>> THE HACKER GUCCIFER 2.0 HAS RELEASED NEW DOCUMENTS THAT HE
SAYS WERE TAKEN FROM DNC SERVICE, THAT IT WASN'T RUSSIAN
HACKERS NAMED AFTER BEARS, AND THESE MEMOS THE CASE EARLY ON
FOR COLLABORATION BETWEEN THE HILLARY CAMPAIGN AND
THE DNC
THAT MUST STRONGER --
>> THESE SORTS OF THINGS ON SOME OF THE REPUBLICAN CANDIDATES AS
WELL, SOME OF THE ATTACKS THEY LAUNCHED ON HILLARY AND SOME OF
HER WEAKNESSES TOO, BUT THESE DOCUMENT WERE FROM FEBRUARY,
LITERALLY TWO MONTHS BEFORE SHE EVEN ENTERED THE RACE, THREE
MONTHS BEFORE BERNIE SANDERS ENTERED, THERE WAS NO REAL RACE
AT THIS POINT BUT ALREADY AN EMPLOYEE OF THE DNC WAS
ALLEGEDLY CRAFTING DEFENSE DOCUMENTS, PREEMPTIVE DEFENSE
DOCUMENTS, TO PROTECT HILLARY CLINTON.
WE HAVE GOT SOME
COMMENTS FROM THE ACTUAL HACKER HIMSELF FROM AN INTERVIEW HE DID
WITH MOTHERBOARD --
>>OR SO HE CLAIMS.
>>SO HE CLAIMS.
WHAT DO YOU THINK SO FAR?
>>AS YOU SEE FROM THESE QUOTES, THE GUY CLAIMING TO BE GUCCIFER
TALKING TO MOTHERBOARD SOUNDS LIKE A BIT OF A CLOWN.
DON'T
TAKE FOR GRANTED WHO IT IS, WE DON'T KNOW IF IT IS THAT GUY, WE
DON'T KNOW IF HE IS GUCCIFER, WE DON'T KNOW WHO GUCCIFER IS.
>>HE IMPLIES HE IS NOT THE ORIGINAL ONE.
>>THIS IS GUCCIFER 2.0, GUCCIFER HAS BEEN ARRESTED, HE IS A REAL
HACKER OF ROMANIAN DISSENT, THIS GUY CLAIMS HE IS GUCCIFER 2.0,
ALSO ROMANIAN.
>>SUSPICIOUS.
>>AND WHEN THEY ASK HIM IF HE CAN WRITE IN ROMANIAN, HE CAN'T.
>>IT'S A HARD LANGUAGE.
>> AND THE FIRMS THE DNC HAS HIRED IS SAYING IT IS THE
RUSSIANS.
OKAY, TO ME THAT IS THE LEAST INTERESTING PART OF
THE STORY.
THE QUESTION IS, ARE THE DOCUMENTS AUTHENTIC?
IF THEY
ARE, I DON'T REALLY CARE WHO HACKED IT, THEY SHOULD BECAUSE
AND PROSECUTED, WHATEVER IT IS.
THE QUESTION IS, ARE THE
DOCUMENTS REAL?
AND WE HAVE TWO PIECES OF EVIDENCE ON THAT, THE
DNC CONFIRMED THAT ONE WAS REAL, THE ONE WHERE THEY OUTLINED ALL
THE ATTACKS AGAINST TRUMP.
THAT ONE IS REAL AND THEY CONFIRMED
THAT.
WHEN THEY ASKED ABOUT THE OTHER DOCUMENTS WHICH SHOW YOU
WORKING WITH HILLARY CLINTON'S TEAM, THEY ARE LIKE --
NO COMMENT.
>>DEBBIE WASSERMAN SCHULTZ STARTED EATING A SNICKERS,
SHE CAN'T TALK BECAUSE IT FILLS UP HER MOUTH WITH CHOCOLATE.
