substantial as the forms themselves.
That space where the torso should be,
which is empty.
The way that what reads as the spine or the upper back
is uplifted as the form seems to
support itself on its elbows.
That lovely negative space that gives us a sense
of lifting up of the upper body.
- [Steven] And because of that lifting up,
not only are the elbows and the forearms
but also on this other indeterminate limbs,
I get the sense that this is not only human.
It's a different kind of creature,
almost an insect that could move forward
on all fours or perhaps all sixes.
- [Beth] There's also a tension
between the soft organic rounded forms
and these straight lines
that seem to draw our attention to
a breast,
an elbow,
a shoulder.
- [Steven] A contour.
This is drawing on form.
Granted when I look at this sculpture,
I can't help but think of the human body,
but I also have a sense that I'm looking at a landscape.
That the knees are distant mountains,
that somehow this is a unity
of human form and the earth itself.
- [Beth] It's so funny that you say that
because when I see this sculpture
I immediately imagine a figure on a beach.
So I didn't just imagine a reclining figure,
I imagined the natural location of this figure, outside.
- [Steven] Sunbaked.
- [Beth] In fact, lifting up to catch the rays of the sun.
- [Steven] The almost cushion-like form
in the center of the sculpture,
that can be read simultaneously
as a chest,
as breasts,
perhaps as a torso,
as an indeterminate form,
creates for me a feeling.
It is the feeling that I have when I arch my back.
When I look at this sculpture,
I feel that pulling in my body.
And so the artist has used the simplest of tools.
He's used form itself,
he's used the line that he's constructed with string.
And he's able to create in me
an association and a physical memory.
- [Beth] Some views of the sculpture
feel very recumbent and languorous
where others have a sense of tension.
If we look at what reads as the head,
we see two circular forms
with an indentation in the center that read as an eye.
And that open mouth that seems to be yearning
and even almost crying.
- [Steven] So we've spent only a few minutes
looking at the sculpture
but we've developed a whole set of associations.
We've matched words with what we're seeing.
And those words have created the foundation
for our own personal interpretation.
And I find that if I spend time describing,
if I spend time looking closely,
even a work of art,
that at first seem difficult and confusing,
that perhaps I didn't like at first glance,
this changes
and an appreciation for what the artist achieved
begins to develop.
(jazzy piano music)