INVALUE DADE VOTER
REGISTRATION BASED ON
INFORMATION.
>> THANK YOU SO MUCH, STIMULUS
SHOWDOWN SENATE MAJORITY WITH
LEADER MITCH MCCONNELL
BLOCKING A STAND-ALONE VOTE TO
INCREASE DIRECT PAYMENTS FROM
600 DOLLARS TO AMERICANS, TO
2000 DOLLARS, YESTERDAY, HOUR
HE DID LEAVE OPEN THE DOOR FOR
A VOTE LATER ON, BEFORE A BILL
THAT TIES OTHER ITEMS ON THE
PRESIDENT AGENDA INCLUDING
REPEALING CONTROVERSIAL
SECTION 230 LIABILITY
PROTECTION FOR BIG TECHNOLOGY
COMPANIES A COMMISSION ON
ELECTION SECURITY JOINING ME NOW, BRAD WENSTRUP,
NOW, BRAD WENSTRUP,
SUBSTANTIVE AS IT AND COURTNEY
DOMINGUEZ.
>> REACTION.
>> WHEN ISSUE THE SENATE I
ASSUME THAT IS WHAT YOU ARE
TALKING ABOUT.
DAGEN: YES, SIR, THAT IS IT.
>> YEAH, SO I THINK, THAT
MCCONNELL TRYING TO DO WHAT
PRESIDENT WOULD LIKE HIM TO DO
ADDRESS THESE ISSUES, 2,000
DOLLARS IS SOMEWHAT
CONTROVERSIAL 00 AS YOU SAID
ALREADY STARTING TO GO OUT THE
DOOR, THERE WAS A LOT MORE IN
THIS RELIEF PACKAGE THAN JUST
THAT MONEY.
YOU KNOW THERE WAS CONTROVERSY
DISCUSSION ABOUT FOREIGN AID
OBVIOUSLY, THE PRESIDENT
BROUGHT THAT UP ALL THOSE
THINGS HAVE BEEN NEGOTIATED
USUALLY NOT ASSOCIATED WITH
STIMULUS BILL, BUILT THIS
STARTED GETTING THROWN
TOGETHER I THINK IF YOU WANT
TO DO 2,000, YOU START LOOKING
AT HOW WE ARE GOING TO PAY FOR
IT, BECAUSE GOING BACK TO
PHASE TWO PHASE THREE PEOPLE
SAID WHAT NEXT PEOPLE SAID I
WANT TO MAKE SURE WE START
TALKING ABOUT HOW WE ARE GOING
TO PAY FOR SOME OF THESE
THINGS I THINK LOGICAL THING
TO DO PAIB WE COULD LOOK AT
FOREIGN AID, MAKE REDUCTIONS
THERE, HELP THE AMERICAN
PEOPLE WILL.
>> DID YOU VOTE AGAINST 2000
DOLLAR CHECK .
>> I DID.
I DID.
DAGEN: WHY.
>> FOR THAT REASON, BECAUSE WE
REALLY WEREN’T ADDRESSING HOW
WE ARE GOING TO PAY FOR THIS,
AND WHERE IS IT ACTUALLY
GOING, YOU KNOW THE REAL KEY
TO GETTING US BACK ON TRACK IS
TO HAVE OUR ECONOMY OPEN,
WE’VE GOT A VACCINE RIGHT NOW,
PEOPLE SHOULD BE ABLE TO START
LINING UP TO GET THAT.
AND I THINK THAT IS GOING TO
MAKE A HUGE DIFFERENCE FOR US
OBVIOUSLY, AND IN THAT VEIN I
WANT TO EXPRESS CONDOLENCES TO
THE YOUNG CONGRESSMAN-ELECT
AND HIS FAMILY, SUCCUMBING TO
COVID 1.
DAGEN: A MEDIA PRAYERS
BLESSINGS TO HIS PARTY HARD
SWITCH BUT SENATE TODAY VOTING
ON WHETHER OR NOT TO OVERRIDE
THE PRESIDENT’S VETO ON
DEFENSE BILL WAS HANDED ORDER
OF BY THE HOUSE EARLIER THIS
WEEK, THE PRESIDENT VETOED THE
BILL LAST KWLOOEK WEEK DID NOT
REAL CONTROVERSIAL SECTION,
230 ACT SHIELDS BIG TECHNOLOGY
COMPANIES FROM LIABILITIES
RELATED USER POSTED CONTENT
SOMETHING I HAVE BEEN TALKING
ABOUT LITERALLY FOR YEARS.