>>THAT NO COMMENT, THE SILENCE IS DEAFENING.
>>IT HAS BEEN DAYS FOR SOME OF THESE DOCUMENTS, WHICH IS
INCREDIBLY SUSPICIOUS.
>>THIS IS THE SECOND OR THIRD WAVE OF DOCUMENTS, AND THE
SECOND WAVE THAT SHOWED COLLUSION BETWEEN HILLARY AND
THE DNC, THAT IS WHEN ALL OF A SUDDEN THEY WENT FROM OH YEAH,
THOSE TRUMP THINGS ARE TRUE, TO, NO COMMENT.
>>AND IMPORTANTLY THESE AREN'T JUST EMAILS BEING SENT TO THE
DNC, THERE IS A PARTICULAR EMPLOYEE WHO IS NAMED IN THESE.
HE ACTUALLY -- IT IS DNC RESEARCH ASSOCIATE JEREMY
BRINSTER, HE HAS SINCE TAKEN DOWN HIS LINKEDIN PAGE.
THAT
DOESN'T MEAN HE DID IT, HIS NAME BEING OUT THERE PROBABLY MEANS
THAT WHETHER OR NOT HE DIDN'T HE PROBABLY RECEIVED ABOUT 10
MILLION ATTACK EMAILS, MAYBE THAT IS WHY HE SHUT IT DOWN.
BUT THERE IS A PARTICULAR NAME, WHICH MEANS THIS IS VERIFIABLE.
YOU CAN TALK TO THAT PERSON AND INTERVIEW HIM, FIND OUT DID
THEY DO IT, CHECK THE COMPUTER.
>>THE PERSON WHO TRACKED HIM DOWN ORIGINALLY IS JORDAN, ALL
REPORTER AT YOUNG TURKS, AND HE HAS BEEN ASKING 72 HOURS AGO, 48
HOURS AGO, THIS MORNING, KIDS ASKING THE DNC, ARE THESE
AUTHENTIC?
THERE ARE ONLY TWO REASONS THAT TO ANSWER, ONE IS
THEY ARE AUTHENTIC AND THEY DON'T WANT TO CONFIRM, THE OTHER
IS MAYBE THEIR LEG SOME SORT OF BEAR TRAP.
GO AHEAD AND QUOTE
THOSE LETTERS -- HA HA.
BUT DON'T PLAY GAMES, WE ARE ASKING
YOU IN PUBLIC, ARE THEY AUTHENTIC OR NOT?
IF YOU DON'T
DENY IT, IT IS PERFECTLY FAIR FOR EVERYONE TO ASSUME THAT THEY
ARE IN FACT AUTHENTIC JUST LIKE THE FIRST ONE YOU CONFIRMED.
SO
IF THAT'S THE CASE, THEN WE GET TO THE HEART OF THOSE TWO
ISSUES, THE REAL ISSUES.
ONE IS YOU ARE COORDINATING ALL THE WAY
BACK THEN, FEBRUARY OF LAST YEAR.
>>HE IS NOT EVEN RUNNING.
>>YOU KNOW SHE'S GOING TO RUN, I GET IT.
YOU THINK SHE'S GOING TO
BE THE DOMINANT CANDIDATE, I GET IT.
I UNDERSTAND.
YOU HAVE NO
IDEA BERNIE SANDERS WILL RISE UP, THE MOST LIBERAL -- WHAT YOU
CONSIDER A SOCIALIST CANDIDATE -- I'M SURE YOU WERE WILDLY
DISMISSIVE, YOU HAD NO IDEA HE WOULD CLOSE A 50 POINT GAP, YOU
HAD NO IDEA HE WOULD WIN 22 OR MORE CONTESTS, ETC.
BUT THINK
ABOUT IT FOR A SECOND, IN FEBRUARY OF LAST YEAR, JOE BIDEN
COULD HAVE ENTERED.
ELIZABETH WARREN COULD HAVE ENTERED.
