SHELDON WHITEHOUSE, HE IS A
MEMBER OF THE SENATE JUDICIARY
COMMITTEE.
SENATOR, THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR
JOINING US TONIGHT.
I'VE BEEN VERY EAGER TO TALK TO
US ONLY THINGS ABOUT THIS
CONFIRMATION INCLUDING OF
COURSE THE MOST OVER USED TWO
WORDS IN ANY CONFIRMATION
HEARING.
JUDICIAL PHILOSOPHY.
LET'S BEGIN THEIR BECAUSE YOU
ALONE DURING THE HEARINGS
POINTED OUT THE OBSERVATORY OF
THE VERY CONCEPT OF JUDICIAL
PHILOSOPHY.
SO LET ME JUST TEETH UP BY
POINTING OUT THAT THE LAST
THREE SUPREME COURT JUDICIAL
SELECTIONS MADE BY PRESIDENT
TRUMP WERE PICKED BY THIS DARK
MONEY NETWORK.
SO WHEN THE REPUBLICANS ARE
LIGHTING THIS DARK MONEY
NETWORK PICK THEIR SELECTIONS,
THEN OF COURSE THEY'RE ALSO
LETTING THEM PICKED THEIR
OBJECTIONS.
SO WHERE DOES IT TURN OUT THAT
ALL THIS JUDICIAL PHILOSOPHY
TALK.
WE HEARD THE WORD 50 TIMES IN
THE HEARING.
IT COMES FROM A LITTLE GROUP OF
GROUPS THAT ALL SHARE THE SAME
ADDRESS CALLED INDEPENDENT
WOMEN'S FORM, INDEPENDENT
WOMEN'S VOICE, INDEPENDENT
WOMEN'S LAW CENTER.
IT'S VERY ATTACHED TO --
WHO'S DONE ALL THE JUDGE
PICKING.
AND HIS PAIR OF FRONT GROUPS,
85 --
WHICH ARE FUNDED BY THE COAX
AND THEIR FOUNDATIONS AND THE
BRADLEY FOUNDATIONS AND IT WAS
RUN BY A CAULK LOBBYIST FOR
YEARS.
WHILE SHE ALSO RAN AMERICANS
FOR PROSPERITY, THE BIG KOCH
BROTHERS POLITICAL MOTHERSHIP
AND SURPRISE SURPRISE IN ONE OF
THESE ORGANIZATIONS YOU WILL
FIND NONE OTHER THAN SENATOR
HAWLEY SPOUSE WORKING.
AND THEY DIRECTED EVERYONE,
ACTUALLY BEFORE JUDGE JACKSON
WAS EVEN NAMED, IT IS IMPORTANT
THAT YOU FOCUS NOT ON THE
SELECTION PROCESS OR THE
NOMINEES PAPER QUALIFICATIONS
BUT RATHER ON THE NEED TO LEARN
MORE ABOUT THE NOMINEES AND
THIS IS ITALICS AND BOLD,
JUDICIAL PHILOSOPHY.
SO THAT COMES STRAIGHT OUT OF
SWAMP DARK MONEY TALKING
POINTS.
AND YOU SEE THE SAME THING WITH
THE SEXUAL PREDATORS ANGLE ON
HER CHILD PORNOGRAPHY
SENTENCING THAT CAME OUT OF
ANOTHER FRONT GROUP.
WITH ALL SORTS OF CREEPY TIES
INCLUDING THE ALLEGE --
MITCHELL.
AND THE GUY WHO RUNS THAT ONE
WAS TED CRUISES OPPOSITE GUY IN
CRUZ FOR PRESIDENT.
I SO YOU'VE GOT HIM AND CREWS
WHO ARE SAYING THESE THINGS
WITH LIKE FAMILY MEMBERS AND
STAFF FEEDING THINGS TO THEM
FROM THESE DARK MONEY GROUPS.
IF IT WEREN'T SO SICKENING, IT
WOULD BE FUNNY.
>> AND LET'S GO TO THAT POINT
ABOUT THE POSSESSION OF CHILD
PORNOGRAPHY CASES.
THIS IS A VERY SIMPLE OBJECTION
TO STATE IF YOU HAVE IT.
