WHAT HE PLANS TO DO TO HELP
FARMERS INCREASE THE FOOD SUPPLY
AND LOWER THE PRICE AT THE
GROCERY STORES.
REPUBLICAN LOUISIANA SENATOR
JOHN KENNEDY.
REACTION TO WHAT THE PRESIDENT
WAS TALKING ABOUT THERE.
>> JOHN, IF I COULD SIT DOWN,
SIT THE PRESIDENT DOWN TODAY
ONE-ON-ONE, AND I DID JUST
LISTEN TO HIS COMMENTS, HERE’S
WHAT I’D TELL HIM.
I’D TELL HIM MR. PRESIDENT,
YOU’RE A NICE MAN.
I WOULD SAY MR. PRESIDENT, I
KNOW YOU WANT WHAT’S BEST FOR
AMERICA BUT MR. PRESIDENT, AND I
SAY THIS GENTLY, YOU’VE GOT TO
STOP BEING A CHUMP.
THERE’S NO FUTURE IN IT.
THERE’S NO FUTURE IN IT FOR YOU
OR FOR THE AMERICAN PEOPLE.
YOU HAVE TO GO BACK TO THE WHITE
HOUSE AND YOU HAVE TO FIRE ALL
THESE WOKERS THAT DON’T REALLY
CARE ABOUT AMERICA.
YES, WE HAVE INFLATION.
IT WAS CAUSED IN PART BY THE
WOKERS IN THE WHITE HOUSE,
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO
THEIR ECONOMISTS.
WE CAN GET IT UNDER CONTROL.
HERE IS HOW WE DO IT.
TURN TO CONGRESS AND SAY FREEZE
ALL SPENDING.
YOU HAVE A BUDGET, LIVE WITHIN
YOUR BUDGET.
THE ONLY EXTRA SPENDING WE ARE
GOING TO DO IS TO HELP UKRAINE.
NUMBER TWO, HE NEEDS TO TELL
CONGRESS CONFIRM JEROME POWELL,
AND THEN TURN TO JEROME POWELL,
NOT DIRECTLY, HE CAN SAY IT
PUBLICLY AND SAY CHAIRMAN DO
WHATEVER YOU HAVE TO DO TO
SQUEEZE THE LIQUIDITY WITHOUT THROWING US INTO A RECESSION.
THROWING US INTO A RECESSION.
BUT HE’S INSULTING THE AMERICAN
PEOPLE, BY BLAMING IT, WHICH
PREDATES THE WAR, ON PUTIN,
GREEDY BUSINESSWOMEN, PRICE
GOUGING, FERTILIZER -- IT’S AN
INSULT TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE.
THAT’S WHAT I WOULD TELL HIM.
>> John: SPEAKING OF FIRING
PEOPLE, ONE OF THE PEOPLE YOU
WOULD LIKE TO FIRE IS THE NEW
HEAD OF THE NEW DISINFORMATION
GOVERNANCE BOARD AND EVERYONE
ASSOCIATED WITH IT.
SENATOR TOM COTTON HAS
INTRODUCED LEGISLATION THAT
WOULD DISALLOW FUNDS TO
ESTABLISH THAT BOARD.
A SIMILAR MEASURE IN THE HOUSE. LAUREN
LAUREN BOBERT FROM COLORADO,
STALIY LEVEL, MAO LEVEL, THIS IS
THE HILL TO DIE ON.
CAN YOU PREVENT IT FROM BEING
FUNDED?
>> YES, IF IT GETS THAT FAR.
BIDEN ADMINISTRATION NEEDS TO
STOP BEING A CHUMP.
WHOEVER TALKED THEM INTO
ESTABLISHING A MINISTRY OF
TRUTH.
THE GOVERNMENT IS GOING TO TELL
US WHAT’S TRUE OR NOT, WHAT WE
CAN BELIEVE AND WHAT WE CAN’T.
WHAT CAN POSSIBLY GO WRONG.