AL
GORE COULD HAVE ENTERED.
OR SOMEONE LIKE BERNIE SANDERS
COULD HAVE ENTERED AND ACTUALLY WON.
AND I MENTION THOSE OTHER
NAMES NOT BECAUSE THEY ARE MORE LEGITIMATE THAN BERNIE SANDERS,
BUT BACK THEN THE DNC CERTAINLY WOULD'VE CONSIDERED THE MORE
LEGITIMATE BUT THOUGHT I DON'T GIVE A DAMN, I'M GOING TO
SUPPORT ONE OF THE CANDIDATES AND NOT THE OTHERS.
SO THERE IS
NO EXCUSE, LIKE, WE ALREADY KNEW.
WHAT DID YOU KNOW?
YOU
WERE POSITIVE HILLARY COULD BEAT ANY OF THE NAMES I MENTIONED?
THAT WOULD BE A CURIOUS THING TO BE POSITIVE ABOUT.
AND THE
SECOND PART IS, ONE OF THE THINGS WE FIND OUT IS, THEY
HAVE THE CLINTON FOUNDATION DONORS.
>>HOW DID THEY GET THOSE?
>>GEE, I WONDER IF THEY ARE COORDINATING, I CAN'T QUITE
TELL.
HOW DID THEY GET THE NAME OF THE CLINTON FOUNDATION
DONORS?
IT APPEARS TO BE A QUID PRO QUO, I WILL GIVE YOU THESE
DONOR NAMES, ONE OF THE THINGS THAT WILL DO IS RAISE MONEY FOR
THE DNC, THAT IS YOUR REWARD.
THE OTHER THING THEY WILL DO IS
FUNNEL THE MONEY BACK TO US, WHICH WE LATER FOUND OUT IS
EXACTLY WHAT HAPPENED. 33 STATE DEMOCRATIC PARTIES AND THE DNC
BASICALLY MONEY LAUNDERED -- NOT ILLEGALLY, IT APPEARS LEGALLY --
LAUNDERED IT BACK TO HILLARY CLINTON'S CAMPAIGN.
THEY'VE BEEN
PLANNING THIS IN THE BEGINNING OF LAST YEAR, AND NOW WE SEE IT
IN THE DOCUMENTS.
THERE MIGHT BE GOOD REASON TO BELIEVE THAT IS
WHY THEY ARE NOT COMMENTING ON IT.
>>PROBABLY, YEAH.
IN BEHIND THE SCENES TALKS I'VE BEEN A LITTLE
BIT JADED, I WOULD SAY, MY RESPONSE TO THIS, BECAUSE I
THINK WE'VE BEEN FOLLOWING THIS ALL ALONG AND WE SEEN THE WAYS
THAT EVERYTHING HAS BEEN TWISTED TO HER ADVANTAGE WHERE IT IS
EVEN CONCEIVABLE THAT YOU COULD TWIST IT, FROM THE DEBATE
SCHEDULE AND ALL OF THAT.
SO FOR ME IT WAS LIKE, OKAY, THIS SHOWS
THAT THEY WERE COLLUDING, I ALREADY KNEW THEY WERE.
IT IS
GOOD TO HAVE THE DOCUMENT EVIDENCE ASSUMING THEY TURN OUT
TO BE VERIFIED AS TRUE, I DON'T THINK THAT THE WAY THE DNC RUNS
WE WILL SEE ANY CHANGE AS A RESULT.
I THINK THEY'VE ALREADY
MOVED ON FROM DEBBIE WASSERMAN SCHULTZ AND INSTALLED A HILLARY
OPERATIVE AS THE NEW HEAD OF THE DNC WHICH WILL PROBABLY BE
FORMALIZED AT THE CONVENTION, BUT IT FEELS GOOD TO KNOW YOU
WERE RIGHT, TO SEE DOCUMENTED EVIDENCE.