HOW DO YOU EXAMINE THE SENATE
TO VOTE TODAY AGAIN, SENATOR
BERNIE SANDERS, AMONG A FEW,
THREATENING TO HOLD THAT, UP,
IN ORDER TO GET 2000 DOLLAR
CHECKS INSTEAD OF 600 DOLLAR
CHECKS.
>> YOU KNOW THAT IS HOW SENATE
WORKS SOMETIMES.
I THINK IT IS IMPORTANT THAT
WE ADDRESS SECTION 230 AS YOU
HAVE BEEN TALKING ABOUT, YOU
KNOW, WHAT IS SUPPOSED TO BE
IN PLATFORMS JUST OPEN
CHALKBOARD TO VOTE THINGS
UNFORTUNATELY, A PROPAGANDA
TOOL FOR SOME, NEEDS TO BE
ADDRESSED, WHEN IT COMES TO
OUR DEFENSE, YOU KNOW, IT IS
FIRST CONSTITUTIONAL DUTY IS
TO PROVIDE FOR THE DEFENSE OF
OUR COUNTRY.
AND THIS IS A BILL THAT IS
DONE THE RIGHT WAY IF A
BIPARTISAN FASHION HUNDREDS OF
AMENDMENTS VOTED UP AND DOWN
AND WE GO THROUGH A PROCESS,
AND WE PUT A BILL OUT THERE,
AND GET IT ON THE PRESIDENT’S
DESK, AND I VOTED TO OVERRIDE
THE VETO I THINK IT IS TOO
HUGELY IMPORTANT, FOR US TO
WAIT ANY LONGER, WE NEED TO
GET THIS SETTLED, BUT, AT THE
SAME TIME, DO I AGREE WITH THE
PRESIDENT ONE HUNDRED PERCENT
ON ADDRESSING SECTION 230.
>> STEVE JUMP IN HERE.
STEVE: I SIT ON INTELLIGENCE
CAN HE I AM WONDERING WHAT
VIBES ABOUT CHINA’S
INTERSECTIONS TOWARDS TAIWAN
ESPECIALLY WITH NEW
ADMINISTRATION COMING IN COULD
BE RATHER OMINOUS,WHAT SHOULD
THE U.S. POLICY BE ON TAIWAN?
>> WELL I THINK, PERSONALLY I
FEEL WE NEED TO GOTTEN TO
PROTECT TAIWAN IN ANY WAY THAT
WE CAN, AND MAINTAIN OUR
RELATIONSHIP WITH THEM, DO I
HAVE CONCERNS THAT CHINA’S
ACTIONS IF THEY SEE ANY TYPE
OF WEAKNESS FROM UNITED STATES
ON THAT I THINK THEY WILL MAKE
A MOVE JUST AS THEY DID WITH
HONG KONG I MEAN THAT WAS NOTE
SUPPOSED TO HAPPEN THE WAY IT
HAPPENED.
THEY ARE ON A ROLL IF YOU WILL
THEY ARE TRYING TO DOMINATE
THE REGION, AND TO HAVE GLOBAL
DOMINANCE THEY WILL DO IT ANY
WAY THEY CAN THEY FEEL TAIWAN
IS THEIRS, SO I THINK THAT IS
A CONCERN, THAT I HAVE, I’VE
HAD CONCERNS ABOUT CHINA’S
AGGRESSIVENESS FOR SOMETIME,
OTHER MEMBERS ON THE COMMITTEE
WERE LOOKING IN ANOTHER
DIRECTION, BUT CHINA IS OUR
NUMBER ONE CONCERN AMONGST
MANY CONCERNS.
DAGEN: SPEAKING OF
INTELLIGENCE COMMITTEE STAY ON
TOP OF THAT GROWING NUMBER OF
HOUSE REPUBLICANS CALLING FOR
REMOVAL OF CALIFORNIA
CONGRESSMAN ERIC SWALWELL FROM
INTEL COMMITTEE IN THE HOUSE
SWALWELL’S CONNECTIONS TO
CHINESE
CHINESES EXPOSED SHOULD
SWALWELL REMAIN ON COMMITTEES
HAVE YOU GOTTEN A CLEAR ANSWER
FROM NANCY PELOSI WHEN THEY
FOUND OUT, BECAUSE, EVERY
BRIEFED ABOUT THIS FIVE YEARS
AGO WHENEVER IT HAPPENED.