AS A MEMBER OF THE COMMITTEE TO
SAY, THERE ARE THREE IN SOME
CASES SOME POINT TO FOUR, CHILD
PORNOGRAPHY CASES WHERE I WISH
THE PRISON SENTENCES YOU GAVE,
BECAUSE YOU DID GIVE PRISON
SENTENCES AND ALL OF THEM, I
WISH THOSE PRESENT SENTENCES
WERE LONGER.
NOW THAT'S HOW LONG IT TAKES TO
STATE THAT.
THEY SPENT HOURS DOING IT AND
YOU SHOWED VERY CLEARLY THAT
THE COMMITTEE, THAT THE REASON
THIS NEVER CAME UP A YEAR AGO,
NEVER CAME UP A YEAR AGO AT HER
LAST CONFIRMATION PROCESS FOR
THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS.
WAS BECAUSE THE DARK MONEY
WORLD HAD NOT PUT TOGETHER THIS
FILE FOR THEM TO HAND TO THEM.
>> YEP.
YEAH I MEAN YOU ACTUALLY THINK
TED CRUZ WAS RUNNING AROUND
THAT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL LIBRARY
PULLING BOOKS OFF SHELVES
LOOKING FOR SOMETHING
OFFENSIVE.
NO, THIS STUFF GETS FED TO THEM
IN THIS CASE IT WAS HIS OLD
OPPOSITE GUY WHO WAS DOING SOME
OF THE RESEARCH.
>> AND THIS WAS ENOUGH TO FLIP
LINDSEY GRAHAM WHO A YEAR AGO,
WHEN ALL OF THESE ISSUES WERE
PRESENT, BECAUSE ALL THE ISSUES
THEY'RE TALKING ABOUT HAPPENED
WHEN SHE WAS AT THE TRIAL
COURT.
AND NOT, I DIDN'T HEAR, CORRECT
ME IF I'M WRONG, IN ALL THE
HOURS OF HEARINGS, I DIDN'T
HEAR ONE MENTION OF A SINGLE
THING SHE HAS DONE AS AN
APPEALS COURT JUDGE THAT WAS
RAISED BY A REPUBLICAN AS AN
OBJECTION IN THIS PROCEEDING.
>> NO, I MEAN THE FOCUS WAS
ENTIRELY ON THE CHILD PORN
THING, THEY WERE OBSESSED WITH
THE CHILD PORN THING.
AND THEY REALLY MISLED THE
PUBLIC ABOUT WHAT WAS GOING ON
AND ALL OF THAT.
BECAUSE THEY'RE POINTS WHERE
THAT SHE SENDS BELOW THE
SOUTHERN GUIDELINES, BUT YOU
CAN ASK ESSENTIALLY ANY FEDERAL
JUDGE, THE TWO WERE SENSITIVE
GUIDELINES OF THE CRACK VERSUS
POWDER COCAINE DISPARITY AND
THIS ONE.
SO IT'S ABSOLUTELY COMMON FOR
JUDGES TO SENTENCE BELOW IT
BECAUSE IT HASN'T BEEN ADAPTED
FOR THE INTERNET AGE.
THE SECOND THING THAT THEY DO
IS THEY PROTECT THE GOVERNMENT
IS THE ONLY ENTITY IN THE ROOM.
BUT IN A SENTENCING, YOU'VE GOT
THE GOVERNMENT AND YOU'VE GOT A
SENSE COUNCIL WHO A JUDGE HAS
AN OBLIGATION TO LISTEN TO AND
TREACHEROUSLY.
AND YOU'VE GOT THE PROBATION
DEPARTMENT, THAT ARM OF THE
COURT, MAKING ITS OWN
SENTENCING RECOMMENDATION AND
THEY RATHER CONVENIENTLY LEFT
OUT ALL THAT.
AND ARGUED THAT SHE WAS SENSING
BELOW WHERE THE GOVERNMENT
RECOMMENDED.
WILL THE GOVERNMENT CUSTOMARILY
MAKES THE HARSHEST
RECOMMENDATION SO THAT'S NO
SURPRISE EITHER.
SO THEY SET UP A FALSE FRAME