BUT IN THE END, I WAS
ALREADY SO SURE THAT THAT RELATIONSHIP SPINS WAY
FARTHER THAN FEBRUARY OF LAST YEAR.
DEBBIE WASSERMAN SCHULTZ DIDN'T JUST END UP IN THIS
POSITION, THEY WORK TOGETHER, THEY KNOW EACH OTHER.
>> SHE WORKED FOR HILLARY CLINTON IN THE LAST CAMPAIGN.
>>EXACTLY.
>>WE KNOW THIS, BUT I MOST EVERYBODY ELSE IN THE REST OF
THE MEDIA -- COME ON, DON'T BE RIDICULOUS.
THE DNC IS NEUTRAL,
WHERE YOU GUYS GET THE IDEA THAT THE DNC WOULD BE WORKING WITH
HILLARY CLINTON?
HERE ARE THE DOCUMENTS.
AND ISN'T IT CURIOUS
THAT THE REST OF THE PRESS HARDLY MENTIONS IT?
THERE ARE A
COUPLE OF WEBSITES FROM A COUPLE OF ORGANIZATIONS, FOX NEWS
MENTIONING IT, AND THEY WILL TURN AROUND AND GO IT IS FOX
NEWS, YOU CAN'T TRUST THOSE GUYS.
I'M ASKING THE REST OF THE
PRESS, IS IT THAT YOU ARE EMBARRASSED?
CNN, ABC, NBC, CBS,
I'M ASKING ALL OF YOU GUYS, ARE YOU EMBARRASSED THAT IN ONE OF
THE DOCUMENTS IT SAID LET'S USE THE PRESS AND NOT LEAVE OUR
FINGERPRINT BEHIND TO MUDDY THE WATERS AGAINST CHARGES AGAINST
HILLARY CLINTON?
AND IN FACT THAT IS EXACTLY HOW THEY USED
YOU.
IS THAT WHY YOU ARE NOT TALKING ABOUT THE STORY, OR DO
YOU HAVE ANOTHER REASON?
WE ARE SUPER OPEN, WE ARE WAITING FOR
THE DNC AND HILLARY CLINTON TO COMMENT, WAITING FOR ANY OF THE
REST OF THE PRESS TO COMMENT.
YOU ARE WONDERING HOW THEY WERE
COLLUDING AND YOU HAD THE DISMISSIVE SCOFF YOU WOULD SEE
EVERY ONCE IN A WHILE, LIKE, THE SYSTEM BEING RIGGED?
DON'T LEAVE
NICHOLAS.
WELL, HERE ARE SOME DOCUMENTS, WHY DON'T YOU
INVESTIGATE?
IF IT IS NOT TRUE, SHOW IT IS NOT TRUE.
WE'RE
ASKING YOU TO INVESTIGATE.
DO YOU HAVE ANY INVESTIGATIVE
REPORTERS?
WE HAVE ONE, I'M NOT SURE YOU DO.
BUT THEY HAVE IN
ESSENCE, EITHER FORMALLY IN THIS CASE, OR MORE LIKELY INFORMALLY,
KIND OF WORKING TOGETHER BECAUSE THEY WANT TO REACH THE SAME
CONCLUSION, IT IS KIND OF EMBARRASSING TO THEM SO
THEY WILL STOP TALKING ABOUT IT, AND AFTERWARDS WHEN YOU SAY
TO SOMEBODY THERE ARE DOCUMENTS THAT SHOW THE DNC AND HENRY
CLINTON COLLUDING, PEOPLE SAY I'VE NEVER HEARD THAT.
SO THEY USE THAT EXCUSE, IT MUST NOT HAVE EXISTED IF I
DIDN'T HEAR ABOUT IT FROM THE MAINSTREAM PRESS.
FUNNY HOW THAT CIRCLE WORKS.
>>AN INCONVENIENT TRUTH, BUT IT WILL BE ON YOUTUBE UNTIL
THE END OF TIME.