NUMBER TWO, DEPICT MISS
JANKOWICZ -- YOU KNOW, I’M SURE
THAT JESUS LOVES HER BUT
EVERYBODY ELSE ON CAPITOL HILL
THINKS SHE’S BIZARRE.
I MEAN --
>> John: WELL, THAT WAS AN
UNUSUAL TIKTOK VIDEO.
>> I MEAN, SHE SAYS I BELIEVE
ONLY IN THE TRUTH.
WELL, SHE’S ALREADY SAID THAT I
BELIEVE THE STEELE DOSSIER,
WHICH ALLEGED THAT PRESIDENT
TRUMP HIRED PROSTITUTES TO
URINATE ON EACH OTHER.
SHE VOUCHED FOR THAT.
>> John: AND SOMETHING ELSE SHE
BELIEVED IN, SHE TWEETED ON
NOVEMBER 1, 2016, PUT THE TWEET
UP ON THE SCREEN, TRUMP HAD NOT
ONE, BUT TWO SECRET EMAIL
SERVERS TO COMMUNICATE WITH
INFLUENTIAL RUSSIAN BANK.
UNBELIEVABLE.
THAT IS DISINFORMATION.
>> LET ME TELL YOU WHAT MISS
JANKOWICZ WILL DO IF SHE GETS
POWER.
SHE WILL DEVOUR THE REAL TRUTH
LIKE IT WAS A LIGHT SNACK.
WHAT’S TRUE IN HER OPINION IS
WHAT SHE BELIEVES, AND EVERYBODY
ELSE IS A MORAN BECAUSE THAT’S
ONE OF THE MARTEST PEOPLE ON THE
PLANETS IN HER OPINION, JUST ASK
HER.
YOU DON’T NEED SOMEBODY LIKE
THAT IN GOVERNMENT, BUT WE DON’T
NEED A MINISTRY OF TRUTH.
SOMETIMES IT WAS JUST A DUMB
IDEA, SOMETIMES STUPIDITY IS
PAYING FOR IT.
>> I WANT TO ASK YOU ABOUT THE
CONSERVATIVE SUPREME COURT
JUSTICES, GOVERNOR YOUNGKIN HAS
ASKED THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
TO DISPATCH THE COUNTY POLICE TO
P UT A SECURITY PERIMETER AROUND
THEIR HOMES.
THERE IS A LAW THAT PROHIBITS
PEOPLE FROM DOING WHAT THEY ARE
DOING.
THERE IT IS UP ON THE SCREEN, I
DON’T WANT TO READ THROUGH IT,
BUT HILLARY VAUGHN CAUGHT UP
WITH ILHAN OMAR AND ASKED
WHETHER OR NOT THEY ARE BREAKING
THE LAW.
>> DO YOU THINK THAT THESE
PROTESTORS SHOULD BE PROSECUTED
FOR BREAKING FEDERAL LAW?
>> WHAT IS THE FEDERAL LAW?
>> 1507.
>> YOU THINK IT’S OK FOR THESE
PRO ABORTION PROTESTORS.
>> THE PEOPLE OUTSIDE -- SUPREME
COURT JUDGES HAVE HEARD A CASE,
THEY THEMSELVES HAVE SAID IT IS
PROTECTED BY THE FIRST AMENDMENT
FOR PEOPLE TO PROTEST.
>> OUTSIDE OF THE HOUSE.
>> TO PROTEST OUTSIDE OF
EVERYWHERE.
>> John: SO FACT CHECK HERE, IN
1983, UNITED STATES VERSUS GRACE
SCOTUS WEIGHED IN ON THAT, RULED
IT DID NOT APPLY TO THE SIDEWALK
OUTSIDE THE SUPREME COURT
BUILDING, SAID NOTHING ABOUT THE
JUSTICE’S HOMES, OR ATTEMPTS TO
INFLUENCE THEM.
SO IN THAT CASE, THE LAW WOULD
APPEAR TO STAND, SENATOR.
>> WELL, LOOK.