>> NO, I WAS NOT A MAJOR
CONCERN, BECAUSE YOU THIS THAT
I SOMETHING LIKE THIS TOOK
PLACE, IF MR. SWALWELL IS
INNOCENT IN EVERY REGARD WE
WOULD BE WARNED THIS TYPE OF
ACTIVITY IS TAKING PLACE WE
SHOULD BE ON GUARD FOR CHINESE
ACTIVITY, WE GET SOME OF THAT
INFORMATION, AS MEMBERS OF THE
MILITARY WE UNDERSTAND, THAT
THESE TYPES OF THINGS TAKE
PLACE.
BUT WE DIDN’T GET ANY OF THAT
INFORMATION I WANT TO KNOW
WHAT DID NANCY PELOSI NO AND
WHAT WHAT DID ADAM SCHIFF KNOW
AND WHAT WHAT DID ERIC
SWALWELL KNOW AND WHEN?
WHY WAS THIS WOMAN ALLOWED TO
RETURN TO CHINA THAT IS
CONFUSING TO ME WHY SHE WAS
ABLE TO GET AWAY FBI DIDN’T
ARREST HER WHILE ALL THIS WAS
A GOING ON JIM COMEY AND
ROBERT MUELLER IN CHARGE OF
THE FBI ARE IN THE HABIT OF
PROTECTING DEMOCRATS IN SOME
WAY?
I DON’T UNDERSTAND THAT.
>> DO DEMOCRATS THINK THIS IS
GOING AWAY THAT PEOPLE ARE
GOING TO STOP ASKING QUESTIONS
ABOUT IT?
>> I THINK THAT THEY WOULD
LIKE IT TO GO AWAY I THINK
THAT IS ONE OF THE THINGS THAT
THEY WOULD LIKE TO JUST SEE
HAPPEN BUT IT CAN’T, THIS IS
TOO BIG AN ISSUE TOO GREAT A
CONCERN, A CONCERN TO EVERYONE
WHO SITS ON THAT COMMITTEE,
AND WITH MR. SWALWELL IN THE
ROOM WONDERING WHAT
CONNECTIONS DOES HE STILL
HAVE, KEEP IN MIND THIS
STARTED WHEN HE WAS A LOCAL
COUNCILMAN NOT WHEN HE WAS
ACTUALLY IN CONGRESS.
BUT CARRIED OVER WHEN IN
CONGRESS HE APPARENTLY FROM
WHAT WE HAVE.
>> DO DEMOCRATS SEE FORTUNE AS
THE THREAT IT IS?
DO THEY SEE CHINA -- DO THEY
ARE THEY IGNORING WHAT IS
GOING ON, IN THE UNITED
STATES, OF CHINA, AND THE
COMMUNIST PARTY PARTICULARLY
EXAMINE COMMUNIST PARTY TRYING
TO INFILTRATE OUR
UNIVERSITIES, US KNOW CHINESE
EMBASSY IN TEXAS, FOR EXAMPLE.
LIKE DO THEY SEE IT AS A
THREAT IT IS?
.
>> BECAUSE THAT VIRUS CAME
FROM -- WELL CHINA.
DAGEN: VIRUS CAME FROM CHINA
THERE IS NO DOUBT ABOUT THAT.
>> LAST FOUR YEARS ON THE
INTELLIGENCE COMMITTEE, THE
DEMOCRATS HAVE SEEMED FOCUSED
ON RUSSIA TRYING TO TRY TRUMP
OR TRUMP ASSOCIATES WITH
RUSSIA, OBVIOUSLY, THAT WAS
PROVEN FALSE SAYING LOOK THIS
DIRECTION LOOK THIS DIRECTION
RATHER THAN LOOKING AT WHAT
CHINA IS DOING THAT IS A MAJOR
CONCERN, WE AS REPUBLICANS ON
THE INTELLIGENCE COMMITTEE
CONTINUE TO PURSUE THE EFFORTS
OF WHAT FORTUNE WAS DOING
GETTING KNOWLEDGE ABOUT WHAT
THEY WERE DOING, SO THAT WE
COULD ADDRESS THOSE ISSUES THE
DEMOCRATS DIDN’T SEEM TOO
INTERESTED IN IT COMPARED TO
REPUBLICANS, AND I HOPE THAT
THAT HE REALIZE NOW THAT THERE
IS A PROBLEM, AND I THINK,
MOST MEMBERS OF CONGRESS DO
UNDERSTAND IT.
MEMBERS ON ARMED SERVICE
COMMITTEE UNDERSTAND IT, BUT
UNDER DIRECTION OF ADAM SCHIFF
WAS PRETTY MUCH LET’S NOT LOOK
OVER THERE, LET’S JUST
CONTINUE TO FOCUS ON TRYING TO
TAKE DOWN THE PRESIDENT.
>> CONGRESSMAN BRAD WENSTRUP