Marjorie Greene has decided to mix up her busy schedule of trying to impeach
Joe Biden every day by, trying to impeach someone else.
In this case, Merrick Garland, she's putting forward articles of impeachment
against the Attorney General because of the raid against Donald trump.
And we can bring up this tweet, you'll see it's several pages long.
It's all available on twitter now if you want to see it.
It includes things like because he's doing persecution against Trump's,
that's silencing millions of voters or something.
That's fine, not particularly interesting.
What I do find interesting is that, she says in part,
it's over the AG's quote efforts to unseal the search warrant for
the home of former President Donald J Trump.
It constitutes an attempt to intimidate, harass and
potentially disqualify a political challenger to president Biden.
So because he yesterday announced that they wanted to unseal that warrant,
he obviously has to be impeached.
And it says in the articles of impeachment,
he will never be able to hold another office in the United States again.
Which I find fascinating.
Because immediately following Merrick Garland putting out that statement
yesterday, Donald trump said, he wants to unseal the documents.
>> Mm hm.
>> So it sounds like, he should be barned from holding any office according to
Marjorie Greene's twisted logic.
They were all saying they want it unsealed and she thinks he should be impeached for
trying to do it.
>> Logic not required.
>> No.
>> Okay So, I mean every part of this.
So there are no documents.
Okay there are documents.
The FBI planted them.
Okay fine, the FBI didn't plant them.
They were secretly declassified.
Okay, well they're not nuclear, Trump admitted they were nuclear and said, yeah,
Obama did it too.
Yeah then Garland, he needs to be impeached for
telling us about what was in there, Trump told us what was in there.
>> [LAUGH].
>> And then he leaked it,
appears he leaked at the Breitbart before it even came out.
And why did trump tell us, he tried desperately to hide the warrant the entire
time, but he knew that it was going to come out today.
So he's going yeah, it's no big deal here it is.
Yeah whatever.
>> Mm hm.
>> Okay and then, Marjorie Taylor Greene today probably will come back and go,
no I didn't mean that Garland should be impeached,
because then Trump should be impeached.
But that's, well actually we don't need logic.
She should still be impeached.
>> Right.
>> For releasing and not releasing it.
>> So does she agree that it is wrong to try and use your presidential
executive leverage, in order to dig up dirt on a political candidate.
I mean if we're going with her logic that that's what's happening 2 and
a half years before another election, sure that yeah,
that's what Biden is doing to prevent Trump from running.
So then what Trump did with Zaleski in Ukraine.
All good.
No it doesn't matter, and of course it's never going to matter.
And that's the scary thing about someone who's like yeah, I have no soft spot for
the FBI been criticizing them.
I mean, probably have quite a file from the FBI on a little,
like anti war Francesca marching in the streets alongside,
I don't know, grandmas and such.
But that's what's so creepy about this whole thing is that,
they're just projecting what they want to do when they get back into power.
>> Mm hm. >> They're projecting, they think and
they're going to spin this as a political maneuver,
not as a matter of national security.
It's always been about Trump, right?
It's always been, hey, this is pretty bad for our country.
They're gonna spend that, and as soon as they get back in the office.
Yeah, yeah, they're going to hollow out the FBI and replace it with loyalists.
They're gonna defund it, or get rid of it.
No, it's just gonna become even more militant and crazy, and
going after progressives and leftists.
And the same thing with, DOD and everything.
I mean, their lesson from the Trump years, is we didn't have enough loyalists.
There weren't enough Giuliani's and Sidney Powell's.
Imagine.
>> Yeah.
>> Yeah that idea originally of coming, hollowing out the government and
firing all these people, it's called rage.
It's a scare from us.
Hilarious.
A right wing philosopher named Curtis Arwin.
And he believes that there should be a dictator in charge of America because
things will be more efficient that way.
And in order to help effectuate that,
you should fire all these government officials, especially at the FBI, etc.
Tucker Carlson and Steve Bannon have raved about him, Blake Masters, Peter Deal, etc.
And Steve Bannon obviously, has advocated for that on his program.
So what the right wing is saying is, you're trying to uphold the law, okay,
we're gonna strike back by completely destroying the rule of law.
>> Mm hm. >> We're gonna destroy all law
enforcement, that's fair and just.
Or at least has some semblance of fairness and justice.
And we're gonna replace it with our brown shirts.
So we're gonna have the dictator we want.
They openly say that they're advocates of that so called right wing intellectual.
And he openly argues for dictatorship.
And of course that white people are, scientifically smarter than black people.
>> Mm hm.
>> And they're saying it, we like this guy, we want to do the thing that he
advocated for, and we're gonna do it, and we're gonna destroy your democracy.
If you let us back in charge, wake up and smell the fascism that's at our doorstep.
>> Yeah. >> Smells terrible.