WE ALL SEE WHAT’S GOING ON.
AND OPINION, A DRAFT OPINION
LEAKED FROM THE SUPREME COURT.
WE DON’T KNOW IF IT’S GOING TO
BE THE FINAL OPINION.
NEO SOCIALIST LEFT HAS BECOME
COMPLETELY UNGLUED.
THEIR RESPONSE IS AS
DISAPPOINTING, I GUESS, AS IT
WAS PREDICTABLE, BURN THE PLACE
DOWN, INTIMIDATE THE JUSTICES,
KILL THE FILIBUSTER, PACK THE
COURT, I HAVE NO PROBLEM WITH
PEACEFUL PROTESTS.
I’M ALL FOR PEACEFUL PROTESTS.
EMPHASIZE PEACEFUL.
BUT IF YOU’RE GONNA PROTEST IN
FRONT OF A PERSON’S HOME, BE
RESPECTFUL, BE PEACEFUL,
UNDERSTAND THE PERSON WHO LIVES
THERE HAS NEIGHBORS.
DON’T BE UGLY, DON’T BE -- I
READ ONE OF THE TWEETS THE OTHER
DAY THAT SAID YOU WILL NEVER
FEEL SAFE UNTIL YOU’RE ROTTING
IN THE GROUND.
>> John: YES.
>> I MEAN, THAT’S -- THAT’S JUST
NOT RIGHT.
IT’S JUST NOT RIGHT.
>> John: TWITTER DID NOT EVEN
SUSPEND THAT PERSON CALLING FOR
MORE VIOLENCE, BY THE WAY,
REFERRING TO THE WISCONSIN PRO
LIFE FIREBOMBING.
SHE DID DELETE HER ACCOUNT, BUT
TWITTER DID NOT DO ANYTHING
ABOUT IT.
>> ONE MORE POINT IF I COULD,
SANDRA, I THINK THIS IS AN
IMPORTANT ONE TO MAKE.
THE HOME ADDRESSES OF THESE
JUSTICES WAS PUBLISHED SO THAT
PEOPLE CORAL I OUTSIDE THERE.
AND IT’S FINE, THEY ARE PEACEFUL
PROTESTORS, YOU COULD SAY, BUT
THERE ARE CRAZIES IN THE WORLD.
ONE SHOWED UP ON THE DOORSTEP OF
JUSTICE ESTHER SALAS, THE PERSON
SHOT HER HUSBAND AND SHOT AND
KILLED HER SON.
WHAT SHE TOLD US YESTERDAY.
>> WE NO LONGER HAVE DANIEL ON
THIS EARTH.
WE NO LONGER HAVE OUR SON.
AND WHY?
BECAUSE I WAS DOING MY JOB.
AND THERE IS NO ROOM IN AMERICA
FOR THIS KIND OF CONDUCT.
I AM ALSO BEGGING OUR LEADERS TO
UNDERSTAND THIS IS NOT A
PARTISAN ISSUE.
>> John: NOT A PARTISAN ISSUE.
SHE IS AN OBAMA APPOINTEE.
PUBLIC
PUBLIC -- PUBLISHING THE HOME
ADDRESSES CAN BE DANGEROUS.
>> YES, AND WE TREATED THEM
DIFFERENTLY.
THEY ARE NOT POLICY MAKERS,
JUDGES CALL THE BALLS AND THE
STRIKES AND HAVE TO MAKE SOME
HARD CALLS BUT NOT POLITICIANS
IN ROBES, THEY ARE JUDGES.
BUT THIS NEW GROUP THAT HAS
TAKEN OVER FROM MY FRIENDS ON
THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY DON’T SEE
IT THAT WAY.
AND THEIR ATTITUDE IS WE HAVE A
MONO
MONOPOLY ON THE TRUTH, IF YOU
DON’T DISAGREE WITH US WE WILL
DESTROY YOU, AND THAT’S NOT THE
AMERICA THAT MOST AMERICANS